I think it would happen if we mess up our ties with Russia and they help North Korea by supplying them with nuclear weapons. It wouldn't be surprisng, when Russia was the Soviet Union, they loved Kim il Sung.
World war 3 wont happen and if it does world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones.
OT_Rage
so insightful...................................................... mr. einstein. lol insightful, obviously sarcasm. I just don't believe world war 3 will happen because if it does i can almost guarantee nukes will be involved and if that happens then you can most likely kiss this planet goodbye for the most part. I know i'm not the only person in the world aware of this.
I don't know, it could start tommorw, it could be 100 years from now, it could never happen. If I had to guess, I would say it is going to start in 2012 if the world economy keeps going down, or about 50 or 60 years from now when the middle east runs is going through the last drops of convetional oil.
If it was going to happen, I think it already would have. The global situation today is one of perfect peace and serenity when you compare it to the way things were during the height of the Cold War.
[QUOTE="OT_Rage"][QUOTE="XileLord"] so insightful...................................................... mr. einstein.XileLord
lol insightful, obviously sarcasm. I just don't believe world war 3 will happen because if it does i can almost guarantee nukes will be involved and if that happens then you can most likely kiss this planet goodbye for the most part. I know i'm not the only person in the world aware of this. He's telling you that, if you're going to blatantly plagiarize someone, don't plagiarize one of the most well known and renown human beings in recorded human history. Do you say, "I had a dream" in racial issue topics?
If it was going to happen, I think it already would have. The global situation today is one of perfect peace and serenity when you compare it to the way things were during the height of the Cold War.
GabuEx
Makes me think of the movie The Day After. IMO one of the most powerful movies I've seen.
World war 3 wont happen and if it does world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones.
XileLord
so insightful...................................................... mr. einstein. lol insightful, obviously sarcasm. I just don't believe world war 3 will happen because if it does i can almost guarantee nukes will be involved and if that happens then you can most likely kiss this planet goodbye for the most part. I know i'm not the only person in the world aware of this. Well, If nukes are used they will only be used in southeast or southwest Asia, and only kill people there and in Australian (they found out that most of the fallout from a nuclear war anywhere would go to Australian). The nukes would fly between India and Pakistan, or Israel and some of the Arab nations (even though they don't have any yet).
[QUOTE="harashawn"] It won't happen. That's what the UN is for. Didn't someone post a tread about Russia planning on resupplying it's military because the UN is making them "uncomfortable"?
[QUOTE="harashawn"] It won't happen. That's what the UN is for. LOL, I hope you are joking. The UN does a terrible job at everything they do. Also they said this about the league of nations right before WW2 (but the league had more problems than the UN namely the US wasn't a part)
[QUOTE="Jacobistheman"][QUOTE="XileLord"][QUOTE="OT_Rage"] so insightful...................................................... mr. einstein. lol insightful, obviously sarcasm. I just don't believe world war 3 will happen because if it does i can almost guarantee nukes will be involved and if that happens then you can most likely kiss this planet goodbye for the most part. I know i'm not the only person in the world aware of this. Well, If nukes are used they will only be used in southeast or southwest Asia, and only kill people there and in Australian (they found out that most of the fallout from a nuclear war anywhere would go to Australian). The nukes would fly between India and Pakistan, or Israel and some of the Arab nations (even though they don't have any yet). Wait, I don't get it. Why would Australia of all places be nuked? Southeast Asia makes sense with North Korea hating on the other Asian countries, but I'm not seeing where you're getting with Australia.
[QUOTE="Jacobistheman"][QUOTE="XileLord"] lol insightful, obviously sarcasm. I just don't believe world war 3 will happen because if it does i can almost guarantee nukes will be involved and if that happens then you can most likely kiss this planet goodbye for the most part. I know i'm not the only person in the world aware of this. Infinite-Zr0
Well, If nukes are used they will only be used in southeast or southwest Asia, and only kill people there and in Australian (they found out that most of the fallout from a nuclear war anywhere would go to Australian). The nukes would fly between India and Pakistan, or Israel and some of the Arab nations (even though they don't have any yet). Wait, I don't get it. Why would Australia of all places be nuked? Southeast Asia makes sense with North Korea hating on the other Asian countries, but I'm not seeing where you're getting with Australia.Australia won't be nuked, but all of the radioactive fallout will funnel there because of wind patterns (I don't really know why but I learned about it in a geography class) so a lot of them will die from radiation poising or cancer.
[QUOTE="Jacobistheman"] LOL, I hope you are joking. The UN does a terrible job at everything they do. Also they said this about the league of nations right before WW2 (but the league had more problems than the UN namely the US wasn't a part) The League of Nations was doomed to begin with. And the treaty of Versailles didn't help either.
[QUOTE="harashawn"][QUOTE="Jacobistheman"] LOL, I hope you are joking. The UN does a terrible job at everything they do. Also they said this about the league of nations right before WW2 (but the league had more problems than the UN namely the US wasn't a part) The League of Nations was doomed to begin with. And the treaty of Versailles didn't help either. Yeah they were. The UN still isn't doing a good job.
[QUOTE="Infinite-Zr0"][QUOTE="Jacobistheman"]Well, If nukes are used they will only be used in southeast or southwest Asia, and only kill people there and in Australian (they found out that most of the fallout from a nuclear war anywhere would go to Australian). The nukes would fly between India and Pakistan, or Israel and some of the Arab nations (even though they don't have any yet).Jacobistheman
Wait, I don't get it. Why would Australia of all places be nuked? Southeast Asia makes sense with North Korea hating on the other Asian countries, but I'm not seeing where you're getting with Australia.Australia won't be nuked, but all of the radioactive fallout will funnel there because of wind patterns (I don't really know why but I learned about it in a geography class) so a lot of them will die from radiation poising or cancer. That doesn't mean radiation is going to clear out of the nuked areas like clouds in the sky. The whole world would still be fubar.
World War 3 won't happen, if it does.. It will be the destruction of our world.. By either through nukes or a biological weapons.... We should actually be happy with nuclear weapons and their creation.. They have basically blocked the idea of major scale war sense their inception due to the Mutually Assured Destrouction.. Thats why I am puzzled how many people claim that if NK or Iran get nukes they will use them.. Why? They have nothing to gain and everything to lose.. NK has nothing to gain from it, they want economic and military power.. Launching a nuke robs them of both things.. Iran wants the expulsion of western powers, and Israel to be dismantled as a nation.. A Nuclear laucnh woul dnot solv ethat, the first would only swell western powers in the region, resorting in their destruction.. And a nuke in Israel is not what htey are after, the land is holy to Islam.... These are just some examples.. IN all honesty if a natrual diseaster doesn't wipe us out, a virus or biological weapon will before nukes imo.
[QUOTE="Jacobistheman"][QUOTE="Infinite-Zr0"] Wait, I don't get it. Why would Australia of all places be nuked? Southeast Asia makes sense with North Korea hating on the other Asian countries, but I'm not seeing where you're getting with Australia.Infinite-Zr0
Australia won't be nuked, but all of the radioactive fallout will funnel there because of wind patterns (I don't really know why but I learned about it in a geography class) so a lot of them will die from radiation poising or cancer. That doesn't mean radiation is going to clear out of the nuked areas like clouds in the sky. The whole world would still be fubar. Enough Nukes dropped at onc ewill destroy our planets eco system and we would all die..
How do you know that it isn't already starting? With the events in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Would be ironic if Germany started it again.
Oh god that would suck. Our aging M16's versus the more modern G36
SunofVich
People say the same thing every time one country invades another. And I highly doubt Germany would pull another stunt these days. And not to mention that infantry is MUCH more obsolete now compared to 40-60 years ago. Also considering the the G36 isn't that much more advanced at all over modern M16s. Nowhere near enough to tip the scales battle.
[QUOTE="harashawn"] It won't happen. That's what the UN is for. the same UN that is ran by rapists? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=un+rape&btnG=Search pick a source. What wars has the UN stopped from happening? Im not saying they didnt, but i dont know of any
World War 3 won't happen, if it does.. It will be the destruction of our world.. By either through nukes or a biological weapons.... We should actually be happy with nuclear weapons and their creation.. They have basically blocked the idea of major scale war sense their inception due to the Mutually Assured Destrouction.. Thats why I am puzzled how many people claim that if NK or Iran get nukes they will use them.. Why? They have nothing to gain and everything to lose.. NK has nothing to gain from it, they want economic and military power.. Launching a nuke robs them of both things.. Iran wants the expulsion of western powers, and Israel to be dismantled as a nation.. A Nuclear laucnh woul dnot solv ethat, the first would only swell western powers in the region, resorting in their destruction.. And a nuke in Israel is not what htey are after, the land is holy to Islam.... These are just some examples.. IN all honesty if a natrual diseaster doesn't wipe us out, a virus or biological weapon will before nukes imo.sSubZerOo
the irrationality of fundamentalists might make them use it. any group of people who believe that the end of the world is a good thing so they can be with their god shouldnt have nukes.
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]World War 3 won't happen, if it does.. It will be the destruction of our world.. By either through nukes or a biological weapons.... We should actually be happy with nuclear weapons and their creation.. They have basically blocked the idea of major scale war sense their inception due to the Mutually Assured Destrouction.. Thats why I am puzzled how many people claim that if NK or Iran get nukes they will use them.. Why? They have nothing to gain and everything to lose.. NK has nothing to gain from it, they want economic and military power.. Launching a nuke robs them of both things.. Iran wants the expulsion of western powers, and Israel to be dismantled as a nation.. A Nuclear laucnh woul dnot solv ethat, the first would only swell western powers in the region, resorting in their destruction.. And a nuke in Israel is not what htey are after, the land is holy to Islam.... These are just some examples.. IN all honesty if a natrual diseaster doesn't wipe us out, a virus or biological weapon will before nukes imo.OT_Rage
the irrationality of fundamentalists might make them use it. any group of people who believe that the end of the world is a good thing so they can be with their god shouldnt have nukes. Fundamentalists would only be able to get their hands on a few at best.. And if our nations hav ea knee jerk reaction of stupidity to launch hundreds.. Than we do deserve to die.. For having such narrow sighted stupidity.
Also if I were you I would be more worried about biologically engineered viruses.. Its with in our technology now to create a virus that is highly contagious with a 30% or higher death rate...
[QUOTE="Infinite-Zr0"][QUOTE="Jacobistheman"][QUOTE="Infinite-Zr0"] Wait, I don't get it. Why would Australia of all places be nuked? Southeast Asia makes sense with North Korea hating on the other Asian countries, but I'm not seeing where you're getting with Australia.Australia won't be nuked, but all of the radioactive fallout will funnel there because of wind patterns (I don't really know why but I learned about it in a geography class) so a lot of them will die from radiation poising or cancer. That doesn't mean radiation is going to clear out of the nuked areas like clouds in the sky. The whole world would still be fubar. Well most of the Fallout which doesn't Fall out [of the sky] will most likely makes its way to austrailia. It is kind of like how the radiation from the meltdown in Chernobyl went to the rest of eastern Europe.
[QUOTE="Infinite-Zr0"][QUOTE="Jacobistheman"]Australia won't be nuked, but all of the radioactive fallout will funnel there because of wind patterns (I don't really know why but I learned about it in a geography class) so a lot of them will die from radiation poising or cancer.Jacobistheman
That doesn't mean radiation is going to clear out of the nuked areas like clouds in the sky. The whole world would still be fubar. Well most of the Fallout which doesn't Fall out [of the sky] will most likely makes its way to austrailia. It is kind of like how the radiation from the meltdown in Chernobyl went to the rest of eastern Europe. Enough nuclear bombs dropped at once, can send us into Nuclear winter.. Something we would not be prepared to handle and we would most likely lose 75% or more of our population at least due to starvation from the massive famine tha twould occur.
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]World War 3 won't happen, if it does.. It will be the destruction of our world.. By either through nukes or a biological weapons.... We should actually be happy with nuclear weapons and their creation.. They have basically blocked the idea of major scale war sense their inception due to the Mutually Assured Destrouction.. Thats why I am puzzled how many people claim that if NK or Iran get nukes they will use them.. Why? They have nothing to gain and everything to lose.. NK has nothing to gain from it, they want economic and military power.. Launching a nuke robs them of both things.. Iran wants the expulsion of western powers, and Israel to be dismantled as a nation.. A Nuclear laucnh woul dnot solv ethat, the first would only swell western powers in the region, resorting in their destruction.. And a nuke in Israel is not what htey are after, the land is holy to Islam.... These are just some examples.. IN all honesty if a natrual diseaster doesn't wipe us out, a virus or biological weapon will before nukes imo.OT_Rage
the irrationality of fundamentalists might make them use it. any group of people who believe that the end of the world is a good thing so they can be with their god shouldnt have nukes. Yeah, I can see Iran using them to blow up everyone who doesn't believe the same as they do, most likely Israel, and possibly other Aribic Nations which are shia not sunni.
[QUOTE="OT_Rage"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]World War 3 won't happen, if it does.. It will be the destruction of our world.. By either through nukes or a biological weapons.... We should actually be happy with nuclear weapons and their creation.. They have basically blocked the idea of major scale war sense their inception due to the Mutually Assured Destrouction.. Thats why I am puzzled how many people claim that if NK or Iran get nukes they will use them.. Why? They have nothing to gain and everything to lose.. NK has nothing to gain from it, they want economic and military power.. Launching a nuke robs them of both things.. Iran wants the expulsion of western powers, and Israel to be dismantled as a nation.. A Nuclear laucnh woul dnot solv ethat, the first would only swell western powers in the region, resorting in their destruction.. And a nuke in Israel is not what htey are after, the land is holy to Islam.... These are just some examples.. IN all honesty if a natrual diseaster doesn't wipe us out, a virus or biological weapon will before nukes imo.Jacobistheman
the irrationality of fundamentalists might make them use it. any group of people who believe that the end of the world is a good thing so they can be with their god shouldnt have nukes. Yeah, I can see Iran using them to blow up everyone who doesn't believe the same as they do, most likely Israel, and possibly other Aribic Nations which are shia not sunni. ... He is talking about terrorists.. Not Iran.. You think if Iran was as crazy as you claimed they would have tried to do an immense attack by now that was no holds bar? Its been 30 years and still nothing.. Furthermore how many times do I have to DRIVE this into your head, they would neve nuke Israel.. IT IS THEIR HOLY LAND, it would be sacriligious to their beliefs.. And they are only concerned with expelling the Israeli's from the land..
[QUOTE="Jacobistheman"][QUOTE="Infinite-Zr0"] That doesn't mean radiation is going to clear out of the nuked areas like clouds in the sky. The whole world would still be fubar.sSubZerOo
Well most of the Fallout which doesn't Fall out [of the sky] will most likely makes its way to austrailia. It is kind of like how the radiation from the meltdown in Chernobyl went to the rest of eastern Europe. Enough nuclear bombs dropped at once, can send us into Nuclear winter.. Something we would not be prepared to handle and we would most likely lose 75% or more of our population at least due to starvation from the massive famine tha twould occur. I know it can, but I don't think that many nukes would be launched, Russia and the US aren't going to launch. Possibly Isreal or India and Pakastan which I don't think have enough to send us into a nuclear winter (I might be wrong). I honestly think there is a way greater chance that a Volcano or Meteor would send us into the next ice age.
Log in to comment