How much would you trust an A.I.?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ariabed
Ariabed

2121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1  Edited By Ariabed
Member since 2014 • 2121 Posts

Google has acquired an A.I. Company and have also been buying up robotics companies. Car companies are working on cars that can drive themselves.

Also computers have partial control of a lot of things in our lives, our cars, aeroplanes, traffic lights to name a few.

Would you place full trust in a car to drive you to your destination?

Also in the future can you see humans relinquishing full control to an A.I. to run certain things like public transport, the manufacturing of cars, washing machines, mobile phones etc?

Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21695 Posts

I trust them as long as their programmings don't get tampered with...

Edit: On second thought, not really. Some people got too much time on their hands and they probably would find ways to hack A.I.'s. That may end up becoming a big problem...

Avatar image for indzman
indzman

27736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 indzman
Member since 2006 • 27736 Posts

As long it serves me well without any malfunctions lol

Avatar image for deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d
deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d

7914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d
Member since 2005 • 7914 Posts

A perfect A.I. is smart as a rock

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38935 Posts

things can always go wrong, whether it's a human in charge or a machine. when we reach a point that statistically the machine is less likely to **** up than the human, i'm on board.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

@tocool340 said:

I trust them as long as their programmings don't get tampered with...

Edit: On second thought, not really. Some people got too much time on their hands and they probably would find ways to hack A.I.'s. That may end up becoming a big problem...

Do you have any idea how many "easter eggs" have been programmed into video games alone by their actual developers that the publishers didn't know about? You don't need tampering to get malicious code.

-Byshop

Avatar image for jasean79
jasean79

2593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jasean79
Member since 2005 • 2593 Posts

I'll only trust it if the car is on a track and there's little room for error.

AI will never replace human intelligence in my eyes. AI cannot reason like the human mind, and if I'm in a situation where I need to react fast, my instinct takes over. AI lacks that ability. I'm fine with the way things are now when it comes to automobiles. I don't want a car that can park and drive itself.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@ariabed said:

Google has acquired an A.I. Company and have also been buying up robotics companies. Car companies are working on cars that can drive themselves.

Also computers have partial control of a lot of things in our lives, our cars, aeroplanes, traffic lights to name a few.

Would you place full trust in a car to drive you to your destination?

Also in the future can you see humans relinquishing full control to an A.I. to run certain things like public transport, the manufacturing of cars, washing machines, mobile phones etc?

I have a problem with that too, but that's just me being irrational. At least with Google cars, they've already been through a shitload of testing and their safety record speaks for itself. They're safe as hell.

Having said that, I'd still want to be able to override the AI and take control for myself should the need arise.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

mark my words.

self driving cars are going to revolutionize road safety.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@Riverwolf007 said:

mark my words.

self driving cars are going to revolutionize road safety.

They already have a stellar safety record, and that's with them driving among unpredictable humans.

Once these things start becoming more common, the obvious next step would be to have them communicate with each other. This would enable every car to know exactly what every other car around it is about to do, making accidents virtually impossible.

Avatar image for jasean79
jasean79

2593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 jasean79
Member since 2005 • 2593 Posts

@MrGeezer said:

@Riverwolf007 said:

mark my words.

self driving cars are going to revolutionize road safety.

They already have a stellar safety record, and that's with them driving among unpredictable humans.

Once these things start becoming more common, the obvious next step would be to have them communicate with each other. This would enable every car to know exactly what every other car around it is about to do, making accidents virtually impossible.

Until there's a malfunction in one of the car's computers...

Would you really want to place that much faith in something in which you have no control over? I know I wouldn't.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

@MrGeezer said:

@Riverwolf007 said:

mark my words.

self driving cars are going to revolutionize road safety.

They already have a stellar safety record, and that's with them driving among unpredictable humans.

Once these things start becoming more common, the obvious next step would be to have them communicate with each other. This would enable every car to know exactly what every other car around it is about to do, making accidents virtually impossible.

it is going be amazing to be in this generation of people that don't have to give up their mobility when they get to old to drive.

the future is pretty freakin' sweet.

Avatar image for 4myAmuzumament
4myAmuzumament

1791

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 4myAmuzumament
Member since 2013 • 1791 Posts

No, I would never trust a Cylon.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@jasean79 said:

@MrGeezer said:

@Riverwolf007 said:

mark my words.

self driving cars are going to revolutionize road safety.

They already have a stellar safety record, and that's with them driving among unpredictable humans.

Once these things start becoming more common, the obvious next step would be to have them communicate with each other. This would enable every car to know exactly what every other car around it is about to do, making accidents virtually impossible.

Until there's a malfunction in one of the car's computers...

Would you really want to place that much faith in something in which you have no control over? I know I wouldn't.

In which case, the other cars merely react to what is happening. That's the exact same thing as what Google's cars have to deal with now, and their safety record is phenomenal.

Furthermore, that's the exact same thing that HUMANS have to deal with now. Except that humans get distracted, have slow reaction times, etc.

If you drive now, you have zero control of the jerks on the road. But you still go on the road and drive. Any way you cut it, switching to self-driving cars is going to drastically increase road safety and cut down on accidents. Even with the occasional error or malfunction, it'll be a statistically far safer system than having a bunch of humans drive around like idiots.

Avatar image for ariabed
Ariabed

2121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#15  Edited By Ariabed
Member since 2014 • 2121 Posts

@MrGeezer: yeh I agree the amount of error in humans driving normal cars would far out weigh the amount of malfunctions there would be in A.I. Controlled cars.

Humans tend to; drink and drive, text and talk on the phone while driving(which can be worse than drink driving), they drive tired and fall asleep at the wheel, get distracted looking at a hot piece of ass, misjudge time and distance, run red lights, speed.

With A.I. You would cut out all of that.

Avatar image for ShepardCommandr
ShepardCommandr

4939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 ShepardCommandr
Member since 2013 • 4939 Posts

I would trust it more than a human that's for sure.

Avatar image for jasean79
jasean79

2593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 jasean79
Member since 2005 • 2593 Posts

You people put way too much trust in technology.

Avatar image for bowchicka07
bowchicka07

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 5

#18 bowchicka07
Member since 2013 • 1104 Posts

I would trust EDI but not the terminator.

Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts

Not at all, unless I have control over it's programming.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38935 Posts

@jasean79 said:

You people put way too much trust in technology.

nope, i just put a lot less trust in stupid people.

Avatar image for ariabed
Ariabed

2121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#22 Ariabed
Member since 2014 • 2121 Posts

What about a fully autonomous railway system?

Avatar image for battlespectre
BattleSpectre

7989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 BattleSpectre
Member since 2009 • 7989 Posts

I'd like to date an AI hottie. So then I can terminate her.

Avatar image for theveryspecialk
TheVerySpecialK

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#24  Edited By TheVerySpecialK
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

Depends on the level of "AI" you are talking about: if you're talking about the limited kind that already serves a variety of purposes today, then sure. But if you're talking fully-sentient science fiction AI, then hell no.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

Good AI is incredibly complicated and I do trust things that are overly complicated, a bit like any software really, it's always going to have bugs especially when it's reading from sensors and trying to interpret stuff on it's own, that is the least trustworthy thing about AI. It's supposed to gather data and then perform an action based on the data.

Avatar image for ariabed
Ariabed

2121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#27 Ariabed
Member since 2014 • 2121 Posts

@Motokid6: trains are still driven by humans, aren't they? you also have ticket sales people, you could potentially do away with humans and just have ticket machines and automated trains, maybe just have a few guys in a control room, if there was any malfunctions a alert could be sent instantly to a control room and the train good be stopped from the control room. And any other trains could be re directed, you could even have a A.I running the control room.

Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

@MrGeezer said:

@jasean79 said:

@MrGeezer said:

@Riverwolf007 said:

mark my words.

self driving cars are going to revolutionize road safety.

They already have a stellar safety record, and that's with them driving among unpredictable humans.

Once these things start becoming more common, the obvious next step would be to have them communicate with each other. This would enable every car to know exactly what every other car around it is about to do, making accidents virtually impossible.

Until there's a malfunction in one of the car's computers...

Would you really want to place that much faith in something in which you have no control over? I know I wouldn't.

In which case, the other cars merely react to what is happening. That's the exact same thing as what Google's cars have to deal with now, and their safety record is phenomenal.

Furthermore, that's the exact same thing that HUMANS have to deal with now. Except that humans get distracted, have slow reaction times, etc.

If you drive now, you have zero control of the jerks on the road. But you still go on the road and drive. Any way you cut it, switching to self-driving cars is going to drastically increase road safety and cut down on accidents. Even with the occasional error or malfunction, it'll be a statistically far safer system than having a bunch of humans drive around like idiots.

Exactly. I hope self-driving cars take over soon.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38935 Posts

@ariabed said:

@MrGeezer: yeh I agree the amount of error in humans driving normal cars would far out weigh the amount of malfunctions there would be in A.I. Controlled cars.

Humans tend to; drink and drive, text and talk on the phone while driving(which can be worse than drink driving), they drive tired and fall asleep at the wheel, get distracted looking at a hot piece of ass, misjudge time and distance, run red lights, speed.

With A.I. You would cut out all of that.

just yesterday my wife and i were driving to the store and there was a woman next to us in here car driving 45-50mpg with both hands off the wheel texting on here phone, occasionally looking up to see the car was still moving in the general direction she wanted. a minute or two later we saw the same woman again both hands off the wheel fixing her hair.

with dipshits like that driving around, we can't get good AI for cars fast enough.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#30 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@ariabed said:

Google has acquired an A.I. Company and have also been buying up robotics companies. Car companies are working on cars that can drive themselves.

Also computers have partial control of a lot of things in our lives, our cars, aeroplanes, traffic lights to name a few.

Would you place full trust in a car to drive you to your destination?

Also in the future can you see humans relinquishing full control to an A.I. to run certain things like public transport, the manufacturing of cars, washing machines, mobile phones etc?

not for driving i won't

but for a train or something yeah