How would America be today had the Confederates won the Civil War?

  • 95 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

Besides the US and the CS being divided, of course. 

Do you think the CS would have eventually abolished slavery?

Would the US and CS be like how North and South Korea are today? 

Avatar image for The4thVIII
The4thVIII

420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 The4thVIII
Member since 2013 • 420 Posts
WW1 would have finished to south off. Not to mention Black guys captured richmond for the north, they would have cuaght it again eventually.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

WW1 would have finished to south off. Not to mention Black guys captured richmond for the north, they would have cuaght it again eventually.The4thVIII
Huh?

Avatar image for The4thVIII
The4thVIII

420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 The4thVIII
Member since 2013 • 420 Posts

[QUOTE="The4thVIII"]WW1 would have finished to south off. Not to mention Black guys captured richmond for the north, they would have cuaght it again eventually.BMD004

Huh?

What?
Avatar image for TheWalkingGhost
TheWalkingGhost

6092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 TheWalkingGhost
Member since 2012 • 6092 Posts
The south did abolish slavery during the civil war I think.
Avatar image for lowkey254
lowkey254

6031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#6 lowkey254
Member since 2004 • 6031 Posts

They wouldn't be like NK/SK  because there weren't any nukes to threaten one another with.
I know that I would be a slave if the Confederacy won. 

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
It likely would have just reunited like Texas after their short independence.
Avatar image for MakeMeaSammitch
MakeMeaSammitch

4889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MakeMeaSammitch
Member since 2012 • 4889 Posts

I honestly wonder if slavery would be around today.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

I honestly wonder if slavery would be around today.

MakeMeaSammitch
Technology replaced it everywhere else in the Western world. Would have happened here.
Avatar image for Trender_man
Trender_man

143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Trender_man
Member since 2013 • 143 Posts

tumblr_m4scn5zLm91qztjn5o1_r1_500.jpg.

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

I honestly wonder if slavery would be around today.

MakeMeaSammitch
It certainly would have lasted a good bit longer, but we would likely still have state endorsed and enforced segregation today in the year 2013. The South really is that ass backwards.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
The south did abolish slavery during the civil war I think.TheWalkingGhost
Uhhhhh you sure about that?
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]The south did abolish slavery during the civil war I think.PannicAtack
Uhhhhh you sure about that?

Not fully, no. But they allowed slaves to sign up for the military in exchange for freedom.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

We'd still be seeing Underground Railroad like actions taking place, with a hugh influx of minorities coming into the North. The South would be raiding soverign state in Africa for more slave.

I'm mostly joking.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]The south did abolish slavery during the civil war I think.KC_Hokie
Uhhhhh you sure about that?

Not fully, no. But they allowed slaves to sign up for the military in exchange for freedom.

So then they didn't abolish slavery at all.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"] Uhhhhh you sure about that?

Not fully, no. But they allowed slaves to sign up for the military in exchange for freedom.

So then they didn't abolish slavery at all.

No. But neither did the North.
Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]The south did abolish slavery during the civil war I think.KC_Hokie
Uhhhhh you sure about that?

Not fully, no. But they allowed slaves to sign up for the military in exchange for freedom.

That's not exactly an abolishment of slavery as much as a holding the freedom from it as a carrot if you survive whatever long service you'd have, A service I'm sure would only end if the South had won but you would no doubt still be prosecuted or harrassed by those that disliked the thought of a dark skinned man or woman living as a free person.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"] Uhhhhh you sure about that?Treflis

Not fully, no. But they allowed slaves to sign up for the military in exchange for freedom.

That's not exactly an abolishment of slavery as much as a holding the freedom from it as a carrot if you survive whatever long service you'd have, A service I'm sure would only end if the South had won but you would no doubt still be prosecuted or harrassed by those that disliked the thought of a dark skinned man or woman living as a free person.

Yea and free blacks were harassed in the North at the same time. And the North didn't abolish slavery either until after the war.
Avatar image for OrkHammer007
OrkHammer007

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#19 OrkHammer007
Member since 2006 • 4753 Posts

Read How Few Remain and the rest of the Timeline 191 novels by Harry Turtledove. He speculated that slavery would be dead by the 1880s, but the CSA would persist into WW II because of alliances with England and France (who silently backed them in the Civil War, and would have recognized their independence had they won) as a nation with a permanent underclass of blacks. The US, in turn, would be allied with Germany as a counter to the CS.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

Read How Few Remain and the rest of the Timeline 191 novels by Harry Turtledove. He speculated that slavery would be dead by the 1880s, but the CSA would persist into WW II because of alliances with England and France (who silently backed them in the Civil War, and would have recognized their independence had they won) as a nation with a permanent underclass of blacks. The US, in turn, would be allied with Germany as a counter to the CS.

OrkHammer007
No. England nor France were anywhere close to allies with the South. They stayed far, far away because of the slavery issue. On top of that they didn't want another war against the U.S. Remember, The UK still controlled Canada and didn't want another North American war.
Avatar image for Squeets
Squeets

8185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 Squeets
Member since 2006 • 8185 Posts

The South never would have won.

Almost every northern soldier who signed up short of abolitionists did so to reunify the country.  Lincoln's goal was reunification.  The next president's goal would have been reunification, etc, etc.  They would not have stopped until the country was made whole again and the south could not last.

The white population in the south was ~20% of the north's (~6,000,000 in the south to ~28,000,000 in the North)...

All of the manufacturing power of the United States was in the North, most of the rail lines, almost as much farmland as there was in the south, etc...

The war was over from the start.

Avatar image for mindstorm
mindstorm

15255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 mindstorm
Member since 2003 • 15255 Posts

- The civil war would be remained something along the lines of the War of Northern Aggression.

- The nature of government would likely put more emphasis on state rights rather than the national government.

- Slavery and segregation would have lasted longer.

- The South might not have had the financial struggles leaving the war (though a war can be won with a cost, just depends upon how far you want the scenario to go).

- Though the South would be relieved of its taxes that when toward the North's industrialization, trade would likely be affected with the North. As such, it's hard to say whether the separation of the North and South would be good for the South. At the very least the North would loose a large portion of its income because of its lack of taxing the South.

Source: From the South and listens to old people bicker. As such, the sources are not the best.

Avatar image for OrkHammer007
OrkHammer007

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#23 OrkHammer007
Member since 2006 • 4753 Posts
[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]

Read How Few Remain and the rest of the Timeline 191 novels by Harry Turtledove. He speculated that slavery would be dead by the 1880s, but the CSA would persist into WW II because of alliances with England and France (who silently backed them in the Civil War, and would have recognized their independence had they won) as a nation with a permanent underclass of blacks. The US, in turn, would be allied with Germany as a counter to the CS.

KC_Hokie
No. England nor France were anywhere close to allies with the South. They stayed far, far away because of the slavery issue. On top of that they didn't want another war against the U.S. Remember, The UK still controlled Canada and didn't want another North American war.

I was referring to the books, where they were in diplomatic contact, due to the South's inexpensive cotton.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]

Read How Few Remain and the rest of the Timeline 191 novels by Harry Turtledove. He speculated that slavery would be dead by the 1880s, but the CSA would persist into WW II because of alliances with England and France (who silently backed them in the Civil War, and would have recognized their independence had they won) as a nation with a permanent underclass of blacks. The US, in turn, would be allied with Germany as a counter to the CS.

OrkHammer007
No. England nor France were anywhere close to allies with the South. They stayed far, far away because of the slavery issue. On top of that they didn't want another war against the U.S. Remember, The UK still controlled Canada and didn't want another North American war.

I was referring to the books, where they were in diplomatic contact, due to the South's inexpensive cotton.

That doesn't make sense. The South's cotton would have been cheap had they won or lost.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
The south did abolish slavery during the civil war I think.TheWalkingGhost
No they didnt. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation abolishing slavery in the south, but the Confederate government did not.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

- The civil war would be remained something along the lines of the War of Northern Aggression.

- The nature of government would likely put more emphasis on state rights rather than the national government.

- Slavery and segregation would have lasted longer.

- The South might not have had the financial struggles leaving the war (though a war can be won with a cost, just depends upon how far you want the scenario to go).

- Though the South would be relieved of its taxes that when toward the North's industrialization, trade would likely be affected with the North. As such, it's hard to say whether the separation of the North and South would be good for the South. At the very least the North would loose a large portion of its income because of its lack of taxing the South.

Source: From the South and listens to old people bicker. As such, the sources are not the best.

mindstorm
The South would have been extremely poor off. Most of the the population, and almost all of the industry was in the North. The South during the 1800's was basically an agricultural state.
Avatar image for Squeets
Squeets

8185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 Squeets
Member since 2006 • 8185 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]

Read How Few Remain and the rest of the Timeline 191 novels by Harry Turtledove. He speculated that slavery would be dead by the 1880s, but the CSA would persist into WW II because of alliances with England and France (who silently backed them in the Civil War, and would have recognized their independence had they won) as a nation with a permanent underclass of blacks. The US, in turn, would be allied with Germany as a counter to the CS.

OrkHammer007

No. England nor France were anywhere close to allies with the South. They stayed far, far away because of the slavery issue. On top of that they didn't want another war against the U.S. Remember, The UK still controlled Canada and didn't want another North American war.

I was referring to the books, where they were in diplomatic contact, due to the South's inexpensive cotton.

Its a pretty implausible scenario considering the US navy was vastly expanded during the war and southern trade with Europe was virtually stopped entirely, later in the war England and France unofficially/sometimes officially supported the Union simply to restore the trade as stockpiles and backstores of cotton ran out in Europe... Not to mention France, despite hefty American ambitions, would have NEVER intervened if Britain did not also intervene, and Britain was never anywhere near intervening.

Avatar image for OrkHammer007
OrkHammer007

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#28 OrkHammer007
Member since 2006 • 4753 Posts

[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]No. England nor France were anywhere close to allies with the South. They stayed far, far away because of the slavery issue. On top of that they didn't want another war against the U.S. Remember, The UK still controlled Canada and didn't want another North American war.KC_Hokie
I was referring to the books, where they were in diplomatic contact, due to the South's inexpensive cotton.

That doesn't make sense. The South's cotton would have been cheap had they won or lost.

Their cotton was cheap. Therefore, they were in diplomatic contact with the CSA. Don't overthink it... Just accept it and read the books.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]I was referring to the books, where they were in diplomatic contact, due to the South's inexpensive cotton.OrkHammer007

That doesn't make sense. The South's cotton would have been cheap had they won or lost.

Their cotton was cheap. Therefore, they were in diplomatic contact with the CSA. Don't overthink it... Just accept it and read the books.

No. Due to the Northern blockade, Europe received almost all of their cotton from Egypt during the war. They didn't switch back to Southern cotton until AFTER the war.
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts
A few years ago I watched a movie called C.S.A. that was made by Spike Lee and presented in the form of a UK documentary. In it the Confederate States abolished the United States after wining the war, slavery continued to the present day (to include having a mock version of Cops on TV that was about capturing runaway slaves), all non-Christian religions as well as atheism were banned, openly racist commercials were broadcast, we were allies with Hitler during World War 2, we had a North American version of the Berlin Wall with Canada since they didn't agree with slavery still being in place, and more. Not the best movie in the world and a lot of it was probably exagerations but it's something you could look at if you're trying to burn an hour and a half.
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#31 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

>How would America be today had the Confederates won the Civil War? 

America would be more outdated in general than reality.

Avatar image for OrkHammer007
OrkHammer007

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#32 OrkHammer007
Member since 2006 • 4753 Posts

[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] That doesn't make sense. The South's cotton would have been cheap had they won or lost.KC_Hokie

Their cotton was cheap. Therefore, they were in diplomatic contact with the CSA. Don't overthink it... Just accept it and read the books.

No. Due to the Northern blockade, Europe received almost all of their cotton from Egypt during the war. They didn't switch back to Southern cotton until AFTER the war.

For fvck's sake, READ THE BOOKS. I didn't write them, so arguing with me as to why England and France allied with the South after the CSA took Washington DC is pointless.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts
haiti
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

Alternate history is a what if scenario and nothing can be seen as true due to it not happening unless solid research is done into the subject.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
What if scenarios are pretty hard to accurately assess. Only thing for sure is that both sides would probably be worse off.
Avatar image for radicalcentrist
radicalcentrist

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 radicalcentrist
Member since 2012 • 335 Posts

To your first question: I see no reason to think that slavery would have been abolished. The confederate constitution forbade states from abolishing slavery.

To your second question, aside from slavery both the north and the south have basically the same political and economic systems. North and South Korea, by contrast, have about as different political and economic systems as two nations can possibly have. 

Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

The world would probably be a much difference place, For better or for worst I can't say.

Read How Few Remain and the rest of the Timeline 191 novels by Harry Turtledove. He speculated that slavery would be dead by the 1880s, but the CSA would persist into WW II because of alliances with England and France (who silently backed them in the Civil War, and would have recognized their independence had they won) as a nation with a permanent underclass of blacks. The US, in turn, would be allied with Germany as a counter to the CS.

OrkHammer007

I haven't read the Timeline 191 books by Turtledove (reading the Worldwar books right now). But I did read The Guns of the South, a standalone book he wrote, which was pretty interesting, but kind of silly. 

Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#38 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts
haitiBossPerson
This, most likely
Avatar image for OrkHammer007
OrkHammer007

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#39 OrkHammer007
Member since 2006 • 4753 Posts

The world would probably be a much difference place, For better or for worst I can't say.

[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]

Read How Few Remain and the rest of the Timeline 191 novels by Harry Turtledove. He speculated that slavery would be dead by the 1880s, but the CSA would persist into WW II because of alliances with England and France (who silently backed them in the Civil War, and would have recognized their independence had they won) as a nation with a permanent underclass of blacks. The US, in turn, would be allied with Germany as a counter to the CS.

Chaos_HL21

I haven't read the Timeline 191 books by Turtledove (reading the Worldwar books right now). But I did read The Guns of the South, a standalone book he wrote, which was pretty interesting, but kind of silly. 

I thought it was pretty entertaining. Time travel + AK-47s in Gen. Lee's hands... fascinating stuff.

I tried to reread the World War books, but finding myself rooting for the Nazis in any capacity was starting to make my skin crawl.

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#40 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

You could go watch C.S.A.: Confederate States of America to get some comedic insight into the idea.

Avatar image for TheWalkingGhost
TheWalkingGhost

6092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#41 TheWalkingGhost
Member since 2012 • 6092 Posts
[QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]The south did abolish slavery during the civil war I think.PannicAtack
Uhhhhh you sure about that?

Yes......55% yes...
Avatar image for MuD3
MuD3

2192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 MuD3
Member since 2011 • 2192 Posts
more racistier...
Avatar image for TheWalkingGhost
TheWalkingGhost

6092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 TheWalkingGhost
Member since 2012 • 6092 Posts
Damn glitchspot
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

If the south didn't get their butt kicked. There would have been WWI. Russia backed the north, the brits backing the south. And then other countries would follow suit.

Avatar image for deactivated-6243ee9902175
deactivated-6243ee9902175

5847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-6243ee9902175
Member since 2007 • 5847 Posts

Well my guess is World War 2 would have been won by the Axis since half of the US in the war probably wouldn't have cut it. For all we know the South could have allied with Axis powers too. Alternate history book anyone?

Avatar image for HomicidalCherry
HomicidalCherry

959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 HomicidalCherry
Member since 2009 • 959 Posts

[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]

Read How Few Remain and the rest of the Timeline 191 novels by Harry Turtledove. He speculated that slavery would be dead by the 1880s, but the CSA would persist into WW II because of alliances with England and France (who silently backed them in the Civil War, and would have recognized their independence had they won) as a nation with a permanent underclass of blacks. The US, in turn, would be allied with Germany as a counter to the CS.

KC_Hokie

No. England nor France were anywhere close to allies with the South. They stayed far, far away because of the slavery issue. On top of that they didn't want another war against the U.S. Remember, The UK still controlled Canada and didn't want another North American war.

France especially was seriously considering allying with the South early in the war.  They needed cotton and if England had supported them, they might have gone as far as breaking the Union blockade to ensure regular cotton trade.  Support wasn't as strong in England, but a faction supported recognizing the CSA.

Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

I thought it was pretty entertaining. Time travel + AK-47s in Gen. Lee's hands... fascinating stuff.

I tried to reread the World War books, but finding myself rooting for the Nazis in any capacity was starting to make my skin crawl.

OrkHammer007

That was one of the themes of the book. All of the non-Nazi characters can't stant working with the Nazis too (and most still see them as the enemy), but when it between that and enslavement by an alien race. They are forced to work along side the. One of the interesting things about the book is how it gives character to the aliens. They are not just some evil invading Alien race.

Avatar image for lozengez
lozengez

490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 lozengez
Member since 2011 • 490 Posts
It would be a third world country.