I am a liberal .And i am proud of it

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

delol

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

go you, hi five. I don't see why there should be liberal guilt, maybe its an american thing as here in the UK there is quite a lot of liberal groupsbraindead_hero

dosent liberal mean free market capitalist in europe?

he means the american kind, where you slowly go into socialism. :)

[QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

H8sMikeMoore

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

I'm a liberal and I'm proud!

Proud, I tell you! PROUD!

[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

bman784

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and thats where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

delol

I'm a guy.

[QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

H8sMikeMoore

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and thats where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

[QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

H8sMikeMoore

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

[QUOTE="braindead_hero"]go you, hi five. I don't see why there should be liberal guilt, maybe its an american thing as here in the UK there is quite a lot of liberal groupsH8sMikeMoore

No the labour party which currentlyis in the UK government is a socialist party

dosent liberal mean free market capitalist in europe?

he means the american kind, where you slowly go into socialism. :)

Well the labour party is a socialist party and is a traditional left wing party. Which stands for public ownership and welfare as well as a public health service all of which I agree with and generally find american liberals are still too right wing

Anarcho Communism FTW

[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

bman784

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and thats where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

depends on the control.

if you're talking about FDA food safety, then yes.

or the laws that make it so you have to print ingridients and nutritional info.

not ALLLLLLLL regulations are bad, just some of the bigger ones.

Anarcho Communism FTW

-Austin-

how about Neo-Satanic-Naturalism mixed with some Ultra-Consevative-Facsim?

I guess you can say I fall more on the conservative side. I don't follow all of its ideals but I don't like what has become of Liberalism.AgileNate

[QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

H8sMikeMoore

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and thats where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

depends on the control.

if you're talking about FDA food safety, then yes.

or the laws that make it so you have to print ingridients and nutritional info.

not ALLLLLLLL regulations are bad, just some of the bigger ones.

[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

delol

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and thats where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

depends on the control.

if you're talking about FDA food safety, then yes.

or the laws that make it so you have to print ingridients and nutritional info.

not ALLLLLLLL regulations are bad, just some of the bigger ones.

not true at all, the internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. theres big guys, thats for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

what bad business practice? youll have to be more specific. most bad business happens to exploit corporate welfare in some form or another. in capitalism there is no corporate welfare.

[QUOTE="AgileNate"]I guess you can say I fall more on the conservative side. I don't follow all of its ideals but I don't like what has become of Liberalism.delol

I rather not be specific because it would only lead to an un-stoppable mess of quotes.

not true at all, the internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. theres big guys, thats for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

H8sMikeMoore

Wasn't the Standard Oil Trust of 1863 a monopoly?

[QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

H8sMikeMoore

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and thats where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

depends on the control.

if you're talking about FDA food safety, then yes.

or the laws that make it so you have to print ingridients and nutritional info.

not ALLLLLLLL regulations are bad, just some of the bigger ones.

not true at all, the internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. theres big guys, thats for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

what bad business practice? youll have to be more specific. most bad business happens to exploit corporate welfare in some form or another. in capitalism there is no corporate welfare.

[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

THE_DRUGGIE

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and thats where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

depends on the control.

if you're talking about FDA food safety, then yes.

or the laws that make it so you have to print ingridients and nutritional info.

not ALLLLLLLL regulations are bad, just some of the bigger ones.

not true at all, the internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. theres big guys, thats for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

Wasn't the Standard Oil Trust of 1863 a monopoly?

It may have been, im currently reading into it.

But regardless, government services are voted in monopolies.

Ive never not favored anti monopoly laws though.

not true at all, the internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. theres big guys, thats for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

what bad business practice? youll have to be more specific. most bad business happens to exploit corporate welfare in some form or another. in capitalism there is no corporate welfare.

H8sMikeMoore

[QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="AgileNate"]I guess you can say I fall more on the conservative side. I don't follow all of its ideals but I don't like what has become of Liberalism.AgileNate

I rather not be specific because it would only lead to an un-stoppable mess of quotes.

[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

delol

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and thats where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

depends on the control.

if you're talking about FDA food safety, then yes.

or the laws that make it so you have to print ingridients and nutritional info.

not ALLLLLLLL regulations are bad, just some of the bigger ones.

not true at all, the internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. theres big guys, thats for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

what bad business practice? youll have to be more specific. most bad business happens to exploit corporate welfare in some form or another. in capitalism there is no corporate welfare.

the youtube case has nothing to do with monopolization.

Yahoo refused.

You lose.

[QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

H8sMikeMoore

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and thats where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

depends on the control.

if you're talking about FDA food safety, then yes.

or the laws that make it so you have to print ingridients and nutritional info.

not ALLLLLLLL regulations are bad, just some of the bigger ones.

not true at all, the internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. theres big guys, thats for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

what bad business practice? youll have to be more specific. most bad business happens to exploit corporate welfare in some form or another. in capitalism there is no corporate welfare.

the youtube case has nothing to do with monopolization.

Yahoo refused.

You lose.

You see the reason I wasnt specific ;)AgileNate

[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

delol

liberal guilt is more in refrence (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and thats where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

depends on the control.

if you're talking about FDA food safety, then yes.

or the laws that make it so you have to print ingridients and nutritional info.

not ALLLLLLLL regulations are bad, just some of the bigger ones.

not true at all, the internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. theres big guys, thats for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

what bad business practice? youll have to be more specific. most bad business happens to exploit corporate welfare in some form or another. in capitalism there is no corporate welfare.

the youtube case has nothing to do with monopolization.

Yahoo refused.

You lose.

as usual i have a very hard time understanding your english.

even if corporations buy stuff, theres always going to be readily available alternatives. particularly within the open source community. which by the way you cant "buy"

[QUOTE="braindead_hero"]go you, hi five. I don't see why there should be liberal guilt, maybe its an american thing as here in the UK there is quite a lot of liberal groupsH8sMikeMoore

dosent liberal mean free market capitalist in europe?

he means the american kind, where you slowly go into socialism. :)

Yay! I like that.

[QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

H8sMikeMoore

liberal guilt is more in reference (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and that's where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

depends on the control.

if you're talking about FDA food safety, then yes.

or the laws that make it so you have to print ingredients and nutritional info.

not ALLLLLLLL regulations are bad, just some of the bigger ones.

not true at all, the Internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. there's big guys, that's for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

what bad business practice? you have to be more specific. most bad business happens to exploit corporate welfare in some form or another. in capitalism there is no corporate welfare.

the youtube case has nothing to do with monopolization.

Yahoo refused.

You lose.

as usual i have a very hard time understanding your English.

even if corporations buy stuff, there's always going to be readily available alternatives. particularly within the open source community. which by the way you cant "buy"

[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="bman784"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="delol"]

Liberal guilt is a damn feeling to someone that states to be a liberal .Liberal cames from liberty so i urge my fellows liberals to quit guilt and assume pride

PS HE8michaelmoore i expect your inspired counterstrike8)

delol

liberal guilt is more in reference (at least i always thought it was) to white guilt, and liberals are usually the ones who fall for it.

im a classic liberal. its unfortunate that the "liberal" today has nothing to do with liberty and everything to do with massive government.

and that's where I disagree with liberalism (american)

personal freedom and economic go hand in hand.

depends on the control.

if you're talking about FDA food safety, then yes.

or the laws that make it so you have to print ingredients and nutritional info.

not ALLLLLLLL regulations are bad, just some of the bigger ones.

not true at all, the Internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. there's big guys, that's for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

what bad business practice? you have to be more specific. most bad business happens to exploit corporate welfare in some form or another. in capitalism there is no corporate welfare.

the youtube case has nothing to do with monopolization.

Yahoo refused.

You lose.

as usual i have a very hard time understanding your English.

even if corporations buy stuff, there's always going to be readily available alternatives. particularly within the open source community. which by the way you cant "buy"

[/QUOTE The open source community is unhappily a drop of water in the net bussiness ocean

its growing, and it proves theres really no way to monopolize anything as long as that alternative is there. you cant actually make it go away.

not true at all, the internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. theres big guys, thats for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

what bad business practice? youll have to be more specific. most bad business happens to exploit corporate welfare in some form or another. in capitalism there is no corporate welfare.

H8sMikeMoore

Not true. There used to only be one phone company. That was a monopoly. Currently most areas have a choice of only ONE cable company.

[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"]

not true at all, the internet is a great example of how that argument falls flat. almost no regulations, no monopolies. theres big guys, thats for sure but its quite easy to not use them.

the only monopolies in the US are the government run ones. There has never been a monopoly formed due to capitalism, only socialism and socialization.

what bad business practice? youll have to be more specific. most bad business happens to exploit corporate welfare in some form or another. in capitalism there is no corporate welfare.

LJS9502_basic

Not true. There used to only be one phone company. That was a monopoly. Currently most areas have a choice of only ONE cable company.

I dont know much about the phone company. Anyway I retract my statement about no monopolies, but Ive always stood for anti monopoly laws anyway

Big-government planning, spending, and taxing -- exactly what the nation and the stock market doesn't want to hear.Mr_Manikin52

Bush spent more. Taxes...well considering the state of the economy and the cost of the war...I'd be more surprised that they don't go up no matter who wins.

I am a hardcore meat loving gun shooting patriotic conservative American. And I'm proud of it.

[QUOTE="Mr_Manikin52"]Big-government planning, spending, and taxing -- exactly what the nation and the stock market doesn't want to hear.LJS9502_basic

Bush spent more. Taxes...well considering the state of the economy and the cost of the war...I'd be more surprised that they don't go up no matter who wins.

they pretty much have to at this point. but we could always bring home troops from places that arent combat zones such as the UK, Germany and Japan. that might save a buck or two.

[QUOTE="Mr_Manikin52"]Big-government planning, spending, and taxing -- exactly what the nation and the stock market doesn't want to hear.LJS9502_basic

Bush spent more. Taxes...well considering the state of the economy and the cost of the war...I'd be more surprised that they don't go up no matter who wins.

Well.. let's end the two party system and get Bob Barr to win.

Bush is NOT a true conservative.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Manikin52"]Big-government planning, spending, and taxing -- exactly what the nation and the stock market doesn't want to hear.Mr_Manikin52

Bush spent more. Taxes...well considering the state of the economy and the cost of the war...I'd be more surprised that they don't go up no matter who wins.

Well.. let's end the two party system and get Bob Barr to win.

Bush is NOT a true conservative.

yeah definitely

I just want to point out that socialism creates one big monopoly, its called the government.

No one wants that.

[QUOTE="Mr_Manikin52"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Manikin52"]Big-government planning, spending, and taxing -- exactly what the nation and the stock market doesn't want to hear.H8sMikeMoore

Bush spent more. Taxes...well considering the state of the economy and the cost of the war...I'd be more surprised that they don't go up no matter who wins.

Well.. let's end the two party system and get Bob Barr to win.

Bush is NOT a true conservative.

Well.. let's end the two party system and get Bob Barr to win.

Bush is NOT a true conservative.

Mr_Manikin52

[QUOTE="Mr_Manikin52"]

Well.. let's end the two party system and get Bob Barr to win.

Bush is NOT a true conservative.

LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="Mr_Manikin52"]

Well.. let's end the two party system and get Bob Barr to win.

Bush is NOT a true conservative.

LJS9502_basic