This topic is locked from further discussion.
To deny the existence of a Supreme God, would be to diectly deny the existance of GOOD and EVIL. Therefore, if evil doesn't exist please allow me to rape your wife in front of your very eyes. If there is no evil, there will be zero consequenses for said actions, right? Since we have established the evidence for Good and Evil, who determines the line between them? If it isn't God, then who? Now, do you think maybe you are simply DENYING the possibility of a God? Ineedtofindyou
To deny the existence of a Supreme God, would be to diectly deny the existance of GOOD and EVIL. Ineedtofindyou
Not necessarily. If this was a math equation, your if/then statements do not add up.
[QUOTE="Ineedtofindyou"]To deny the existence of a Supreme God, would be to diectly deny the existance of GOOD and EVIL. Therefore, if evil doesn't exist please allow me to rape your wife in front of your very eyes. If there is no evil, there will be zero consequenses for said actions, right? Since we have established the evidence for Good and Evil, who determines the line between them? If it isn't God, then who? Now, do you think maybe you are simply DENYING the possibility of a God? Lord_Daemon
just read the first part. -and no, i would not be praying if u put a gun to my head. baiums_inferno
If anything, I would want God to forgive the guy killing me.
[QUOTE="Ineedtofindyou"]To deny the existence of a Supreme God, would be to diectly deny the existance of GOOD and EVIL. quadraleap
Not necessarily. If this was a math equation, your if/then statements do not add up.
They pretty much do. If there is no higher being than man, man dictates all rules, and there are no absolutes concerning morality, which is a man-made idea since there is no basis for it in nature. Therefore, every person has the right to come to his or her own conclusions concerning morality, hence leaving no room for any universal set of standards.[QUOTE="Lord_Daemon"][QUOTE="Ineedtofindyou"]To deny the existence of a Supreme God, would be to diectly deny the existance of GOOD and EVIL. Therefore, if evil doesn't exist please allow me to rape your wife in front of your very eyes. If there is no evil, there will be zero consequenses for said actions, right? Since we have established the evidence for Good and Evil, who determines the line between them? If it isn't God, then who? Now, do you think maybe you are simply DENYING the possibility of a God? Ineedtofindyou
[QUOTE="quadraleap"][QUOTE="Ineedtofindyou"]To deny the existence of a Supreme God, would be to diectly deny the existance of GOOD and EVIL. sahredd
Not necessarily. If this was a math equation, your if/then statements do not add up.
They pretty much do. If there is no higher being than man, man dictates all rules, and there are no absolutes concerning morality, which is a man-made idea since there is no basis for it in nature. Therefore, every person has the right to come to his or her own conclusions concerning morality, hence leaving no room for any universal set of standards.
He said good and evil, not heaven and hell. Good and evil are labels for human traits/human behavior that occur despite what you believe. Thats what I was trying to say.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment