I think Cigarettes should be banned, and Marijuana legalized.

I think that neither should be banned. Also, people obviously would be far more prone to smoke marijuana in public were it legalized...

Does that mean my tobacco pipe would be banned? :cry:

Legal/illegal – doesn't really matter. The police don't care for it much unless they're bored or you're carrying a hefty amount. Cigarette smoke is one of a multitude of smells that waft around the city and beyond – car fumes, fish at the market, cow **** in the fields, Chinese restaurants, farts in the lift, etc. Why single out one that you don't like?

I think Marijuana for personal use and in private should be legalized for the simple reason that it doesn't affect anyone. People on the streets smoke EVERYWHERE, even 10ft away from a no-smoking sign simply because they're not in the premises, but that doesn't mean others can't smell it.

Sure, there's hash, but people won't be walking around holding a bong trying to smoke. People walk around with cigarettes. th3warr1or

I disagree. I need cigarette for mix. Otherwise the weed doesnt burn properly.

Legal/illegal – doesn't really matter. The police don't care for it much unless they're bored or you're carrying a hefty amount. Cigarette smoke is one of a multitude of smells that waft around the city and beyond – car fumes, fish at the market, cow **** in the fields, Chinese restaurants, farts in the lift, etc. Why single out one that you don't like?

poptart

I think Marijuana for personal use and in private should be legalized for the simple reason that it doesn't affect anyone. People on the streets smoke EVERYWHERE, even 10ft away from a no-smoking sign simply because they're not in the premises, but that doesn't mean others can't smell it.

Sure, there's hash, but people won't be walking around holding a bong trying to smoke. People walk around with cigarettes. th3warr1or

So its legal to smoke marijuana, as long as its not in public and people can't smell it? If they were to legalise it you'd expect that you could be free to engage in it wherever you want without much interference, otherwise you'd be acting the same as you would be when it was illegal. There would be absolutely no point to it.

Everything should be banned for the lulz.Dystopian-X

[QUOTE="poptart"]

Legal/illegal – doesn't really matter. The police don't care for it much unless they're bored or you're carrying a hefty amount. Cigarette smoke is one of a multitude of smells that waft around the city and beyond – car fumes, fish at the market, cow **** in the fields, Chinese restaurants, farts in the lift, etc. Why single out one that you don't like?

chris_yz80

Well, I have several farmers in my family, and cow crap is pretty stinky. I find it to be like a kind of sweet, sickly poo. But who's to say the smell of smoke to one person is any worse than the smell emitting from the local greasy kebab shop for another?

Stop thinking. You're not good at it.

I_am_george

I think we should ban the act of breathing in oxygen.

[QUOTE="chris_yz80"][QUOTE="poptart"]

Legal/illegal – doesn't really matter. The police don't care for it much unless they're bored or you're carrying a hefty amount. Cigarette smoke is one of a multitude of smells that waft around the city and beyond – car fumes, fish at the market, cow **** in the fields, Chinese restaurants, farts in the lift, etc. Why single out one that you don't like?

poptart

Well, I have several farmers in my family, and cow crap is pretty stinky. I find it to be like a kind of sweet, sickly poo. But who's to say the smell of smoke to one person is any worse than the smell emitting from the local greasy kebab shop for another?

I think we should ban the act of breathing in oxygen.

Assassin1349

I think we should ban the act of breathing in oxygen.

Assassin1349

Dont be silly. You should tax it.

[QUOTE="Assassin1349"]

I think we should ban the act of breathing in oxygen.

Dystopian-X

I think we should ban the act of breathing in oxygen.

Assassin1349

No, just ban odours. The man with body odour in the shop? 6 months in jail and lifetime monitoring of deodorant application. People who fart in the lift? Deoderised anal plug inserted for life and registered as a known 'public guffer'. I think it would work

[QUOTE="I_am_george"]

Stop thinking. You're not good at it.

hamstergeddon

yeah, your really smart :roll:

I'm getting tired of all this anti-smoking threads. Some people like to relax with a cigarette after a long day at work. Why would you want to take that away from them?

[QUOTE="hamstergeddon"][QUOTE="I_am_george"]

Stop thinking. You're not good at it.

hedden93

yeah, your really smart :roll:

I'm getting tired of all this anti-smoking threads. Some people like to relax with a cigarette after a long day at work. Why would you want to take that away from them?

There's a thing called 3rd hand smoke.

[QUOTE="th3warr1or"]I think Marijuana for personal use and in private should be legalized for the simple reason that it doesn't affect anyone. People on the streets smoke EVERYWHERE, even 10ft away from a no-smoking sign simply because they're not in the premises, but that doesn't mean others can't smell it.

Sure, there's hash, but people won't be walking around holding a bong trying to smoke. People walk around with cigarettes. freek666

So its legal to smoke marijuana, as long as its not in public and people can't smell it? If they were to legalize it you'd expect that you could be free to engage in it wherever you want without much interference, otherwise you'd be acting the same as you would be when it was illegal. There would be absolutely no point to it.

There's a thing called 2rd hand smoke.

Gaming-Planet

There's a thing called 2rd hand smoke.

[QUOTE="hamstergeddon"][QUOTE="I_am_george"]

Stop thinking. You're not good at it.

hedden93

yeah, your really smart :roll:

I'm getting tired of all this anti-smoking threads. Some people like to relax with a cigarette after a long day at work. Why would you want to take that away from them?

There's a thing called 2rd hand smoke.

Although I'm not personally opposed to the legalization of marijuana, I strongly disagree with the statement that it "doesn't affect anyone" black_tempest

Indeed. When it makes you completely stoned, that affects you.

You TC are a fool.

[QUOTE="th3warr1or"]I think Marijuana for personal use and in private should be legalized for the simple reason that it doesn't affect anyone. People on the streets smoke EVERYWHERE, even 10ft away from a no-smoking sign simply because they're not in the premises, but that doesn't mean others can't smell it.

Sure, there's hash, but people won't be walking around holding a bong trying to smoke. People walk around with cigarettes. freek666

So its legal to smoke marijuana, as long as its not in public and people can't smell it? If they were to legalise it you'd expect that you could be free to engage in it wherever you want without much interference, otherwise you'd be acting the same as you would be when it was illegal. There would be absolutely no point to it.

Not at all. Its all about the trading process that is such a drag. And if they were to legalize you'd not expect that you are free to engage wherever you want, you cant do that not even in Amsterdan, I have no idea why you'd think so

The reason is that pot smokers arent marginalized, they are productive, normal, smart and dont want to be treated as criminals in the eyes of the law, that is the point!

You TC are a fool.

CUDCUD

[QUOTE="CUDCUD"]

You TC are a fool.

th3warr1or

brain damage says nochris_yz80

i agree .

[QUOTE="chris_yz80"]brain damage says noMrLions

What if people get hotboxed in restaurants! :OMrLions

What if people get hotboxed in restaurants! :OMrLions

A lot would thank you later :O

[QUOTE="th3warr1or"]I think Marijuana for personal use and in private should be legalized for the simple reason that it doesn't affect anyone. People on the streets smoke EVERYWHERE, even 10ft away from a no-smoking sign simply because they're not in the premises, but that doesn't mean others can't smell it.

Sure, there's hash, but people won't be walking around holding a bong trying to smoke. People walk around with cigarettes. freek666

So its legal to smoke marijuana, as long as its not in public and people can't smell it? If they were to legalise it you'd expect that you could be free to engage in it wherever you want without much interference, otherwise you'd be acting the same as you would be when it was illegal. There would be absolutely no point to it.

You can't walk down the street drinking a bottle of scotch either, who cares if you have to go into a house or a smoke shop to smoke?

So its legal to smoke marijuana, as long as its not in public and people can't smell it? If they were to legalise it you'd expect that you could be free to engage in it wherever you want without much interference, otherwise you'd be acting the same as you would be when it was illegal. There would be absolutely no point to it.freek666

where do i sign?

You simply can't ban cigarettes. It doesn't work. You cannot ban something that is highly addictive, has been legal for centuries, and that millions are addicted to. It just cannot be done.

I think Marijuana for personal use and in private should be legalized for the simple reason that it doesn't affect anyone. People on the streets smoke EVERYWHERE, even 10ft away from a no-smoking sign simply because they're not in the premises, but that doesn't mean others can't smell it.

Sure, there's hash, but people won't be walking around holding a bong trying to smoke. People walk around with cigarettes. th3warr1or

I've seen people walk around with joints.

I can't get high off of second hand cigarette smoke.