If people are going to say Islam is violent....

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5806da829a153
deactivated-5806da829a153

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 deactivated-5806da829a153
Member since 2011 • 93 Posts

It has nothing to do with Islam or Christianity or Judaism.

Some people are just violent. There will be always be egotistical people who want to hurt other people.

Avatar image for majoras_wrath
majoras_wrath

6062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#102 majoras_wrath
Member since 2005 • 6062 Posts
[QUOTE="fidosim"]At the risk of sounding like a douche, you could argue that Islam is inherently more violent than Christianity, since the central figure of Christianity was a man who never led an army, preached that "those who live by the sword die by the sword," and was put to death by the state while allegedly asking God to forgive his executioners; whereas the central figure of Islam was an expansionistic warlord who was apparently capable of great brutality, and whose successors created through force a worldly community stretching from Portugal to the borders of India.limpbizkit818
This is true. I never understood why so many people white knight for Islam and the writings of its 6th century warlord. Baffles me at times.

Don't give a flying f*ck about the religion, as in my eyes it's as flawed as every other Abrahamic religion (if not slightly worse), but people tend to group the followers of Islam in with their criticism of the religion, making very bigoted and occasionally racist remarks along the way.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="limpbizkit818"][QUOTE="fidosim"]At the risk of sounding like a douche, you could argue that Islam is inherently more violent than Christianity, since the central figure of Christianity was a man who never led an army, preached that "those who live by the sword die by the sword," and was put to death by the state while allegedly asking God to forgive his executioners; whereas the central figure of Islam was an expansionistic warlord who was apparently capable of great brutality, and whose successors created through force a worldly community stretching from Portugal to the borders of India.majoras_wrath
This is true. I never understood why so many people white knight for Islam and the writings of its 6th century warlord. Baffles me at times.

Don't give a flying f*ck about the religion, as in my eyes it's as flawed as every other Abrahamic religion (if not slightly worse), but people tend to group the followers of Islam in with their criticism of the religion, making very bigoted and occasionally racist remarks along the way.

Yup.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts
All religions can be used to justify anything. However, there is a larger tendency to associate any violent acts by a muslim as acts of terror and such while the guy in Norway was who acted believing he was on Gods side to the same extent that suicide bombers do, but nobody mentioned him as being part of a Christian crusade, even though he mentions it in his blog. At the end of the day....all religions can be used to justify violence, so no Islam is not any more evil than Christianity or Judaism
Avatar image for Wolf-Man2006
Wolf-Man2006

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#105 Wolf-Man2006
Member since 2006 • 4187 Posts

Like with all religions, there are people that strictly follow all of said religion's guidelines and rules no matter what, even if it includes projecting tyranny on people of different opinions...

Avatar image for speedfog
speedfog

4966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#106 speedfog
Member since 2009 • 4966 Posts

I don't know if peopel here know it but if people that belive in the Islam die... They will go to a good place with some virgins if im right...

Avatar image for Wolf-Man2006
Wolf-Man2006

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#107 Wolf-Man2006
Member since 2006 • 4187 Posts

I don't know if peopel here know it but if people that belive in the Islam die... They will go to a good place with some virgins if im right...

speedfog

According to the extremists (I'm not sure if what they believe is mistranslated from the Quaran), they want to convert everybody into Muslims while killing whoever they think are "infidels." There's a book called "Infidel" by Ayaan Hirsi Ali that I recommend if you want to learn about fundamentalist Muslim beliefs,,

Feel free to correct me if I get anything wrong

Avatar image for DarthJohnova
DarthJohnova

4599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#108 DarthJohnova
Member since 2010 • 4599 Posts

Yes, Christianity has had it's times of bloodshed and terror, however it has moved with the times and realised that you can't do that in this day and age. Christians aren't driving planes into buildings.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#109 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

Islam is definitely not a peaceful religion, regardless of how many crazy followers it has.

Whether other religions are equally violent is irrelevant.

Avatar image for biggus_phallus
biggus_phallus

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 biggus_phallus
Member since 2012 • 42 Posts
[QUOTE="BossPerson"]All religions can be used to justify anything. However, there is a larger tendency to associate any violent acts by a muslim as acts of terror and such while the guy in Norway was who acted believing he was on Gods side to the same extent that suicide bombers do, but nobody mentioned him as being part of a Christian crusade, even though he mentions it in his blog. At the end of the day....all religions can be used to justify violence, so no Islam is not any more evil than Christianity or Judaism

The Norwegian guy wasn't a practicing Christian, he was a "cultural christian" which is what Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens call themselves. Also, the Norwegian guy was working alone while there are millions of Muslim extremists worldwide. At face-value, your argument is dishonest because Christians don't murder people for burning the Bible. Attempting to equalize the two religions is intellectually dishonest.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts
[QUOTE="biggus_phallus"][QUOTE="BossPerson"]All religions can be used to justify anything. However, there is a larger tendency to associate any violent acts by a muslim as acts of terror and such while the guy in Norway was who acted believing he was on Gods side to the same extent that suicide bombers do, but nobody mentioned him as being part of a Christian crusade, even though he mentions it in his blog. At the end of the day....all religions can be used to justify violence, so no Islam is not any more evil than Christianity or Judaism

The Norwegian guy wasn't a practicing Christian, he was a "cultural christian" which is what Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens call themselves. Also, the Norwegian guy was working alone while there are millions of Muslim extremists worldwide. At face-value, your argument is dishonest because Christians don't murder people for burning the Bible. Attempting to equalize the two religions is intellectually dishonest.

look up the shooter, he believed he was a Templar soldier fighting a holy war. Secondly, there are not millions of extremists. Tens of thousands at most. The rest in the militias are just brainwashed, and are mostly illiterate, they probably have never even read the Quran for themselves
Avatar image for biggus_phallus
biggus_phallus

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 biggus_phallus
Member since 2012 • 42 Posts
[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="biggus_phallus"][QUOTE="BossPerson"]All religions can be used to justify anything. However, there is a larger tendency to associate any violent acts by a muslim as acts of terror and such while the guy in Norway was who acted believing he was on Gods side to the same extent that suicide bombers do, but nobody mentioned him as being part of a Christian crusade, even though he mentions it in his blog. At the end of the day....all religions can be used to justify violence, so no Islam is not any more evil than Christianity or Judaism

The Norwegian guy wasn't a practicing Christian, he was a "cultural christian" which is what Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens call themselves. Also, the Norwegian guy was working alone while there are millions of Muslim extremists worldwide. At face-value, your argument is dishonest because Christians don't murder people for burning the Bible. Attempting to equalize the two religions is intellectually dishonest.

look up the shooter, he believed he was a Templar soldier fighting a holy war. Secondly, there are not millions of extremists. Tens of thousands at most. The rest in the militias are just brainwashed, and are mostly illiterate, they probably have never even read the Quran for themselves

He believed he was a Templar soldier fighting to protect his Christian culture. But he didn't believe in God and was not a practicing Christian. And it is a statistical fact that there are millions of Muslim extremists, depending on how you define an "extremist".
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#113 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Islam is violent. Just because christianity is also violent, doesnt make islam any less violent.

Avatar image for biggus_phallus
biggus_phallus

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 biggus_phallus
Member since 2012 • 42 Posts

Islam is definitely not a peaceful religion, regardless of how many crazy followers it has.

Whether other religions are equally violent is irrelevant.

ghoklebutter
Islam is violent. Just because christianity is also violent, doesnt make islam any less violent.sonicare
My sentiment exactly.
Avatar image for Gibsonsg527
Gibsonsg527

3313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Gibsonsg527
Member since 2010 • 3313 Posts

As far as I know most religions aren't violent in themselves but its the people who abuse and miss interpret thier religion that are violent.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180226 Posts
Hypocritical much? Anyway let's look at the leaders of the two religions. Mohammed I believe was a warlord....no? Jesus....turned the other cheek. /thread
Avatar image for _R34LiTY_
_R34LiTY_

3331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 _R34LiTY_
Member since 2008 • 3331 Posts

I don't think there is one religion that is more violent than the other. In fact, even though I don't agree with religion, I believe it is inherently good as far as what people are supposed to take from it. I think people use a holy book as an excuse to conduct their own illicit behavior which comes natural to them without the command of the creator, but thanks to the holy book, people can hide how they're naturally sick in the mind by saying that "God wills it" and because of that, does the idea of religious extremists come about when they're just naturally deluded.

Avatar image for Oyashiro1000
Oyashiro1000

7403

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Oyashiro1000
Member since 2009 • 7403 Posts

Islam isn't violent, nor is Christianity.chessmaster1989
I agree with this, it is what people make of them.

Avatar image for wii60_3
wii60_3

2017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#119 wii60_3
Member since 2007 • 2017 Posts

Except for Buddhists and Jews and Sikhs, all the religions kunts.

Ilovegames1992
Give this man a medal, you speak the truth
Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#120 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts
African slavery first started with Turkish traders. Salem witch hunts were misguided fervor that killed innocents for many reasons other than legitimate witchcraft. The Crusades were just as much politically motivated as it was religious, the same can be said about the Inquisition. Hitler was raised Catholic, but ultimately rejected it in favour of neo-paganism with nationalistic overtones. Natives died because of foreign diseases which their bodies never had a chance of developing an immune system for, missionaries spent just as much time trying to help the natives as the imperial powers spent trying to kill them. I do admit that there have been many Christians who have done terrible things over the years, and I do apologize for that. That being said, none of the things you have listed were ever condoned by the Bible, and the justifications used for them are either taken out of context or misinterpreted. Is witchcraft a sin? Yes. Is it worthy of death? As Jesus would say: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."
Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#122 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

Yes, Christianity has had it's times of bloodshed and terror, however it has moved with the times and realised that you can't do that in this day and age. Christians aren't driving planes into buildings.

DarthJohnova
They're shooting up kids on remote islands in Norway instead.
Avatar image for Nayef_shroof
Nayef_shroof

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Nayef_shroof
Member since 2011 • 709 Posts

*Sigh* Lets begin. The misinformation/slander of Muhammad (PBUH) is quite saddening.

Quick histroy lesson:

The various tribes of the Arabs during pre-Islamic history were arguably some of the most morally depraved peoples on the planet (At least during that time period). The tribes were locked in a state of constant warfare, the victors eliminating every member of the opposing tribe (Including women and children). Racism was rife within Arabia, the ideological norm being that Arabs are superior to every other race, and subsequently, enslavement of other races due to an inferiority complex was common. Infanticide was a common practice, burying baby girls alive after they were born just because they were females. Women were literally sold as commoditites and were actually owned, having no legal or basic human rights. Orphans, having no family ties to offer them support in a tribal society, were sold as slaves, or if they had wealth, they would be married off so that the family could steal their inheritence. The rich would usurp the poor, exploiting them with crushing interest, forcing many to become slaves. Not ot mention the fact that most Arabs were pagans who worshipped a variety of deities/idols. I could literally continue for paragraphs, but regardless/

Muhammad (PBUH) in only 23 years:

  • Ended racism/discrimination agaisnt peoples of all ethnicities/races, forming one of the most tolerant socieites on the planet
  • Ended the disgustingly rampant practice of infanticide/female abortions
  • Gave women proper human rights that nearly all of Europe hadn't even established until centuries after (EX. Right to an education, owning property, inheritience rights, divorce rights, etc)
  • Established an ethical code of war that has forbidden the killing of innocent civillians (Especially women and children), destruction of property, slaughter of livestock, etc. It's also fornidden to transgress (initiate war) against any group of peoples, unless they are aggressors. (BTW, Islam is the only religion on the planet, at least monotheistic, with these set of principles established)
  • Ended pervasive poverty, as the mandaotry tax muslims must pay in charity was allocated efficiently to the poor and needy

I can further elaborate on many more virtuous accomplishments that Muhammad carried out, but ill just leave it at this

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#124 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

It has nothing to do with Islam or Christianity or Judaism.

Some people are just violent. There will be always be egotistical people who want to hurt other people.

roboticman2
True, but have you ever read the books of the Abrahamic religions? They certainly encourage violence - at least in the name of God.
Avatar image for Legacy-of-Todd
Legacy-of-Todd

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Legacy-of-Todd
Member since 2011 • 539 Posts

I would guess my religion is pretty violent, we do have lightsabers

Annnd 500 posts

Avatar image for ehhwhatever
ehhwhatever

1463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 ehhwhatever
Member since 2010 • 1463 Posts

*Sigh* Lets begin. The misinformation/slander of Muhammad (PBUH) is quite saddening.

Quick histroy lesson:

The various tribes of the Arabs during pre-Islamic history were arguably some of the most morally depraved peoples on the planet (At least during that time period). The tribes were locked in a state of constant warfare, the victors eliminating every member of the opposing tribe (Including women and children). Racism was rife within Arabia, the ideological norm being that Arabs are superior to every other race, and subsequently, enslavement of other races due to an inferiority complex was common. Infanticide was a common practice, burying baby girls alive after they were born just because they were females. Women were literally sold as commoditites and were actually owned, having no legal or basic human rights. Orphans, having no family ties to offer them support in a tribal society, were sold as slaves, or if they had wealth, they would be married off so that the family could steal their inheritence. The rich would usurp the poor, exploiting them with crushing interest, forcing many to become slaves. Not ot mention the fact that most Arabs were pagans who worshipped a variety of deities/idols. I could literally continue for paragraphs, but regardless/

Muhammad (PBUH) in only 23 years:

  • Ended racism/discrimination agaisnt peoples of all ethnicities/races, forming one of the most tolerant socieites on the planet
  • Ended the disgustingly rampant practice of infanticide/female abortions
  • Gave women proper human rights that nearly all of Europe hadn't even established until centuries after (EX. Right to an education, owning property, inheritience rights, divorce rights, etc)
  • Established an ethical code of war that has forbidden the killing of innocent civillians (Especially women and children), destruction of property, slaughter of livestock, etc. It's also fornidden to transgress (initiate war) against any group of peoples, unless they are aggressors. (BTW, Islam is the only religion on the planet, at least monotheistic, with these set of principles established)
  • Ended pervasive poverty, as the mandaotry tax muslims must pay in charity was allocated efficiently to the poor and needy

I can further elaborate on many more virtuous accomplishments that Muhammad carried out, but ill just leave it at this

Nayef_shroof
How much did you get paid to post this?
Avatar image for Gamefan1986
Gamefan1986

1325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Gamefan1986
Member since 2005 • 1325 Posts

I'm not a big fan of religion, but thats a pretty poor comparison IMO TC. The crusades happened a thousand years ago back when people thought the earth was flat and girls got married when they were 12.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#128 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

Muhammad (PBUH) in only 23 years:

  • Ended racism/discrimination agaisnt peoples of all ethnicities/races, forming one of the most tolerant socieites on the planet
  • Ended the disgustingly rampant practice of infanticide/female abortions
  • Gave women proper human rights that nearly all of Europe hadn't even established until centuries after (EX. Right to an education, owning property, inheritience rights, etc)
  • Established an ethical code of war that has forbidden the killing of innocent civillians (Especially women and children), destruction of property, slaughter of livestock, etc. It's also fornidden to transgress (initiate war) against any group of peoples, unless they are aggressors. (BTW, Islam is the only religion on the planet, at least monotheistic, with these set of principles established)
  • Ended pervasive poverty, as the mandaotry tax muslims must pay in charity was allocated efficiently to the poor and needy

I can further elaborate on many more virtuous accomplishments that Muhammad carried out, but ill just leave it at this

Nayef_shroof

1. It's true that Islam isn't racist, but that doesn't mean it's a tolerant religion. Far from it. Also, on a related note, Islam still allows slavery.

3. So what? Islam allows spousal abuse (Qur'an 4:34), encourages female subordination, forbids wives to go out without their husbands' permission and says that wives who refuse to have sex will be cursed by the angels unless they have a "good reason" to abstain from sex. Also, Islam has unfair inheritance laws that put women at a disadvantage relative to men, condones sexual slavery, has a victim-blaming stance with regards to sexual assault, and, finally, is full of teachings that emphasize the low status of women (women are deficient in intelligence and religion, the majority of people in hell are female, women were the first fitna for the Jews, etc.). And while Islam doesn't explicitly discourage women from getting an education, it does discourage women going outside because of "temptation" and the irrational fear of premarital sex. There's probably much more I'm forgetting. Go look this sh*t up if you think I'm lying. I could be wrong about some things but I am certain that Islam is biased towards men.

4. Wrong. Jihad is not only defensive. There is also offensive jihad, which most reputable Islamic scholars regard as obligatory.

Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

*Sigh* Lets begin. The misinformation/slander of Muhammad (PBUH) is quite saddening.

Quick histroy lesson:

The various tribes of the Arabs during pre-Islamic history were arguably some of the most morally depraved peoples on the planet (At least during that time period). The tribes were locked in a state of constant warfare, the victors eliminating every member of the opposing tribe (Including women and children). Racism was rife within Arabia, the ideological norm being that Arabs are superior to every other race, and subsequently, enslavement of other races due to an inferiority complex was common. Infanticide was a common practice, burying baby girls alive after they were born just because they were females. Women were literally sold as commoditites and were actually owned, having no legal or basic human rights. Orphans, having no family ties to offer them support in a tribal society, were sold as slaves, or if they had wealth, they would be married off so that the family could steal their inheritence. The rich would usurp the poor, exploiting them with crushing interest, forcing many to become slaves. Not ot mention the fact that most Arabs were pagans who worshipped a variety of deities/idols. I could literally continue for paragraphs, but regardless/

Muhammad (PBUH) in only 23 years:

  • Ended racism/discrimination agaisnt peoples of all ethnicities/races, forming one of the most tolerant socieites on the planet
  • Ended the disgustingly rampant practice of infanticide/female abortions
  • Gave women proper human rights that nearly all of Europe hadn't even established until centuries after (EX. Right to an education, owning property, inheritience rights, divorce rights, etc)
  • Established an ethical code of war that has forbidden the killing of innocent civillians (Especially women and children), destruction of property, slaughter of livestock, etc. It's also fornidden to transgress (initiate war) against any group of peoples, unless they are aggressors. (BTW, Islam is the only religion on the planet, at least monotheistic, with these set of principles established)
  • Ended pervasive poverty, as the mandaotry tax muslims must pay in charity was allocated efficiently to the poor and needy

I can further elaborate on many more virtuous accomplishments that Muhammad carried out, but ill just leave it at this

Nayef_shroof

Sounds like they're making everybody equal.

Equally oppressed.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#130 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17982 Posts

What I don't understand is how people claim Islam to be entirely NON violent. That it does not advocate violence at all under any circumstances whatsoever. I could look up and post quotes that promote violent retributive action from the Q'uran, though then I'd be flooded by responses claiming I'm entirely looking at it out of context, as if for some reason viewing a violent quote IN context somehow all of a sudden makes it non-violent.

"I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"

That strikes me as fairly brutal. I don't care if it's all in defense of the faith, nor if it's wrapped in the most noble of intentions. It still advocates violence. I'd appreciate hearing how it doesn't, I've made this point before in other threads and no one has been able to explain this to me.

Avatar image for Nayef_shroof
Nayef_shroof

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Nayef_shroof
Member since 2011 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]

Muhammad (PBUH) in only 23 years:

  • Ended racism/discrimination agaisnt peoples of all ethnicities/races, forming one of the most tolerant socieites on the planet
  • Ended the disgustingly rampant practice of infanticide/female abortions
  • Gave women proper human rights that nearly all of Europe hadn't even established until centuries after (EX. Right to an education, owning property, inheritience rights, etc)
  • Established an ethical code of war that has forbidden the killing of innocent civillians (Especially women and children), destruction of property, slaughter of livestock, etc. It's also fornidden to transgress (initiate war) against any group of peoples, unless they are aggressors. (BTW, Islam is the only religion on the planet, at least monotheistic, with these set of principles established)
  • Ended pervasive poverty, as the mandaotry tax muslims must pay in charity was allocated efficiently to the poor and needy

I can further elaborate on many more virtuous accomplishments that Muhammad carried out, but ill just leave it at this

ghoklebutter

1. It's true that Islam isn't racist, but that doesn't mean it's a tolerant religion. Far from it. Also, on a related note, Islam still allows slavery.

The Islamic empires are some of, if not, the most tolerant empires on the planet...The one incident that was a drastic deviation from the tolerance of ISlamic empires was the unfortunate incident of the Armenian Genocide

Under very specific circumstances, but it isn't the same slavery as Europeans practiced, as European slavery was based around the notion of racial inferiority giving justification to enslave a particular group of people. In European slavery, the slaves and their children, in most cases, were enslaved for life. On the contrary, in Islam, any child born from a slave is free, and the slave cannot be enslaved for life. In european slavery, it was also forbidden, again in most cases, to teach slaves, but under Islam, it is strongly recommended. Slaves in Islam are given basic human rights as well, unlike European slaves that were constantly abused

3. So what? Islam allows spousal abuse (Qur'an 4:34), encourages female subordination, forbids wives to go out without their husbands' permission and says that wives who refuse to have sex will be cursed by the angels unless they have a "good reason" to abstain from sex. Also, Islam has unfair inheritance laws that put women at a disadvantage relative to men, condones sexual slavery, has a victim-blaming stance with regards to sexual assault, and, finally, is full of teachings that emphasize the low status of women (women are deficient in intelligence and religion, the majority of people in hell are female, women were the first fitna for the Jews, etc.). And while Islam doesn't explicitly discourage women from getting an education, it does discourage women going outside because of "temptation" and the irrational fear of premarital sex. There's probably much more I'm forgetting. Go look this sh*t up if you think I'm lying. I could be wrong about some things but I am certain that Islam is biased towards men.

Islam DOES NOT allow spousal abuse, as it is one of the largest sins you can commit...If women choose not to have sex with their husbands for no apparent reason, then it would become more likely that the husband would be inclined to commit a sin (Adultery) to fulfill his sexual desires, that its why. That doesn't mean women have to have sex when their husbands desire, but at least have a decent reason...What do you mean unfair inheritence? They obtain, in nearly all cases, the same exact amount...No, sexual slavery is not allowed in Islam. LOL were does it state that "women are deficient in intelligence and religion, the majority of people in hell are female, women were the first fitna for the Jews"? It says women will be the majority of people in Heaven AND Hell, but the rest of that information is not true...

4. Wrong. Jihad is not only defensive. There is also offensive jihad, which most reputable Islamic scholars regard as obligatory.

There is obligatory Jihad in defense...Thats it. BTW, Jihad is not "Holy War"...

Avatar image for DarkOfKnight
DarkOfKnight

2543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 DarkOfKnight
Member since 2011 • 2543 Posts
Some of the things you mentioned weren't spurred by Christianity. The Holocaust surely wasn't, and people have been calling Christianity violent forever.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#133 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

At the risk of sounding like a douche, you could argue that Islam is inherently more violent than Christianity, since the central figure of Christianity was a man who never led an army, preached that "those who live by the sword die by the sword," and was put to death by the state while allegedly asking God to forgive his executioners; whereas the central figure of Islam was an expansionistic warlord who was apparently capable of great brutality, and whose successors created through force a worldly community stretching from Portugal to the borders of India.fidosim

Hypocritical much? Anyway let's look at the leaders of the two religions. Mohammed I believe was a warlord....no? Jesus....turned the other cheek. /threadLJS9502_basic

Perhaps you should read up on early Muslim history to get context and see what 'actually' happened rather than making statements with no real knowledge of what you're talking about, no? (note that I put 'actually' in quotes because there is a good deal of scholarly debate among historians surrounding the events during Muhammad's life and shortly thereafter)

And this goes not only for fidosim LJ, but for everyone in this thread making similar claims.

Avatar image for DarkOfKnight
DarkOfKnight

2543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 DarkOfKnight
Member since 2011 • 2543 Posts
Hypocritical much? Anyway let's look at the leaders of the two religions. Mohammed I believe was a warlord....no? Jesus....turned the other cheek. /threadLJS9502_basic
Really Matthew
34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

36 And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

38And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.
Avatar image for ehhwhatever
ehhwhatever

1463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 ehhwhatever
Member since 2010 • 1463 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Hypocritical much? Anyway let's look at the leaders of the two religions. Mohammed I believe was a warlord....no? Jesus....turned the other cheek. /threadchessmaster1989

Perhaps you should read up on early Muslim history to get context rather than making statements with no real knowledge of what you're talking about, no?

And this goes not only for LJ, but for everyone in this thread making similar claims.

Have you ever heard of the GREEN FLAG OF MUHAMMED? Did you know the messiah is represented as a ensign or flag? Their green flag and suicide bombings are part of their faith! to Islam the war is on.
Avatar image for DarkOfKnight
DarkOfKnight

2543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 DarkOfKnight
Member since 2011 • 2543 Posts
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Hypocritical much? Anyway let's look at the leaders of the two religions. Mohammed I believe was a warlord....no? Jesus....turned the other cheek. /threadehhwhatever

Perhaps you should read up on early Muslim history to get context rather than making statements with no real knowledge of what you're talking about, no?

And this goes not only for LJ, but for everyone in this thread making similar claims.

Have you ever heard of the GREEN FLAG OF MUHAMMED? Did you know the messiah is represented as a ensign or flag? Their green flag and suicide bombings are part of their faith! to Islam the war is on.

The flag is black not green.
Avatar image for g0ddyX
g0ddyX

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 g0ddyX
Member since 2005 • 3914 Posts

Christianity and Islam are a lot ALIKE when you compare it to other religions.

Really, My Brother From Another Mother.

Because theres one god and similar prophets and values.
Peace

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts

The religions themselves are not violent but those @ssholes who pretend to be part of the religion and do terrible stuff in the name of religion to pollute its name are.

Avatar image for MannyDelgado
MannyDelgado

1187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 MannyDelgado
Member since 2011 • 1187 Posts
I love it when Muslims pretend to be tolerant. You just know it's not going to last when someone brings up women's rights, and homosexuality, and antisemitism, and what exactly should be done with the hands of thieves...
Avatar image for DarkOfKnight
DarkOfKnight

2543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 DarkOfKnight
Member since 2011 • 2543 Posts
[QUOTE="DarthJohnova"]

Yes, Christianity has had it's times of bloodshed and terror, however it has moved with the times and realised that you can't do that in this day and age. Christians aren't driving planes into buildings.

shakmaster13
They're shooting up kids on remote islands in Norway instead.

That was ONE lunatic and is no way a representative of the religion as a whole.
Avatar image for DarthJohnova
DarthJohnova

4599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#141 DarthJohnova
Member since 2010 • 4599 Posts
[QUOTE="DarthJohnova"]

Yes, Christianity has had it's times of bloodshed and terror, however it has moved with the times and realised that you can't do that in this day and age. Christians aren't driving planes into buildings.

shakmaster13
They're shooting up kids on remote islands in Norway instead.

One example of a guy who was declared to by psychotic...really?
Avatar image for DeX2010
DeX2010

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#142 DeX2010
Member since 2010 • 3989 Posts
Islam itself isn't, but those clerics who preach their own version of the Qu'ran inciting violence and hatred are evil. So they are effectively turning their own religion into evil propaganda. Then again I'm athiest.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180226 Posts
[QUOTE="Ilovegames1992"]

Except for Buddhists and Jews and Sikhs, all the religions kunts.

wii60_3
Give this man a medal, you speak the truth

Jewish doesn't have violence in their history? Might want to read the OT.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180226 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Hypocritical much? Anyway let's look at the leaders of the two religions. Mohammed I believe was a warlord....no? Jesus....turned the other cheek. /threadDarkOfKnight
Really Matthew
34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

36 And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

38And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.

Ah quote mining....let's start here. Show me where he advocated using violence because you have not done so with those quotes. Basically they mean there will be conflict due to His new teachings. You're up....

Avatar image for Ilovegames1992
Ilovegames1992

14221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#145 Ilovegames1992
Member since 2010 • 14221 Posts

[QUOTE="wii60_3"][QUOTE="Ilovegames1992"]

Except for Buddhists and Jews and Sikhs, all the religions kunts.

LJS9502_basic

Give this man a medal, you speak the truth

Jewish doesn't have violence in their history? Might want to read the OT.

So?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180226 Posts

[QUOTE="fidosim"]At the risk of sounding like a douche, you could argue that Islam is inherently more violent than Christianity, since the central figure of Christianity was a man who never led an army, preached that "those who live by the sword die by the sword," and was put to death by the state while allegedly asking God to forgive his executioners; whereas the central figure of Islam was an expansionistic warlord who was apparently capable of great brutality, and whose successors created through force a worldly community stretching from Portugal to the borders of India.chessmaster1989

Hypocritical much? Anyway let's look at the leaders of the two religions. Mohammed I believe was a warlord....no? Jesus....turned the other cheek. /threadLJS9502_basic

Perhaps you should read up on early Muslim history to get context and see what 'actually' happened rather than making statements with no real knowledge of what you're talking about, no? (note that I put 'actually' in quotes because there is a good deal of scholarly debate among historians surrounding the events during Muhammad's life and shortly thereafter)

And this goes not only for fidosim LJ, but for everyone in this thread making similar claims.

Facts are facts. Muhammed did lead raids and was called a warlord. You want to revise history.....but that doesn't change it chess.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180226 Posts
So?Ilovegames1992
Awesome counterpoint. Did you debate in school?
Avatar image for Ilovegames1992
Ilovegames1992

14221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#148 Ilovegames1992
Member since 2010 • 14221 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="fidosim"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Hypocritical much? Anyway let's look at the leaders of the two religions. Mohammed I believe was a warlord....no? Jesus....turned the other cheek. /threadLJS9502_basic

Perhaps you should read up on early Muslim history to get context and see what 'actually' happened rather than making statements with no real knowledge of what you're talking about, no? (note that I put 'actually' in quotes because there is a good deal of scholarly debate among historians surrounding the events during Muhammad's life and shortly thereafter)

And this goes not only for fidosim LJ, but for everyone in this thread making similar claims.

Facts are facts. Muhammed did lead raids and was called a warlord. You want to revise history.....but that doesn't change it chess.

Can you link me to some historical texts which prove Muhammad led raids pleas. Not even disputing it i just like at least some semblance of evidence.

Avatar image for DarkOfKnight
DarkOfKnight

2543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 DarkOfKnight
Member since 2011 • 2543 Posts
Ah quote mining....let's start here. Show me where he advocated using violence because you have not done so with those quotes. Basically they mean there will be conflict due to His new teachings. You're up....LJS9502_basic
:lol: Saying that anybody who loves their family more than him is not worthy of him is NOT saying there will be conflict due to his teachings. He is saying that if you love your family more than him you are NOT worthy of him, and since you need to be in order to get into heaven.......Yeah, not seeing anything positive here. You're up.....
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#150 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="wii60_3"][QUOTE="Ilovegames1992"]

Except for Buddhists and Jews and Sikhs, all the religions kunts.

LJS9502_basic

Give this man a medal, you speak the truth

Jewish doesn't have violence in their history? Might want to read the OT.

Or look at the middle east. . . .