[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]What would you ban? I would ban abortion, and multiple languages (only one worldwide language) Undiverse world is undiverse. I'd ban racism or facism.
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]What would you ban? I would ban abortion, and multiple languages (only one worldwide language) Undiverse world is undiverse. I'd ban racism or facism. One unversal language would be far more practical.
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]What would you ban? I would ban abortion, and multiple languages (only one worldwide language) JabbaDaHutt30
Undiverse world is undiverse. I'd ban racism or facism. One unversal language would be far more practical. But far more boring.
[QUOTE="JabbaDaHutt30"][QUOTE="super_mario_128"] Undiverse world is undiverse. I'd ban racism or facism.super_mario_128
One unversal language would be far more practical. But far more boring.
Nah it'd be better. For example now we can experience all shows without subtitles or crappy dubs, music, movies, could be more universal. It'd be easier to visit places. Could understand more people.
Radical religion, as in there being a limit to how obsessed you should be with religion. I think having some faith is good, but guiding your entire life by some set of rules that limit your enjoyment on life is just stupid...all this bs i hear from ppl that dont do things cause of some silly rules they go by. You want to believe in god, go ahead and acknowledge him and thank him, but don't live a restricted life...
Andddd the labeling of grls/women as sluts/hoes/etc for having sex...women should be able to enjoy sex as much as a man does without having to get labeled with bad rep...
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"][QUOTE="JabbaDaHutt30"] One unversal language would be far more practical. AHUGECAT
But far more boring.
Nah it'd be better. For example now we can experience all shows without subtitles or crappy dubs, music, movies, could be more universal. It'd be easier to visit places. Could understand more people.
It'd be 100 times more fun.
Not to mention the political implication. I believe that one language would be a step further to uniting the people of the world! Power to the people!
I would ban religion. It brings so much pain to the world.hillelslovak
So has atheism. Josef Stalin and Mao ZeDong alone (who presecuted millions of Christians) put anything Christian (and even Islamic) radicals did to shame.
[QUOTE="hillelslovak"]I would ban religion. It brings so much pain to the world.AHUGECAT
So has atheism. Josef Stalin and Mao ZeDong alone (who presecuted millions of Christians) put anything Christian (and even Islamic) radicals did to shame.
Radical religion, as in there being a limit to how obsessed you should be with religion. I think having some faith is good, but guiding your entire life by some set of rules that limit your enjoyment on life is just stupid...all this bs i hear from ppl that dont do things cause of some silly rules they go by. You want to believe in god, go ahead and acknowledge him and thank him, but don't live a restricted life...
IceCold54
So you want to ban people's beliefs. Great idea you got there :roll:
I mean, banning something won't mean it will go away, it just means people will do it in the shadows illegaly.
clembo1990
Um how is wanting only one language a Nazi belief?
They wanted every person to be German :|
Yeah in Germany and Russia, but wanting a global language is not wiping out races or invading nations. If anything it would unite more people.The opposite of the Nazis beliefs.
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"][QUOTE="JabbaDaHutt30"] One unversal language would be far more practical. AHUGECAT
But far more boring. Nah it'd be better. For example now we can experience all shows without subtitles or crappy dubs, music, movies, could be more universal. It'd be easier to visit places. Could understand more people. It'd be 100 times more fun. I beg to differ. If you don't understand the beauty of being bilingual then whatever...
[QUOTE="hillelslovak"]I would ban religion. It brings so much pain to the world.AHUGECAT
So has atheism. Josef Stalin and Mao ZeDong alone (who presecuted millions of Christians) put anything Christian (and even Islamic) radicals did to shame.
You are being ignorant. Stalin and Mao were Communists, THAT was their dogmatic dictatorship. Atheism is a rejection of God's existance, it's not bound by any rule other than that, Atheists are not an organised belief system they are just people.
[QUOTE="hillelslovak"]I would ban religion. It brings so much pain to the world.hillelslovak
So has atheism. Josef Stalin and Mao ZeDong alone (who presecuted millions of Christians) put anything Christian (and even Islamic) radicals did to shame.
Atheism is not a religion........
I know this (which is why I said "so has atheism"), but what I am saying is that all beliefs (or in the atheists case, lack of belief) have caused terror in the world.
You show me Osama, I show you Josef Stalin, Columbine kids and Timothy McVeigh, you show me Fred Phelps, I show you Michael Newdow (sp). See what I mean?
I would ban hardcore activists/liberals. Long story short, hardcore liberals care more about saving the lifes of rare Woodpeckers in Northern Washington/Oregon instead of helping do things such as.... ohh I don't know... poverty?
I would ban abortion, and multiple languages (only one worldwide language)
cyberdarkkid
I suppose you'd make that one language English :roll: That would be the only logical decision, since English is the most popular language in developed regions.
[QUOTE="hillelslovak"]I would ban religion. It brings so much pain to the world.clembo1990
So has atheism. Josef Stalin and Mao ZeDong alone (who presecuted millions of Christians) put anything Christian (and even Islamic) radicals did to shame.
You are being ignorant. Stalin and Mao were Communists, THAT was their dogmatic dictatorship. Atheism is a rejection of God's existance, it's not bound by any rule other than that, Atheists are not an organised belief system they are just people.
And Christians/Muslims are just people as well.
I do not hate atheism, or any religion. I am just saying you can't say with a serious face only religion causes harm and atheism is perfect.
So has atheism. Josef Stalin and Mao ZeDong alone (who presecuted millions of Christians) put anything Christian (and even Islamic) radicals did to shame.
AHUGECAT
Atheism is not a religion........
I know this (which is why I said "so has atheism"), but what I am saying is that all beliefs (or in the atheists case, lack of belief) have caused terror in the world.
You show me Osama, I show you Josef Stalin, you show me Fred Phelps, I show you Michael Newdow (sp). See what I mean?
They did nothing in the name of atheism. You need to do some research
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="clembo1990"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"] Um how is wanting only one language a Nazi belief? They wanted every person to be German :| Yeah in Germany and Russia, but wanting a global language is not wiping out races or invading nations. If anything it would unite more people.The opposite of the Nazis beliefs. You think that telling a country to abandon their language - part of their heritage - will unite the world? :lol:
[QUOTE="hillelslovak"]I would ban religion. It brings so much pain to the world.AHUGECAT
So has atheism. Josef Stalin and Mao ZeDong alone (who presecuted millions of Christians) put anything Christian (and even Islamic) radicals did to shame.
Heh heh heh heh, don't get me started on the inquisition and medieval torture. What Stalin and Mao did were for progress in their economy to industrialize it. Sure it was at a terrible cost, but at least there was a reason. The religions back in the day did it to prevent change and enlightenment. For example, Galileo. If he, among other scholars were allowed to teach openly, we would probably be sotechnologically ahead. Anyway, ever heard of the stretching rack?
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"][QUOTE="JabbaDaHutt30"] One unversal language would be far more practical. AHUGECAT
But far more boring.
Nah it'd be better. For example now we can experience all shows without subtitles or crappy dubs, music, movies, could be more universal. It'd be easier to visit places. Could understand more people.
It'd be 100 times more fun.
You can't enforce something like languages.
By enforcing languages you are also enforcing literary arts.
You would also be placing a stupid law onto other people who for them their language may have a cultural importance.
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="cyberdarkkid"] I suppose you'd make that one language English :roll: cyberdarkkid
Actually in this thread I nominated German - nice try, though.
That doesn't matter, banning someone else from using their own language is not right.
Well english would be a good idea, because most people use it and most entertainment is in it but the easiest language to learn and master is German, which is why I nominated German.
And no, it isn't. If anything it will help them even moreso.
[QUOTE="JabbaDaHutt30"][QUOTE="cyberdarkkid"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"] What would you ban? I would ban abortion, and multiple languages (only one worldwide language) I suppose you'd make that one language English :roll: That would be the only logical decision, since English is the most popular language in developed regions. Tell that to China, who are predicted to be the next economic superpower in the near-future...
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"][QUOTE="JabbaDaHutt30"] One unversal language would be far more practical. AHUGECAT
But far more boring.
Nah it'd be better. For example now we can experience all shows without subtitles or crappy dubs, music, movies, could be more universal. It'd be easier to visit places. Could understand more people.
It'd be 100 times more fun.
Easier? Sure. Better? It's arguable. But hey, life would be easy if we were all the same skin color, religion, ethnicity, etc. Languages are art in it's simplest form, why would you want to destroy something so fundamental to the human experience? For convenience?
Log in to comment