I'm actually a big fan of "laziness", but I call it something else: efficiency. A lot of people at my job feel like they need to do certain things right away, like it has to be done.
For example, they do four tasks separately in the span of 30 minutes because they can't do those tasks all at once due to timing. This requires them to walk out somewhere, do something, come back, do something at the place they just left earlier, then they have to go back outside, then they have to go back inside.
Me? I wait ten minutes, work on some paperwork (and extra, fifth task), then I spend five minutes doing those four things because they're all ready to be done at the same time, and in the same area.
People think it's lazy because I am sitting down typing for most of that time when others are walking around all over the property, but the truth is I do more than them, do a better job (because I am good at it), and use less energy doing it.
So, yeah...laziness efficiency is where it's at.
Remember: if you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
@with_teeth26 said:
@RicanV said:
Laziness is not "efficiency." Either there is a lack of product involved or someone else is picking up the slack which are both terrible.
I think two people could accomplish the same task using different methods but have the same end result, where one person puts in way more effort but in a stupider way. lets say its some kind of data processing task.
one person could buckle down and do it manually, the other person could look up some code on stack exchange that will automate the same process. the 'lazy' option would be the more efficient and clever one in this case.
The problem is in the US we have this culture, at least at blue-collar or labor jobs, that the harder you work, the more you sweat, and all that nonsense you put into a job, it means you're getting a lot done...that's the assumption, at least. You could problably accomplish a lot less than someone else who more efficient, but if your boss only saw how much you were running around and sweating and the long [wasteful] hours you were putting in--but did not see how little you were doing--you'd probably be rewarded for it more than the guy who does more work in less time with greater quality.
You hear it a lot when people don't get their way, they're like "Oh man I deserve that raise, I work so hard" and I often want to say "Yeah, but...what did you actually do?"
*found this little gem that echoes my sentiments quite well.
Gilbreth studied the methods of various bricklayers—the poor workmen and the best ones, and he stumbled upon an astonishing fact of great importance and significance. He found that he could learn most from the lazy man!
Most of the chance improvements in human motions that eliminate unnecessary movement and reduce fatigue have been hit upon, Gilbreth thinks, by men who were lazy—so lazy that every needless step counted.”
Another important thing Gilbreth noted was that the so-called expert factory workers are often the most wasteful of their motions and strength. Because of their energy and ability to work at high speed, such men may be able to produce a large quantity of good work, and thus qualify as experts, but they tire themselves out of all proportion to the amount of work done.
That explains why we have such high turnover haha. They may not be lazy, but they're quitters. Which is kind of lazy, isn't it? :D
Log in to comment