Is Beowulf ALL CG??

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Witchsight
Witchsight

12145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Witchsight
Member since 2004 • 12145 Posts

Hey, ive got a money bet with a friend about Beowulf, that movie thats comin out. She says it was ALL done in CG and there are no scenes with real actors. I say that they used CG to enhance alot of the scenes but every now and then they just enhance some parts while leaving others real.

Is there any ACTUAL actors in the movie, or is it all CG on top of actors :? :?

Avatar image for kirk4ever
kirk4ever

3543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 kirk4ever
Member since 2005 • 3543 Posts
i think they acted wearing those ball scanners on there bodies and faces.....then they took those data from the sensors and made hem into cg..im sure they acted..watch the making of polar espress on youtube if they have..something like that...but i dont think theres any real actors in movie
Avatar image for Harbadakus
Harbadakus

5474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Harbadakus
Member since 2005 • 5474 Posts
It's entirely CG. No blended CG/real scenes.
Avatar image for Witchsight
Witchsight

12145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Witchsight
Member since 2004 • 12145 Posts

It's entirely CG. No blended CG/real scenes.Harbadakus

Nooooo. Not only do i lose the bet, i also think thats lame. Why hire all the huge actors to cover them up? Plus it doesnt really look great as far as CG goes compared to what 300 looked like

Avatar image for kirk4ever
kirk4ever

3543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 kirk4ever
Member since 2005 • 3543 Posts

[QUOTE="Harbadakus"]It's entirely CG. No blended CG/real scenes.Witchsight

Nooooo. Not only do i lose the bet, i also think thats lame. Why hire all the huge actors to cover them up? Plus it doesnt really look great as far as CG goes compared to what 300 looked like

how much is the bet for ? :D 20$? 100$? :P

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
Any one else think the second trialer was god awful and that the guy who directed that trailer should be fired?
Avatar image for Razoroo
Razoroo

1945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7 Razoroo
Member since 2003 • 1945 Posts
What the hell are you on about? The actos' facial features have all been motion captured using a new version of the method. The reason it is CG is to give it a slight fantasy element to it and yet make it realistic. That's why they didn't combine live-action with CGI, they wanted it all to look a certain way. It's not lame at all. The actor's lend their voices too which is great, although what is up with Angelina Jolie's accent? Oh well, she's still hot.
Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

[QUOTE="Harbadakus"]It's entirely CG. No blended CG/real scenes.Witchsight

Nooooo. Not only do i lose the bet, i also think thats lame. Why hire all the huge actors to cover them up? Plus it doesnt really look great as far as CG goes compared to what 300 looked like

????

The only thing CG in 300 was the background, which isnt hard, just alot of green screens.This on the other hand is all CG,and as far as CG movies go its looking pretty damn good. The reason for the actors is that theres no way to create a CG face from scratch and make it look as good and realistic as these do.

Avatar image for Witchsight
Witchsight

12145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Witchsight
Member since 2004 • 12145 Posts

I meant, 300 WASNT CG and it looked better than this i think. They had some CG and real actors and i think it looks miles better than the Beowulf trailers

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

I meant, 300 WASNT CG and it looked better than this i think. They had some CG and real actors and i think it looks miles better than the Beowulf trailers

Witchsight
I dont understand what you are saying?WHo cares if 300 was cg or not. Of course if 300 wasnt cg it looked better?But if you mean looked better movie wise then what the hell does cgi have anything to do with 300?
Avatar image for fepepinar
fepepinar

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 fepepinar
Member since 2007 • 856 Posts

I didn't quite like the trailer, I thought the game trailer for Beowulf was more exciting since it had a God of War feeling.

But I don't dislike the fact that the movie will be all CGI, I'll judge after watching.

Avatar image for Witchsight
Witchsight

12145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Witchsight
Member since 2004 • 12145 Posts
[QUOTE="Witchsight"]

I meant, 300 WASNT CG and it looked better than this i think. They had some CG and real actors and i think it looks miles better than the Beowulf trailers

SaintLeonidas

I dont understand what you are saying?WHo cares if 300 was cg or not. Of course if 300 wasnt cg it looked better?But if you mean looked better movie wise then what the hell does cgi have anything to do with 300?

Sigh. Im saying 300 looked great, ill guess you agree by your name, so i dont expect you to argue but continue if you must. Im saying Beowulf using CG all the time doesnt look good. It doesnt look terrible, but not as good as 300. Remember; 300 used CG but not on very important organic things like people and expressions. Thus why i dont like Beowulf so far.

Avatar image for Putzwapputzen
Putzwapputzen

4462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 Putzwapputzen
Member since 2005 • 4462 Posts
it looks too fake. i dont really like it. though i still want to see the movie.
Avatar image for rohver
rohver

11848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 rohver
Member since 2005 • 11848 Posts
Sorry buddy, you lost the bet :(
Avatar image for Devouring_One
Devouring_One

32312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#15 Devouring_One
Member since 2004 • 32312 Posts
I think it's all done with real actors, but CG was skinned over every object making the whole movie CG.
Avatar image for Witchsight
Witchsight

12145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Witchsight
Member since 2004 • 12145 Posts

Sorry buddy, you lost the bet :(rohver

Bigtime :(. I was hoping to find maybe 1 un-CG'd scene. Poopies

Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#17 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts
[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="Witchsight"]

I meant, 300 WASNT CG and it looked better than this i think. They had some CG and real actors and i think it looks miles better than the Beowulf trailers

Witchsight

I dont understand what you are saying?WHo cares if 300 was cg or not. Of course if 300 wasnt cg it looked better?But if you mean looked better movie wise then what the hell does cgi have anything to do with 300?

Sigh. Im saying 300 looked great, ill guess you agree by your name, so i dont expect you to argue but continue if you must. Im saying Beowulf using CG all the time doesnt look good. It doesnt look terrible, but not as good as 300. Remember; 300 used CG but not on very important organic things like people and expressions. Thus why i dont like Beowulf so far.

these are 2 completely different purposes. 300 was exagerated, but founded in reality. therefore, it has a more realistic look. the directors and writers had said it is "history on steroids." beowulf is founded completely on fantasy. so it was not meant to look realistic. you are mixing up "good" with "realistic."

edited for glitchspot.

Avatar image for JiveT
JiveT

8619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 JiveT
Member since 2005 • 8619 Posts

I wonder if you were the kid at Knotts Scary Farm's Beowulf maze who asked me if it was all CG or not...I tried to tell you then and there!

What I find funny is how the commercials try to show Beowulf giving a 300 type line with the "I am ripper, slasher, blah blah blah, I am Beowulf" The way he says that last line makes him sound like Cartman almost.

Avatar image for GamerPro1984
GamerPro1984

818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 GamerPro1984
Member since 2006 • 818 Posts

I remember having to read the book in high school. I was'nt much of a fan at the time, but seeing the trailers for the movie it looks pretty cool. I doubt its 100% CG animated , its probaly like 75%, lots of blue/green screen.

When I watch it im going to pretend its God of War instead so I'll be sure to enjoy it. Theres one part in the trailer where hes like " I AM BEOWULF!!" I couldnt help thinking about our Spartan friend hehe.

edit: typos & spacing

Avatar image for Witchsight
Witchsight

12145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Witchsight
Member since 2004 • 12145 Posts

[QUOTE="Witchsight"]Sigh. Im saying 300 looked great, ill guess you agree by your name, so i dont expect you to argue but continue if you must. Im saying Beowulf using CG all the time doesnt look good. It doesnt look terrible, but not as good as 300. Remember; 300 used CG but not on very important organic things like people and expressions. Thus why i dont like Beowulf so far.

LoG-Sacrament

these are 2 completely different purposes. 300 was exagerated, but founded in reality. therefore, it has a more realistic look. the directors and writers had said it is "history on steroids." beowulf is founded completely on fantasy. so it was not meant to look realistic. you are mixing up "good" with "realistic."

edited for glitchspot.

I see what you mean but i think your point is moot. Doing it all in CG is purely asthetic sure, but they didnt NEED to. It couldbe argued 300 was mostly fantasy anyway. I think 300 looks quite otherwordly as well, i mean, have you seen many movies like it? But they didnt need to have thier actors pasted over with CG to achieve it. Mixing the two in 300 looked great. Going all out in CG, while a statement to technology , just simply isnt as impressive.

Avatar image for Mattchu758
Mattchu758

3449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Mattchu758
Member since 2003 • 3449 Posts
yea its all CG dude, its called Motion Capture, they also did it with Monster House
Avatar image for g-unit248
g-unit248

7197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 g-unit248
Member since 2005 • 7197 Posts
anyone else think this movie looks absolutely awful??
Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#23 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts

[QUOTE="LoG-Sacrament"][QUOTE="Witchsight"]Sigh. Im saying 300 looked great, ill guess you agree by your name, so i dont expect you to argue but continue if you must. Im saying Beowulf using CG all the time doesnt look good. It doesnt look terrible, but not as good as 300. Remember; 300 used CG but not on very important organic things like people and expressions. Thus why i dont like Beowulf so far.

Witchsight

these are 2 completely different purposes. 300 was exagerated, but founded in reality. therefore, it has a more realistic look. the directors and writers had said it is "history on steroids." beowulf is founded completely on fantasy. so it was not meant to look realistic. you are mixing up "good" with "realistic."

edited for glitchspot.

I see what you mean but i think your point is moot. Doing it all in CG is purely asthetic sure, but they didnt NEED to. It couldbe argued 300 was mostly fantasy anyway. I think 300 looks quite otherwordly as well, i mean, have you seen many movies like it? But they didnt need to have thier actors pasted over with CG to achieve it. Mixing the two in 300 looked great. Going all out in CG, while a statement to technology , just simply isnt as impressive.

300 was a based a real battle with real historical figures. the effects were there is stylize the action for contemporary audiences.

beowulf is based a people's perfect hero. since perfect is impossible. it had to look like fantasy.

again. its 2 completely different purposes.

Avatar image for HupHupOranje
HupHupOranje

1450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 HupHupOranje
Member since 2006 • 1450 Posts
The poem was pretty good, but the movie looks terrible. I was so disappointed when I found out it was all CG.
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36096 Posts

[QUOTE="Harbadakus"]It's entirely CG. No blended CG/real scenes.Witchsight

Nooooo. Not only do i lose the bet, i also think thats lame. Why hire all the huge actors to cover them up? Plus it doesnt really look great as far as CG goes compared to what 300 looked like

I dont know 300 had one look throughout the whole movie well except for that wolf part at the begining but Beowulf seems to have a whole bunch of visual styles to it and i think thats very cool

Avatar image for hydralisk86
hydralisk86

8847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 hydralisk86
Member since 2006 • 8847 Posts
[QUOTE="Witchsight"]

[QUOTE="Harbadakus"]It's entirely CG. No blended CG/real scenes.Serraph105

Nooooo. Not only do i lose the bet, i also think thats lame. Why hire all the huge actors to cover them up? Plus it doesnt really look great as far as CG goes compared to what 300 looked like

Someone else already asked this, but how much did you bet?
Avatar image for Witchsight
Witchsight

12145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Witchsight
Member since 2004 • 12145 Posts

It was over 1$ :)

Also, the men in 300 were real, and they looked every bit the macho over ripped He-Man stereotype

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36096 Posts

It was over 1$ :)

Also, the men in 300 were real, and they looked every bit the macho over ripped He-Man stereotype

Witchsight

still that movie rocked i dont care if it didnt portray people correctly it was so much fun to watch