Context is important, for instance if racist white supremacist nationalist groups are appropriating the use of the flag in promotion of their xenophobic ultranationalistic ideals then it will carry around that symbolism and meaning for many.
It's like saying there was nothing inherently racist about the swastika, in fact very dated and positive beliefs surrounding the symbol long predate when the Nazis appropriated the symbol, though Eastern cultures still use it since it doesn't carry same connotation with them but in Western society the symbol is quite a notorious one.
Again, context is everything, and prevalence, so if the only people waving the flag around incessantly are a bunch of racists then yeah they're basically hijacking is symbolism.
Anyhow, article was best summed up with these short paragraphs:
Almost a quarter (24 per cent), of the English said they considered their flag to be racist, compared to 10 per cent of Scots and seven per cent of Welsh, when asked about their own flags.
The report blames the “extreme street hooligans of the English Defence League” for “toxifying” the St George’s Cross, although it says politicians should also take responsibility for failing to “speak up for the inclusive patriotism of the English majority”.
It draws a clear parallel with the situation in Scotland and Wales, where civic leaders have done more to “counter rejectionist or exclusive versions of national identity”.
And there you go.
But I can only guess TC brought this up for no other reason than to make hot air about PC culture; hope that's not the case.
Log in to comment