This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SAURON221
SAURON221

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SAURON221
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts

I herd a story of a high school kid who was caught drinking. Now the judge dismissed the underage drinking charge. Even though he did the school still has decided to administer a punishment.If the law dismisses a charge how does the school have right to do so? In the eyes of the law he did nothing, so how can the school say he did something?

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

I herd a story of a high school kid who was caught drinking. Now the judge dismissed the underage drinking charge. Even though he did the school still has decided to administer a punishment.If the law dismisses a charge how does the school have right to do so? In the eyes of the law he did nothing, so how can the school say he did something?

SAURON221
Whatever you, uh, herd, school punishments are generally completely distinct from the criminal justice system. Otherwise, principals would be able to put people into prison.
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

The judge deciding to no prosecute the kid does not mean he suddenly didn't do the crime. The school has every right to take appropriate action.

Avatar image for XilePrincess
XilePrincess

13130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 XilePrincess
Member since 2008 • 13130 Posts
If the school rule is no alcohol on campus, he can still be punished by the school, underage drinking or not.
Avatar image for hue14
hue14

1228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#5 hue14
Member since 2006 • 1228 Posts

I agree ^

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
Being cleared in a criminal court does not absocnd one of all responsibilities from their actions. Look at what happened to OJ in Civil court even after he was found not guilty in a criminal one.
Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

I suspect you're mistaking an absence of a guilty verdict as a declaration of innocence. The two are NOT equivalent.

Avatar image for Noskillkill
Noskillkill

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Noskillkill
Member since 2009 • 1116 Posts

Well not everything you did wrong at school has to be against the law. or else you could be thrown into jail for being late to class too many times. School rules stop disruptive and innapropriate behavior that is out of reach of the law. it is to make a safe learning atmosphere.

Avatar image for aransom
aransom

7408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 aransom
Member since 2002 • 7408 Posts

In the eyes of the law he did nothing, so how can the school say he did something?

SAURON221

Cheating isn't against the law, does that mean the school can't discipline you for that?

Avatar image for Y2Jfan23
Y2Jfan23

898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Y2Jfan23
Member since 2009 • 898 Posts
A school can't punish him legally unless he was caught drinking AT SCHOOL.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
A school can't punish him legally unless he was caught drinking AT SCHOOL.Y2Jfan23
That is up to the school board; for instance, Cobb county in Georgia...
Avatar image for SAURON221
SAURON221

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 SAURON221
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts

The only thing that seems strange to me is the only reason the school knows is because of the legal system. In which I mean they are aware of it because he had to go to court. If it is dropped in court then in my opinion it should be drooped for school cause nothing was ever proved in my opinion.

Avatar image for cornholio157
cornholio157

4603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#13 cornholio157
Member since 2005 • 4603 Posts

The judge deciding to no prosecute the kid does not mean he suddenly didn't do the crime. The school has every right to take appropriate action.

Pirate700

exactly hes only released from all further liablities and punishments of a crime if hes prosecuted and found not guilty, having the charges dropped doesnt hold the same power

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

The judge deciding to no prosecute the kid does not mean he suddenly didn't do the crime. The school has every right to take appropriate action.

cornholio157

exactly hes only released from all further liablities and punishments of a crime if hes prosecuted and found not guilty, having the charges dropped doesnt hold the same power

He's only released from criminal charges if found not guilty, such as in the aforementioned OJ case. Innocent in criminal court, yet had to pay out a civil wrongful death suit.