I'm not an American myself, but I think it's not that they wouldn't want a female president, but more H.Clinton is a loser. If someone came along who had a convincing campaign, I would vote for them no matter what they were, if I were eligible to vote.
I am 100% ok with it. Generally speaking women are smarter than men. It would be very interesting to see what happens... would anything change? would everything change? :)
I am 100% ok with it. Generally speaking women are smarter than men. It would be very interesting to see what happens... would anything change? would everything change? :)
I'm not a big fan of ms H.C. though...
zero9167
Actually generally speaking, it has been scientifically proven that on average, men are 1/3 more intelligent then woman due to our larger brains.
I am 100% ok with it. Generally speaking women are smarter than men. It would be very interesting to see what happens... would anything change? would everything change? :)
I'm not a big fan of ms H.C. though...
VetteMan85
Actually generally speaking, it has been scientifically proven that on average, men are 1/3 more intelligent then woman due to our larger brains.really. i have no scientific proof to prove anything so i guess you win this one...
[QUOTE="Sajo7"]A woman? Yes. Hilary Clinton? No way.delol
why not ? she is intelligent ,good looking and has a great advantage she is brighter than her husband who was president for 8 yearsShe's EXTREMELY left wing, totally radical, and has very low support even from the Dems for many other reasons. Her husband was harmless, she's a complete lunatic.
I can't stand Hillary Clinton. The last thing this country needs after Bush is another polarizing president. It has little to do with her being a woman.
Too bad the person who would make the best Republican candidate is not even running...
Oh, and about the whole"female president" issue? I think the Democratic nominee will come down to a close race between Clinton and Obama with Clinton just edging by...
Too bad the person who would make the best Republican candidate is not even running...
Oh, and about the whole"female president" issue? I think the Democratic nominee will come down to a close race between Clinton and Obama with Clinton just edging by...
portej
They both have HUGE egos. They will both run for the party.
If she is chosen to represent the Democratic, she'll win. It's basically the Democratic candidate that they need to choose. After that, we know they'll win.
[QUOTE="delol"][QUOTE="Sajo7"]A woman? Yes. Hilary Clinton? No way.VetteMan85
why not ? she is intelligent ,good looking and has a great advantage she is brighter than her husband who was president for 8 yearsShe's EXTREMELY left wing, totally radical, and has very low support even from the Dems for many other reasons. Her husband was harmless, she's a complete lunatic. Vetteman85 i got this crazy fantasy whit left wing women
[QUOTE="VetteMan85"]They both have HUGE egos. They will both run for the party.Sajo7
Well, you sort of have to if you run for president.
A smart runner knows that if two members from the same party run, they will both lose. That's how Clinton got in in the first place. If they where smart, one would back down.
[QUOTE="VetteMan85"]They both have HUGE egos. They will both run for the party.VetteMan85
Well, you sort of have to if you run for president.
A smart runner knows that if two members from the same party run, they will both lose. That's how Clinton got in in the first place. If they where smart, one would back down.
[QUOTE="VetteMan85"]They both have HUGE egos. They will both run for the party.Sajo7
Well, you sort of have to if you run for president.
A smart runner knows that if two members from the same party run, they will both lose. That's how Clinton got in in the first place. If they where smart, one would back down.
Oh sorry, I was referring to the ego comment.
So was I and I agree with you. I'm just saying their egos are SO large that they probably wouldn't concider what I just stated.:)
[QUOTE="VetteMan85"]They both have HUGE egos. They will both run for the party.VetteMan85
Well, you sort of have to if you run for president.
A smart runner knows that if two members from the same party run, they will both lose. That's how Clinton got in in the first place. If they where smart, one would back down.
Oh sorry, I was referring to the ego comment.
So was I and I agree with you. I'm just saying their egos are SO large that they probably wouldn't concider what I just stated.:)
I don't think that has anything to do with a big ego, I mean if you didn't agree with your opponent would you back down?
[QUOTE="VetteMan85"]They both have HUGE egos. They will both run for the party.Sajo7
Well, you sort of have to if you run for president.
A smart runner knows that if two members from the same party run, they will both lose. That's how Clinton got in in the first place. If they where smart, one would back down.
Oh sorry, I was referring to the ego comment.
So was I and I agree with you. I'm just saying their egos are SO large that they probably wouldn't concider what I just stated.:)
I don't think that has anything to do with a big ego, I mean if you didn't agree with your opponent would you back down?
It doesn't matter. If you are a Democrat, you would still prefer any Dem over a Rep (and vise-versa). If two people from the same party run against each other AND the other party, they will lose. The same thing happened with Bush Sr. against Clinton. Bush would have had it all locked up for a second term but just barely lost because some other Rep decided to run against him also. The result was a Democrat in power. Same thing here.
[QUOTE="delol"]I am not american but if i was i will vote H. Clinton yet i think that american democracy is not enough mature to elect a she-president guynamedbilly
You'd vote for a president just because she's a woman? hmmm...
That's why ignorant children are not allowed to vote, American or otherwise.
Log in to comment