Japan Cabinet Approves Landmark Military Change.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#1  Edited By Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

Japan's cabinet has approved a landmark change in security policy, paving the way for its military to fight overseas.

From the article:

Under its constitution, Japan is barred from using force to resolve conflicts except in cases of self-defence.

But a reinterpretation of the law will now allow "collective self-defence" - using force to defend allies under attack.

PM Shinzo Abe has been pushing hard for the move, arguing Japan needs to adapt to a changing security environment.

Others believe that the constitution is a post-war relic imposed on Japan by the US that restricts it from engaging in the normal activities of a modern nation.

China - with whom Japan is currently engaged in a bitter territorial dispute - says it opposes the change, accusing Japan of "remilitarising" under Mr Abe.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said that the new policy "raises doubts about Japan's approach to peaceful development", and accused Japan of "hyping the China threat".

"We urge Japan to sincerely respect the rightful concerns of neighbouring Asian countries, diligently solve any related issues, and not affect China's rights and the stability of the region," he said.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I like. Enough with Chinese encroachment and passive/aggressive moves to settle disputes. Plus I wouldn't trust Obama to be a reliable partner. What say you OT?

Avatar image for osirisx3
osirisx3

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 osirisx3
Member since 2012 • 2113 Posts

old news bra

i am sure japan will be happy they can send their kids off to die in americas wars now.

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

Guess this means they have finally perfected battle exoskeletons. We are all fucked.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Good news. America can't defend every sector of the world. We need allies who are willing to fight with us if the need arises.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#5  Edited By branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

The world has changed and Japan is not an exception. This path will be good for them because it gives them more independence and the United States will now be more capable of funding energy R & D.

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

Japan doing what Obama won't: keeping their word to their allies. This is essentially a re-affirmation to Taiwan and South Korea that Japan will have their back and hopefully the other nations of the world see this bold move and take note. If the US will not lead, the other nations of the world will with or without US approval.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

I doubt Japan has any interest of escalating the conflict and if anything this is something that won't be a hinderence if it, hopefully not, comes a day when their closest allies are attacked and thus they can lend military aid but probably also a change so they can easier have China see them as stronger rather then weaker and possibly even begin to defuse the territorial conflicts.

Not that I can understand why any of them want some barren small islands anyways.

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

@Treflis said:
Not that I can understand why any of them want some barren small islands anyways.

oil