I know this is a rather huge and heated debate among scholars and historians alike.
But I wanted to know Off-topic's opinion on the matter.
Personally, I think Hanson was the first. We give Washington too much credit
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I know this is a rather huge and heated debate among scholars and historians alike.
But I wanted to know Off-topic's opinion on the matter.
Personally, I think Hanson was the first. We give Washington too much credit
Uh, no it isn't. President of the Continental Congress does not equal President of the United States.I know this is a rather huge and heated debate among scholars and historians alike.MetalDogGear
Uh, no it isn't. President of the Continental Congress does not equal President of the United States.[QUOTE="MetalDogGear"]
I know this is a rather huge and heated debate among scholars and historians alike.jim_shorts
Uh, no it isn't. President of the Continental Congress does not equal President of the United States.[QUOTE="MetalDogGear"]
I know this is a rather huge and heated debate among scholars and historians alike.jim_shorts
This.
I thought maybe they were similar roles.
However it seems the President of Continental Congress was elected by congress officials to moderate debates.
He didn't lead a country, or symbolize a leader of the country in any way.
Uh, no it isn't. President of the Continental Congress does not equal President of the United States.[QUOTE="jim_shorts"]
[QUOTE="MetalDogGear"]
I know this is a rather huge and heated debate among scholars and historians alike.Nibroc420
This.
I thought maybe they were similar roles.
However it seems the President of Continental Congress was elected by congress officials to moderate debates.
He didn't lead a country, or symbolize a leader of the country in any way.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment