i think it was better then the second but not as good as the first...anyone here read the novel of te first one, i just finished it...great book,i actually like it better then the movie lol
My issue with 3 was how short it was. Other than that, the action was great! Of course NOTHING could ever top the original. The 2nd one was great though, too!
[QUOTE="zeldafan00013"]It goes in order from best to worst first to third. cjek
Yep. You can see a few elements of crapness appearing in the 2nd one, but it wasn't bad. The third was just awful Yeah pretty much. The first was amazing,
[QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="gs_gear"]LOL 3rd was bad? Wait till the 4th comes out next year. Did you know Uwe Boll is directing it? lolgs_gear
Directed by Joe JohnstonDude I was joking :|, anyway I think Joe Johnston isn't directing the 4th one. Do you have a link? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0369610/ :/
i wouldnt say it was bad.... but they just messed it up, it didnt work like the other ones did... well i cant wait for jurassic park 4 coming soon in 2008
it was obviously worse than the other two since they didnt hav the source material and story that the first two provided becuase of thw books and you can tell it suffered. same with the ending of the lost world with the T-rex. it lost most of its flare wen they strayed from the books. the books were alot better than the movies could ever be.
Log in to comment