This topic is locked from further discussion.
There's no way our country would tolerate another war with any nation at this time. There would be a revolt if we went to war with Iran.
It's much more likely that Russia will return to its pre cold war stance now that they are debt free and led by a KGB official and invade western europe than it would be that the US would invade Iran.
there will most likely be a draft to fill our needs in the miltarynobodyshero87That'll work on one condition: We actually know why we're fighting. The real truth. This isn't the 60s anymore, the world's common sense has rose quite a bit since we realized what our governments and cohorts have been doing to us. It's probable to happen, but not if the good guys step up to the plate. I think fear is a part of their hesitation, really.
Haha...that's interesting about the draft. My psychology professor told me of a friend of his in college, that was also a Psychology major. Apparently, they train these students in hypnosis, and this guy could actually tap on his leg twice with his finger, and use his hypnosis to make his blood pressure spike. So during his medical evaluation before entrance to the draft, he did it, and received a 4F, which is a medical inconsistency, allowing him to be free from the draft. Pretty cool, even though he should have served his country.   LilpetoReally....what this professor's name, if you don't mind?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6376639.stm that report there proves you wrong, if America would never go to war then why do they have battle plans?There's no way our country would tolerate another war with any nation at this time. There would be a revolt if we went to war with Iran.
It's much more likely that Russia will return to its pre cold war stance now that they are debt free and led by a KGB official and invade western europe than it would be that the US would invade Iran.
sonicare
They wont struggle when they throw in the draft. Hopefully after the election, all these problems will fade away. If not, I am getting the hell out of here.daniel52587The democraps won't fix anything, just make it worse: same thing goes for the republican'ts if another one gets elected.
[QUOTE="sonicare"]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6376639.stm that report there proves you wrong, if America would never go to war then why do they have battle plans? In case they are needed? It always pays to be prepared.There's no way our country would tolerate another war with any nation at this time. There would be a revolt if we went to war with Iran.
It's much more likely that Russia will return to its pre cold war stance now that they are debt free and led by a KGB official and invade western europe than it would be that the US would invade Iran.
Galantina
[QUOTE="Galantina"][QUOTE="sonicare"]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6376639.stm that report there proves you wrong, if America would never go to war then why do they have battle plans? In case they are needed? It always pays to be prepared.There's no way our country would tolerate another war with any nation at this time. There would be a revolt if we went to war with Iran.
It's much more likely that Russia will return to its pre cold war stance now that they are debt free and led by a KGB official and invade western europe than it would be that the US would invade Iran.
andyxm
Haha...that's interesting about the draft. My psychology professor told me of a friend of his in college, that was also a Psychology major. Apparently, they train these students in hypnosis, and this guy could actually tap on his leg twice with his finger, and use his hypnosis to make his blood pressure spike. So during his medical evaluation before entrance to the draft, he did it, and received a 4F, which is a medical inconsistency, allowing him to be free from the draft. Pretty cool, even though he should have served his country.   LilpetoWhy? Who does people act like their country owns them? I say, if you don't want to serve, don't. Me, personally, would never go to war for no country.
[QUOTE="andyxm"][QUOTE="Galantina"][QUOTE="sonicare"]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6376639.stm that report there proves you wrong, if America would never go to war then why do they have battle plans? In case they are needed? It always pays to be prepared.There's no way our country would tolerate another war with any nation at this time. There would be a revolt if we went to war with Iran.
It's much more likely that Russia will return to its pre cold war stance now that they are debt free and led by a KGB official and invade western europe than it would be that the US would invade Iran.
Snake-Drinker
[QUOTE="andyxm"][QUOTE="Galantina"][QUOTE="sonicare"]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6376639.stm that report there proves you wrong, if America would never go to war then why do they have battle plans? In case they are needed? It always pays to be prepared.There's no way our country would tolerate another war with any nation at this time. There would be a revolt if we went to war with Iran.
It's much more likely that Russia will return to its pre cold war stance now that they are debt free and led by a KGB official and invade western europe than it would be that the US would invade Iran.
Snake-Drinker
Meh, the main problem is Iran's president (can't remember his name) who has been taking such an antagonistic stance with his foreign policy. However, his popular support at home is beginning to wane since Iranians are upset by his focus on defying the world, rather than fulfilling his promises of domestic reform. If he's voted out of office, which is pretty likely, than the tension will definitely go down.acegunslingerIn a incident of war USA will kick Iran's as* even though it'll be a bit hard for them cuz Iran have lots of soldiers to fight with but then if there'll be a war Iran will bomb us (Israel) too and then we'll have to enter the "battle zone" and that mean this war will be probably the worse war we ever had in the middle east...
[QUOTE="Snake-Drinker"][QUOTE="andyxm"][QUOTE="Galantina"][QUOTE="sonicare"]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6376639.stm that report there proves you wrong, if America would never go to war then why do they have battle plans? In case they are needed? It always pays to be prepared.There's no way our country would tolerate another war with any nation at this time. There would be a revolt if we went to war with Iran.
It's much more likely that Russia will return to its pre cold war stance now that they are debt free and led by a KGB official and invade western europe than it would be that the US would invade Iran.
Galantina
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aN47FIS3L2Pk&refer=europe
With Iran defying the UN and America revealing there plans about what they would do if war broke out then I think its fairly safe to say that war is inevitable.
How are America going to fight two wars at a time? there struggling as it is with Iraq nevermind throwing Iran into it all.
Galantina
A couple of things...
First off a military draft is extremely unlikely. If I'm not mistaken the President can request one to be enstated, however, it's completely up to congress. As congress sits right now....no draft.
Secord, Iran is a fully organized, well trained and modern standing army. Regardless of any nuclear abilities they MIGHT have, their army alone is far more potent than any military we have faced in a LONG time. Its not strategically logical to attack as majority unified modern militarized county like Iran.
[QUOTE="Galantina"]http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aN47FIS3L2Pk&refer=europe
With Iran defying the UN and America revealing there plans about what they would do if war broke out then I think its fairly safe to say that war is inevitable.
How are America going to fight two wars at a time? there struggling as it is with Iraq nevermind throwing Iran into it all.
snackdaddy
A couple of things...
First of a military draft is extremely unlikely. If I'm not mistaken the President can request one to be enstated, however, it's completely up to congress. As congress sits right now....no draft.
Secord, Iran is a fully organized, well trained and modern standing army. Regardless of any nuclear abilities they MIGHT have, their army alone is far more potent than any military we have faced in a LONG time. Its not strategically logical to attack as majority unified modern militarized county like Iran.
Its much safer to strike countries that can't fight back, like Iraq.[QUOTE="daniel52587"]They wont struggle when they throw in the draft. Hopefully after the election, all these problems will fade away. If not, I am getting the hell out of here.sped_edThe democraps won't fix anything, just make it worse: same thing goes for the republican'ts if another one gets elected. I trust democrats over republicans. Regardless, if things dont get better. I am getting the hell out.
[QUOTE="Galantina"][QUOTE="Snake-Drinker"][QUOTE="andyxm"][QUOTE="Galantina"][QUOTE="sonicare"]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6376639.stm that report there proves you wrong, if America would never go to war then why do they have battle plans? In case they are needed? It always pays to be prepared.There's no way our country would tolerate another war with any nation at this time. There would be a revolt if we went to war with Iran.
It's much more likely that Russia will return to its pre cold war stance now that they are debt free and led by a KGB official and invade western europe than it would be that the US would invade Iran.
Snake-Drinker
[QUOTE="sped_ed"][QUOTE="daniel52587"]They wont struggle when they throw in the draft. Hopefully after the election, all these problems will fade away. If not, I am getting the hell out of here.daniel52587The democraps won't fix anything, just make it worse: same thing goes for the republican'ts if another one gets elected. I trust democrats over republicans. Regardless, if things dont get better. I am getting the hell out. I don't trust either party,at all, they're both flucked.
[QUOTE="snackdaddy"][QUOTE="Galantina"]http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aN47FIS3L2Pk&refer=europe
With Iran defying the UN and America revealing there plans about what they would do if war broke out then I think its fairly safe to say that war is inevitable.
How are America going to fight two wars at a time? there struggling as it is with Iraq nevermind throwing Iran into it all.
Snake-Drinker
A couple of things...
First of a military draft is extremely unlikely. If I'm not mistaken the President can request one to be enstated, however, it's completely up to congress. As congress sits right now....no draft.
Secord, Iran is a fully organized, well trained and modern standing army. Regardless of any nuclear abilities they MIGHT have, their army alone is far more potent than any military we have faced in a LONG time. Its not strategically logical to attack as majority unified modern militarized county like Iran.
Its much safer to strike countries that can't fight back, like Iraq. you say they cant fight back, but they are getting stronger as time goes on, 6 british helicopters have been shot down in the past month by rocket propelled grenades, we didnt have this problem at the beginnig of the war.[QUOTE="Snake-Drinker"][QUOTE="snackdaddy"][QUOTE="Galantina"]http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aN47FIS3L2Pk&refer=europe
With Iran defying the UN and America revealing there plans about what they would do if war broke out then I think its fairly safe to say that war is inevitable.
How are America going to fight two wars at a time? there struggling as it is with Iraq nevermind throwing Iran into it all.
Galantina
A couple of things...
First of a military draft is extremely unlikely. If I'm not mistaken the President can request one to be enstated, however, it's completely up to congress. As congress sits right now....no draft.
Secord, Iran is a fully organized, well trained and modern standing army. Regardless of any nuclear abilities they MIGHT have, their army alone is far more potent than any military we have faced in a LONG time. Its not strategically logical to attack as majority unified modern militarized county like Iran.
Its much safer to strike countries that can't fight back, like Iraq. you say they cant fight back, but they are getting stronger as time goes on, 6 british helicopters have been shot down in the past month by rocket propelled grenades, we didnt have this problem at the beginnig of the war. These are insurgents, not the Iraqi army. They were fairly crap when we invaded. Its just that the morons who planned the conflict didn't plan for the aftermath. I think the war was wrong, but if there must be war, can they not think it out properly first?[QUOTE="Snake-Drinker"][QUOTE="snackdaddy"][QUOTE="Galantina"]http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aN47FIS3L2Pk&refer=europe
With Iran defying the UN and America revealing there plans about what they would do if war broke out then I think its fairly safe to say that war is inevitable.
How are America going to fight two wars at a time? there struggling as it is with Iraq nevermind throwing Iran into it all.
Galantina
A couple of things...
First of a military draft is extremely unlikely. If I'm not mistaken the President can request one to be enstated, however, it's completely up to congress. As congress sits right now....no draft.
Secord, Iran is a fully organized, well trained and modern standing army. Regardless of any nuclear abilities they MIGHT have, their army alone is far more potent than any military we have faced in a LONG time. Its not strategically logical to attack as majority unified modern militarized county like Iran.
Its much safer to strike countries that can't fight back, like Iraq. you say they cant fight back, but they are getting stronger as time goes on, 6 british helicopters have been shot down in the past month by rocket propelled grenades, we didnt have this problem at the beginnig of the war.Despite an increase in attacks on our forces it is still absolutely NOTHING compared to what Iran would show us. Iraq is split into far too many militia groups, religious zealots groups, etc... to actually physically FORCE troops to withdraw. As terrible as it is to loss our guys over there it's not a war in the sense that Iran would be a war.
[QUOTE="nobodyshero87"]there will most likely be a draft to fill our needs in the miltaryBranKetraThat'll work on one condition: We actually know why we're fighting. The real truth. This isn't the 60s anymore, the world's common sense has rose quite a bit since we realized what our governments and cohorts have been doing to us. It's probable to happen, but not if the good guys step up to the plate. I think fear is a part of their hesitation, really. thats true but our government will never tell us the real truth they will most likely only tell us what we want to hear.
2009- Iran drops atomic bomb.
Iran to US- "Haha we destroyed one of your cities beotch"
2009- US deploys 1500 nuclear missiles
US to nonexistent Iran- "Haha we destroyed your whole fuc*ing country beotch"
[QUOTE="sped_ed"][QUOTE="daniel52587"]They wont struggle when they throw in the draft. Hopefully after the election, all these problems will fade away. If not, I am getting the hell out of here.daniel52587The democraps won't fix anything, just make it worse: same thing goes for the republican'ts if another one gets elected. I trust democrats over republicans. Regardless, if things dont get better. I am getting the hell out.
politicians are all the same,not matter what party they are in.
[QUOTE="Galantina"][QUOTE="Snake-Drinker"][QUOTE="snackdaddy"][QUOTE="Galantina"]http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aN47FIS3L2Pk&refer=europe
With Iran defying the UN and America revealing there plans about what they would do if war broke out then I think its fairly safe to say that war is inevitable.
How are America going to fight two wars at a time? there struggling as it is with Iraq nevermind throwing Iran into it all.
snackdaddy
A couple of things...
First of a military draft is extremely unlikely. If I'm not mistaken the President can request one to be enstated, however, it's completely up to congress. As congress sits right now....no draft.
Secord, Iran is a fully organized, well trained and modern standing army. Regardless of any nuclear abilities they MIGHT have, their army alone is far more potent than any military we have faced in a LONG time. Its not strategically logical to attack as majority unified modern militarized county like Iran.
Its much safer to strike countries that can't fight back, like Iraq. you say they cant fight back, but they are getting stronger as time goes on, 6 british helicopters have been shot down in the past month by rocket propelled grenades, we didnt have this problem at the beginnig of the war.Despite an increase in attacks on our forces it is still absolutely NOTHING compared to what Iran would show us. Iraq is split into far too many militia groups, religious zealots groups, etc... to actually physically FORCE troops to withdraw. As terrible as it is to loss our guys over there it's not a war in the sense that Iran would be a war.
actually iraq's army was no slouch either at the start of the war either... but a direct invasion would only occur after prolonged airstrikes[QUOTE="nobodyshero87"]there will most likely be a draft to fill our needs in the miltaryROLFCHANKin case you didnt hear, the democrats took back the legislative branch last fall. there will be no draft anytime soon. i doubt there would be one no matter who was in control. Wrong. It's the Democrats that started up the draft talks in the first place.
[QUOTE="snackdaddy"][QUOTE="Galantina"][QUOTE="Snake-Drinker"][QUOTE="snackdaddy"][QUOTE="Galantina"]http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aN47FIS3L2Pk&refer=europe
With Iran defying the UN and America revealing there plans about what they would do if war broke out then I think its fairly safe to say that war is inevitable.
How are America going to fight two wars at a time? there struggling as it is with Iraq nevermind throwing Iran into it all.
comp_atkins
A couple of things...
First of a military draft is extremely unlikely. If I'm not mistaken the President can request one to be enstated, however, it's completely up to congress. As congress sits right now....no draft.
Secord, Iran is a fully organized, well trained and modern standing army. Regardless of any nuclear abilities they MIGHT have, their army alone is far more potent than any military we have faced in a LONG time. Its not strategically logical to attack as majority unified modern militarized county like Iran.
Its much safer to strike countries that can't fight back, like Iraq. you say they cant fight back, but they are getting stronger as time goes on, 6 british helicopters have been shot down in the past month by rocket propelled grenades, we didnt have this problem at the beginnig of the war.Despite an increase in attacks on our forces it is still absolutely NOTHING compared to what Iran would show us. Iraq is split into far too many militia groups, religious zealots groups, etc... to actually physically FORCE troops to withdraw. As terrible as it is to loss our guys over there it's not a war in the sense that Iran would be a war.
actually iraq's army was no slouch either at the start of the war either... but a direct invasion would only occur after prolonged airstrikesAirstrikes are not an option since Iran has air defense all over their country...they also have a huge amount of fighter jets.......the US would most likley loose to Iran
I enjoy reading how everyone thinks the US wants to attack Iran, when in reality, it's over 50 countries including those in the UN, among other security councils, who are suggesting sanctions. Imposing sanctions on a country does in no way shape or form mean war is iminant.Indeed, and these so called battle plans are probably by no means a full fledged invasion (i haven't read anything about them so i could be wrong) and there is a huge difference between strategic air strikes and an invasion. I actually think that Israel might get trigger happy and nuke Iran if things continue they way they are now.
LukeAF24
lmao!!!! i think it would take far less then 1500 nukes to wipe out Iran, but yes i see your point. but what if Iran have more than 1?2009- Iran drops atomic bomb.
Iran to US- "Haha we destroyed one of your cities beotch"
2009- US deploys 1500 nuclear missiles
US to nonexistent Iran- "Haha we destroyed your whole fuc*ing country beotch"
logansdabest
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment