data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e325/8e3255ee92c9d45013d7bb9591d01be896c73df1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609b7/609b75daf6e6b5b3ab4a22582e02c2875d9c8717" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21bec/21becc7bc0d11099f506b46b7f854016002239e9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dedf3/dedf358d6e43ed59f6362fa9f95a783e01c0be1a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/060a8/060a8378222da46adb557f020a56464afcfdfb67" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7239b/7239b5f5e50862ad735c2998ee1e18a88da51521" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ff36/8ff364ae539fc0d39797d64847c8214db6f1c243" alt=""
This topic is locked from further discussion.
This one was particularly bad. I mean, just everything about it is horrible.
Honestly, examine this from an artistic standpoint. The sketch lines over his muscles make them seem disproportionate. The gloves? Stupid, but not nearly as stupid as that hat over the do rag. Then, there's his G-Unit branded underwear that's showing, and what's the deal with calling the Massacre without showing a single drop of blood, or anything violent at all? There's no shade of red, and the background has these pretty little designs over it. The fact that not a single attribute of this album cover reflects the album's theme in conjuction with the highlights of 50's muscles only proves that this album cover serves as nothing but stocking Curtis Jackon's own ego. Just a really dumb, stupid album cover.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment