Agreed. I don't know why people try to be misleading with stuff like this.rragnaar
Not misleading at all, if you read the article...the measure was spearheaded by a liberal group of young voters.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Agreed. I don't know why people try to be misleading with stuff like this.rragnaar
Not misleading at all, if you read the article...the measure was spearheaded by a liberal group of young voters.
[QUOTE="salutations2YOU"][QUOTE="IcyToasters"]For the Presidential election I can understand, but why not vote on local matters that affect them directly? Why would the presidential election be any different? I mean, they pay taxes, right?????It just seems a little more significant to the country as a whole. Not that I believe in elections in any case but that's another thread.Am I misunderstanding something... Or is that really just the most rediculous thing to even consider? You should be a citizen to vote >_____>
BMD004
[QUOTE="topsemag55"][QUOTE="BMD004"] People who visit this country pay sales tax... and they aren't citizens or residents. LJS9502_basic
Bingo...good answer.:)
Oh wow. I paid Canadian sales tax....they owe me some votes. Really, LJ? I expected better from you. Sales tax while visiting is completely different from income tax while legally residing somewhere on a much more permanent basis, and you know it. The person in question would be a full legal resident of wherever they live and it's absurd that they would not have a say in how the place is governed on a local scale.If we allow non-citizens to vote - even for just local politics, then what else will this open the door to? ... I dont agree with it. If you want to vote - no matter on how large the scale is... you should become a legalized citizen. Just because you are here illegally for 13 years - doesnt mean you get a right to do as a legal citizen would cause you havent been caught or kicked out yet. Sorry if that sounds harsh... but Illegal citizen is illegal. xhellcatx
This article is about legal residents, not illegal ones.
If we allow non-citizens to vote - even for just local politics, then what else will this open the door to? ... I dont agree with it. If you want to vote - no matter on how large the scale is... you should become a legalized citizen. Just because you are here illegally for 13 years - doesnt mean you get a right to do as a legal citizen would cause you havent been caught or kicked out yet. Sorry if that sounds harsh... but Illegal citizen is illegal. xhellcatxThey're not illegal.
If we allow non-citizens to vote - even for just local politics, then what else will this open the door to? ... I dont agree with it. If you want to vote - no matter on how large the scale is... you should become a legalized citizen. Just because you are here illegally for 13 years - doesnt mean you get a right to do as a legal citizen would cause you havent been caught or kicked out yet. Sorry if that sounds harsh... but Illegal citizen is illegal. xhellcatx
You do know there are NON citizens in the country that are not here illegally right? Furthermore this is a slippery slope fallacy, no politician on either side would support for non citizens to possibly decide elections on the state or national level.
If they are an American, then yes. If you're not an American citizen, then you have no say in American affairs.[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="worlock77"]
Do you believe that the people should have a say in how their local governance is ran and decided?
worlock77
So you feel that the people of local municipalities have no right to decide how their local governance is decided?
You keep saying THEIR. THEIR local government. It isn't THEIR government. Why isn't it THEIR government? Because they aren't a legal citizen! It isn't THEIR'S.[QUOTE="Superbored"][QUOTE="goth_bacon"]Absolutely not. That's a terrible idea in every way.Wiffle_Snuff
They're forced to pay taxes, yet they no voice in the government?
No taxation without represenation? Didn't you crazy yanks fight a war with an awesome nation over something similar? Did the settling families of America take citizenship tests when they arrived? No? Too busy killing Indians and taking their land I guess. Someone touched a nerve... and you are calling Britain awesome, and calling us yanks? The settling families came here to escape a Tyrant and have more freedoms. Then they were taxed and they simply asked for Representations and they were told they are 'Virtual Representation' (I think thats the word). Also, is the "Too busy killing Indians and taking their land I guess." thing even necessary? You seem to assume that EVERY one in the Pre-American Nation was out to kill all the Indians and take all their land, some did. Not all took part, actually alot left them alone and wanted to let them be. Don't be sore about the Revolutionary War, it was a long time ago.They're not illegal. I'm livid.of course they do. think about how many more votes they'll get if illegals can vote.
HUGE_Flavor
of course they do. think about how many more votes they'll get if illegals can vote.
HUGE_Flavor
:| Reading comprehension.. This topic is about legal non citizens here on visa or green card.. Not illegals.
of course they do. think about how many more votes they'll get if illegals can vote.
HUGE_Flavor
Hits the nail on the head.:)
Agreed. I don't know why people try to be misleading with stuff like this.[QUOTE="rragnaar"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]
What a completely unbias and objective title to the topic. :roll:
TheShadowLord07
uhh im confuse how is the title is miseading.
Well for one, the title implies that ALL liberals want to give non-citizens voting rights, which isn't true, and it omits the fact that this is about local elections only. Basically, judging from the thread title alone, you'd think there was a vast liberal cabal at work trying to get a bunch of foreigners to rig the upcoming elections.[QUOTE="worlock77"][QUOTE="BMD004"] If they are an American, then yes. If you're not an American citizen, then you have no say in American affairs.BMD004
So you feel that the people of local municipalities have no right to decide how their local governance is decided?
You keep saying THEIR. THEIR local government. It isn't THEIR government. Why isn't it THEIR government? Because they aren't a legal citizen! It isn't THEIR'S.When I say their I'm talking about the people of Portlane, Maine. Should the people of a particular city not have to right to decide who gets to vote in their local elections?
[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="salutations2YOU"]For the Presidential election I can understand, but why not vote on local matters that affect them directly?salutations2YOUWhy would the presidential election be any different? I mean, they pay taxes, right?????It just seems a little more significant to the country as a whole. Not that I believe in elections in any case but that's another thread. You don't even "believe" in elections? Then you proabably aren't the most unbiased person to be debating on this topic. Next.
[QUOTE="HUGE_Flavor"]
of course they do. think about how many more votes they'll get if illegals can vote.
topsemag55
Hits the nail on the head.:)
Did you read your own thread? Your article isn't about illegals. They are here legally. So no it hits nothing on its head.[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"][QUOTE="rragnaar"] Agreed. I don't know why people try to be misleading with stuff like this.rragnaar
uhh im confuse how is the title is miseading.
Well for one, the title implies that ALL liberals want to give non-citizens voting rights, which isn't true, and it omits the fact that this is about local elections only. Basically, judging from the thread title alone, you'd think there was a vast liberal cabal at work trying to get a bunch of foreigners to rig the upcoming elections.if tc is not going to edit the title. couldn't you do it? you know so people want be mislead?
[QUOTE="Wiffle_Snuff"][QUOTE="Superbored"]No taxation without represenation? Didn't you crazy yanks fight a war with an awesome nation over something similar? Did the settling families of America take citizenship tests when they arrived? No? Too busy killing Indians and taking their land I guess. Someone touched a nerve... and you are calling Britain awesome, and calling us yanks? The settling families came here to escape a Tyrant and have more freedoms. Then they were taxed and they simply asked for Representations and they were told they are 'Virtual Representation' (I think thats the word). Also, is the "Too busy killing Indians and taking their land I guess." thing even necessary? You seem to assume that EVERY one in the Pre-American Nation was out to kill all the Indians and take all their land, some did. Not all took part, actually alot left them alone and wanted to let them be. Don't be sore about the Revolutionary War, it was a long time ago.They're forced to pay taxes, yet they no voice in the government?
Ryan_Kitchen
Actually most came here because there was plenty of land up for grabs. It had nothing to do with "escaping a tyrant".
[QUOTE="HUGE_Flavor"]
of course they do. think about how many more votes they'll get if illegals can vote.
topsemag55
Hits the nail on the head.:)
Its pretty sad that the topic creator didn't even read the article.. Or he would note these are non citizens over here legally, not illegally.. Furthermore its based on the extremely local level.. State and national parties, democrat nor republican really could care less about this because they wouldn't have the right to vote..
no[QUOTE="salutations2YOU"][QUOTE="alfredooo"]
next step we are letting the russians and the chinese vote in our elections and end up as a communist nation, just like Obama wants.
alfredooo
no? :|
you know its coming
No it isn't and this has nothing to do with Obama, but don't let a small thing like fact keep you from making cheap non-points.
no[QUOTE="salutations2YOU"][QUOTE="alfredooo"]
next step we are letting the russians and the chinese vote in our elections and end up as a communist nation, just like Obama wants.
alfredooo
no? :|
you know its coming
No it's not. There's nothing communistic about Obama's ideology.no[QUOTE="salutations2YOU"][QUOTE="alfredooo"]
next step we are letting the russians and the chinese vote in our elections and end up as a communist nation, just like Obama wants.
alfredooo
no? :|
you know its coming
:| Wow REALLY? Firstly Russian's are not communists any more nor are their population pro communist.. Furthermore the Chinese government is popular.. AND FINALLY Obama nor the democrat party are not socialists or communists.. I mean to see this kind of rhetoric 2 years in is just ridiculous.
When I say their I'm talking about the people of Portlane, Maine. Should the people of a particular city not have to right to decide who gets to vote in their local elections?worlock77If they aren't citizens, then they shouldn't have a say! You're acting like I'm the one who is out of his mind for not wanting people who aren't even citizens of this country to be able to vote and have a say in the laws of this country.
What a completely unbias and objective title to the topic. :roll:
sSubZerOo
haha my thoughts as well.
I live in a college town full of liberals and I do not know a single one that wants illegals to have voting rights
[QUOTE="IcyToasters"]For the Presidential election I can understand, but why not vote on local matters that affect them directly?Am I misunderstanding something... Or is that really just the most rediculous thing to even consider? You should be a citizen to vote >_____>
salutations2YOU
I'm not sure if you're serious or if you're stuck in the early 90s still. And erm, it's legal immigrants who are to be given the right to vote in these local elections, yet don't have citizenship? I don't comprehend why they're not citizens in the first place unless they're on a visa (though the example given in the article sounds like he's there for the long run). I don't really care regardless, let the municipality proposition what it likes.next step we are letting the russians and the chinese vote in our elections and end up as a communist nation, just like Obama wants.
alfredooo
Well for one, the title implies that ALL liberals want to give non-citizens voting rights, which isn't true, and it omits the fact that this is about local elections only. Basically, judging from the thread title alone, you'd think there was a vast liberal cabal at work trying to get a bunch of foreigners to rig the upcoming elections.rragnaar
Fine, I can change it to liberals in Maine.:P
[QUOTE="rragnaar"] Well for one, the title implies that ALL liberals want to give non-citizens voting rights, which isn't true, and it omits the fact that this is about local elections only. Basically, judging from the thread title alone, you'd think there was a vast liberal cabal at work trying to get a bunch of foreigners to rig the upcoming elections.topsemag55
Fine, I can change it to liberals in Maine.:P
I already changed it.I already changed it.rragnaar
:lol:
I noticed that afterward.
It still isn't misleading, as the measure was spearheaded by a liberal group of young voters.
[QUOTE="worlock77"]When I say their I'm talking about the people of Portlane, Maine. Should the people of a particular city not have to right to decide who gets to vote in their local elections?BMD004If they aren't citizens, then they shouldn't have a say! You're acting like I'm the one who is out of his mind for not wanting people who aren't even citizens of this country to be able to vote and have a say in the laws of this country.
Why should the people of the city not have to right to decide who gets to vote in city elections?
[QUOTE="worlock77"]When I say their I'm talking about the people of Portlane, Maine. Should the people of a particular city not have to right to decide who gets to vote in their local elections?BMD004If they aren't citizens, then they shouldn't have a say! You're acting like I'm the one who is out of his mind for not wanting people who aren't even citizens of this country to be able to vote and have a say in the laws of this country. It's more the municipal laws and various local elections that occur regularly in a community, rather than the grand scale of the entire nation, which this is not referring to.
Someone touched a nerve... and you are calling Britain awesome, and calling us yanks? The settling families came here to escape a Tyrant and have more freedoms. Then they were taxed and they simply asked for Representations and they were told they are 'Virtual Representation' (I think thats the word). Also, is the "Too busy killing Indians and taking their land I guess." thing even necessary? You seem to assume that EVERY one in the Pre-American Nation was out to kill all the Indians and take all their land, some did. Not all took part, actually alot left them alone and wanted to let them be. Don't be sore about the Revolutionary War, it was a long time ago.[QUOTE="Ryan_Kitchen"][QUOTE="Wiffle_Snuff"] No taxation without represenation? Didn't you crazy yanks fight a war with an awesome nation over something similar? Did the settling families of America take citizenship tests when they arrived? No? Too busy killing Indians and taking their land I guess.worlock77
Actually most came here because there was plenty of land up for grabs. It had nothing to do with "escaping a tyrant".
The people of England (Catholics) fled to 2 other countries because the King of England left the Catholic Church because he could not divorce his wife, he made The Church of England (Or something to that affect, it was basically the same as the Catholic Church) and as those people fled and were booted from other countries they came to America. Also some came to America under the Mercantilism System (The Colony exists solely for the benefit of the Mother Country). Many Pilgrims, Puritans, and others came to America for a more free choice of their religion (to worship w/o persecution). They described the King of England as a Tyrant, and as the generations of those Families went on they considered themselves more of Americans than that of British Subjects. Although there was the 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 rule, (1/3 for independence, 1/3 loyal to the king, 1/3 who don't care), the large majority of the whole soon to be nation, agreed that they had no proper representation within Parliament. Again, they called this next king a Tyrant also. They didn't come here for the land. They came either to escape and worship w/o persecution, or they came here as part of the Mercantilism System, to make money, then go home.What I don't understand is that people here are saying, "well, I think it's fine if they vote in local elections, but not in presidential elections". And why do you make that distinction between local and national elections? You're acting like there are only legal residents in Portland, Maine. Guess what, there are legal residents all over the country. If all voting districts did this, then there would be non-citizens voting all over the country.
I just don't understand why you make that distinction. Either you are for non-citizens voting, or you are against it.
[QUOTE="alfredooo"]
[QUOTE="salutations2YOU"]noworlock77
no? :|
you know its coming
No it isn't and this has nothing to do with Obama, but don't let a small thing like fact keep you from making cheap non-points.
this has everything to do with Obama. He isn't an American citizen (he was born in Kenya) and all the libs want to pass this law so he can vote for himself in the next election.
[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="worlock77"]When I say their I'm talking about the people of Portlane, Maine. Should the people of a particular city not have to right to decide who gets to vote in their local elections?bluezyIf they aren't citizens, then they shouldn't have a say! You're acting like I'm the one who is out of his mind for not wanting people who aren't even citizens of this country to be able to vote and have a say in the laws of this country. It's more the municipal laws and various local elections that occur regularly in a community, rather than the grand scale of the entire nation, which this is not referring to. I understand that. I don't care if it is small-scale or not. It makes no difference to me the size of the election. Citizens = vote. Non-Citizens of this country = No vote in this country. Too bad, so sad. You want to vote in the United States of America? Become an American. If you are not an American, then you cannot vote in the American elections. End of story.
[QUOTE="worlock77"][QUOTE="Ryan_Kitchen"] Someone touched a nerve... and you are calling Britain awesome, and calling us yanks? The settling families came here to escape a Tyrant and have more freedoms. Then they were taxed and they simply asked for Representations and they were told they are 'Virtual Representation' (I think thats the word). Also, is the "Too busy killing Indians and taking their land I guess." thing even necessary? You seem to assume that EVERY one in the Pre-American Nation was out to kill all the Indians and take all their land, some did. Not all took part, actually alot left them alone and wanted to let them be. Don't be sore about the Revolutionary War, it was a long time ago.Ryan_Kitchen
Actually most came here because there was plenty of land up for grabs. It had nothing to do with "escaping a tyrant".
The people of England (Catholics) fled to 2 other countries because the King of England left the Catholic Church because he could not divorce his wife, he made The Church of England (Or something to that affect, it was basically the same as the Catholic Church) and as those people fled and were booted from other countries they came to America. Also some came to America under the Mercantilism System (The Colony exists solely for the benefit of the Mother Country). Many Pilgrims, Puritans, and others came to America for a more free choice of their religion (to worship w/o persecution). They described the King of England as a Tyrant, and as the generations of those Families went on they considered themselves more of Americans than that of British Subjects. Although there was the 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 rule, (1/3 for independence, 1/3 loyal to the king, 1/3 who don't care), the large majority of the whole soon to be nation, agreed that they had no proper representation within Parliament. Again, they called this next king a Tyrant also. They didn't come here for the land. They came either to escape and worship w/o persecution, or they came here as part of the Mercantilism System, to make money, then go home.Only a small percentage of settlers crossed the sea to escape religous persecution. As far as "tyrant", moden research has shown that King George really wasn't tyrannical at all. In fact most colonists were happy to be British subjects until they got tired of paying British taxes without having representation in the British parliment.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment