looks vs smarts?

which is most useful?

which would you rather have?

go!

Looks unless you're incredibly smart. That's also assuming you're not good looking but dumb as hell.

I have some smarts, sometimes I wonder what it would be like to have looks.

For friendships. I don't know. I have some friends that aren't smart at all, but they are still interesting. I have some friends that are ugly, but again, still interesting. I don't think either really matters to me.

For a lover relationship, probably looks. I mean, if we share interests and still have interesting conversations, smarts aren't that big of a deal. But I can't see a relationship lasting with someone I wasn't physically attracted too.

Honestly, I'd rather have smarts of the two. I mean, I'd prefer a little of both. But it would be super cool to be extremely smart, even if I was even more ugly than I am now.

Balance man...balance. Balance is better.

A Christian person who has a lot of fun.

Smarts. Because at some point we all get ugly. Age does that to a personmaheo30

Physical attraction is important at the start, but I think smarts help in the long run. I can't see myself dating an airhead.

Smarts. Because at some point we all get ugly. Age does that to a person. You are going to be ugly one day. maheo30

which is most useful?

which would you rather have?

go!

Adversary16

Why not have both? I can't like a typical "dumb blonde" as they call em, but I also can't like an ugly brainiac. There is such thing as good looking smart people though, the type I would personally go for.

[QUOTE="maheo30"]Smarts. Because at some point we all get ugly. Age does that to a personHeirren

Looks.

I don't need a mate telling me that im stupid >.>

I'd take a 70-30 split in favor of smarts. I can't stand conversation with people who are intellectually limited.Zeviander

Smarts are very important to me.

Let's face it being smart is way more useful then looking attractive.

Unless your an extremely attractive woman they can get by on looks alone. :P

which is most useful?

which would you rather have?

go!

Adversary16

I dont consider anyone "intellectually limited".champion837

Balance man...balance. Balance is better.

lo_Pine

Both, i don't think i could have a reltionship with a person who was stupid

[QUOTE="maheo30"]Smarts. Because at some point we all get ugly. Age does that to a person. You are going to be ugly one day. Fightingfan

I go for looks more. Intelligence is nice, but overall, looks have always been more important to me.

Ugly =/= Bad ass In fact the ugliest are the most bad ass.cfstar

There's not really alot of people that are both or the media just makes it seem like thatseahorse123

looks seriously. I couldnt give a fvck at how much smart I am if I could get any pvssy I want... hell, I prefer to fvck hot dumb girls then average smart girls. I hate dating a girl smarter then me. Call me sexist but it is how it is

Smarts. Because at some point we all get ugly. Age does that to a person. You are going to be ugly one day. maheo30

Dont know bout you but I woudl still gladly bang Susan Sarandon or Michelle Pheifer

Ignorance is bliss

Mixture. A guy can look incredibly good looking but if he is really dim I find that a turn off.