@themajormayor said:
@GazaAli said:
@themajormayor said:
@GazaAli said:
@themajormayor said:
@GazaAli said:
I'm not denying them their victory. I'm sure it was a hard-earned one. But doesn't it sound peculiar to you that a state would compete in some sport competition in which it doesn't belong to in the first place? It is peculiar you know. It has nothing to do with Israel being evil and whatnot. The thing does have political connotations.
I think the Asian league would not allow them in due to the hostile relations between them and many of its members. If they were allowed to join then really there wouldn't be a competition anymore. So in that sense it's perhaps similar to why Cardiff City plays in the premier league even though they are not English. And Monaco plays in Ligue 1 even though they are not in France. What really is mind boggling is that Cyprus, an Asian Middle Eastern country, can join the EU.
It is a no brainer that Israel would choose to compete in European sports' leagues because of the antagonism that is between Israel and many members that compete in Asian sports' leagues. And regarding the other two examples you mentioned, they're really special cases that do not involve states with sovereignty, geopolitical matters and foreign relations/image.
Not only Cyprus which is possibly a Middle Eastern state ( a very small and irelevant one too) managed to join the EU, but it also almost managed to bring it down to its knees lol. The enlargement of the EU in the 90s was so sloppy and poorly thought-out it seems.
With Cardiff and Monaco I was referring to the fact that if they were playing in their own league then there wouldn't be any competition. They would win every match they ever play basically. So it makes more sense for them to join the French league, which they are close to geographically and culturally, for example and play against teams of similar quality. I am not saying it should always be like that but in some cases it makes more sense. Similarly it makes more sense for a team which is one of European history's top teams and almost on NBA level to play in Europe against teams of similar quality like Real Madrid, Barcelona, Olympiakos etc. In Asia, half of the matches they would win on walk over and the other ones they would humiliate them completely I would assume.
Assuming that Maccabi Tel-Aviv is that good of a basketball team and assuming that Asia mostly sucks in basketball, I wouldn't say that the main reason why Maccabi Tel-Aviv is being allowed to compete in a European league is because its a strong team that needs the proper league to compete in owing to the fact that Israel is absolutely geographically irrelevant to Europe and that it has neither a cultural nor a historical connection with any European country. But the stuff you mentioned about both Cardiff and Monaco is interesting, I admit I did not know of it.
It would be complete anarchy and a breakdown of the world's sports system if clubs started to choose in which league they should be allowed to compete because of their level of skill.
I must admit that I just assumed that Asia sucks in basketball. But Maccabi Tel Aviv is really one of the best European teams historically. Maybe even the best. I don't think it's the major reason either but it could be a contributing factor. Seriously if they would join the Asia league they might just abolish the competition since we know who will win every year (I assume). Even in football they were dominating Asia at the time that they played there and Israel is not as good in football as they are in basketball.
I don't understand this. I would expect you to say that Israel is some kind of European outpost in the Middle East.
Yes I agree to 99%. But in some extreme cases such as Monaco it makes more sense for them to not play in the Monacan "league".
As I said I don't have enough information on the state of Asian basketball, although its statistically impossible for the same team to dominate exclusively over an extended period of time. Also, I'm not sure that Israel would come any close to dominating Asian football.
I don't believe that Israel is a European outpost per say. But again I don't believe that Israel is a Middle Eastern state either. Basically, Israel is a tiny toddler state in the middle of a region whom states share the same language, the same religion, and the same history and mostly the same ethnicity generally speaking. Israel on the other hand contrasts the entire region in all of these attributes. Furthermore, the Israeli society is highly heterogeneous. Some Israelis are of African descent, others are of Arabic descent and some others of European descent. And even within this dichotomy you will find numerous subdivisions. For example Israeli European-descendants have numerous lineages or ancestries : German, French, English, Slavic...etc. So in a nutshell, Israel belongs nowhere. Europe just screwed when it didn't allow them to integrate into European societies. You might think that I hold this view of Israel the state because of the enmity I have towards it, which is something I believe to be wrong. What I'm trying to say is that this is a largely objective view of reality.
Log in to comment