Mayor Bloomberg: Skip college, become a plumber

  • 150 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts
I do not necessarily agree with everything he states or tries to do, but most of this, I do agree with. New York City's billionaire mayor tells students that most of them should avoid a costly degree and instead learn a well-paying trade has the details. [quote="linked article"] Bloomberg may have a point. The 2010 median pay for plumbers, pipefitters and steamfitters was almost $47,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. The median pay for all occupations was slightly more than $33,000. But the top 10% of plumbers, pipefitters and steamfitters earned more than $79,000, the agency said. Even better, the job segment is projected to grow 26% through 2020, with new construction and a wave of retirements among older plumbers spurring employment. Bloomberg, whose net worth is estimated at $27 billion by Forbes, added that plumbing has another benefit in that it isn't suitable for outsourcing. "It's hard to farm that out, . . . and it's hard to automate that," Bloomberg said.

What do you think?
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

don't really trust anything bloomberg says

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

It's good advice. College really isn't suited for a lot of people, an overabundance of people with degrees have seriously driven down the market value of many of them, and a skilled trade can be worth gold.

Avatar image for The__Kraken
The__Kraken

858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 The__Kraken
Member since 2012 • 858 Posts

Some of what he said makes sense.

Frankly, many college students are wasting money by going to college. And it does not help that in America (yes, I am generalizing), we pretty much convince every school child that college is where they NEED to get to, and if they don't get to college, they are a failure.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

It's good advice. College really isn't suited for a lot of people, an overabundance of people with degrees have seriously driven down the market value of many of them, and a skilled trade can be worth gold.

worlock77

yeah, people shouldn't just go to college because they think they have to in order to get a "good" job. Or because their parents want them to

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

I am not sure what to say about this. The report is only as good as 2013. Few years later, it will be another story again if everyone wants to be Mario. The concept is simple and sound, get a well paying skill set. But, it is hard to predict its supply and demand in the future.magicalclick

i don't think it necessarily means everyone should go out and be a plumber

Avatar image for ThaneKrios28
ThaneKrios28

1551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ThaneKrios28
Member since 2013 • 1551 Posts

you guys will get a kick out of this

 

 

Bloomberg Refused Second Slice of Pizza at Local Restaurant . http://dailycurrant.com/2013/05/02/bloomberg-refused-second-slice-of-pizza-at-local-restaurant/

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

I am not sure what to say about this. The report is only as good as 2013. Few years later, it will be another story again if everyone wants to be Mario. The concept is simple and sound, get a well paying skill set. But, it is hard to predict its supply and demand in the future.magicalclick

I doubt there's going to be an oversupply of plumbers. It's hardly a glamorous job, even if it pays well.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

you guys will get a kick out of this

 

 

Bloomberg Refused Second Slice of Pizza at Local Restaurant . http://dailycurrant.com/2013/05/02/bloomberg-refused-second-slice-of-pizza-at-local-restaurant/

ThaneKrios28

Meh. The Daily Currant fails at being on The Onion's level.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#13 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45496 Posts
while people like him shouldn't say such things it's kind of true, many kids go to college on federal loans that they'll likely never pay back, at the expense of taxpayers, so they can get a job they didn't need a college degree for, I think schools should split up vocational and technical training and fast track it, save liberal arts to be taught at tax funded local libraries and community centers
Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
My same response in every thread like this: You get higher education because you are interested in learning. If money is the prime objective, than there are better ways to start making money.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
I don't so much think that becoming a plumber is a better future investment than going to college, I just think it's a huge freaking mistake how we've somehow managed to convince everyone that they're failures if they don't go to college. Some people are better off going to college, some people are better off skipping college and learning a trade. But yeah...I agree that many people would be better off becoming a plumber.
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts
I am not sure what to say about this. The report is only as good as 2013. Few years later, it will be another story again if everyone wants to be Mario. The concept is simple and sound, get a well paying skill set. But, it is hard to predict its supply and demand in the future.magicalclick
There will always be a need for ironworkers, boilermakers, shipbuilders, welders, millwrights and other tradesmen of some sort. Houses will not be able to be built by themselves, nor shopping centers, high-rises both residential and commercial. While not necessarily high tech or highly skilled, building roads is not something that can be automated either. Imagine if everyone stopped learning trades and nothing else was built in the US. We would devolve back to the stone age and be looking for caves to live in and people would have to scrounge or hunt for their own food again as well as slaughter it. There is another trade that is necessary for today's world, a butcher.
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts
I don't so much think that becoming a plumber is a better future investment than going to college, I just think it's a huge freaking mistake how we've somehow managed to convince everyone that they're failures if they don't go to college. Some people are better off going to college, some people are better off skipping college and learning a trade. But yeah...I agree that many people would be better off becoming a plumber. MrGeezer
It's one thing to go to college, it's another to major in something that does not pay dividends for the time spent in school.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
My same response in every thread like this: You get higher education because you are interested in learning. If money is the prime objective, than there are better ways to start making money.dramaybaz
I disagree, at least for most undergraduate studies. Information is more open and easily available than it has ever been, and it's often far easier to simply learn without having to go into debt or pay out the ass for a college education. That isn't necessarily to say that there's anything wrong with going to college just to learn. But it's very often a case of paying to get taught $hit that one could have easily learned on their own if they actually had the interest to do so. If people are going to go to college just to learn, then they certainly shouldn't expect that to land them a job and should know well enough that going into debt is a bad idea because they're probably never going to recover that money through employment. So...I guess maybe I do agree with you, kind of? I guess more appropriate is to say this: some people go to college to learn and some people go to college to get a job. But students would do very well to recognize which category they fall into, and make decisions appropriately.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"] It's one thing to go to college, it's another to major in something that does not pay dividends for the time spent in school.

Whether or not something pays dividends for the time spent in school sort of depends in large part on how many people are doing it. We can identify the majors which pay off and the ones which don't, we can say "don't major in literature, major in electrical engineering." But as soon as everyone starts flocking to the majors which pay off, that just diminishes that major's ability to pay off. At best, we ought to be glad that there are people getting "worthless" majors. If they wised up and decided to go into something which pays off, that'd just diminish the value of those majors.
Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
[QUOTE="dramaybaz"]My same response in every thread like this: You get higher education because you are interested in learning. If money is the prime objective, than there are better ways to start making money.MrGeezer
I disagree, at least for most undergraduate studies. Information is more open and easily available than it has ever been, and it's often far easier to simply learn without having to go into debt or pay out the ass for a college education. That isn't necessarily to say that there's anything wrong with going to college just to learn. But it's very often a case of paying to get taught $hit that one could have easily learned on their own if they actually had the interest to do so. If people are going to go to college just to learn, then they certainly shouldn't expect that to land them a job and should know well enough that going into debt is a bad idea because they're probably never going to recover that money through employment. So...I guess maybe I do agree with you, kind of? I guess more appropriate is to say this: some people go to college to learn and some people go to college to get a job. But students would do very well to recognize which category they fall into, and make decisions appropriately.

By learning, I don't just mean browsing Wikipedia, but having hands on approach, and being able to work in the field of your choice, even if isn't the highest paid.
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"] It's one thing to go to college, it's another to major in something that does not pay dividends for the time spent in school.

Whether or not something pays dividends for the time spent in school sort of depends in large part on how many people are doing it. We can identify the majors which pay off and the ones which don't, we can say "don't major in literature, major in electrical engineering." But as soon as everyone starts flocking to the majors which pay off, that just diminishes that major's ability to pay off. At best, we ought to be glad that there are people getting "worthless" majors. If they wised up and decided to go into something which pays off, that'd just diminish the value of those majors.

The thing is, there are too many people who just do not want to get their hands dirty so to speak. Way too many people are wanting supposedly cushy office jobs for the degrees they are getting. Will people wise up? I seriously do not think so. The baby boomer generation drilled it into the heads of their kids way to well to get them to think otherwise.
Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#23 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

There are many reasons why jobs that are high paying and do not require expensive education to do may be undersupplied.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="dramaybaz"] By learning, I don't just mean browsing Wikipedia, but having hands on approach, and being able to work in the field of your choice, even if isn't the highest paid.

One of the big problems is that people don't get to work in their field of choice, because they get the degree and then the degree is worthless at actually getting them into the field. Sure...while you're in school you sort of get to play at it and utilize the college's equipment and such. But that doesn't last long, once you've graduated (and assuming you aren't continuing your studies there) it's over. You get 4 years of using a chemistry lab or a photo lab or a telescope, then it's back into the real world. If that college experience isn't setting you up to have a similar "hands on approach" elsewhere (in other words, "getting a job"), then surely one has to ask whether or not that brief and limited time of "hands on learning" was actually worth the expense.
Avatar image for Laihendi
Laihendi

5872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Laihendi
Member since 2009 • 5872 Posts
If Bloomberg and the other socialists would stop subsidizing education then there would not be an overabundance of college degrees right now.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts
If Bloomberg and the other socialists would stop subsidizing education then there would not be an overabundance of college degrees right now.Laihendi
You have the worst gimmick ever.
Avatar image for cheese_game619
cheese_game619

13317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 cheese_game619
Member since 2005 • 13317 Posts
lots of people complete trades instead of study in australia and they earn more money in the trade than most people that come out of uni and america is australias late night bitch in terms of economy that we call up drunk late at night to fvck rough for 45 minutes and then kick out to go to sleep
Avatar image for Laihendi
Laihendi

5872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Laihendi
Member since 2009 • 5872 Posts
[QUOTE="Laihendi"]If Bloomberg and the other socialists would stop subsidizing education then there would not be an overabundance of college degrees right now.Nuck81
You have the worst gimmick ever.

You think this is a gimmick? The government gives away free or heavily subsidized education to each of the 300 million people who live in this country, and then you wonder why there are too many people with college degrees. Basic logic indicates that if subsidizing education results in too many people getting college degrees then we should stop subsidizing education.
Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#30 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts

I want to do something that I enjoy, don't really care about the money.

Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="dramaybaz"] By learning, I don't just mean browsing Wikipedia, but having hands on approach, and being able to work in the field of your choice, even if isn't the highest paid.

One of the big problems is that people don't get to work in their field of choice, because they get the degree and then the degree is worthless at actually getting them into the field. Sure...while you're in school you sort of get to play at it and utilize the college's equipment and such. But that doesn't last long, once you've graduated (and assuming you aren't continuing your studies there) it's over. You get 4 years of using a chemistry lab or a photo lab or a telescope, then it's back into the real world. If that college experience isn't setting you up to have a similar "hands on approach" elsewhere (in other words, "getting a job"), then surely one has to ask whether or not that brief and limited time of "hands on learning" was actually worth the expense.

Maybe you are thinking of degrees in film studies etc. I don't see how a scientist/engineer/healthcare etc etc person would be employed without having a qualification. Yes, work experience etc comes in to play, but there is NO way someone is hiring you because you seemed "cool" and "talkative".
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts
[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]If Bloomberg and the other socialists would stop subsidizing education then there would not be an overabundance of college degrees right now.Laihendi
You have the worst gimmick ever.

You think this is a gimmick? The government gives away free or heavily subsidized education to each of the 300 million people who live in this country, and then you wonder why there are too many people with college degrees. Basic logic indicates that if subsidizing education results in too many people getting college degrees then we should stop subsidizing education.

Yes, your entire act is a gimmick. It was a pretty good laughs at the beginning with you playing a caricature of an extreme libertarian. But you've played it to the max for too long and that cow has run dry. Hit reset, start over
Avatar image for AutoPilotOn
AutoPilotOn

8655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 AutoPilotOn
Member since 2010 • 8655 Posts
I don't understand why more people don't get into trades. You can start out at around 20 dollars an hour at least with little to no school debt. Where I am there are tons of college grads that r under on unemployed with massive college debt. Trades r hurting finding people who can pass a drug test. There is a huge boom of shale natural gas drilling with good paying jobs nobody can qualify for. Where I work you start at about 20 an hour plus monthly bonus if an extra 3 to 6 dollars an hour since I been here plus a year end bonus of 23% the last years wages. I have a computer science degree but I don't use it ands its paid for. I got my job based off experience and ability just to pass a piss test lol.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

As a college professor, I would encourage anyone interested in learning or specific careers to go to college. That being said, there are lots of great opportunities in various trades, and often they are well paying. 

One big issue I have with technical schools is that many are offering associates and bachelor's degrees, with instructors who do not have terminal degrees in their field. In my opinion, that is doing students who go in that direction a disservice. Techinal schools should be for trade education, and two-year and four-year schools should be for degrees.

Avatar image for Jd1680a
Jd1680a

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#35 Jd1680a
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts
Its good financial advice. Someone becoming a plumber will go into a trade school and get a job starting around $15 an hour as apprentice and move up to journeyman around $30 an hour. Most people who go into college for four years will come out with $80,000 in debt. While the plumber would have made $80,000 with minimal amount of debt.
Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts
How about say, not making these degrees costly
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

If Bloomberg and the other socialists would stop subsidizing education then there would not be an overabundance of college degrees right now.Laihendi

Like that subsidized education you're getting?

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="dramaybaz"] Maybe you are thinking of degrees in film studies etc. I don't see how a scientist/engineer/healthcare etc etc person would be employed without having a qualification. Yes, work experience etc comes in to play, but there is NO way someone is hiring you because you seemed "cool" and "talkative".

Wow, this post literally has nothing to do with what I just typed.
Avatar image for bnarmz
bnarmz

1372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 bnarmz
Member since 2012 • 1372 Posts

Never liked or trusted him. But in these times a trade may be more flexible due to costly tuition and lack of job opportunities (way too many college grads are out of work). There is only but so many Doctors,Lawyers,Aaccountants the world needs. There are about 8 billion people in the world, there is no way you/we/us are going to find 8 billion jobs.

Find a skill you can provide as a service independently as well as within a company. A trade will grant you skills you can utilize immediately (plumbing, electrician, PC/electronic tech, medical assistant/radiology assistant, security specialists, etc... These jobs, depending where you reside can get you close to and/or bypass a six figure salary. Colleges are leaving many people oweing a crap load of money while struggling seeking out internships that actually turn into permanent work/careers. It depends on the individuals commitments/drive and connections to turn the college experience in to a worth while investment. Times are rough, the economies are dwindling.... so choose wisely.

Avatar image for mmwmwmmwmwmm
mmwmwmmwmwmm

620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 mmwmwmmwmwmm
Member since 2008 • 620 Posts
[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Nuck81"] You have the worst gimmick ever.

You think this is a gimmick? The government gives away free or heavily subsidized education to each of the 300 million people who live in this country, and then you wonder why there are too many people with college degrees. Basic logic indicates that if subsidizing education results in too many people getting college degrees then we should stop subsidizing education.

Yes, your entire act is a gimmick. It was a pretty good laughs at the beginning with you playing a caricature of an extreme libertarian. But you've played it to the max for too long and that cow has run dry. Hit reset, start over

scenario: can't explain how guy is wrong 1. call him a gimmick 2. ? 3. profit
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]If Bloomberg and the other socialists would stop subsidizing education then there would not be an overabundance of college degrees right now.Laihendi
You have the worst gimmick ever.

You think this is a gimmick? The government gives away free or heavily subsidized education to each of the 300 million people who live in this country, and then you wonder why there are too many people with college degrees. Basic logic indicates that if subsidizing education results in too many people getting college degrees then we should stop subsidizing education.

No

now go back to burning your parents' house down

Avatar image for osirisx3
osirisx3

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#42 osirisx3
Member since 2012 • 2113 Posts

you can learn a trade at college so i find that kinda funny. Avoid college and go to a college!

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

I do not necessarily agree with everything he states or tries to do, but most of this, I do agree with. New York City's billionaire mayor tells students that most of them should avoid a costly degree and instead learn a well-paying trade has the details. [quote="linked article"] Bloomberg may have a point. The 2010 median pay for plumbers, pipefitters and steamfitters was almost $47,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. The median pay for all occupations was slightly more than $33,000. But the top 10% of plumbers, pipefitters and steamfitters earned more than $79,000, the agency said. Even better, the job segment is projected to grow 26% through 2020, with new construction and a wave of retirements among older plumbers spurring employment. Bloomberg, whose net worth is estimated at $27 billion by Forbes, added that plumbing has another benefit in that it isn't suitable for outsourcing. "It's hard to farm that out, . . . and it's hard to automate that," Bloomberg said. WhiteKnight77
What do you think?

I don't necessarily agree with the mayor. But, surprise, surprise! Plumbing was one of my sidelines when I was just starting out long ago. There are different types of plumbing ranging from (home) construction, outdoor, maintenance, and gas lines. I quit after many years because it is dirty (often unsanitary) work and labor-intensive. Plus, I'm not the most precise with a backhoe. I have a few busted water mains under my belt. :lol:

Avatar image for Diablo-B
Diablo-B

4063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#44 Diablo-B
Member since 2009 • 4063 Posts
I don't know about becoming a plumber. $47,000 isn't that much money. But I do agree that more people should learn a trade rather then go to college. I would recommend people avoid college unless you are focused on a specific career that both pays well and you need college training for.

Not to mention some people just weren't meant for college. I know a girl, isn't very smart (thats putting it lightly). She is trying to earn a degree and is paying for it by stripping and nude modeling on the side. She hates her job but desperately wants to get a degree. But I know for a fact that she isn't cut out for college, she barely got through high school. She keeps failing her classes and will end up staying in some form of the erotic entertainment industry because its easy money, if you can keep your looks. For someone like her she would be better off pursuing a trade, saving the expense, and quitting the job she hates. But she is trying so hard, I haven't the heart to tell her.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

I don't know about becoming a plumber. $47,000 isn't that much money. But I do agree that more people should learn a trade rather then go to college. I would recommend people avoid college unless you are focused on a specific career that both pays well and you need college training for.

 

Not to mention some people just weren't meant for college. I know a girl, isn't very smart (thats putting it lightly). She is trying to earn a degree and is paying for it by stripping and nude modeling on the side. She hates her job but desperately wants to get a degree. But I know for a fact that she isn't cut out for college, she barely got through high school. She keeps failing her classes and will end up staying in some form of the erotic entertainment industry because its easy money, if you can keep your looks. For someone like her she would be better off pursuing a trade, saving the expense, and quitting the job she hates. But she is trying so hard, I haven't the heart to tell her.Diablo-B

$47000 before taxes is higher than my salary with a PhD and 6 years experience.

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#46 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts

A: go school math, english, science, history spend 2 years pick a major HOPING you end up with something you like for other 2+ years

 

B: figure somethings out you like and tackle it straight on. 

 

Pick your poison!  

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

I think that's elitist talk.

Avatar image for Diablo-B
Diablo-B

4063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#48 Diablo-B
Member since 2009 • 4063 Posts

[QUOTE="Diablo-B"]I don't know about becoming a plumber. $47,000 isn't that much money. But I do agree that more people should learn a trade rather then go to college. I would recommend people avoid college unless you are focused on a specific career that both pays well and you need college training for.

 

....jimkabrhel

$47000 before taxes is higher than my salary with a PhD and 6 years experience.

What degree/field are you working in? $47000 can be good in some states but in NJ, where I live I would barely be living paycheck to pay check, unless I moved into a crime ridden neighborhood. NY where I used to live isn't any different

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Diablo-B"]I don't know about becoming a plumber. $47,000 isn't that much money. But I do agree that more people should learn a trade rather then go to college. I would recommend people avoid college unless you are focused on a specific career that both pays well and you need college training for.

 

Not to mention some people just weren't meant for college. I know a girl, isn't very smart (thats putting it lightly). She is trying to earn a degree and is paying for it by stripping and nude modeling on the side. She hates her job but desperately wants to get a degree. But I know for a fact that she isn't cut out for college, she barely got through high school. She keeps failing her classes and will end up staying in some form of the erotic entertainment industry because its easy money, if you can keep your looks. For someone like her she would be better off pursuing a trade, saving the expense, and quitting the job she hates. But she is trying so hard, I haven't the heart to tell her.jimkabrhel

$47000 before taxes is higher than my salary with a PhD and 6 years experience.

Really? I make quite a bit more than that as a high school teacher
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#50 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="Diablo-B"]I don't know about becoming a plumber. $47,000 isn't that much money. But I do agree that more people should learn a trade rather then go to college. I would recommend people avoid college unless you are focused on a specific career that both pays well and you need college training for.

 

....Diablo-B

$47000 before taxes is higher than my salary with a PhD and 6 years experience.

What degree/field are you working in? $47000 can be good in some states but in NJ, where I live I would barely be living paycheck to pay check, unless I moved into a crime ridden neighborhood. NY where I used to live isn't any different

Chemistry. I'm a professor at a 2-year college in the midwest.