This topic is locked from further discussion.
Some of what he said makes sense.
Frankly, many college students are wasting money by going to college. And it does not help that in America (yes, I am generalizing), we pretty much convince every school child that college is where they NEED to get to, and if they don't get to college, they are a failure.
It's good advice. College really isn't suited for a lot of people, an overabundance of people with degrees have seriously driven down the market value of many of them, and a skilled trade can be worth gold.
worlock77
yeah, people shouldn't just go to college because they think they have to in order to get a "good" job. Or because their parents want them to
I am not sure what to say about this. The report is only as good as 2013. Few years later, it will be another story again if everyone wants to be Mario. The concept is simple and sound, get a well paying skill set. But, it is hard to predict its supply and demand in the future.magicalclick
i don't think it necessarily means everyone should go out and be a plumber
you guys will get a kick out of this
Â
Â
Bloomberg Refused Second Slice of Pizza at Local Restaurant . http://dailycurrant.com/2013/05/02/bloomberg-refused-second-slice-of-pizza-at-local-restaurant/
I am not sure what to say about this. The report is only as good as 2013. Few years later, it will be another story again if everyone wants to be Mario. The concept is simple and sound, get a well paying skill set. But, it is hard to predict its supply and demand in the future.magicalclick
I doubt there's going to be an oversupply of plumbers. It's hardly a glamorous job, even if it pays well.
you guys will get a kick out of this
Â
Â
Bloomberg Refused Second Slice of Pizza at Local Restaurant . http://dailycurrant.com/2013/05/02/bloomberg-refused-second-slice-of-pizza-at-local-restaurant/
ThaneKrios28
Meh. The Daily Currant fails at being on The Onion's level.
I am not sure what to say about this. The report is only as good as 2013. Few years later, it will be another story again if everyone wants to be Mario. The concept is simple and sound, get a well paying skill set. But, it is hard to predict its supply and demand in the future.magicalclickThere will always be a need for ironworkers, boilermakers, shipbuilders, welders, millwrights and other tradesmen of some sort. Houses will not be able to be built by themselves, nor shopping centers, high-rises both residential and commercial. While not necessarily high tech or highly skilled, building roads is not something that can be automated either. Imagine if everyone stopped learning trades and nothing else was built in the US. We would devolve back to the stone age and be looking for caves to live in and people would have to scrounge or hunt for their own food again as well as slaughter it. There is another trade that is necessary for today's world, a butcher.
I don't so much think that becoming a plumber is a better future investment than going to college, I just think it's a huge freaking mistake how we've somehow managed to convince everyone that they're failures if they don't go to college. Some people are better off going to college, some people are better off skipping college and learning a trade. But yeah...I agree that many people would be better off becoming a plumber. MrGeezerIt's one thing to go to college, it's another to major in something that does not pay dividends for the time spent in school.
My same response in every thread like this: You get higher education because you are interested in learning. If money is the prime objective, than there are better ways to start making money.dramaybazI disagree, at least for most undergraduate studies. Information is more open and easily available than it has ever been, and it's often far easier to simply learn without having to go into debt or pay out the ass for a college education. That isn't necessarily to say that there's anything wrong with going to college just to learn. But it's very often a case of paying to get taught $hit that one could have easily learned on their own if they actually had the interest to do so. If people are going to go to college just to learn, then they certainly shouldn't expect that to land them a job and should know well enough that going into debt is a bad idea because they're probably never going to recover that money through employment. So...I guess maybe I do agree with you, kind of? I guess more appropriate is to say this: some people go to college to learn and some people go to college to get a job. But students would do very well to recognize which category they fall into, and make decisions appropriately.
[QUOTE="dramaybaz"]My same response in every thread like this: You get higher education because you are interested in learning. If money is the prime objective, than there are better ways to start making money.MrGeezerI disagree, at least for most undergraduate studies. Information is more open and easily available than it has ever been, and it's often far easier to simply learn without having to go into debt or pay out the ass for a college education. That isn't necessarily to say that there's anything wrong with going to college just to learn. But it's very often a case of paying to get taught $hit that one could have easily learned on their own if they actually had the interest to do so. If people are going to go to college just to learn, then they certainly shouldn't expect that to land them a job and should know well enough that going into debt is a bad idea because they're probably never going to recover that money through employment. So...I guess maybe I do agree with you, kind of? I guess more appropriate is to say this: some people go to college to learn and some people go to college to get a job. But students would do very well to recognize which category they fall into, and make decisions appropriately. By learning, I don't just mean browsing Wikipedia, but having hands on approach, and being able to work in the field of your choice, even if isn't the highest paid.
There are many reasons why jobs that are high paying and do not require expensive education to do may be undersupplied.
If Bloomberg and the other socialists would stop subsidizing education then there would not be an overabundance of college degrees right now.LaihendiYou have the worst gimmick ever.
[QUOTE="Laihendi"]If Bloomberg and the other socialists would stop subsidizing education then there would not be an overabundance of college degrees right now.Nuck81You have the worst gimmick ever. You think this is a gimmick? The government gives away free or heavily subsidized education to each of the 300 million people who live in this country, and then you wonder why there are too many people with college degrees. Basic logic indicates that if subsidizing education results in too many people getting college degrees then we should stop subsidizing education.
[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]If Bloomberg and the other socialists would stop subsidizing education then there would not be an overabundance of college degrees right now.LaihendiYou have the worst gimmick ever. You think this is a gimmick? The government gives away free or heavily subsidized education to each of the 300 million people who live in this country, and then you wonder why there are too many people with college degrees. Basic logic indicates that if subsidizing education results in too many people getting college degrees then we should stop subsidizing education.Yes, your entire act is a gimmick. It was a pretty good laughs at the beginning with you playing a caricature of an extreme libertarian. But you've played it to the max for too long and that cow has run dry. Hit reset, start over
As a college professor, I would encourage anyone interested in learning or specific careers to go to college. That being said, there are lots of great opportunities in various trades, and often they are well paying.Â
One big issue I have with technical schools is that many are offering associates and bachelor's degrees, with instructors who do not have terminal degrees in their field. In my opinion, that is doing students who go in that direction a disservice. Techinal schools should be for trade education, and two-year and four-year schools should be for degrees.
Never liked or trusted him. But in these times a trade may be more flexible due to costly tuition and lack of job opportunities (way too many college grads are out of work). There is only but so many Doctors,Lawyers,Aaccountants the world needs. There are about 8 billion people in the world, there is no way you/we/us are going to find 8 billion jobs.
Find a skill you can provide as a service independently as well as within a company. A trade will grant you skills you can utilize immediately (plumbing, electrician, PC/electronic tech, medical assistant/radiology assistant, security specialists, etc... These jobs, depending where you reside can get you close to and/or bypass a six figure salary. Colleges are leaving many people oweing a crap load of money while struggling seeking out internships that actually turn into permanent work/careers. It depends on the individuals commitments/drive and connections to turn the college experience in to a worth while investment. Times are rough, the economies are dwindling.... so choose wisely.
[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]If Bloomberg and the other socialists would stop subsidizing education then there would not be an overabundance of college degrees right now.LaihendiYou have the worst gimmick ever. You think this is a gimmick? The government gives away free or heavily subsidized education to each of the 300 million people who live in this country, and then you wonder why there are too many people with college degrees. Basic logic indicates that if subsidizing education results in too many people getting college degrees then we should stop subsidizing education.
No
now go back to burning your parents' house down
I do not necessarily agree with everything he states or tries to do, but most of this, I do agree with. New York City's billionaire mayor tells students that most of them should avoid a costly degree and instead learn a well-paying trade has the details. [quote="linked article"] Bloomberg may have a point. The 2010 median pay for plumbers, pipefitters and steamfitters was almost $47,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. The median pay for all occupations was slightly more than $33,000. But the top 10% of plumbers, pipefitters and steamfitters earned more than $79,000, the agency said. Even better, the job segment is projected to grow 26% through 2020, with new construction and a wave of retirements among older plumbers spurring employment. Bloomberg, whose net worth is estimated at $27 billion by Forbes, added that plumbing has another benefit in that it isn't suitable for outsourcing. "It's hard to farm that out, . . . and it's hard to automate that," Bloomberg said. WhiteKnight77What do you think?
I don't necessarily agree with the mayor. But, surprise, surprise! Plumbing was one of my sidelines when I was just starting out long ago. There are different types of plumbing ranging from (home) construction, outdoor, maintenance, and gas lines. I quit after many years because it is dirty (often unsanitary) work and labor-intensive. Plus, I'm not the most precise with a backhoe. I have a few busted water mains under my belt. :lol:
I don't know about becoming a plumber. $47,000 isn't that much money. But I do agree that more people should learn a trade rather then go to college. I would recommend people avoid college unless you are focused on a specific career that both pays well and you need college training for.Â
Not to mention some people just weren't meant for college. I know a girl, isn't very smart (thats putting it lightly). She is trying to earn a degree and is paying for it by stripping and nude modeling on the side. She hates her job but desperately wants to get a degree. But I know for a fact that she isn't cut out for college, she barely got through high school. She keeps failing her classes and will end up staying in some form of the erotic entertainment industry because its easy money, if you can keep your looks. For someone like her she would be better off pursuing a trade, saving the expense, and quitting the job she hates. But she is trying so hard, I haven't the heart to tell her.Diablo-B
$47000 before taxes is higher than my salary with a PhD and 6 years experience.
A: go school math, english, science, history spend 2 years pick a major HOPING you end up with something you like for other 2+ years
Â
B: figure somethings out you like and tackle it straight on.Â
Â
Pick your poison! Â
[QUOTE="Diablo-B"]I don't know about becoming a plumber. $47,000 isn't that much money. But I do agree that more people should learn a trade rather then go to college. I would recommend people avoid college unless you are focused on a specific career that both pays well and you need college training for.
Â
....jimkabrhel
$47000 before taxes is higher than my salary with a PhD and 6 years experience.
What degree/field are you working in? $47000 can be good in some states but in NJ, where I live I would barely be living paycheck to pay check, unless I moved into a crime ridden neighborhood. NY where I used to live isn't any different[QUOTE="Diablo-B"]I don't know about becoming a plumber. $47,000 isn't that much money. But I do agree that more people should learn a trade rather then go to college. I would recommend people avoid college unless you are focused on a specific career that both pays well and you need college training for.
Â
Not to mention some people just weren't meant for college. I know a girl, isn't very smart (thats putting it lightly). She is trying to earn a degree and is paying for it by stripping and nude modeling on the side. She hates her job but desperately wants to get a degree. But I know for a fact that she isn't cut out for college, she barely got through high school. She keeps failing her classes and will end up staying in some form of the erotic entertainment industry because its easy money, if you can keep your looks. For someone like her she would be better off pursuing a trade, saving the expense, and quitting the job she hates. But she is trying so hard, I haven't the heart to tell her.jimkabrhel
$47000 before taxes is higher than my salary with a PhD and 6 years experience.
Really? I make quite a bit more than that as a high school teacher[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]
[QUOTE="Diablo-B"]I don't know about becoming a plumber. $47,000 isn't that much money. But I do agree that more people should learn a trade rather then go to college. I would recommend people avoid college unless you are focused on a specific career that both pays well and you need college training for.
Â
....Diablo-B
$47000 before taxes is higher than my salary with a PhD and 6 years experience.
What degree/field are you working in? $47000 can be good in some states but in NJ, where I live I would barely be living paycheck to pay check, unless I moved into a crime ridden neighborhood. NY where I used to live isn't any differentChemistry. I'm a professor at a 2-year college in the midwest.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment