Mississippi Discrimination Law Signed by Governor

  • 92 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts

http://www.wlox.com/story/25156994/mississippi-religious-freedom-restoration-act-signed-into-law

But don't worry; when this is ruled unconstitutional in the next five minutes, I'm sure Republicans will be quick to propose a religious freedom bill permitting separate water fountains.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

Yea, social conservatism is a pretty big joke.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

what does the bill do?

Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts

@lostrib said:

what does the bill do?

Allows businesses to refuse service for "religious reasons." So if they think God says not to like gays, a business owner can refuse to serve gays--which is exactly why the bill exists.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Makhaidos said:

@lostrib said:

what does the bill do?

Allows businesses to refuse service for "religious reasons." So if God says not to like gays, a business owner can refuse to serve gays--which is exactly why the bill exists.

I'm pretty sure the KKK subscribes to some form of religious belief...

let's see how that works out

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

So sad but not unexpected from the inbreed hick politicians they have in that degenerate state. Didn't they just recently ratify the 13th amendment, too?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

@Aljosa23 said:

So sad but not unexpected from the inbreed hick politicians they have in that degenerate state. Didn't they just recently ratify the 13th amendment, too?

What's even more sad is that not everyone from these states is a knuckle-dragging neanderthal, and these nutjobs are dragging the entire state down with them.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697
deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697

7110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697
Member since 2002 • 7110 Posts
@Aljosa23 said:

So sad but not unexpected from the inbreed hick politicians they have in that degenerate state. Didn't they just recently ratify the 13th amendment, too?

I wouldn't go far as calling them "inbreed hicks".

Almost all Southern States oppose marriages between 1st cousins. As oppose to most Northern States which have laws legalizing 1st cousin marriages, especially here in NYC. Ironic, really, when you hear about Southern stereotypes.

Just saying.

But going back topic, yeah those laws are backwards thinking and stupid.

Avatar image for Flubbbs
Flubbbs

4968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Flubbbs
Member since 2010 • 4968 Posts

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

Agreed.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@AmazonTreeBoa said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

Agreed.

seriously?

Avatar image for hailtothequeen
HailtotheQueen

290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#12  Edited By HailtotheQueen
Member since 2014 • 290 Posts

@Makhaidos said:

http://www.wlox.com/story/25156994/mississippi-religious-freedom-restoration-act-signed-into-law

But don't worry; when this is ruled unconstitutional in the next five minutes, I'm sure Republicans will be quick to propose a religious freedom bill permitting separate water fountains.

The first time a Muslim or Atheist business owner refuses to serve Christians they will be screaming about persecution. lol

Its Mississippi, do we really expect any thing more from the state with one of the worst education systems in the country and one of the highest amounts of religious fundamentalism?

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

While I understand why you would be against this law, personally I don't have a problem with it. Think of it this way: this law allows people to openly state their opposition to certain people using their establishments. If you knew who didn't want to serve you due to your lifestyle wouldn't you avoid them even if legally you have a right to be served there?

For example, while I don't personally know anybody who is actively protesting Chick Fil A, I have read of people both straight and homosexual who refuse to eat there due to the executive who has a problem with gay marriage. It would be like some restaurant owner telling me he hates black people but will serve me because the law says he has to. Knowing that he is a racist, I won't give him my money anyway.

Now, if the law allowed doctors to withhold life-saving medical care from homosexuals due to religious beliefs like segregation laws allowed hospitals to refuse treatment to non whites in the past that is a different story.

Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

Why does this crap still exist in the South? They're like the Middle East of the US (meaning they're several years behind in the human rights department).

Avatar image for Braun_Roid_Rage
Braun_Roid_Rage

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By Braun_Roid_Rage
Member since 2013 • 790 Posts

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

so not that

Avatar image for Braun_Roid_Rage
Braun_Roid_Rage

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Braun_Roid_Rage
Member since 2013 • 790 Posts

@lostrib said:

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

so not that

"unless"

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@lostrib said:

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

so not that

"unless"

in other words, not that

Avatar image for Braun_Roid_Rage
Braun_Roid_Rage

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Braun_Roid_Rage
Member since 2013 • 790 Posts

@lostrib: Forgot what state we're talking about, so yeah lol.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45436 Posts

well, abhorrent for sure, but maybe there's a silver lining that this will go up the court chain to SCOTUS, and fingers cross they'd rule on the side of human decency

Avatar image for whiskeystrike
whiskeystrike

12213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 whiskeystrike
Member since 2011 • 12213 Posts
@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

But according to the article you can. It just simply has to be a religious belief.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

Considering that religious belief incorporates a lot of religions, plus religions can simply be created, it's entirely possible for minorities to be discriminated against under this law.

This was meant almost entirely for Christians to use the Bible, and would not consider other religions, but you can damn well believe that anyone would use this law to their advantage.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

If you're a business owner in Mississippi this is pretty damn good for you. Once one of your competitors refuses to serve someone you can say you don't discriminate and bam, you get extra business.

Avatar image for hailtothequeen
HailtotheQueen

290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#24 HailtotheQueen
Member since 2014 • 290 Posts

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

Ah so its okay to discriminate against groups that you approve of personally. Yeah, nothing hypocritical about that.

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#25 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14490 Posts

@hailtothequeen said:

@Makhaidos said:

http://www.wlox.com/story/25156994/mississippi-religious-freedom-restoration-act-signed-into-law

But don't worry; when this is ruled unconstitutional in the next five minutes, I'm sure Republicans will be quick to propose a religious freedom bill permitting separate water fountains.

The first time a Muslim or Atheist business owner refuses to serve Christians they will be screaming about persecution. lol

Its Mississippi, do we really expect any thing more from the state with one of the worst education systems in the country and one of the highest amounts of religious fundamentalism?

I would like to see this happen, if the law got passed.

Avatar image for Solaryellow
Solaryellow

7340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By Solaryellow
Member since 2013 • 7340 Posts

While it may be morally and ethically wrong to deny any service to someone based on race, sex, etc.., what business it is of the government to tell people whom they have to offer a service? The federal government of the United States is by far one of the most unethical, immoral and hypocritical entities ever to exist on this planet.

Avatar image for deactivated-5985f1128b98f
deactivated-5985f1128b98f

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27  Edited By deactivated-5985f1128b98f
Member since 2007 • 1914 Posts

This is OUTRAGEOUS !!!!

Don't these backward hicks know that Gay rights trump ALL other rights !?!?!?!

You have no right of freedom of association if it interferes with Gay rights.

You have no right to your religious freedom if it interferes with Gay rights.

I mean, if a Jewish shop owner wants to refuse to serve a neo-Nazi dressed up in his Hitler costume, the Jew better be sure the Nazi is not gay.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#28 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
@collegeboy64 said:

This is OUTRAGEOUS !!!!

Don't these backward hicks know that Gay rights trump ALL other rights !?!?!?!

You have no right of freedom of association if it interferes with Gay rights.

You have no right to your religious freedom if it interferes with Gay rights.

I mean, if a Jewish shop owner wants to refuse to serve a neo-Nazi dressed up in his Hitler costume, the Jew better be sure the Nazi is not gay.

Your tears are delicious.

Avatar image for deactivated-5985f1128b98f
deactivated-5985f1128b98f

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-5985f1128b98f
Member since 2007 • 1914 Posts

@chessmaster1989 said:
@collegeboy64 said:

This is OUTRAGEOUS !!!!

Don't these backward hicks know that Gay rights trump ALL other rights !?!?!?!

You have no right of freedom of association if it interferes with Gay rights.

You have no right to your religious freedom if it interferes with Gay rights.

I mean, if a Jewish shop owner wants to refuse to serve a neo-Nazi dressed up in his Hitler costume, the Jew better be sure the Nazi is not gay.

Your tears are delicious.

Are you coming on to me ?!?!

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#30  Edited By chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
@collegeboy64 said:

@chessmaster1989 said:
@collegeboy64 said:

This is OUTRAGEOUS !!!!

Don't these backward hicks know that Gay rights trump ALL other rights !?!?!?!

You have no right of freedom of association if it interferes with Gay rights.

You have no right to your religious freedom if it interferes with Gay rights.

I mean, if a Jewish shop owner wants to refuse to serve a neo-Nazi dressed up in his Hitler costume, the Jew better be sure the Nazi is not gay.

Your tears are delicious.

Are you coming on to me ?!?!

If you want my body and you think I'm sexy come on sugar let me know

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@collegeboy64 said:

This is OUTRAGEOUS !!!!

Don't these backward hicks know that Gay rights trump ALL other rights !?!?!?!

You have no right of freedom of association if it interferes with Gay rights.

You have no right to your religious freedom if it interferes with Gay rights.

I mean, if a Jewish shop owner wants to refuse to serve a neo-Nazi dressed up in his Hitler costume, the Jew better be sure the Nazi is not gay.

Going a bit overboard there

Avatar image for deactivated-5985f1128b98f
deactivated-5985f1128b98f

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By deactivated-5985f1128b98f
Member since 2007 • 1914 Posts

@lostrib said:

@collegeboy64 said:

This is OUTRAGEOUS !!!!

Don't these backward hicks know that Gay rights trump ALL other rights !?!?!?!

You have no right of freedom of association if it interferes with Gay rights.

You have no right to your religious freedom if it interferes with Gay rights.

I mean, if a Jewish shop owner wants to refuse to serve a neo-Nazi dressed up in his Hitler costume, the Jew better be sure the Nazi is not gay.

Going a bit overboard there

I have no tolerance for half-steppers like you.

Extremism in defense of Gay Rights is no vice.

Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33  Edited By Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts

Honestly, I don't have an issue with this.

Let businesses deny service to whomever they want, and then a good number of people will boycott those places and bring their money to businesses that don't discriminate.

If they want to shoot themselves in the foot, let them.

Avatar image for LittleMac19
LittleMac19

1638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#34  Edited By LittleMac19
Member since 2009 • 1638 Posts

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

^^Agreed, it's their business so they should be able to run it in any way they see fit. With that said, perception means a lot in the eye of the general public so by denying service to a certain group of customers based on their beliefs or whatever could cast a dark cloud over that company and push potential customers elsewhere...

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

@LittleMac19 said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

^^Agreed, it's their business so they should be able to run it in any way they see fit. With that said, perception means a lot in the eye of the general public so by denying service to a certain group of customers based on their beliefs or whatever could cast a dark cloud over that company and push potential customers elsewhere...

As well as bring more customers in that agree with the shop owner. Just look what happened with Chick-Fil-A. Gays tried to protest and in turn, Chick-Fil-A had huge lines of supporters coming to show their support and Chick-Fil-A made a lot of money from it.

Avatar image for slateman_basic
slateman_basic

4142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 slateman_basic
Member since 2002 • 4142 Posts

@AmazonTreeBoa said:

@LittleMac19 said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

^^Agreed, it's their business so they should be able to run it in any way they see fit. With that said, perception means a lot in the eye of the general public so by denying service to a certain group of customers based on their beliefs or whatever could cast a dark cloud over that company and push potential customers elsewhere...

As well as bring more customers in that agree with the shop owner. Just look what happened with Chick-Fil-A. Gays tried to protest and in turn, Chick-Fil-A had huge lines of supporters coming to show their support and Chick-Fil-A made a lot of money from it.

Because everyone thought it was a crap protest. What the founders and owners of the company do with their money is no one's business. CFA's are independently owned franchises. So, in fact, by protesting, they were likely protesting someone who supported their lifestyle and even donated money to equal rights causes.

What they failed to understand is that CFA has a tremendous amount of loyalty. PArt of it is the religious right seeing a company founded by people who share the same religious beliefs. But the majority of it is that CFA offers a good product at a fair price with fantastic service. They are normally involved in local communities. They hire and train people to be polite and friendly. They have a corporate philosophy to excel at customer service and relations, even if it requires them to take a loss on sale (fixing an order for free, adding extra sauces, etc.) So while gays want to say it didn't work because of homophobes, they're only partially correct. It didn't work because everyone recognized what was going on and wanted to support a company they like. Which is the way free market economies should work.

Avatar image for MakeMeaSammitch
MakeMeaSammitch

4889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37  Edited By MakeMeaSammitch
Member since 2012 • 4889 Posts

it's the south. be thankful they only went this far and didn't start linching gays and colored folk.

Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38  Edited By Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts

@VERTIGO47 said:

Almost all Southern States oppose marriages between 1st cousins.

Yeah, except for Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Arizona, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and Tennessee.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

lol at people defending it.

Avatar image for TheFlush
TheFlush

5965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#40 TheFlush
Member since 2002 • 5965 Posts

This will be overruled, socially backwards ideology is going to die anyway, but sometimes you have to give it a little push.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@hailtothequeen said:

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

Ah so its okay to discriminate against groups that you approve of personally. Yeah, nothing hypocritical about that.

Both he and flubbs are trolls.

Avatar image for Flubbbs
Flubbbs

4968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Flubbbs
Member since 2010 • 4968 Posts

@toast_burner said:

@hailtothequeen said:

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

Ah so its okay to discriminate against groups that you approve of personally. Yeah, nothing hypocritical about that.

Both he and flubbs are trolls.

lol yea you got me

Avatar image for Braun_Roid_Rage
Braun_Roid_Rage

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43  Edited By Braun_Roid_Rage
Member since 2013 • 790 Posts

@toast_burner said:

@hailtothequeen said:

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

Ah so its okay to discriminate against groups that you approve of personally. Yeah, nothing hypocritical about that.

Both he and flubbs are trolls.

LOL, you troll anyone that doesn't bow down to queers.

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44  Edited By AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@toast_burner said:

@hailtothequeen said:

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

Ah so its okay to discriminate against groups that you approve of personally. Yeah, nothing hypocritical about that.

Both he and flubbs are trolls.

LOL, you troll anyone that doesn't bow down to queers.

Yep, which is why he is ignored by me and I never bother responding to him. There are like 7-10 people on these forums that get that kind of treatment from me. If you can't have a grownup conversation, I see no reason to read their post, let alone reply to them.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@AmazonTreeBoa said:

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@toast_burner said:

@hailtothequeen said:

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

This

If it discriminates against ethnic minorities though I have a problem with it.

Ah so its okay to discriminate against groups that you approve of personally. Yeah, nothing hypocritical about that.

Both he and flubbs are trolls.

LOL, you troll anyone that doesn't bow down to queers.

Yep, which is why he is ignored by me and I never bother responding to him. There are like 7-10 people on these forums that get that kind of treatment from me. If you can't have a grownup conversation, I see no reason to read their post, let alone reply to them.

Pretty sure you're a troll as well. or just incredibly stupid.

Ironic that you mention having a grown up conversation. Have you ever said anything that contains any logic or facts? I assume you're just a 13 year old boy who knows nothing about society or politics other than what your daddy has told you.

Avatar image for bforrester420
bforrester420

3480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#46  Edited By bforrester420
Member since 2014 • 3480 Posts

**** the south.

Avatar image for bforrester420
bforrester420

3480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#47  Edited By bforrester420
Member since 2014 • 3480 Posts

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

Yeah, you should be able to turn away anyone but white people if you want...

I can't believe some of the responses here that basically boil down to "It's okay to pick and choose who we discriminate against."

Avatar image for Flubbbs
Flubbbs

4968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48  Edited By Flubbbs
Member since 2010 • 4968 Posts

@bforrester420 said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

Yeah, you should be able to turn away anyone but white people if you want...

I can't believe some of the responses here that basically boil down to "It's okay to pick and choose who we discriminate against."

:(:(.. if you dont like that then you should go somewhere else

Avatar image for bforrester420
bforrester420

3480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#49 bforrester420
Member since 2014 • 3480 Posts

@Flubbbs said:

@bforrester420 said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

Yeah, you should be able to turn away anyone but white people if you want...

I can't believe some of the responses here that basically boil down to "It's okay to pick and choose who we discriminate against."

:(:(.. if you dont like that then you should go somewhere else

If you want a country run by religion, move to Iran.

Avatar image for Primordialous
Primordialous

1313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 Primordialous
Member since 2012 • 1313 Posts

@bforrester420 said:

@Flubbbs said:

@bforrester420 said:

@Flubbbs said:

you should be able to serve or not serve whoever you want

Yeah, you should be able to turn away anyone but white people if you want...

I can't believe some of the responses here that basically boil down to "It's okay to pick and choose who we discriminate against."

:(:(.. if you dont like that then you should go somewhere else

If you want a country run by religion, move to Iran.

If you want a secular govenment, move to the Soviet Union (when it still existed)