This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for catlin_czirr
catlin_czirr

2545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 catlin_czirr
Member since 2007 • 2545 Posts
Which sport is superior in your opinion, and why?
Avatar image for SmashBrosLegend
SmashBrosLegend

11344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 SmashBrosLegend
Member since 2006 • 11344 Posts
Boxers are world-class athletes, which is why some of them make upwards of 30 million for a fight. MMA is cool and they're also great athletes, but those guys are kidding themselves if they think they stand a chance against the likes of Floyd Mayweather or Vitali Klitscho.
Avatar image for Manly-manly-man
Manly-manly-man

3477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Manly-manly-man
Member since 2006 • 3477 Posts

Boxers are world-class athletes, which is why some of them make upwards of 30 million for a fight. MMA is cool and they're also great athletes, but those guys are kidding themselves if they think they stand a chance against the likes of Floyd Mayweather or Vitali Klitscho.SmashBrosLegend

Don't assume too much. In a straight boxing match the boxers will win of course, but if it was just a plain fight I would say the MMA guys have a better chance at winning.

Avatar image for SmashBrosLegend
SmashBrosLegend

11344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 SmashBrosLegend
Member since 2006 • 11344 Posts

[QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]Boxers are world-class athletes, which is why some of them make upwards of 30 million for a fight. MMA is cool and they're also great athletes, but those guys are kidding themselves if they think they stand a chance against the likes of Floyd Mayweather or Vitali Klitscho.Manly-manly-man

Don't assume too much. In a straight boxing match the boxers will win of course, but if it was just a plain fight I would say the MMA guys have a better chance at winning.

Vitali Klitscho has such amazing reach that they wouldn't be able to get close to him, and Mayweather is so fast they wouldn't lay a finger on him. A lot of mixed-martial artists are failed boxers and wrestlers. That's why they went to UFC/Pride/ect, because they couldn't handle the best of the best pro boxers.
Avatar image for FlaminDeath
FlaminDeath

4181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 FlaminDeath
Member since 2004 • 4181 Posts
MMA would win hands down.
Avatar image for USmellLikePoopy
USmellLikePoopy

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 USmellLikePoopy
Member since 2006 • 1920 Posts
I think MMA is superior, because it's a lot more fun to watch and the guys are doing a lot more damage.
Avatar image for RamboSymbiot
RamboSymbiot

6302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 RamboSymbiot
Member since 2007 • 6302 Posts
MMA would school em'
Avatar image for JohnBasedow
JohnBasedow

858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 JohnBasedow
Member since 2005 • 858 Posts
I prefer to watch MMA. In a boxing match a boxer would win, in a mma match the mmaer would win. In a street fight I'd bet on the mmer but the boxer always has a punchers chance.
Avatar image for joetira
joetira

2879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 joetira
Member since 2005 • 2879 Posts
MMA can be used for practical purposes, boxing is a sport. And if you think an ordinary boxer would win your kidding yourself. In any UFC match or MMA match, there will be a kickboxer etc. vs a jui jitsu(cant spell it) and the jui jitsu guy will dominate.
Avatar image for DMRaMeX
DMRaMeX

3569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 DMRaMeX
Member since 2005 • 3569 Posts
[QUOTE="Manly-manly-man"]

[QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]Boxers are world-class athletes, which is why some of them make upwards of 30 million for a fight. MMA is cool and they're also great athletes, but those guys are kidding themselves if they think they stand a chance against the likes of Floyd Mayweather or Vitali Klitscho.SmashBrosLegend

Don't assume too much. In a straight boxing match the boxers will win of course, but if it was just a plain fight I would say the MMA guys have a better chance at winning.

Vitali Klitscho has such amazing reach that they wouldn't be able to get close to him, and Mayweather is so fast they wouldn't lay a finger on him. A lot of mixed-martial artists are failed boxers and wrestlers. That's why they went to UFC/Pride/ect, because they couldn't handle the best of the best pro boxers.

Floyd Mayweather got floored by Sonny Liston in the first round two times! Besides, it's better to watch two men standing up and slugging at each other then to two guys lay on top of each other.

EDIT: Lol, I thought that you meant Floyd Patterson

Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
Nobody in this world can beat Floyd Mayweather Jr.
Avatar image for csimonma
csimonma

2820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 csimonma
Member since 2005 • 2820 Posts

Nobody in this world can beat Floyd Mayweather Jr.Kahuna_1

I think GSP would be able to destroy him in a regular fight

Avatar image for rimnet00
rimnet00

11003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#14 rimnet00
Member since 2003 • 11003 Posts
I think both sports can't really be compared. Boxing is a technical sport, while MMA is about technique. Comparing the two is really apples and oranges.
Avatar image for ElArab
ElArab

5754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ElArab
Member since 2007 • 5754 Posts
OMG are you guys kidding yourseves? An MMA fighter would win in a boxing match too! MMA guys have all sorts of training, they know boxing and more, you can't be considered an MMA fighter if you know bits and pieces of an art, you have to know it all! Watch Fight Quest and Fight Science on discovery and nat. geo. channel and you'll know why, try youtube or something.
Avatar image for Manly-manly-man
Manly-manly-man

3477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Manly-manly-man
Member since 2006 • 3477 Posts

OMG are you guys kidding yourseves? An MMA fighter would win in a boxing match too! MMA guys have all sorts of training, they know boxing and more, you can't be considered an MMA fighter if you know bits and pieces of an art, you have to know it all! Watch Fight Quest and Fight Science on discovery and nat. geo. channel and you'll know why, try youtube or something.ElArab

An MMA fighter knows how to box, but not nearly as well as a professional boxer.

Avatar image for haloraider
haloraider

3110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 haloraider
Member since 2006 • 3110 Posts

I think both sports can't really be compared. Boxing is a technical sport, while MMA is about technique. Comparing the two is really apples and oranges. rimnet00

Agreed. Totally different styles of fighting so no comparison, really.

Avatar image for limitless_rage
limitless_rage

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 limitless_rage
Member since 2006 • 134 Posts
[QUOTE="Manly-manly-man"]

[QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]Boxers are world-class athletes, which is why some of them make upwards of 30 million for a fight. MMA is cool and they're also great athletes, but those guys are kidding themselves if they think they stand a chance against the likes of Floyd Mayweather or Vitali Klitscho.SmashBrosLegend

Don't assume too much. In a straight boxing match the boxers will win of course, but if it was just a plain fight I would say the MMA guys have a better chance at winning.

Vitali Klitscho has such amazing reach that they wouldn't be able to get close to him, and Mayweather is so fast they wouldn't lay a finger on him. A lot of mixed-martial artists are failed boxers and wrestlers. That's why they went to UFC/Pride/ect, because they couldn't handle the best of the best pro boxers.

Actually there are several phenomenal boxers who have made the transition to mma with less than stellar results. Fact is that if an mma guy can get past the initial few punches, most are gonna take the boxers to the mat ... which is completely out of their element. When most boxers are taken down, they literally have no idea what to do next. Not to mention that jui-jitsu is widely considered the best individual martial art (even when you count boxing), and most mma fighters utilize at least some jui-jitsu. As far as them being fast, that only applies to their fists. Their footwork is designed to dodge punches, not takedowns.

Avatar image for limitless_rage
limitless_rage

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 limitless_rage
Member since 2006 • 134 Posts

Nobody in this world can beat Floyd Mayweather Jr.Kahuna_1

You need to be specific here ... Randy Couture would dominate little Floyd, so would Tim Sylvia. But in his weight class, there aren't many. I think it was already said but GSP could probably beat him without a problem, and for that matter so could Matt Hughes and BJ Penn.

Avatar image for Robertoey
Robertoey

1996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Robertoey
Member since 2005 • 1996 Posts

Mixed Martial Artists hands down. The only area in which a boxer will win is, of course, boxing. And that doesn't account for a striking match, where suddenly the boxer has to worry about not only punches, but kicks, elbows, knees and the clinch game. Leg kicks alone are enough to slow down a boxers rhythm.

Now lets factor in the ground game. Not only is it something that the boxer is unskilled in, it's foreign too them, it's a completely new way of thinking. A boxers best chance of competing in MMA is not too try to become proficient at grappling, that would take far too long (10 years on average to gain a brazilian jiu jitsu black belt, and lets not forget about wrestling, the base of most fighters skills). Instead his best bet would simply be to try to develop a solid submission defense, train too avoid the submissions and get back on his feet. A boxer would have to train for MMA for multiple years if he wished to stand even a chance against the middle tier competitors.

There are many fighters in MMA who thrive on their standup skills, but don't make the mistake of believing that they're one dimensional fighters. People like Chuck Liddell, Wanderlei Silva, Anderson Silva, CroCop, etc are all accomplished wrestlers and brazilian jiu jitsu practicioners. Of the four fighters I mentioned, both Wanderlei and Anderson are brazilian jiu jitsu black belts. Chuck Liddell is a purple belt, and CroCop is also a purple belt underneath Werdum. They all rely almost entirely on their standup.

Helio Gracie challenged Joe Louis (by many considered the greatest to have ever lived), Primo Carnera and Ezzard Charles too no-holds-barred fights. All three a much larger than him, and all three are considered boxing greats, all three declined.

Royce Gracie challenged Mike Tyson to a no holds barred fight and Mike Tyson declined the offer.

More recently, Sean Sherk publicly challenged Floyd Mayweather (currently considered to be the worlds greatest boxer) too a fight in the UFC. After much trash talking on Floyd Mayweathers part, he declined.

Avatar image for _Dispair_
_Dispair_

645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 _Dispair_
Member since 2007 • 645 Posts

Boxers fight under far more restrictions. MMA is the closest thing to real fighting competative sport will ever achieve. The best MMA fighter would take down the best boxer no problem since boxers aren't trained in groundfighting/grappling.

Avatar image for Robertoey
Robertoey

1996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Robertoey
Member since 2005 • 1996 Posts
:)
Avatar image for rinkegekido2110
rinkegekido2110

617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 rinkegekido2110
Member since 2004 • 617 Posts
Both are skilled contests, but MMA is more visually appealing than straight boxing.
Avatar image for Pittfan666
Pittfan666

8638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#24 Pittfan666
Member since 2003 • 8638 Posts
Boxing is the better sport because all they do in the MMA is just wrestle each other which is really dull and doesn't take as much skill as normal boxing.
Avatar image for kurama2002
kurama2002

1414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 kurama2002
Member since 2005 • 1414 Posts
Boxing for me.
Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#27 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts
boxers are better at boxing, but mixed martial artists are better fighters. its as simple as that. anyway, i prefer mma mostly because it is a more immediately violent sport.
Avatar image for Lockedge
Lockedge

16765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Lockedge
Member since 2002 • 16765 Posts

Nobody in this world can beat Floyd Mayweather Jr.Kahuna_1

Fedor Emelianenko might. If anyone can, he'd be able to. All Fedor would need to do is get in close, and Fedor is a fast dude. Once he grapples Floyd, it's over.

Avatar image for metallica_fan42
metallica_fan42

21143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#29 metallica_fan42
Member since 2006 • 21143 Posts
In a straight up boxing match, obviously the boxer. In an MMA match, that's a toss up. Sure, the boxer has the advantage standing up, but he has no take-down defense whatsoever. If the boxer doesn't hit him with a punch, the fight would be over very quickly on the ground.
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts

[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]Nobody in this world can beat Floyd Mayweather Jr.Lockedge

Fedor Emelianenko might. If anyone can, he'd be able to. All Fedor would need to do is get in close, and Fedor is a fast dude. Once he grapples Floyd, it's over.

Might? Fedor is bar none the best MMA fighter today. He would absolutely destroy Mayweather.

Avatar image for Total-KO
Total-KO

4057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 Total-KO
Member since 2006 • 4057 Posts
Boxing is making a big comeback. Especially in Britain. I like the hype suyrrounding this comeback so I'm gonna say Boxing. MMA is too wishy-washy.
Avatar image for Vfanek
Vfanek

7719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Vfanek
Member since 2006 • 7719 Posts
Why do people argue superiority of sports? Both MMA and boxing are great sports, which both require athletic and mental prowess. Who would win in a street fight? Well obviously the MMAer, as he's trained for the type of combat. A boxer is a puncher, and solely trains for punching, his grappling and kicking skills will be limited. Does that make him less of an athlete? No, I'd like to see any of you boxing bashers to fight a boxer, you wouldn't manage the first round. They are two different sports, let's keep them both living ey?
Avatar image for fordies
fordies

5829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 fordies
Member since 2005 • 5829 Posts

You can't really compare them since boxers are specialists at boxing thats all the train where as MMA fighters have to train ju-jitsu, kickboxing and wrestling at the very least and that in itself means they wont be as specialized however i think they are a lot more dangerous put it this way if you put a top MMA fighter in the ring with a top boxer of the same weight division he will get his a** handed to him and vice versa.

Avatar image for Vfanek
Vfanek

7719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Vfanek
Member since 2006 • 7719 Posts
Boxing is making a big comeback. Especially in Britain. I like the hype suyrrounding this comeback so I'm gonna say Boxing. MMA is too wishy-washy.Total-KO
Gotta agree with the first statement, boxing is becoming something here. Moving away from the "Thug sport" mentality and people are actually enjoying the sport. RIcky Hatton lost, sure, but litteraly every person in Britain showed his or her support for him. MMA have become popular in a more.. 'mainstream' crowd so to say, sometimes makes it look a bit too much like American gladiator. At least from what I've seen, when folks watch an MMA fight they will comment on how 'big' the person is, rather than his actual combat ability. Everyone can flex a muscle, but Christ... Still though, we got people like Fedor. He doesn't look like much, at all. Could really just be a bloody office worker, but when he gets in the ring.. What to say? He's a monster.
Avatar image for N8A
N8A

18602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 N8A
Member since 2007 • 18602 Posts
I'm a big MMA fan and prefer it over boxing.
Avatar image for btaylor2404
btaylor2404

11353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#36 btaylor2404
Member since 2003 • 11353 Posts
Boxing, like to watch some MMA, but I was brought up watching boxing. If pro sports (NFL, NBA, MLB) were still being paid like they were in the 60's and 70's there would be no MMA, all the good boxers are playing other sports, and sadly the public mostly doesn't care about the fantastic lower weight classes (under 147).
Avatar image for dismal_soul
dismal_soul

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 dismal_soul
Member since 2008 • 139 Posts
I prefer MMA, its usually more exciting and has more variety. Whenever I watch boxing on tv most of it is pretty boring. There are a lot of good fights on ESPN classic and the Spanish channels though but they still aren't as exciting as a good MMA fight.
Avatar image for overkill_
overkill_

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 overkill_
Member since 2008 • 392 Posts
hm.. MMA.
Avatar image for kurama2002
kurama2002

1414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 kurama2002
Member since 2005 • 1414 Posts
If i had to choose between the two to pursue a career i would pick boxing hands down. MMA will most likely never generate 100 million dollars fights.
Avatar image for JCblueside
JCblueside

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 JCblueside
Member since 2005 • 14529 Posts

Its all about adaptation according the great Bruce Lee.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
Boxing is much more enjoyable to watch.. MMA matchs most times I watch them consist of a guy tackling another.. Which then leads into two guys who know little to nothing about wrestling most times spending the rest of th ematch on the ground... yeah very entertaining :roll:
Avatar image for CJL182
CJL182

9233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 CJL182
Member since 2003 • 9233 Posts
Boxers don't stand a chance if anything goes, but it depends on the fighters if only striking is allowed. Obviously boxers would win if they could only punch.
Avatar image for hormagaunt
hormagaunt

6309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 hormagaunt
Member since 2003 • 6309 Posts

MMA- more diverse however grapplers **** me off really bad, there should be more good standing battles. And price and K1 is better than UFC in my opinion

Avatar image for Alter_Echo
Alter_Echo

10724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 Alter_Echo
Member since 2003 • 10724 Posts

There are less constrictive rules in MMA which widens the success pool a lot. Joe blow brawler can be an MMA champion but would get owned in a boxing match because he lacks form and training and cant just take a guy to the ground and pound him to death.

I like them both but i prefer boxing. Even in MMA the part i enjoy the most is the stand up striking.

MMA fighters would get owned in boxing because of the rule set

Boxers would get owned in MMA because of the rule set.

They are 2 different sports. You cant compare them. Its apples and oranges.