clicky
Don't insult fellow OTers because of their political preferences; you can't emperically prove they are conversatives - I MEAN, be nice you silly c - anyway I got this:
This topic is locked from further discussion.
You area social-democratic cosmopolitan. 1 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 6 percent are more extremist than you.
.
"You area cosmopolitan Social Democrat. 15 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 68 percent are more extremist than you."
Not entirely accurate I don't think, because I rushed it and stayed neutral on a few questions I didn't know much about.
You are a neoliberal Democrat. 6 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 92 percent are more extremist than you.
Liberal Democrat. 2 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 51 percent are more extremist than you..
that doesn't sound like me
Joshywaa
Says I am a "a social democratic Cosmopolitan" and that 13% of the participators are in the same category and 83% are more extremist than me
I looked up what anthropocentric means. But I like the animals :[
My political compass from that other thread, like the one that ghoklebutter posted, put me somewhere around the Dalai Lama and near Ghandi. Those two seem like nice fellows.
Donno what any of this really means though.
It called me a neo-conservative.
Animals are inferior; they deserve to be in my crosshairs, and then on my damn grill.
[QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"] You are a Leftist-Fascist. 4 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 61 percent are more extremist than you. Hah, accurate enough I guess.GlamourBoppin"Leftist-Fascist"? That's a new one. /nick Mussolini no it's not.
You are a democratic National Liberal. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 54 percent are more extremist than you.
I think this test is flawed.
"homosexuals should have the exact same rights as Heterosexuals"
This will be misconstrued because I will say yes they should have the same rights and they do today. The question is better rephrased "Should people have the right to marry the same sex."
"Resources have to be managed by society"
What does this mean? That the government should manage resources or that the people should?
Society means the people, but I agree that question is a bit vague. What resources? Your point on the homosexual rights is a bit pedantic; it obviously implies marriage. Sure straight people can't marry the same sex either, but we both know what the debate really means.You are a democratic National Liberal. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 54 percent are more extremist than you.
I think this test is flawed.
"homosexuals should have the exact same rights as Heterosexuals"
This will be misconstrued because I will say yes they should have the same rights and they do today. The question is better rephrased "Should people have the right to marry the same sex."
"Resources have to be managed by society"
What does this mean? That the government should manage resources or that the people should?
Philokalia
Society means the people, but I agree that question is a bit vague. What resources? Your point on the homosexual rights is a bit pedantic; it obviously implies marriage. Sure straight people can't marry the same sex either, but we both know what the debate really means.[QUOTE="Philokalia"]
You are a democratic National Liberal. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 54 percent are more extremist than you.
I think this test is flawed.
"homosexuals should have the exact same rights as Heterosexuals"
This will be misconstrued because I will say yes they should have the same rights and they do today. The question is better rephrased "Should people have the right to marry the same sex."
"Resources have to be managed by society"
What does this mean? That the government should manage resources or that the people should?
MrPraline
The question nontheless is falwed. I believe we should have the exact same rights for all people. Homosexuals included.
Society means the people, but I agree that question is a bit vague. What resources? Your point on the homosexual rights is a bit pedantic; it obviously implies marriage. Sure straight people can't marry the same sex either, but we both know what the debate really means.[QUOTE="MrPraline"]
[QUOTE="Philokalia"]
You are a democratic National Liberal. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 54 percent are more extremist than you.
I think this test is flawed.
"homosexuals should have the exact same rights as Heterosexuals"
This will be misconstrued because I will say yes they should have the same rights and they do today. The question is better rephrased "Should people have the right to marry the same sex."
"Resources have to be managed by society"
What does this mean? That the government should manage resources or that the people should?
Philokalia
The question nontheless is falwed. I believe we should have the exact same rights for all people. Homosexuals included.
So do I; including the right to marry the person you love (idgaf if that's a fellow man).Society means the people, but I agree that question is a bit vague. What resources? Your point on the homosexual rights is a bit pedantic; it obviously implies marriage. Sure straight people can't marry the same sex either, but we both know what the debate really means.[QUOTE="MrPraline"]
[QUOTE="Philokalia"]
You are a democratic National Liberal. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 54 percent are more extremist than you.
I think this test is flawed.
"homosexuals should have the exact same rights as Heterosexuals"
This will be misconstrued because I will say yes they should have the same rights and they do today. The question is better rephrased "Should people have the right to marry the same sex."
"Resources have to be managed by society"
What does this mean? That the government should manage resources or that the people should?
Philokalia
The question nontheless is falwed. I believe we should have the exact same rights for all people. Homosexuals included.
Do you think 9 y/os shoud have the right to vote?[QUOTE="pie-junior"]
Do you think 9 y/os shoud have the right to vote?Philokalia
No, they aren't old enough.
But you said "the exact same rights for all people". Aren't 9 y/os people?But you said "the exact same rights for all people". Aren't 9 y/os people?pie-junior
And all 9 year olds have no right to vote.
[QUOTE="pie-junior"] But you said "the exact same rights for all people". Aren't 9 y/os people?Philokalia
And all 9 year olds have no right to vote.
Also, Philokalia, do you think every (adult) person has the right to marry the person they love, or just straight people?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment