I've never been quite sure of what the proper etiquette is for bands and "is/are." Often times I see people interchange between "is" and "are." Now logically, it seems like you would say "is" talking about the band as a whole, because if you finish the sentence, "Radiohead is a great band" seems correct, as the single unit term (a) connotes that "is" would be the proper verb form. Yet you see people say "Radiohead are a great band" and this too can be correct as you can indeed say "they are a group of steel mill workers" or something. I've heard the argument "you use 'are' when talking about the members that make up the band, like you think each member of the band is great, and 'is' when referring to the band as a whole." However, if that's true, then unless you were specifically going to pinpoint a member as an exception, what would be the point of using "are" over "is"? A conversation like what I'm about to say wouldn't usually follow:
"Radiohead are great" "You like the band, huh?" "No, I think the band sucks, but the musicians that make up the band are great... except Thom Yorke."
No one would ever say "that band is fantastic" and mean that the musicians are terrible, but the band altogether sounds good. In other words, if you like the band, you usually think the musicians have talent proportional to how much you like them (whether this assumption is true is irrelevant as this is the way most people think). I've looked it up on Google and found nothing.
So when is the proper time to use one instead of the other? I'm hoping for someone double-majoring in English and Music to answer my question or something close. :P
Log in to comment