MYSTERIOUS mystery puzzle.

Who stole the money?

Richardson is a rich man living in his luxurious manner, has a wife and 3 kids, plus 4 workers working around that big mansion.

now a large amount of money has been stolen overnight, yesterday.

the police has doubts one of the 4 workers cause they were at the scene at different times.

worker 1 was at the place of thievery between 1 to 2.

worker 2 was at the place of thievery between 4 to 5.

worker 3 was at the place of thievery between 6 to 7.

worker 4 was at the place of thievery between 8 to 9.

now detective who according to you is the thief. as a big clue, worker 4 is the one who was worried during the investigation.

Who stole the money?

Richardson is a rich man living in his luxurious manner, has a wife and 3 kids, plus 4 workers working around that big mansion.

now a large amount of money has been stolen overnight, yesterday.

the police has doubts one of the 4 workers cause they were at the scene at different times.

worker 1 was at the place of thievery between 1 to 2.

worker 2 was at the place of thievery between 4 to 5.

worker 2 was at the place of thievery between 6 to 7.

worker 4 was at the place of thievery between 8 to 9.

now detective who according to you is the thief. as a big clue, worker 4 is the one who was worried during the investigation.

youruser

NOW to be more precise.

worker 1 has stated that he did not saw any money while he was there working.

worker 2 has stated that he did see the money while he was there working.

worker 3 has stated that he did not saw that particular area while working.

worker 4 has stated that he did not saw the money but he did saw a few misplaced 100 $, which he also informed to the manor's owner, Richardson.

i pressed the enter by mistakes, here is the last and full and further details.

worker 1 has a past record of stealing a shining thing.

workder 2 has a good past record.

worker 3 is new.

worker 4 is still new.

so worker 1 and 2 are the only old person working.

the amount of stolen money is 1000$

Richardson himself has doubts on his wife, who knew the money was kept in the particular place cause it was she who placed her, but he cannot say that to his wife in her face. his kids are too small.

worker 1 has an alibi that he has sweared to never steal a thing after he was caught once before.

worker 2 has an alibi that he has seen the money while he was there.

worker 3 has an alibi that he is just new and did not noticed the area where the money was kept.

worker 4 has an alibi that he is still new and did saw some money lying there.

whats more worker 1's mom is ill and is currently being operated in the hospital, so it could be him.

whats more worker 2' family is fine and all, but he could be looking to go rich stealing way.

whats more worker 3 is new so he cannot really be trusted.

whats more worker 4 is still new but he does know all details of the entire mansion including the locker room.

now this should be easy and obvious.

close but no cigar (f7 dialogue). i will explain why but only after revealing the real villian here.

look one of the worker is the real thief, but still this topic gets enough post, or if no one posts out of no interest, i will reveal it all, with precise reasons, valid.

and just can it be me or you, we do not work at richardson's manor.

alright the real answer is no.3 and do not think i am making that a thief out of majority votes.

this one is simple, i would like to hear if anyone would like to post on so as to why worker 3 is that thief.

then i will post the realism.

Worker 3. Worker 4 was the only one who never saw the money, because Worker 3 took it out before he could see it, that's why he was nervous in the interview, he figured it would be blamed on him because worker 1, 2 and 3 all could have confirmed seeing it. Worker 2 seeing it would cover worker 1, and worker 3 seeing it would cover worker 2, but it would be an all too easy cover for worker 4 to blame it on 3 so he would be nervous the cops would find him guilty.

come on leap, i am dissappointed with the lessly responses.

when someone tries to post something new, this happens.

blue you are missing the point worker 4 did saw a $ 100 lying around, you are good and close but thats that.

i am just gonna wait a bit more, if anyone with interest posts the real reason behind worker 3's name.

worker 3 is the real thief cause he stated he did not even saw the area, considering he was new thats understandable but if you clearly view the statement of other workers you will notice the faults.

1 did not saw the money, because during that time money was not kept there.

2 did saw the money and he was right.

3 was lying cause he stole the money.

4 was not lying what he did saw was 100$ which was dropped by worker 3 during his steal of 1000$.

simply put worker 1 not seeing the money clears him, worker 2 sawing the money clears him, worker 3 cannot escape thanks to worker 2's statement.

worker was innocent as he did mentioned whatever he saw otherwise he could grabbed that 100$ and brough himself some games.

i posted this kinda topic as i am playing ace attorney series. thanks.