Obama Admin: Attempts to exclude Fox News from the White House Press Pool

  • 56 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for KH-mixerX
KH-mixerX

5702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#1 KH-mixerX
Member since 2007 • 5702 Posts

http://www.examiner.com/x-19663-LA-Legal-Examiner~y2009m10d23-White-House-press-pool-thwarts-Fox-News-exclusion

This seriously needs to stop. The War on Fox News is completely misplaced and ridiculous. Just because they're not blatantly left winged like pretty much every other news outlet out there. It's unethical, it's immoral, and it's UnAmerican. Although I do wanna point out that I have a lot of respect for those other news outlets that stood up for Fox.

Avatar image for XD4NTESINF3RNOX
XD4NTESINF3RNOX

7438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 XD4NTESINF3RNOX
Member since 2008 • 7438 Posts
plus there's Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Press, and Freedom of Religion, soon all of those will be gone once he takes away Freedom of Press IMO
Avatar image for Ringx55
Ringx55

5967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Ringx55
Member since 2008 • 5967 Posts
Wow, thats a new low against Fox.
Avatar image for SunofVich
SunofVich

4665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 SunofVich
Member since 2004 • 4665 Posts

I dont like Fox news as much as the next guy but they are unfortunately still a news outlet and should not be be banned from the white house press event. Even though they will take what ever is said at the event and twist it into something seemingly terrible and feed it the the ignorant hordes as being un-american, un-patriotic or some other BS like that.

Avatar image for awsss
awsss

1370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 awsss
Member since 2005 • 1370 Posts

What? Fox blatantly spreads propaganda in an outspoken, rude, and immature kind of way. The others are just biased. I don't agree with this, but it's a very rational and reasonable decision. If you haven't yet take a look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDR47EKTrCQ&feature=topvideos.

Avatar image for KH-mixerX
KH-mixerX

5702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#6 KH-mixerX
Member since 2007 • 5702 Posts

I dont like Fox news as much as the next guy but they are unfortunately still a news outlet and should not be be banned from the white house press event. Even though they will take what ever is said at the event and twist it into something seemingly terrible and feed it the the ignorant hordes as being un-american, un-patriotic or some other BS like that.

SunofVich

Now that's a whole new argument there. As much as I'd like to take you up on that debate, I won't.

Avatar image for KH-mixerX
KH-mixerX

5702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#7 KH-mixerX
Member since 2007 • 5702 Posts

What? Fox blatantly spreads propaganda in an outspoken, rude, and immature kind of way. The others are just biased. I don't agree with this, but it's a very rational and reasonable decision. If you haven't yet take a look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDR47EKTrCQ&feature=topvideos.

awsss

The bottom line here, is that the Obama Administration wants to silence anyone who doesn't agree with and accept them with open arms. And unfortunately, since Fox is the only network in existence it seems these days that doesn't wildly slant to the left, they're the ones that get targeted. Now, Fox isn't innocent when it comes to bias. No news media is unfortunately. But something has to be done about the American News Media as a whole. It's a political smear machine for the Democratic Party.

Avatar image for tormentor313
tormentor313

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 tormentor313
Member since 2009 • 348 Posts
its not anti freedom of press, because the white house chooses who it lets into the press rooms and to ask questions. they are FREE to select who they want in there. anti freedom of press would be to try and shut down fox news, they are not doing that. although fox news is not really news anyways, so they dont belong in the white house.
Avatar image for RJay123
RJay123

911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 RJay123
Member since 2009 • 911 Posts

[QUOTE="awsss"]

What? Fox blatantly spreads propaganda in an outspoken, rude, and immature kind of way. The others are just biased. I don't agree with this, but it's a very rational and reasonable decision. If you haven't yet take a look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDR47EKTrCQ&feature=topvideos.

KH-mixerX

The bottom line here, is that the Obama Administration wants to silence anyone who doesn't agree with and accept them with open arms. And unfortunately, since Fox is the only network in existence it seems these days that doesn't wildly slant to the left, they're the ones that get targeted. Now, Fox isn't innocent when it comes to bias. No news media is unfortunately. But something has to be done about the American News Media as a whole. It's a political smear machine for the Democratic Party.

Your opinion is biased....seeing as you are clearly a Republican yourself. I'd trust an Independant's opinion on this matter a lot more.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#10 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
You're right about one thing: they're not blatantly left wing...they're blatantly right wing. Whats the point in having them there if they're just going to make up rubbish for the average to believe?
Avatar image for Tannerr33
Tannerr33

896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#11 Tannerr33
Member since 2004 • 896 Posts

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

[QUOTE="awsss"]

What? Fox blatantly spreads propaganda in an outspoken, rude, and immature kind of way. The others are just biased. I don't agree with this, but it's a very rational and reasonable decision. If you haven't yet take a look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDR47EKTrCQ&feature=topvideos.

RJay123

The bottom line here, is that the Obama Administration wants to silence anyone who doesn't agree with and accept them with open arms. And unfortunately, since Fox is the only network in existence it seems these days that doesn't wildly slant to the left, they're the ones that get targeted. Now, Fox isn't innocent when it comes to bias. No news media is unfortunately. But something has to be done about the American News Media as a whole. It's a political smear machine for the Democratic Party.

Your opinion is biased....seeing as you are clearly a Republican yourself. I'd trust an Independant's opinion on this matter a lot more.

How do you know he isn't a right leaning independant? Assuming he is a republican just makes you sound like a jackass. He could be libertarian for all you know or some other party that has right leaning views.

Avatar image for RJay123
RJay123

911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 RJay123
Member since 2009 • 911 Posts

[QUOTE="SunofVich"]

I dont like Fox news as much as the next guy but they are unfortunately still a news outlet and should not be be banned from the white house press event. Even though they will take what ever is said at the event and twist it into something seemingly terrible and feed it the the ignorant hordes as being un-american, un-patriotic or some other BS like that.

KH-mixerX

Now that's a whole new argument there. As much as I'd like to take you up on that debate, I won't.

This line cements you being Republican.

If I am wrong, may lightning strike me down right now.

Avatar image for KH-mixerX
KH-mixerX

5702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#13 KH-mixerX
Member since 2007 • 5702 Posts

[QUOTE="RJay123"]

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

The bottom line here, is that the Obama Administration wants to silence anyone who doesn't agree with and accept them with open arms. And unfortunately, since Fox is the only network in existence it seems these days that doesn't wildly slant to the left, they're the ones that get targeted. Now, Fox isn't innocent when it comes to bias. No news media is unfortunately. But something has to be done about the American News Media as a whole. It's a political smear machine for the Democratic Party.

Tannerr33

Your opinion is biased....seeing as you are clearly a Republican yourself. I'd trust an Independant's opinion on this matter a lot more.

How do you know he isn't a right leaning independant? Assuming he is a republican just makes you sound like a jackass. He could be libertarian for all you know or some other party that has right leaning views.

I don't even know what I am. All I know is that Fox is biased just like every other news media outlet in existence. I also know that excluding them just because they don't lean the same way as the rest of the American News outlets is wrong. Never once have I claimed that Fox has clean hands when it comes to bias. And in case you didn't know, there is no such thing as a true "independent." Everyone is biased in some way or another. It's sad, but it is the truth unfortunately.

Avatar image for KH-mixerX
KH-mixerX

5702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#14 KH-mixerX
Member since 2007 • 5702 Posts

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

[QUOTE="SunofVich"]

I dont like Fox news as much as the next guy but they are unfortunately still a news outlet and should not be be banned from the white house press event. Even though they will take what ever is said at the event and twist it into something seemingly terrible and feed it the the ignorant hordes as being un-american, un-patriotic or some other BS like that.

RJay123

Now that's a whole new argument there. As much as I'd like to take you up on that debate, I won't.

This line cements you being Republican.

If I am wrong, may lightning strike me down right now.

I'd stear clear of tall places and open fields for a while if I were you....

Avatar image for get-ka12
get-ka12

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 get-ka12
Member since 2009 • 1946 Posts
So much for Freedom of the Press. :roll:
Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts

Fox news brought this on themselves, I dont agree with them being blocked from this really but I do think the media should be more liable to repercussions when they sensationalise stories and make something out of nothing the way Fox news have done for years now (and that would apply to a lot of press for that matter).

Avatar image for SuperVegeta518
SuperVegeta518

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 SuperVegeta518
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts

What? Fox blatantly spreads propaganda in an outspoken, rude, and immature kind of way. The others are just biased. I don't agree with this, but it's a very rational and reasonable decision. If you haven't yet take a look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDR47EKTrCQ&feature=topvideos.

awsss

A bunch of small clips from mostly opinion shows proves nothing. The news shows (meaning not Hannity or Glenn Beck) while still slightly right wing, are no worse than any other news channel. MSNBC has very liberal opinion shows that praise Obama but they won't exclude MSNBC. Just because the Obama administration doesn't like something that Fox News says doesn't make it suddenly okay to exclude them. As soon as government starts excluding news organizations because an administration doesn't like its message, we will have the equivalent of start controlled media. Imagine the outrage you would feel if Bush had only allowed fox news to cover him because it was less critical of his administration than other news outlets.

Avatar image for SuperVegeta518
SuperVegeta518

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 SuperVegeta518
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts

Fox news brought this on themselves, I dont agree with them being blocked from this really but I do think the media should be more liable to repercussions when they sensationalise stories and make something out of nothing the way Fox news have done for years now (and that would apply to a lot of press for that matter).

SapSacPrime

that would apply to every major news outlet. Should we just abolish free press because we don't like the way news is delivered and because we might believe that there is nothing behind a paticular story?

Avatar image for C_BozkurT_C
C_BozkurT_C

3580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 C_BozkurT_C
Member since 2008 • 3580 Posts
So much for Freedom of the Press. :roll:get-ka12
Fox News only spews propaganda, it has no place.
Avatar image for SuperVegeta518
SuperVegeta518

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 SuperVegeta518
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

[QUOTE="SunofVich"]

I dont like Fox news as much as the next guy but they are unfortunately still a news outlet and should not be be banned from the white house press event. Even though they will take what ever is said at the event and twist it into something seemingly terrible and feed it the the ignorant hordes as being un-american, un-patriotic or some other BS like that.

RJay123

Now that's a whole new argument there. As much as I'd like to take you up on that debate, I won't.

This line cements you being Republican.

If I am wrong, may lightning strike me down right now.

i am a libertarian and I would completely disagree with that statement. While there are things on fox news that make me cringe, every other major news source is just as bad.(well I believe that MSNBC is on another level but that's another story) Not liking a message does not make those that follow it ignorant(being right or wrong is once again a different story). This is the same view that people have on religion. It is not ignorance, most are well aware of the other side of the story, it's just firmly held beliefs that you disagree with.

Avatar image for SuperVegeta518
SuperVegeta518

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 SuperVegeta518
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts

[QUOTE="get-ka12"]So much for Freedom of the Press. :roll:C_BozkurT_C
Fox News only spews propaganda, it has no place.

Your sig is propaganda, it has no place. The only reason I say this is because I don't like the message of your signature, not because it is actually a form of state controlled media.

Avatar image for SuperVegeta518
SuperVegeta518

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 SuperVegeta518
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts

[QUOTE="get-ka12"]So much for Freedom of the Press. :roll:RearNakedChoke

The press doesn't have the freedom to film anywhere they want.

They simply were not invited, tough s***. It's not like Fox reports news, they literally just make it up.

This is why I can't stand arguing politics with the immature. They are the ones that simply make up there own facts and over time become pathological liars so that they don't ever have to challenge there own beliefs, they can simply say that others are liars and believe that there own belief is absolute fact based on rock solid unbreakable evidence. I have admitted that I was wrong before because being open to other view points even while completely disagreeing with them is the only way to truly advance our own understanding.

Avatar image for get-ka12
get-ka12

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 get-ka12
Member since 2009 • 1946 Posts

[QUOTE="get-ka12"]So much for Freedom of the Press. :roll:C_BozkurT_C
Fox News only spews propaganda, it has no place.

Even if that is true, which it may or may not be, it is not the federal government's place to limit the press freedoms of those that it governs, this is a clear breech of the First Amendment of the Constitution.

It would not be right either if a Conservative president were doing it to a liberal news outlet.

Avatar image for RearNakedChoke
RearNakedChoke

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 RearNakedChoke
Member since 2009 • 1699 Posts

[QUOTE="RearNakedChoke"]

[QUOTE="get-ka12"]So much for Freedom of the Press. :roll:SuperVegeta518

The press doesn't have the freedom to film anywhere they want.

They simply were not invited, tough s***. It's not like Fox reports news, they literally just make it up.

This is why I can't stand arguing politics with the immature. They are the ones that simply make up there own facts and over time become pathological liars so that they don't ever have to challenge there own beliefs, they can simply say that others are liars and believe that there own belief is absolute fact based on rock solid unbreakable evidence. I have admitted that I was wrong before because being open to other view points even while completely disagreeing with them is the only way to truly advance our own understanding.

They're not spewing BS? You agree that Obama is a socialist, a communist, hitler (as Glen Beck put it), that he's a racist, that he'll bring about the end of capitalism in America? That he's intentionally trying to destroy the country? These are the things that you'll hear when you watch an episode of Fox news.

Avatar image for SuperVegeta518
SuperVegeta518

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 SuperVegeta518
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts

[QUOTE="SuperVegeta518"]

[QUOTE="RearNakedChoke"]

The press doesn't have the freedom to film anywhere they want.

They simply were not invited, tough s***. It's not like Fox reports news, they literally just make it up.

RearNakedChoke

This is why I can't stand arguing politics with the immature. They are the ones that simply make up there own facts and over time become pathological liars so that they don't ever have to challenge there own beliefs, they can simply say that others are liars and believe that there own belief is absolute fact based on rock solid unbreakable evidence. I have admitted that I was wrong before because being open to other view points even while completely disagreeing with them is the only way to truly advance our own understanding.

They're not spewing BS? You agree that Obama is a socialist, a communist, hitler (as Glen Beck put it), that he's a racist, that he'll bring about the end of capitalism in America? That he's intentionally trying to destroy the country? These are the things that you'll hear when you watch an episode of Fox news.

These are opinion shows. MSNBC has opinion shows that are left leaning and said things that were just as bad about the Bush administration. Not agreeing with an OPINION does not make it BS and it does not make it ok to silence an opinion and excluding Fox News is a step towards the Obama Administrations own Patriot Act.

Avatar image for Guybrush_3
Guybrush_3

8308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Guybrush_3
Member since 2008 • 8308 Posts

I don't blame them. Fox News Channel is not actually a news reporting channel. It is just one giant smear campaign against the democrats and the obama administration.

Avatar image for bluezy
bluezy

29297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#29 bluezy
Member since 2004 • 29297 Posts

[QUOTE="C_BozkurT_C"][QUOTE="get-ka12"]So much for Freedom of the Press. :roll:get-ka12

Fox News only spews propaganda, it has no place.

Even if that is true, which it may or may not be, it is not the federal government's place to limit the press freedoms of those that it governs, this is a clear breech of the First Amendment of the Constitution.

It would not be right either if a Conservative president were doing it to a liberal news outlet.

It's not a breach of anything. Free speech does not allow for slander. If the Obama administration believes Fox News is slandering them, they can restrict their access just like for anyone else.
Avatar image for MrPraline
MrPraline

21351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 MrPraline
Member since 2008 • 21351 Posts
[QUOTE="get-ka12"]So much for Freedom of the Press. :roll:C_BozkurT_C
Fox News only spews propaganda, it has no place.

With a signature like that, you shouldn't be too hard on propaganda.
Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

I dont like Fox news as much as the next guy but they are unfortunately still a news outlet and should not be be banned from the white house press event. Even though they will take what ever is said at the event and twist it into something seemingly terrible and feed it the the ignorant hordes as being un-american, un-patriotic or some other BS like that.

SunofVich

This. I figured the White House was above this petty bickering.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

As much as I support freedom of the press I'm not sure it applies. The White House is not witholding information from the media, they are revoking the PRIVILEDGE granted to major networks to have exclusive interviews. They don't allow tabloids or even smaller news networks into these ionterviews, as they said it was just the major networks, and they do that because they feel those networks have credibility. If they feel Fox has lost that credibility (like they ever had it in the first place) they have every right to not let them in.

Avatar image for Jfisch93
Jfisch93

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#33 Jfisch93
Member since 2008 • 3557 Posts

I think liberal nuts and conservative loons need to go away permanently, they don't run for the white house, they run for money. Extremes never work. We need a party that's for the people again.

Avatar image for DA_B0MB
DA_B0MB

9938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 DA_B0MB
Member since 2005 • 9938 Posts
Fox news is the most biased and worst major news source.
Avatar image for Maniacc1
Maniacc1

5354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#35 Maniacc1
Member since 2006 • 5354 Posts
I cannot stand FOX News, I cannot stand the use of propaganda and fear against it's viewers, I cannot stand it's blatant bias. But I believe in the Constitution, and the administration should NOT have blocked them.
Avatar image for _BlueDuck_
_BlueDuck_

11986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 _BlueDuck_
Member since 2003 • 11986 Posts

According to this link ( http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/wh-were-happy-to-exclude-fox-but-didnt-yesterday-with-feinberg-interview.php) , infact Fox was not on the list ofnetworks to receive an interview because they were the only ones who did not ask for one. Once the other networks realised that Fox was not on the list (because they didn't ask to be on it), they asked for Fox to be included, which is then what happened.

Avatar image for bluezy
bluezy

29297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#37 bluezy
Member since 2004 • 29297 Posts
I cannot stand FOX News, I cannot stand the use of propaganda and fear against it's viewers, I cannot stand it's blatant bias. But I believe in the Constitution, and the administration should NOT have blocked them. Maniacc1
I would disagree that it's unconstitutional, even if they did block them access.
Avatar image for tbone29
tbone29

5552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 tbone29
Member since 2004 • 5552 Posts
Sounds good to me.
Avatar image for marvin3269
marvin3269

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 marvin3269
Member since 2009 • 140 Posts

Thats because the white house is racist.

Avatar image for Maniacc1
Maniacc1

5354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#40 Maniacc1
Member since 2006 • 5354 Posts
[QUOTE="Maniacc1"]I cannot stand FOX News, I cannot stand the use of propaganda and fear against it's viewers, I cannot stand it's blatant bias. But I believe in the Constitution, and the administration should NOT have blocked them. bluezy
I would disagree that it's unconstitutional, even if they did block them access.

Thanks to this article:

According to this link ( http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/wh-were-happy-to-exclude-fox-but-didnt-yesterday-with-feinberg-interview.php) , infact Fox was not on the list ofnetworks to receive an interview because they were the only ones who did not ask for one. Once the other networks realised that Fox was not on the list (because they didn't ask to be on it), they asked for Fox to be included, which is then what happened.

_BlueDuck_
I no longer see this as a problem. :P
Avatar image for MOSSBERG_E-Rock
MOSSBERG_E-Rock

3049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 MOSSBERG_E-Rock
Member since 2004 • 3049 Posts
[QUOTE="get-ka12"]So much for Freedom of the Press. :roll:C_BozkurT_C
Fox News only spews propaganda, it has no place.

Nice, logical comment, man...
Avatar image for hoola
hoola

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 hoola
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

Usually, if a news network is rude or doesn't like certain officials in the government, those officials will just not appear on that network and that could potentially lower ratings and hurt the network, so the networks have to be kind to the people in the government. However, i think the opposite is happening for Fox news. As the government excludes and attacks them more, people will just get angrier and watch/listen to the Fox Network more often.

Avatar image for TaCoDuDe
TaCoDuDe

3239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 TaCoDuDe
Member since 2006 • 3239 Posts

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

[QUOTE="SunofVich"]

I dont like Fox news as much as the next guy but they are unfortunately still a news outlet and should not be be banned from the white house press event. Even though they will take what ever is said at the event and twist it into something seemingly terrible and feed it the the ignorant hordes as being un-american, un-patriotic or some other BS like that.

RJay123

Now that's a whole new argument there. As much as I'd like to take you up on that debate, I won't.

This line cements you being Republican.

If I am wrong, may lightning strike me down right now.

Oh he's a Republican, god forbid. He's obviously crazy :roll:

Avatar image for p00zer
p00zer

2514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#44 p00zer
Member since 2006 • 2514 Posts

[QUOTE="get-ka12"]

[QUOTE="C_BozkurT_C"] Fox News only spews propaganda, it has no place.bluezy

Even if that is true, which it may or may not be, it is not the federal government's place to limit the press freedoms of those that it governs, this is a clear breech of the First Amendment of the Constitution.

It would not be right either if a Conservative president were doing it to a liberal news outlet.

It's not a breach of anything. Free speech does not allow for slander. If the Obama administration believes Fox News is slandering them, they can restrict their access just like for anyone else.

This is not entirely true. Speech can be monitored for obscenity, libel, fighting words, or hate speech. That is all technically. Though yes they can limit where and when people may speek as they're doing now, it is definitely a breach of something, just not the first amendment. More of a breach of acceptable government control in my opinion..

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

http://www.examiner.com/x-19663-LA-Legal-Examiner~y2009m10d23-White-House-press-pool-thwarts-Fox-News-exclusion

This seriously needs to stop. The War on Fox News is completely misplaced and ridiculous. Just because they're not blatantly left winged like pretty much every other news outlet out there. It's unethical, it's immoral, and it's UnAmerican. Although I do wanna point out that I have a lot of respect for those other news outlets that stood up for Fox.

By not blantently left winged you mean extremely conservative.. Yes.. Get back to me when they stop having Glenn Beck on the air.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="RJay123"]

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

Now that's a whole new argument there. As much as I'd like to take you up on that debate, I won't.

TaCoDuDe

This line cements you being Republican.

If I am wrong, may lightning strike me down right now.

Oh he's a Republican, god forbid. He's obviously crazy :roll:

If you listen to people like Pat Robertson, Glenn Beck, and Limbaugh.. Your crazy in my book.

Avatar image for hamstergeddon
hamstergeddon

7188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 hamstergeddon
Member since 2006 • 7188 Posts

http://www.examiner.com/x-19663-LA-Legal-Examiner~y2009m10d23-White-House-press-pool-thwarts-Fox-News-exclusion

This seriously needs to stop. The War on Fox News is completely misplaced and ridiculous. Just because they're not blatantly left winged like pretty much every other news outlet out there. It's unethical, it's immoral, and it's UnAmerican. Although I do wanna point out that I have a lot of respect for those other news outlets that stood up for Fox.

KH-mixerX
To be fair they have called Obama an Atheist, Muslim, in league with the Taliban, born in Kenya, a Socialist, a Communist, an Anarachist and pretty much everything in between. is that enough of a reason?
Avatar image for TaCoDuDe
TaCoDuDe

3239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 TaCoDuDe
Member since 2006 • 3239 Posts

[QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

http://www.examiner.com/x-19663-LA-Legal-Examiner~y2009m10d23-White-House-press-pool-thwarts-Fox-News-exclusion

This seriously needs to stop. The War on Fox News is completely misplaced and ridiculous. Just because they're not blatantly left winged like pretty much every other news outlet out there. It's unethical, it's immoral, and it's UnAmerican. Although I do wanna point out that I have a lot of respect for those other news outlets that stood up for Fox.

hamstergeddon

To be fair they have called Obama an Atheist, Muslim, in league with the Taliban, born in Kenya, a Socialist, a Communist, an Anarachist and pretty much everything in between. is that enough of a reason?

On the opinion shows. Liberal pundits lashed out at Bush when he was in office. It goes both ways.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="TaCoDuDe"]

[QUOTE="hamstergeddon"][QUOTE="KH-mixerX"]

http://www.examiner.com/x-19663-LA-Legal-Examiner~y2009m10d23-White-House-press-pool-thwarts-Fox-News-exclusion

This seriously needs to stop. The War on Fox News is completely misplaced and ridiculous. Just because they're not blatantly left winged like pretty much every other news outlet out there. It's unethical, it's immoral, and it's UnAmerican. Although I do wanna point out that I have a lot of respect for those other news outlets that stood up for Fox.

To be fair they have called Obama an Atheist, Muslim, in league with the Taliban, born in Kenya, a Socialist, a Communist, an Anarachist and pretty much everything in between. is that enough of a reason?

On the opinion shows. Liberal pundits lashed out at Bush when he was in office. It goes both ways.

I have seen NO where to the extent to how Obama got it.. This is only 9 months in and he is getting harsher criticism than Bush got 5 years into his presidency..
Avatar image for KH-mixerX
KH-mixerX

5702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#50 KH-mixerX
Member since 2007 • 5702 Posts

[QUOTE="TaCoDuDe"]

[QUOTE="hamstergeddon"] To be fair they have called Obama an Atheist, Muslim, in league with the Taliban, born in Kenya, a Socialist, a Communist, an Anarachist and pretty much everything in between. is that enough of a reason?sSubZerOo

On the opinion shows. Liberal pundits lashed out at Bush when he was in office. It goes both ways.

I have seen NO where to the extent to how Obama got it.. This is only 9 months in and he is getting harsher criticism than Bush got 5 years into his presidency..

Your not serious right? Your delusional if you think that. The news media's love affair with Obama has been rampant since even before his election. Bush was crucified on a regular basis in the latter half of his presidency.

Obama deserves every criticism he receives. Especially when he claims to be willing to meet and negotiate with the likes of the Iranian President, a person who has publicly expressed that he wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. His name escapes me at the moment, but you know who I'm referring to. It's things like this, and many others that puts him in the situations he's in now. I can name a bunch off. Before his election he claimed he wouldn't sing the national anthem because he didn't feel comfortable with it. He's yet to produce a birth certificate. He surrounds himself with people like Eric Holder and Rev. Wright. He backs off of the missile program in Europe to appease Russia. The guy is practically unAmerican. And now, he tries to control the news media, as if it's not already dominated by his party.