Obama calls for Congress to vote on oil subsidies

  • 80 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts

"A day after Republicans signaled possible compromise with the White House on energy issues, President Barack Obama called Thursday for Congress to vote in the coming weeks on ending billions of dollars in subsidies for the oil industry."

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/01/politics/obama-energy/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

This was brought up during the budget process as well, and it looks like it's going to be brought into the light again. Do you think these subsidies should end, or should they continue?

For what it's worth, McConnell is framing ending these subsidies as a tax increase (which Republicans by and large oppose point blank).

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky rejected Obama's call to end the oil subsidies.

"If someone in the administration can show me that raising taxes on American energy production will lower gas prices and create jobs, then I will gladly discuss it," McConnell said in a statement. "But since nobody can, and the president doesn't, this is merely an attempt to deflect from his failed policies."McConnell

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Honestly, I dont know enough about how the subsidies affect things. Does ending them mean 5$ gas? I guess it would stimulate the drive for alternative energy but it may also dampen any economic recovery. I just dont know.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts

Honestly, I dont know enough about how the subsidies affect things. Does ending them mean 5$ gas? I guess it would stimulate the drive for alternative energy but it may also dampen any economic recovery. I just dont know.

sonicare
Well, oil is a commodity market with high profits. The prices in such markets aren't typically cost constrained, but rather fall more in line with a classic supply and demand curve. When this came up during the budget process, opponents of ending them weren't even trying to construe them as items which lowered the cost of gasoline, but rather items which encouraged further exploration. Critics of the subsidies point to the high profits in the industry as evidence that additional government incentive isn't needed to entice companies to look for more oil.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Well in that case, end them.

Avatar image for Maniacc1
Maniacc1

5354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#5 Maniacc1
Member since 2006 • 5354 Posts
Last I checked, oil companies are doing just fine on their own. No need for a subsidy.
Avatar image for Banjo_Kongfooie
Banjo_Kongfooie

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Banjo_Kongfooie
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts
Last I checked, oil companies are doing just fine on their own. No need for a subsidy. Maniacc1
The reason oil companies get them is first place is that they bought Republicans.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
I don't think they are necessary.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

I dont think some of the most profitable companies of the world (if not the most) need to get free government money....

Avatar image for Banjo_Kongfooie
Banjo_Kongfooie

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Banjo_Kongfooie
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts

I dont think some of the most profitable companies of the world (if not the most) need to get free government money....

BossPerson

See thats logic, we are logical rational people... Republicans take advantage of social issues to get elected so they can help the 1% and Big Oil... Their only logic is reelection.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]

I dont think some of the most profitable companies of the world (if not the most) need to get free government money....

Banjo_Kongfooie

See thats logic, we are logical rational people... Republicans take advantage of social issues to get elected so they can help the 1% and Big Oil... Their only logic is reelection.

While both parties have prostituted themselves to corporate America, I would agree that Republicans have done it more often...

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

I'm not a huge fan of subsidies in general.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

We give subsidies to green energy, why not the same to the oil industry?

The misconception is that we're actually giving them money, which we aren't. They're getting tax breaks on certain things(like equipment).

So yes, the billion dollar price tag sounds scary at first, but you have to take it in context. It's money that we could be getting if the subsidies were ended and I don't think that's a good idea.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

We give subsidies to green energy, why not the same to the oil industry?

airshocker

B/c two wrongs don't make a right; they both increase the spending level.

Avatar image for Jd1680a
Jd1680a

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#15 Jd1680a
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts
Exxon Mobil made $486 billion in 2011 and $41 billion in net income. Chevron made $204 billion in 2010 and $19 billion in net income. Shell made $368 billion in 2010 and $20 billion in net income. What if the subsidies were to end for these companies, they have enough capital to invest in their own products.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

B/c two wrongs don't make a right; they both increase the spending level.

coolbeans90

Yet one has a legitimate shot at keeping gas prices down, the other does not.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

We give subsidies to green energy, why not the same to the oil industry?

The misconception is that we're actually giving them money, which we aren't. They're getting tax breaks on certain things(like equipment).

So yes, the billion dollar price tag sounds scary at first, but you have to take it in context. It's money that we could be getting if the subsidies were ended and I don't think that's a good idea.

airshocker
There are a number of reasons why they aren't needed, especially for big oil. Aside from them making record profits, it gives them an unfair advantage. They don't need those huge tax breaks especially when America has such huge financial problems...
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

We give subsidies to green energy, why not the same to the oil industry?

The misconception is that we're actually giving them money, which we aren't. They're getting tax breaks on certain things(like equipment).

So yes, the billion dollar price tag sounds scary at first, but you have to take it in context. It's money that we could be getting if the subsidies were ended and I don't think that's a good idea.

airshocker
The difference between green energy and the oil industry is that green energy is a young industry that is just beginning to develop, whereas the oil industry is one of the most profitable industries in the world. It's very hard, if not impossible, for new industries like green energy to become profitable on their own without public investment.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

There are a number of reasons why they aren't needed, especially for big oil. Aside from them making record profits, it gives them an unfair advantage. They don't need those huge tax breaks especially when America has such huge financial problems...BossPerson

An unfair advantage over what? Every US big oil company gets those tax breaks.

Having gas prices increase will cause some pretty huge financial problems as well.

Avatar image for Banjo_Kongfooie
Banjo_Kongfooie

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Banjo_Kongfooie
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts

We give subsidies to green energy, why not the same to the oil industry?

The misconception is that we're actually giving them money, which we aren't. They're getting tax breaks on certain things(like equipment).

So yes, the billion dollar price tag sounds scary at first, but you have to take it in context. It's money that we could be getting if the subsidies were ended and I don't think that's a good idea.

airshocker

Maybe because Green Energy is an industry that needs it while Big Oil obliterates our environment and would be profitable without subsidies.

I can not believe you would even compare the two... OH WAIT, its airshocker... I am not stunned in that case.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

B/c two wrongs don't make a right; they both increase the spending level.

airshocker

Yet one has a legitimate shot at keeping gas prices down, the other does not.

Gas prices have little to do with the subsidies. The oil is sold on the international market anyways and even if they did save money, they wouldn't lower their profit margin to pass the 'savings' on the consumer.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

The difference between green energy and the oil industry is that green energy is a young industry that is just beginning to develop, whereas the oil industry is one of the most profitable industries in the world. It's very hard, if not impossible, for new industries like green energy to become profitable on their own without public investment.-Sun_Tzu-

The real difference is cheaper gas is tangible with the oil subsidies. We get no benefit from green energy subsidies at the moment. Except over-priced electric cars, if you can call that a benefit.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Gas prices have little to do with the subsidies. The oil is sold on the international market anyways and even if they did save money, they wouldn't lower their profit margin to pass the 'savings' on the consumer.BossPerson

Yet they would pass it on anyway.

Avatar image for Moriarity_
Moriarity_

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Moriarity_
Member since 2011 • 1332 Posts
Green energy needs the subsidies so that the industry can develop and become profitable. The oil companies don't have any trouble making money. Plus we need an alternate energy source before we run out of oil, while that day is very far away I'd rather get a viable alternate energy source sooner rather than later.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]The difference between green energy and the oil industry is that green energy is a young industry that is just beginning to develop, whereas the oil industry is one of the most profitable industries in the world. It's very hard, if not impossible, for new industries like green energy to become profitable on their own without public investment.airshocker

The real difference is cheaper gas is tangible with the oil subsidies. We get no benefit from green energy subsidies at the moment. Except over-priced electric cars, if you can call that a benefit.

Oil subsidies won't lead to cheaper gas.....supply of gas is rising anyways (America is at an 8 year high of domestic production), but yet, gas is still rising in price. If you hate high gas prices, blame excessive speculation.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Oil subsidies won't lead to cheaper gas.....supply of gas is rising anyways, but yet, gas is still rising in price. If you hate high gas prices, blame excessive speculation.BossPerson

By cheap I meant current prices. Which aren't cheap, but cheaper than what we'd have without them.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

*shrugs* Oil companies are on record of saying that they don't require the subsidies. We could put that 20 billion towards paing off the national debt.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12873 Posts
The oil industry is basically a monopoly because of government subsidizing but the government only subsidizes oil because its a national security issue.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

B/c two wrongs don't make a right; they both increase the spending level.

airshocker

Yet one has a legitimate shot at keeping gas prices down, the other does not.

Lowers prices by paying for gas indirectly via taxes, though.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
Green energy needs the subsidies so that the industry can develop and become profitable. The oil companies don't have any trouble making money. Plus we need an alternate energy source before we run out of oil, while that day is very far away I'd rather get a viable alternate energy source sooner rather than later.Moriarity_
Personally I'd rather get to an alternative energy source sooner than later so that we don't have to fear prices at the pump.
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

B/c two wrongs don't make a right; they both increase the spending level.

airshocker

Yet one has a legitimate shot at keeping gas prices down, the other does not.

According to economists, neither does in the short term. And in the long term, the other wins out.
Avatar image for Banjo_Kongfooie
Banjo_Kongfooie

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Banjo_Kongfooie
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts

*shrugs* Oil companies are on record of saying that they don't require the subsidies. We could put that 20 billion towards paing off the national debt.

Serraph105

Or we could use the money to help the homeless, orphans, single moms, people who need the money.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]Oil subsidies won't lead to cheaper gas.....supply of gas is rising anyways, but yet, gas is still rising in price. If you hate high gas prices, blame excessive speculation.airshocker

By cheap I meant current prices. Which aren't cheap, but cheaper than what we'd have without them.

So now they are 'cheap' only because they got so used getting these subsidies? Its almost like the oil companies are holding us hostage then by saying if you take away my subsidies i'll raise the price even though im making record profits? I know you are an absolute republican, but at least admit 'government spending' on the oil companies is wrong......Anyways, them saving money will go little way to lowering the price of gas. Unless every oil company in the world got subsidies, the price of gas will continue to rise...
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#34 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

They should be ended, but the result would be a massive increase in the price of gas as the oil speculators shoot the prices up to unholy amounts.

Sad that is has come to this.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]Gas prices have little to do with the subsidies. The oil is sold on the international market anyways and even if they did save money, they wouldn't lower their profit margin to pass the 'savings' on the consumer.airshocker

Yet they would pass it on anyway.

No they don't. Oil is sold on a commodities market.
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

Honestly, I dont know enough about how the subsidies affect things. Does ending them mean 5$ gas? I guess it would stimulate the drive for alternative energy but it may also dampen any economic recovery. I just dont know.

mattbbpl

Well, oil is a commodity market with high profits. The prices in such markets aren't typically cost constrained, but rather fall more in line with a classic supply and demand curve. When this came up during the budget process, opponents of ending them weren't even trying to construe them as items which lowered the cost of gasoline, but rather items which encouraged further exploration. Critics of the subsidies point to the high profits in the industry as evidence that additional government incentive isn't needed to entice companies to look for more oil.

Supply and demand stopped influencing the price of gas lone time ago. At least for the US.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#37 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

*shrugs* Oil companies are on record of saying that they don't require the subsidies. We could put that 20 billion towards paing off the national debt.

Banjo_Kongfooie

Or we could use the money to help the homeless, orphans, single moms, people who need the money.

Aww isn't this cute. You're setting it up so a response would make the person look terrible.

Gotta love it.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]The difference between green energy and the oil industry is that green energy is a young industry that is just beginning to develop, whereas the oil industry is one of the most profitable industries in the world. It's very hard, if not impossible, for new industries like green energy to become profitable on their own without public investment.airshocker

The real difference is cheaper gas is tangible with the oil subsidies. We get no benefit from green energy subsidies at the moment. Except over-priced electric cars, if you can call that a benefit.

Oil subsidies really don't impact gasoline prices one way or the other. And green energy subsidies are an investment, and since they are an investment obviously there isn't going to be that much of a short-term benefit. But since you brought up electric cars, it's because of federal tax credits that make electric cars affordable to middle class Americans.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Lowers prices by paying for gas indirectly via taxes, though.

coolbeans90

Everyone else gets welfare, might as well get some of it for me. xD

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#40 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

What people need to realize is that there is no supply and demand for oil in the USA right now. Between the oil speculators and the oil subsidies, people are just getting stupidly rich without having any shred of competition in the market.

These companies have been using politicans for decades to keep it that way. They'll say it's a market economy, but a market economy isn't ruled by a group of people at Wall St. who can jack up oil prices just because they feel like it.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

*shrugs* Oil companies are on record of saying that they don't require the subsidies. We could put that 20 billion towards paing off the national debt.

Wasdie

Or we could use the money to help the homeless, orphans, single moms, people who need the money.

Aww isn't this cute. You're setting it up so a response would make the person look terrible.

Gotta love it.

and that's why I was ignoring it.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

What people need to realize is that there is no supply and demand for oil in the USA right now. Between the oil speculators and the oil subsidies, people are just getting stupidly rich without having any shred of competition in the market.

These companies have been using politicans for decades to keep it that way. They'll say it's a market economy, but a market economy isn't ruled by a group of people at Wall St. who can jack up oil prices just because they feel like it.

Wasdie
This man has it right
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="sonicare"]

Honestly, I dont know enough about how the subsidies affect things. Does ending them mean 5$ gas? I guess it would stimulate the drive for alternative energy but it may also dampen any economic recovery. I just dont know.

Blue-Sky

Well, oil is a commodity market with high profits. The prices in such markets aren't typically cost constrained, but rather fall more in line with a classic supply and demand curve. When this came up during the budget process, opponents of ending them weren't even trying to construe them as items which lowered the cost of gasoline, but rather items which encouraged further exploration. Critics of the subsidies point to the high profits in the industry as evidence that additional government incentive isn't needed to entice companies to look for more oil.

Supply and demand stopped influencing the price of gas lone time ago. At least for the US.

How so? If you're referring to speculators, it's still a demand effect, they're just buying to hold in the hopes of making money later.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

So now they are 'cheap' only because they got so used getting these subsidies? Its almost like the oil companies are holding us hostage then by saying if you take away my subsidies i'll raise the price even though im making record profits? I know you are an absolute republican, but at least admit 'government spending' on the oil companies is wrong......Anyways, them saving money will go little way to lowering the price of gas. Unless every oil company in the world got subsidies, the price of gas will continue to rise...BossPerson

What does me being a republican have to do with admitting subsidies are wrong? Of course they're wrong, but we're faced with this: Gas prices will go up if we get rid of them.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Oil subsidies really don't impact gasoline prices one way or the other. And green energy subsidies are an investment, and since they are an investment obviously there isn't going to be that much of a short-term benefit. But since you brought up electric cars, it's because of federal tax credits that make electric cars affordable to middle class Americans. -Sun_Tzu-

Affordable my ass. :lol:

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]So now they are 'cheap' only because they got so used getting these subsidies? Its almost like the oil companies are holding us hostage then by saying if you take away my subsidies i'll raise the price even though im making record profits? I know you are an absolute republican, but at least admit 'government spending' on the oil companies is wrong......Anyways, them saving money will go little way to lowering the price of gas. Unless every oil company in the world got subsidies, the price of gas will continue to rise...airshocker

What does me being a republican have to do with admitting subsidies are wrong? Of course they're wrong, but we're faced with this: Gas prices will go up if we get rid of them.

You should do some research on oil markets. Oil prices will not rise because of subsidies directly, oil will rise anyways. And you being a republican means you should be against government spending...
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

You should do some research on oil markets. Oil prices will not rise because of subsidies directly, oil will rise anyways. And you being a republican means you should be against government spending...BossPerson

I'm not against government spending when it's beneficial.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23365 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]So now they are 'cheap' only because they got so used getting these subsidies? Its almost like the oil companies are holding us hostage then by saying if you take away my subsidies i'll raise the price even though im making record profits? I know you are an absolute republican, but at least admit 'government spending' on the oil companies is wrong......Anyways, them saving money will go little way to lowering the price of gas. Unless every oil company in the world got subsidies, the price of gas will continue to rise...BossPerson

What does me being a republican have to do with admitting subsidies are wrong? Of course they're wrong, but we're faced with this: Gas prices will go up if we get rid of them.

You should do some research on oil markets. Oil prices will not rise because of subsidies directly, oil will rise anyways. And you being a republican means you should be against government spending...

You're confusing the terms Republican and Conservative.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="airshocker"]

What does me being a republican have to do with admitting subsidies are wrong? Of course they're wrong, but we're faced with this: Gas prices will go up if we get rid of them.

mattbbpl

You should do some research on oil markets. Oil prices will not rise because of subsidies directly, oil will rise anyways. And you being a republican means you should be against government spending...

You're confusing the terms Republican and Conservative.

my mistake
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

What people need to realize is that there is no supply and demand for oil in the USA right now. Between the oil speculators and the oil subsidies, people are just getting stupidly rich without having any shred of competition in the market.

Wasdie

to go further in proving you are right about the supply and demand of oil, we actually use less oil now than we did in 07 yet prices are nearly as high as they've ever been.