Oh my. Alberta rednecks never cease to amaze me

  • 64 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for effena
effena

2811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 effena
Member since 2008 • 2811 Posts

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2009/06/02/alberta-human-rights-school-gay-education-law.html?ref=rss#socialcomments

"Alberta legislators passed legislation early Tuesday that will give parents the option of pulling their children out of cl@ss when lessons on sex, religion or sexual orientation are being taught."

I think this is pretty close-minded. Children should be exposed to as many different viewpoints as possible.

Avatar image for michael_1234576
michael_1234576

8621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 michael_1234576
Member since 2004 • 8621 Posts
Oh noes not sex ed and religion!
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts
I don't get what it accomplishes. Just makes the kids curious about it and they're going to find out from the other kids... Newsflash parents kids are going to see stuff you don't want them to. They'll survive.
Avatar image for Locke562
Locke562

7673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Locke562
Member since 2004 • 7673 Posts
What's troubling is that teachers can now be sued and brought before a Human Rights Tribunal for talking about Sex Education, Religion, or sexual orientation.
Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

What ages are we talking about?

Avatar image for effena
effena

2811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 effena
Member since 2008 • 2811 Posts

What's troubling is that teachers can now be sued and brought before a Human Rights Tribunal for talking about Sex Education, Religion, or sexual orientation. Locke562

Exactly. This is something that belongs in a school act, not a human rights clause. So here in Alberta, a teacher can be labeled as "inhumane" for simply teaching sex ed

Avatar image for Wolls
Wolls

19119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 Wolls
Member since 2005 • 19119 Posts

The dumbist thing is that sex ed helps prevent underage sex not encourage it

Avatar image for Nagru
Nagru

1956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 Nagru
Member since 2006 • 1956 Posts

I live in Alberta, and right now all you seem to hear at school is teachers & students complaining about that bill. "They're going to use it to take our rights away", "Now we can't talk about sexuality/religion at all", etc.

I'm fine with bill. It's seems to be the same policy we've always had, just more formalized. If the parents think something's inappropriate for their kids age (Or for anyone), it's the parents right to remove the kid from that, and that's always been around. It's not removing the right to talk about these subjects at all, just putting checks on some of the 'bolder' stuff.

Avatar image for MrPraline
MrPraline

21351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 MrPraline
Member since 2008 • 21351 Posts
No, they shouldn't pull out during lessons on sex. Condoms are safer.
Avatar image for Roxas12934
Roxas12934

1854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 Roxas12934
Member since 2006 • 1854 Posts

I live in Alberta and i find this hillarious. Were not Rednecks :P

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

I live in Alberta and i find this hillarious. Were not Rednecks :P

Roxas12934
I don't think the implication that EVERYONE there qualifies. At least that is how I read it.
Avatar image for MrPraline
MrPraline

21351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 MrPraline
Member since 2008 • 21351 Posts
I'm not a redneck. My neck is 100% pure white. (:P)
Avatar image for effena
effena

2811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 effena
Member since 2008 • 2811 Posts

I live in Alberta and i find this hillarious. Were not Rednecks :P

Roxas12934

Yeah, neither am I. Look at my avatar :P There is an abundance of conservative people here, though.

Avatar image for effena
effena

2811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 effena
Member since 2008 • 2811 Posts

I live in Alberta, and right now all you seem to hear at school is teachers & students complaining about that bill. "They're going to use it to take our rights away", "Now we can't talk about sexuality/religion at all", etc.

I'm fine with bill. It's seems to be the same policy we've always had, just more formalized. If the parents think something's inappropriate for their kids age (Or for anyone), it's the parents right to remove the kid from that, and that's always been around. It's not removing the right to talk about these subjects at all, just putting checks on some of the 'bolder' stuff.

Nagru

I agree that parents should have that right as well. If they want to teach their kids about the more sensitive stuff themselves, they should have that right. I'm just concerned about where this bill is placed, which is with human rights, and I believe it should be in the School Act

Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

I agree that parents should have that right as well. If they want to teach their kids about the more sensitive stuff themselves, they should have that right. I'm just concerned about where this bill is placed, which is with human rights, and I believe it should be in the School Act

effena

Your opening post suggests a dramatically different concern than this one.

Avatar image for Head_of_games
Head_of_games

10859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Head_of_games
Member since 2007 • 10859 Posts
I'm in favor of it. Parents should be able to raise their children any way they choose(Within reason), and if that means they want to teach them about sex and religon themselves, then that's fine. I don't believe The government should be able to meddle in parenting.
Avatar image for effena
effena

2811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#17 effena
Member since 2008 • 2811 Posts

[QUOTE="effena"]I agree that parents should have that right as well. If they want to teach their kids about the more sensitive stuff themselves, they should have that right. I'm just concerned about where this bill is placed, which is with human rights, and I believe it should be in the School Act

Oleg_Huzwog

Your opening post suggests a dramatically different concern than this one.

Not nesessarily. Kids NEED to be taught about this kind of stuff from an adult. If not, they will learn about it in an ignorant mannor from their peers. If the parents want to teach it themselves, thats fine, but they way this bill has been made, they can pull the kids out of class just to keep them ignorant, and the school can do nothing about it. THATS why I think it's close minded.

Avatar image for Nagru
Nagru

1956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Nagru
Member since 2006 • 1956 Posts

[QUOTE="Nagru"]

I live in Alberta, and right now all you seem to hear at school is teachers & students complaining about that bill. "They're going to use it to take our rights away", "Now we can't talk about sexuality/religion at all", etc.

I'm fine with bill. It's seems to be the same policy we've always had, just more formalized. If the parents think something's inappropriate for their kids age (Or for anyone), it's the parents right to remove the kid from that, and that's always been around. It's not removing the right to talk about these subjects at all, just putting checks on some of the 'bolder' stuff.

effena

I agree that parents should have that right as well. If they want to teach their kids about the more sensitive stuff themselves, they should have that right. I'm just concerned about where this bill is placed, which is with human rights, and I believe it should be in the School Act

Yes, bringing a teacher before a Human Rights Tribunal for violations is extremely excessive, but the basic principle of 'bill 44' is still perfectly sound.

I'm just waiting to see whether it's really implemented or not. I've already had one teacher say he's just going to ignore the bill, and another's going to 'resist' it. It could end up being swept under the rug, or cancelled, so I'll wait and see what happens.

Avatar image for logos12thman
logos12thman

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 logos12thman
Member since 2009 • 167 Posts

When I took sex ed I had to get my parents to sign a permission slip or I wasn't allowed to be in class during the discussion. This dosen't seem to be that much different.

Avatar image for SSBFan12
SSBFan12

11981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 SSBFan12
Member since 2008 • 11981 Posts
[QUOTE="effena"]

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2009/06/02/alberta-human-rights-school-gay-education-law.html?ref=rss#socialcomments

"Alberta legislators passed legislation early Tuesday that will give parents the option of pulling their children out of cl@ss when lessons on sex, religion or sexual orientation are being taught."

I think this is pretty close-minded. Children should be exposed to as many different viewpoints as possible.

Wow I think that is stupid.
Avatar image for effena
effena

2811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 effena
Member since 2008 • 2811 Posts

im backCrazyinherpants

Oh hai thar

Avatar image for awsss
awsss

1370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 awsss
Member since 2005 • 1370 Posts

Wow dude, Alberta rednecks? There really aren't any rednecks in alberta, though maybe a few farmers.

Anyways this doesn't bother me. Kids wouldn't take it seriously anyways, this stuff belongs outside the classroom.

Avatar image for carrot-cake
carrot-cake

6880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 carrot-cake
Member since 2008 • 6880 Posts

[QUOTE="Roxas12934"]

I live in Alberta and i find this hillarious. Were not Rednecks :P

effena

Yeah, neither am I. Look at my avatar :P There is an abundance of conservative people here, though.


Well its what happens when the progressive conservatives get a dynasty's worth of time in controlling the legislature.
Seriously, when are we going to elect another party? Too many conservatives here.

Avatar image for Fandangle
Fandangle

3433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 Fandangle
Member since 2003 • 3433 Posts

Oh noes not sex ed and religion!michael_1234576

In some instances these go hand in hand

Avatar image for Hungry_bunny
Hungry_bunny

14293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Hungry_bunny
Member since 2006 • 14293 Posts
I do not support this, they talk about the parent's rights and forget about the children's rights, no parent should have the right to let a child stay ignorant. Sex is a complicated subject... but as soon as they've hit puberty, we shouldn't beat around the bush about what it really means to hit puberty. And not teaching them about other cultures can only lead to xenophobia.
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#27 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts
And not teaching them about other cultures can only lead to xenophobia.Hungry_bunny
Oh come on now that is just crazy. *duxup munches on his freedom fries*
Avatar image for AngelofDeath213
AngelofDeath213

2219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 AngelofDeath213
Member since 2009 • 2219 Posts

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2009/06/02/alberta-human-rights-school-gay-education-law.html?ref=rss#socialcomments

"Alberta legislators passed legislation early Tuesday that will give parents the option of pulling their children out of cl@ss when lessons on sex, religion or sexual orientation are being taught."

I think this is pretty close-minded. Children should be exposed to as many different viewpoints as possible.

effena
I thought they were already allowed to do that.
Avatar image for effena
effena

2811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#29 effena
Member since 2008 • 2811 Posts

Wow dude, Alberta rednecks? There really aren't any rednecks in alberta, though maybe a few farmers.

awsss

Lol. You think so? I think there is tons. Try being in Calgary during the Stampede. Nothin' but flannel shirts and cowboy hats.

Avatar image for Paladin_King
Paladin_King

11832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 Paladin_King
Member since 2008 • 11832 Posts
Well, my own feelings about these issues aside, I honestly don't see much wrong with this Bill. It's their kids and unless the parents are doing physical or traumatic damage to their children, I see no reason for why the school's authority should override that of the parents. Plus, if the kid wants to stay in the class, he/she still can. It would just mean disobeying their parents. Big whoop.
Avatar image for _en1gma_
_en1gma_

14617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 _en1gma_
Member since 2004 • 14617 Posts

I agree with you.

Avatar image for Severed_Hand
Severed_Hand

3402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Severed_Hand
Member since 2007 • 3402 Posts
whatever. they still have loads of oil and cash.
Avatar image for awsss
awsss

1370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 awsss
Member since 2005 • 1370 Posts

[QUOTE="awsss"]

Wow dude, Alberta rednecks? There really aren't any rednecks in alberta, though maybe a few farmers.

effena

Lol. You think so? I think there is tons. Try being in Calgary during the Stampede. Nothin' but flannel shirts and cowboy hats.


Funny thing, that, because I live in Calgary. They aren't actually rednecks: everyone wears cowboy gear during the stampede, that's what the stampede is all about. If you wore similar attire at any other time of the year then people would think you were crazy.

Avatar image for Paladin_King
Paladin_King

11832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#34 Paladin_King
Member since 2008 • 11832 Posts
whatever. they still have loads of oil and cash.Severed_Hand
And probably the best/most functional healthcare system in the country.
Avatar image for FlyingArmbar
FlyingArmbar

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 FlyingArmbar
Member since 2009 • 1545 Posts

[QUOTE="effena"]

[QUOTE="awsss"]

Wow dude, Alberta rednecks? There really aren't any rednecks in alberta, though maybe a few farmers.

awsss

Lol. You think so? I think there is tons. Try being in Calgary during the Stampede. Nothin' but flannel shirts and cowboy hats.


Funny thing, that, because I live in Calgary. They aren't actually rednecks: everyone wears cowboy gear during the stampede, that's what the stampede is all about. If you wore similar attire at any other time of the year then people would think you were crazy.

I'm not from Alberta, but flannel + cowboy hat does not = red neck.

Avatar image for RushMetallica
RushMetallica

4501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 RushMetallica
Member since 2007 • 4501 Posts
Ya its pretty stupid. Stupid parents. Parents are stupid.
Avatar image for FlyingArmbar
FlyingArmbar

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 FlyingArmbar
Member since 2009 • 1545 Posts

Ya its pretty stupid. Stupid parents. Parents are stupid.RushMetallica

Yeah, those are stupid parents. So stupid. Bunch of stupid idiots.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Wow. And here I thought Texas was the epitomy of closemindedness.

Avatar image for Dr_Brocoli
Dr_Brocoli

3724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Dr_Brocoli
Member since 2007 • 3724 Posts
thats is very uncanadian and backward, thank god in Quebec we have some of the best education.
Avatar image for kurtoronie
kurtoronie

1097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 kurtoronie
Member since 2006 • 1097 Posts

Everyones mad about this, teachers are suppost to present all points of view to the students, and this prevents them from doing that to a certain degree, so im against it. And how exactly does a bill being passed instantly make Alberta full of rednecks?

Avatar image for clubsammich91
clubsammich91

2229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 clubsammich91
Member since 2009 • 2229 Posts
Canada has rednecks? I always thought that country was as blue as the sky.
Avatar image for pierst179
pierst179

10805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 258

User Lists: 0

#42 pierst179
Member since 2006 • 10805 Posts

That is just terrible and stupid. It will only make them more interested in the subject. Parents like that would probably buy a plastic bubble and put their children in there to protect them from the outside world. :(

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

If this bill passes, I have no faith in democracy.

Edit: They passed it? What the bloody hell? That's amazing for the wrong reasons.

I have no faith in democracy.

Avatar image for zeorshadow19
zeorshadow19

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 zeorshadow19
Member since 2007 • 1471 Posts

They'll find out about it reguardless.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
Idiots.. So now we are gonna have those kids have sex regardless, but the fact they most likely will have little clue about safe sex practicies and other such things.. Its tough to prevent these things, and the ways they have done it are counter productive.. Teaching safe sex is the most logical way to do it, that way if they do have sex they prevent unwanted prenancies, and the spread of STD's.
Avatar image for htekemerald
htekemerald

7325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 htekemerald
Member since 2004 • 7325 Posts

The Texas of Canada is what I have always said.

Avatar image for awsss
awsss

1370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 awsss
Member since 2005 • 1370 Posts

Guys, this is not an issue. Until the kid is 18, they have no civil rights. This includes deciding whether or not they will see this content. If the parents want their kid to be a wing-nut, that's their choice, and their right. 99.9% of the time parents will let their kids stay. Besides, most schools already send home a notice asking if the kid can stay or not. Now it's just mandatory.

EDIT: wow you guys are acting as if this is a big deal: all this is, is that a notice will be send home prior to sex-ed, asking parents if their kid will stay. Every single one of my schools so far has done this, though clearly some schools don't or this wouldn't have become mandatory. In all sex-ed classes I've had, no parent have said no.

Avatar image for FlyingArmbar
FlyingArmbar

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 FlyingArmbar
Member since 2009 • 1545 Posts

Lame law, but it's not going to change anything. Almost every student will take sex-ed. The parents who decide not to let their children go, are going to be the ones who would have sent their children to school with a note anyways.

Besides, their friends will them about it. :P

Avatar image for awsss
awsss

1370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 awsss
Member since 2005 • 1370 Posts

If this bill passes, I have no faith in democracy.

Edit: They passed it? What the bloody hell? That's amazing for the wrong reasons.

I have no faith in democracy.

T_P_O


What? In democracy, all possible options must be presented, so the citizen can decide what's right. This is complying with democracy,because it is giving parents the option to not let their kid do sex-ed.

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

[QUOTE="T_P_O"]

If this bill passes, I have no faith in democracy.

Edit: They passed it? What the bloody hell? That's amazing for the wrong reasons.

I have no faith in democracy.

awsss


What? In democracy, all possible options must be presented, so the citizen can decide what's right. This is complying with democracy,because it is giving parents the option to not let their kid do sex-ed.

This is the stupid thing I've ever seen passed, what good is it doing to the children who are pulled out of lessons for utterly ridiculous reasons? They won't know about safe sex, STD's, teen pregnancy. They won't be allowed to know different sexual orientation objectively, so what's going to happen to kids with homophobic parents? Whatever happened to religious freedom if one child gets locked out of a room while other children are free to make their mind up? They won't be fully educated, that's what and they won't get any benefits from such a thing.

This is the stupidest law I've ever seen, what good can come of it? Makes me glad I live here.