http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-504083_162-10014525.html
Yeah... Driving on a sidewalk to pass a school bus driving children is a GREAT idea! :P
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-504083_162-10014525.html
Yeah... Driving on a sidewalk to pass a school bus driving children is a GREAT idea! :P
That is not a great punishment, its demeaning and inhumane.GazaAliSure it is, if anything that will stop him from ever doing something like that again (which was dangerous) than any fine given to him..
That is not a great punishment, its demeaning and inhumane.GazaAliBut less dangerous and destructive when you compare it to a pedestrian that could have been struck and killed/handicapped/injured/put out of work walking on the sidewalk :)
That is not a great punishment, its demeaning and inhumane.GazaAliAgreed, should have just publicly cut off one of his hands and one foot so he couldn't drive anymore right?
[QUOTE="GazaAli"]That is not a great punishment, its demeaning and inhumane.sSubZerOoSure it is, if anything that will stop him from ever doing something like that again (which was dangerous) than any fine given to him..
Her, not him.
I could be wrong. But if she was really that concerned about looking like an idiot, I doubt she would have committed that crime in the first place.Not if it makes her think twice about doing something as stupid next time she wants to pass a schoolbus
R4gn4r0k
It's troubling that the government apparently has the power to shame and ridicule people for no constructive purpose.Laihendi
It has been used in the past (think the stockade where your head and wrists were locked up) where you were stood outside to serve a sentence. It really needs to be used more often if you really think about it.
It's troubling that the government apparently has the power to shame and ridicule people for no constructive purpose.Laihendi
It has been used in the past (think the stockade where your head and wrists were locked up) where you were stood outside to serve a sentence. It really needs to be used more often if you really think about it.
Damn, GlitchSpot is acting up again.
[QUOTE="Laihendi"]It's troubling that the government apparently has the power to shame and ridicule people for no constructive purpose.WhiteKnight77
It has been used in the past (think the stockade where your head and wrists were locked up) where you were stood outside to serve a sentence. It really needs to be used more often if you really think about it.
Citing centuries old legal precedent is tricky, by the same token I could argue to bring back witch burnings, or "separate but equal" segregation laws. :P[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]Citing centuries old legal precedent is tricky, by the same token I could argue to bring back witch burnings, or "separate but equal" segregation laws. :PI have no problem with humiliation though I would draw the line at witch burnings.It has been used in the past (think the stockade where your head and wrists were locked up) where you were stood outside to serve a sentence. It really needs to be used more often if you really think about it.
Sajo7
I have no problem with humiliation though I would draw the line at witch burnings.WhiteKnight77The thing is, you can't force people to do this kind of stuff. All the lady had to do was...not do it. Then she'd probably go to jail or something, but so what? If these odd humiliation-style punishments are just an alternative to traditional punishments like jail time, then the only people who'll do it in the first place are those who think that jail is even worse. Any way you look at it, this kind of stuff is pretty much always LESS of a punishment than the normal stuff, otherwise people wouldn't agree to do it in the first place. She's getting off easy. She knows she's taking the easy way out, that's precisely why she went along with it.
Citing centuries old legal precedent is tricky, by the same token I could argue to bring back witch burnings, or "separate but equal" segregation laws. :PI have no problem with humiliation though I would draw the line at witch burnings. Well my point is simply saying that we used to do something isn't a sufficient argument in support of it.[QUOTE="Sajo7"][QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]
It has been used in the past (think the stockade where your head and wrists were locked up) where you were stood outside to serve a sentence. It really needs to be used more often if you really think about it.
WhiteKnight77
[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]I have no problem with humiliation though I would draw the line at witch burnings.MrGeezerThe thing is, you can't force people to do this kind of stuff. All the lady had to do was...not do it. Then she'd probably go to jail or something, but so what? If these odd humiliation-style punishments are just an alternative to traditional punishments like jail time, then the only people who'll do it in the first place are those who think that jail is even worse. Any way you look at it, this kind of stuff is pretty much always LESS of a punishment than the normal stuff, otherwise people wouldn't agree to do it in the first place. She's getting off easy. She knows she's taking the easy way out, that's precisely why she went along with it.
I am usually the guy that often takes a strict view on sentencing and charges. I want the monther who has lost a child in a wreck to be charged for and fined for not having their kid in a child safety seat (this happened in the city I live in, but wasn't fined as she had lost to much, :roll: ). I am all for making an example out of someone and in this case, she is being made an example of for others to see. I would be just as fine with her being sent to jail for a year.
Sure it is, if anything that will stop him from ever doing something like that again (which was dangerous) than any fine given to him..[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="GazaAli"]That is not a great punishment, its demeaning and inhumane.WhiteKnight77
Her, not him.
mhmDon't get me wrong, I don't particularly have anything against this kind of punishment. It might be enough of a punishment. I'm just saying...some people are sort of acting as if jail and fines aren't a real punishment, and the way to really get to people is to do these kind of embarrassing novelty punishments. And it's not really like that at all. You can't force people to do this stuff. If she thought this punishment was so bad, all she had to do was not show up. Any way you look at it, she's being allowed to choose her punishment, and she's gonna choose the lesser punishment. So whenever these kinds of weird punishments are handed out, the person is pretty much always getting off easy. Not that I'm against it. Even if she's getting off easy, it still might be enough to keep her from committing the crime again. So yeah...better than sending her to jail. I'm just saying...this IS the lesser punishment, otherwise she would've just not bothered showing up. EDIT: As far as making an example of people, think about what she REALLY has to do. She's having to spend a whopping two hours standing on a street being mildly embarrassed. That might be sufficient in this case, but I don't really think it sets much of an example. You make an example of people by giving them the maximum penalty allowed, not by letting them off easy.I am usually the guy that often takes a strict view on sentencing and charges. I want the monther who has lost a child in a wreck to be charged for and fined for not having their kid in a child safety seat (this happened in the city I live in, but wasn't fined as she had lost to much, :roll: ). I am all for making an example out of someone and in this case, she is being made an example of for others to see. I would be just as fine with her being sent to jail for a year.
WhiteKnight77
so let me get this straight.
she drove on the sidewalk, to pass a bus, the was unloading children.
so had endangered several children.
and her only punishment was having to hold a sign for 2 fvcking hours?
SMH
This is the kind of justice that prevents people from doing it again. Fines and slaps in the wrist just don't do it anymore.Zeviander
:lol: I can't stop laughing. :lol:
Now I can stop. It doesn't work if it is a different crime or the same crime...... again. How many times Lindsay got arrest for the same thing?
I can wait....
Judge didn't do anything but add something ridiculous to the fine. If I had a fine like that, I pay it and won't do it again. That's a lesson I will forever remember. Like the user above my post. I'm smh because the driver didn't serve time but for 2 hours holding a sign + a fine....... COME ON!
And using the justice system to become some sort of edgy hero judge for the Twitter generation: always -1000. MrPralinemhm, comes off as insecure and floundering
[QUOTE="DaBrainz"]He should of sentenced all Ohioans to hold an "idiot" sign.NailedGR
That's funny because you wrote "should of" instead of "should have".
I could tell you why that is funny but it's funnier to have you be obvlivious.
you showed himI don't and can never approve of this sort of inventive punishment from those behind the bench. We once had a character here named Ted Poe who did that sort of crap all the time. Every ruling I saw him make in that regard was a circus show on his part, attempting to become popular with the public at large. It worked too, since he now sits in Congress.
And using the justice system to become some sort of edgy hero judge for the Twitter generation: always -1000. MrPraline
This times A milly
[QUOTE="GazaAli"]That is not a great punishment, its demeaning and inhumane.sSubZerOoSure it is, if anything that will stop him from ever doing something like that again (which was dangerous) than any fine given to him.. I disagree. This is an easy punishment. Stand up holding a piece of cardboard for an hour for 2 days. If you have an ipod or smartphone not only would this be easy compared to losing money or jail time but its also rather relaxing.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment