when you compare it to the size of Earth.
Check out these beasts and you'll find out ours is a little scrawny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4iD-9GSW-0&feature=g-vrec&context=G244fe0aRVAAAAAAAAAw
This topic is locked from further discussion.
when you compare it to the size of Earth.
Check out these beasts and you'll find out ours is a little scrawny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4iD-9GSW-0&feature=g-vrec&context=G244fe0aRVAAAAAAAAAw
Prefer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEheh1BH34Q&feature=relatedNicksonmanPrefer http://scaleoftheuniverse.com/
[QUOTE="Nicksonman"]Prefer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEheh1BH34Q&feature=relatedthemajormayorPrefer http://scaleoftheuniverse.com/ Old
[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="Nicksonman"]Prefer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEheh1BH34Q&feature=relatedNicksonmanPrefer http://scaleoftheuniverse.com/ Old I prefer it anyways
[QUOTE="Nicksonman"]Prefer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEheh1BH34Q&feature=relatedthemajormayorPrefer http://scaleoftheuniverse.com/ Nice. I love that.
There's a sun a billion times bigger than our sun?!.. wow!!!DogswithgunsNo... there are supermassive black holes that are billions of solar masses though. You can only have stars so massive before gravity overwhelms competing forces and causes runaway collapse into a compact body. Hypergiants are VERY large however, if short-lived. For the record as well, there is only one sun... Sol = The Sun.... it's a name for our primary. Other stars are... stars, or have their own names and designations other than Sol/Sun.
I should clarify; anything above ~200 solar masses either blows itself apart, or undergoes collapse.
[QUOTE="raynimrod"]It helps that we've never had contact with other life forms. But we haven't even explored 1% if the universe, so the fact that we've never had contact with other life forms doesn't say anything.We're so insignificant as a planet and as a species, how can we collectively be so arrogant to boot lol?
PS2_ROCKS
Prefer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEheh1BH34Q&feature=relatedNicksonman
I love that video, thank you... keep forgetting to add it to my favorites... the music is so damn haunting
[QUOTE="Nicksonman"]Prefer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEheh1BH34Q&feature=relatedAtlanticRock
I love that video, thank you... keep forgetting to add it to my favorites... the music is so damn haunting
Aw, someone beat me to it. :PEven when the size of planets/stars are dispayed on a scale like that it is still difficult to grasp how large those objects actually are.
[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"][QUOTE="raynimrod"]It helps that we've never had contact with other life forms. But we haven't even explored 1% if the universe, so the fact that we've never had contact with other life forms doesn't say anything.lol we havnt even explored our solar system, we have explored waaaay less than 1% more like 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%We're so insignificant as a planet and as a species, how can we collectively be so arrogant to boot lol?
Nicksonman
i think you meant only 1% of the universe is visible to us
But we haven't even explored 1% if the universe, so the fact that we've never had contact with other life forms doesn't say anything.lol we havnt even explored our solar system, we have explored waaaay less than 1% more like 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%[QUOTE="Nicksonman"][QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"] It helps that we've never had contact with other life forms.Crokodile69
i think you meant only 1% of the universe is visible to us
0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% is more accurate. I just pulled 1% from my ass for simplicity's sake.Wow, I love universe related stuff. Makes me wonder that we're small. But then I don't really care, I just like to watch.
LMFAO at the end of that gif...
P.S. - I'm jealous that some massive alien out there has a Blue Sun...
No... there are supermassive black holes that are billions of solar masses though. You can only have stars so massive before gravity overwhelms competing forces and causes runaway collapse into a compact body. Hypergiants are VERY large however, if short-lived. For the record as well, there is only one sun... Sol = The Sun.... it's a name for our primary. Other stars are... stars, or have their own names and designations other than Sol/Sun.[QUOTE="Dogswithguns"]There's a sun a billion times bigger than our sun?!.. wow!!!Frame_Dragger
I should clarify; anything above ~200 solar masses either blows itself apart, or undergoes collapse.
Volume wise though it is billion times bigger than the Sun.There's a sun a billion times bigger than our sun?!.. wow!!!DogswithgunsNo... there are supermassive black holes that are billions of solar masses though. You can only have stars so massive before gravity overwhelms competing forces and causes runaway collapse into a compact body. Hypergiants are VERY large however, if short-lived. For the record as well, there is only one sun... Sol = The Sun.... it's a name for our primary. Other stars are... stars, or have their own names and designations other than Sol/Sun.
I should clarify; anything above ~200 solar masses either blows itself apart, or undergoes collapse.
Volume wise though it is billion times bigger than the Sun. No... the largest star in terms of its radius, is no more than 2000 times lager than Sol.No... it's a G-Type main sequence star... it's pretty much average.compared to other stars its rather small
LaytonsCat
[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] No... there are supermassive black holes that are billions of solar masses though. You can only have stars so massive before gravity overwhelms competing forces and causes runaway collapse into a compact body. Hypergiants are VERY large however, if short-lived. For the record as well, there is only one sun... Sol = The Sun.... it's a name for our primary. Other stars are... stars, or have their own names and designations other than Sol/Sun.Volume wise though it is billion times bigger than the Sun. No... the largest star in terms of its radius, is no more than 2000 times lager than Sol. But radius isn't volume. When calculating the volume the number is much larger. Basically what I'm talking about is how many suns fits into vy canis majoris. Much more than 2000. 2000 is only the radius.I should clarify; anything above ~200 solar masses either blows itself apart, or undergoes collapse.
Frame_Dragger
No... the largest star in terms of its radius, is no more than 2000 times lager than Sol. But radius isn't volume. When calculating the volume the number is much larger. Basically what I'm talking about is how many suns fits into vy canis majoris. Much more than 2000. 2000 is only the radius. Volume would be a function of cubing, radius is linear... you don't get from 2000-> billions with an expoential function that way. If you take the MAX, it's 800,000,000 times greater volume, at MOST.[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] Volume wise though it is billion times bigger than the Sun.themajormayor
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]But radius isn't volume. When calculating the volume the number is much larger. Basically what I'm talking about is how many suns fits into vy canis majoris. Much more than 2000. 2000 is only the radius. Volume would be a function of cubing, radius is linear... you don't get from 2000-> billions with an expoential function that way. If you take the MAX, it's 800,000,000 times greater volume, at MOST. Yes this is what I mean. The reason I said billions was because some websites said about one billion and some said about 10 billion and I was too lazy to do my own calculations :( but yeah 800,000,000 sounds reasonable.[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] No... the largest star in terms of its radius, is no more than 2000 times lager than Sol.Frame_Dragger
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] But radius isn't volume. When calculating the volume the number is much larger. Basically what I'm talking about is how many suns fits into vy canis majoris. Much more than 2000. 2000 is only the radius.Volume would be a function of cubing, radius is linear... you don't get from 2000-> billions with an expoential function that way. If you take the MAX, it's 800,000,000 times greater volume, at MOST. Yes this is what I mean. The reason I said billions was because some websites said about one billion and some said about 10 billion and I was too lazy to do my own calculations :( but yeah 800,000,000 sounds reasonable. That's the max, for Canis Major mind you... and it's a rough calculation based on normal progession for a perfect sphere. I wouldn't feel bad in your shoes, but for the record when talking about the "size" of a star, volume is arguably the least useful/used measurement. Mass in terms of Solar Masses is the first measure, with Solar Radii being a distant second.themajormayor
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] But radius isn't volume. When calculating the volume the number is much larger. Basically what I'm talking about is how many suns fits into vy canis majoris. Much more than 2000. 2000 is only the radius.Volume would be a function of cubing, radius is linear... you don't get from 2000-> billions with an expoential function that way. If you take the MAX, it's 800,000,000 times greater volume, at MOST. Yes this is what I mean. The reason I said billions was because some websites said about one billion and some said about 10 billion and I was too lazy to do my own calculations :( but yeah 800,000,000 sounds reasonable.themajormayor
There is a sun that is 4 million times the mass of our sun. Billions? Maybe.
Yes this is what I mean. The reason I said billions was because some websites said about one billion and some said about 10 billion and I was too lazy to do my own calculations :( but yeah 800,000,000 sounds reasonable.[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] Volume would be a function of cubing, radius is linear... you don't get from 2000-> billions with an expoential function that way. If you take the MAX, it's 800,000,000 times greater volume, at MOST.CBR600-RR
There is a sun that is 4 million times the mass of our sun. Billions? Maybe.
No... again, the upper limit on stellar mass is ~200 solar masses. 4 million solar masses is a medium sized black hole.[QUOTE="CBR600-RR"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] Yes this is what I mean. The reason I said billions was because some websites said about one billion and some said about 10 billion and I was too lazy to do my own calculations :( but yeah 800,000,000 sounds reasonable. Frame_Dragger
There is a sun that is 4 million times the mass of our sun. Billions? Maybe.
No... again, the upper limit on stellar mass is ~200 solar masses. 4 million solar masses is a medium sized black hole.A sun 20 million times the mass of our sun is enough to create a black hole.
No... again, the upper limit on stellar mass is ~200 solar masses. 4 million solar masses is a medium sized black hole.[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="CBR600-RR"]
There is a sun that is 4 million times the mass of our sun. Billions? Maybe.
CBR600-RR
A sun 20 million times the mass of our sun is enough to create a black hole.
wut?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment