oh oh
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/28/palin-a-whack-job-top-mcc_n_138523.html
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I read in the paper that McCain staffers are complaining saying Palin is dragging the campaign and she is hard to control. McCain still stands by her regardless, that's why you can't vote for old dudes like this. They are stubborn old men set in their ways and find it difficult to admit bad judgement. At least it was a great for the Obama campaign.
--
[QUOTE="Jandurin"]Wait wait. Is she trying to run for President in 2012? :oMattUD1Probably. She has enough of a following that she could try. She's smarter and more evil than I imagined. Good for her.
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="MattUD1"][QUOTE="Jandurin"]Wait wait. Is she trying to run for President in 2012? :oMattUD1Probably. She has enough of a following that she could try. She's smarter and more evil than I imagined. Good for her.Good for her, bad for everyone else. Correct. Still, if that's what she's doing, I'm slightly impressed. It's more certain than getting in with McCain and just hoping he dies.
Huffington Post, huh? Nothing wrong with their writers.Theokhothomg shocker Hear about the kid that fooled.. everyone? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Glass_(reporter) That's more insidious than just having a crazy reporter.
clintons gona rock her world in 2012. yes people its true hillary will return for the 2012 election. gee i wonder whos gona win that oneTazzmission187
What? Doesn't that assume a lot, like Obama will lose AND Mcstain will keel over?
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]Huffington Post, huh? Nothing wrong with their writers.Jandurinomg shocker Hear about the kid that fooled.. everyone? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Glass_(reporter) That's more insidious than just having a crazy reporter.
Um. . .okay. . .but I didn't call on The New Republic as a source.:|
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]Huffington Post, huh? Nothing wrong with their writers.Jandurinomg shocker Hear about the kid that fooled.. everyone? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Glass_(reporter) That's more insidious than just having a crazy reporter. I saw the movie about him.It had Anakin Skywalker in it. (not really.just the guy who plays him.)
Um okay. My point was, people are people. You can't discredit a source because someone killed someone. If you're going to discredit a source, at least have a story like the one I provided.Um. . .okay. . .but I didn't call on The New Republic as a source.:|
Theokhoth
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]Um okay. My point was, people are people. You can't discredit a source because someone killed someone. If you're going to discredit a source, at least have a story like the one I provided.Um. . .okay. . .but I didn't call on The New Republic as a source.:|
Jandurin
Actually, if you had given me the pleasure of reading the article and not just the title, you would see that the Huffington Post's "staff" consists almost entirely of bloggers, who are personal acquaintances of the Post's founder and sometimes run errands for her as part of their "job" description.
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]Um okay. My point was, people are people. You can't discredit a source because someone killed someone. If you're going to discredit a source, at least have a story like the one I provided.Um. . .okay. . .but I didn't call on The New Republic as a source.:|
Theokhoth
Actually, if you had given me the pleasure of reading the article and not just the title, you would see that the Huffington Post's "staff" consists almost entirely of bloggers, who are personal acquaintances of the Post's founder and sometimes run errands for her as part of their "job" description.
I did read that, actually. But that wasn't the point of the article.Is anything else new? I knew this from the moment she talked about her beliefs that the earth is 6000 years old and dinosaurs walked with man. sSubZerOo
From the Bible, how could you deduce anything else?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment