Photography advice

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

Hey, I'm looking for a Compact System Camera or a digital SLR.

It has to have a manual focus.

All settings (F-stop, SS, Exposure, White balance etc.) must be manually adjustable.

The optical zoom it comes with has to be capable of macro and distance photograhy.

I don't care how bulky it is.

My budget is 600$.

I have been looking at a Canon rebel T3 or a Canon Powershot G11. Are these good options? Or are there better ones off the top of your head.

Any advice is welcome.

Avatar image for Jackboot343
Jackboot343

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Jackboot343
Member since 2007 • 2574 Posts

I'd recommend doing artistic nudes

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

I'd recommend doing artistic nudes

Jackboot343

Agreed. Set up a nude studio in the garage and go to town.

Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#5 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts

[QUOTE="Jackboot343"]

I'd recommend doing artistic nudes

Pirate700

Agreed. Set up a nude studio in the garage and go to town.

I liked your earlier advice better.
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="Jackboot343"]

I'd recommend doing artistic nudes

Allicrombie

Agreed. Set up a nude studio in the garage and go to town.

I liked your earlier advice better.

I decided it wasn't edgy enough for what he was looking for.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#7 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

Hey, I'm looking for a Compact System Camera or a digital SLR.

It has to have a manual focus.

All settings (F-stop, SS, Exposure, White balance etc.) must be manually adjustable.

The optical zoom it comes with has to be capable of macro and distance photograhy.

I don't care how bulky it is.

My budget is 600$.

I have been looking at a Canon rebel T3 or a Canon Powershot G11. Are these good options? Or are there better ones off the top of your head.

Any advice is welcome.

GOGOGOGURT

I haven't had much experience with DSLRs, but I've had the best luck with Canon cameras in general. I'd say go with whatever Canon you can find the best deal on.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

Hey, I'm looking for a Compact System Camera or a digital SLR.

It has to have a manual focus.

All settings (F-stop, SS, Exposure, White balance etc.) must be manually adjustable.

The optical zoom it comes with has to be capable of macro and distance photograhy.

I don't care how bulky it is.

My budget is 600$.

I have been looking at a Canon rebel T3 or a Canon Powershot G11. Are these good options? Or are there better ones off the top of your head.

Any advice is welcome.

jimkabrhel

I haven't had much experience with DSLRs, but I've had the best luck with Canon cameras in general. I'd say go with whatever Canon you can find the best deal on.

I prefer Nikon but you can't go wrong with either.

Avatar image for phhstom1
phhstom1

1999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 phhstom1
Member since 2008 • 1999 Posts
I have a Canon 600D (rebel T3) it's a great camera. Not sure what you mean about the optical zoom it comes with has to be able to do a macro and distance photography. The lenses you use will determine what sort of photography you'll be able to achieve. Standard kit lenses (18-55mm and 55-250mm) are okay for basic landscapes and portraits, but terrible for macro. The very definition of macro is that the size of the object you are taking a photograph of fills the exact same space on the camera's image sensor (i.e 1x magnification, a 1 cm bug will fill 1cm on the sensor) No kit lenses will be able to do this without extension tubes or other modifications. A bona fide canon macro lens will set you back another 600bucks easily (but they are well worth it) Do some more research, especially into DSLR's they work a lot differently compared to smaller point and shoot options, but of course you get much better results.
Avatar image for quikdash6
quikdash6

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 quikdash6
Member since 2004 • 480 Posts
Well, the Rebel T3 is the better camera being a DSLR with interchangeable lenses, and obviously lets you control all the settings. The lens is what determines being able to shoot at a distance or get macro shots. If you provide an example of what you consider macro photography to be I can tell you if the kit lens will give you what you want or if you would need something else.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

I have a Canon 600D (rebel T3) it's a great camera. Not sure what you mean about the optical zoom it comes with has to be able to do a macro and distance photography. The lenses you use will determine what sort of photography you'll be able to achieve. Standard kit lenses (18-55mm and 55-250mm) are okay for basic landscapes and portraits, but terrible for macro. The very definition of macro is that the size of the object you are taking a photograph of fills the exact same space on the camera's image sensor (i.e 1x magnification, a 1 cm bug will fill 1cm on the sensor) No kit lenses will be able to do this without extension tubes or other modifications. A bona fide canon macro lens will set you back another 600bucks easily (but they are well worth it) Do some more research, especially into DSLR's they work a lot differently compared to smaller point and shoot options, but of course you get much better results.phhstom1

Ok thanks.

So the rebel T3 comes with two lenses? (18-55mm and 55-250mm)

And I dislike point and shoot. I'm well past that stage and I can't get the shot that I really want with a point and shoot.

Ok I guess I didn't understand macro, but I want to be able to take close-ups at high quality, and 18-55mm is perfect for that, just not distance.

Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

Hey, I'm looking for a Compact System Camera or a digital SLR.

It has to have a manual focus.

All settings (F-stop, SS, Exposure, White balance etc.) must be manually adjustable.

The optical zoom it comes with has to be capable of macro and distance photograhy.

I don't care how bulky it is.

My budget is 600$.

I have been looking at a Canon rebel T3 or a Canon Powershot G11. Are these good options? Or are there better ones off the top of your head.

Any advice is welcome.

jimkabrhel

I haven't had much experience with DSLRs, but I've had the best luck with Canon cameras in general. I'd say go with whatever Canon you can find the best deal on.

This is what I've heard also.

Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="Jackboot343"]

I'd recommend doing artistic nudes

Pirate700

Agreed. Set up a nude studio in the garage and go to town.

But then I'd be competing with other pimps in da 'hood.

Avatar image for Pffrbt
Pffrbt

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Pffrbt
Member since 2010 • 6612 Posts

What's photography?

Avatar image for Daanyal
Daanyal

773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Daanyal
Member since 2009 • 773 Posts

You could probably get a Canon 550D (or the Nikon equivalent) with a kit lens for that much. Heck, you might even be able to get a 600D, considering the 650D is coming out very soon. And there's not much difference between the three cameras anyway. 600D adds a swivelly screen, 650D adds touch.

Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

What's photography?

Pffrbt

I'ts like pornography except you can do it in public.

Avatar image for phhstom1
phhstom1

1999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 phhstom1
Member since 2008 • 1999 Posts
So the rebel T3 comes with two lenses? (18-55mm and 55-250mm)

And I dislike point and shoot. I'm well past that stage and I can't get the shot that I really want with a point and shoot.

Ok I guess I didn't understand macro, but I want to be able to take close-ups at high quality, and 18-55mm is perfect for that, just not distance.

GOGOGOGURT
Depends on where you buy it from. Some places will just sell you the body with no lenses, others will put in the most basic (18-55) some will do twin lens kits (18-55 and 55-250) and others will do a discount on another lens if you buy it at the same time (or at least that's how we do it here in Australia, i assume it's the same worldwide.) Yeh a lot of people think macro photography is just close up, but pure macro requires that minimum of 1x magnification. If you're just after close up then the 18-55 (or even 55-250mm) will serve you okay. Macro really is difficult to get your head around and it requires a lot of reading and new techniques to account for issues like incredibly shallow depth of field and stuff, but it is fantastic! As far as shooting at distance i'm not quite sure what you mean. Are you talking about doing landscapes or something where the subject is the quite far awya and you need to be able to 'zoom' in on them?
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]So the rebel T3 comes with two lenses? (18-55mm and 55-250mm)

And I dislike point and shoot. I'm well past that stage and I can't get the shot that I really want with a point and shoot.

Ok I guess I didn't understand macro, but I want to be able to take close-ups at high quality, and 18-55mm is perfect for that, just not distance.

phhstom1

Depends on where you buy it from. Some places will just sell you the body with no lenses, others will put in the most basic (18-55) some will do twin lens kits (18-55 and 55-250) and others will do a discount on another lens if you buy it at the same time (or at least that's how we do it here in Australia, i assume it's the same worldwide.) Yeh a lot of people think macro photography is just close up, but pure macro requires that minimum of 1x magnification. If you're just after close up then the 18-55 (or even 55-250mm) will serve you okay. Macro really is difficult to get your head around and it requires a lot of reading and new techniques to account for issues like incredibly shallow depth of field and stuff, but it is fantastic! As far as shooting at distance i'm not quite sure what you mean. Are you talking about doing landscapes or something where the subject is the quite far awya and you need to be able to 'zoom' in on them?

Yes, like wildlife photograhy, being able to get a good shot without getting so close to scare them off. Would a 55-250mm do for that?

So if I bought it off Amazon, do you think a 2 lense kit would be an option? If you don't know, then what store would you reccomend to buy the camera from?

I can see how the Depth of field would be difficult with macro, but it seems pretty cool.

Avatar image for quikdash6
quikdash6

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 quikdash6
Member since 2004 • 480 Posts

[QUOTE="phhstom1"]I have a Canon 600D (rebel T3) it's a great camera. Not sure what you mean about the optical zoom it comes with has to be able to do a macro and distance photography. The lenses you use will determine what sort of photography you'll be able to achieve. Standard kit lenses (18-55mm and 55-250mm) are okay for basic landscapes and portraits, but terrible for macro. The very definition of macro is that the size of the object you are taking a photograph of fills the exact same space on the camera's image sensor (i.e 1x magnification, a 1 cm bug will fill 1cm on the sensor) No kit lenses will be able to do this without extension tubes or other modifications. A bona fide canon macro lens will set you back another 600bucks easily (but they are well worth it) Do some more research, especially into DSLR's they work a lot differently compared to smaller point and shoot options, but of course you get much better results.GOGOGOGURT

Ok thanks.

So the rebel T3 comes with two lenses? (18-55mm and 55-250mm)

And I dislike point and shoot. I'm well past that stage and I can't get the shot that I really want with a point and shoot.

Ok I guess I didn't understand macro, but I want to be able to take close-ups at high quality, and 18-55mm is perfect for that, just not distance.

It doesn't necessarily come with two lenses. It depends where you purchase it from and what kind of bundle they have.

This is a true macro photograph

This is probably what you would get from the kit lens after the photo was cropped

Avatar image for one_plum
one_plum

6823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 one_plum
Member since 2009 • 6823 Posts

If I were to choose, I would take T2i over the T3. Not sure of the price difference between the two though.

Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

[QUOTE="phhstom1"]I have a Canon 600D (rebel T3) it's a great camera. Not sure what you mean about the optical zoom it comes with has to be able to do a macro and distance photography. The lenses you use will determine what sort of photography you'll be able to achieve. Standard kit lenses (18-55mm and 55-250mm) are okay for basic landscapes and portraits, but terrible for macro. The very definition of macro is that the size of the object you are taking a photograph of fills the exact same space on the camera's image sensor (i.e 1x magnification, a 1 cm bug will fill 1cm on the sensor) No kit lenses will be able to do this without extension tubes or other modifications. A bona fide canon macro lens will set you back another 600bucks easily (but they are well worth it) Do some more research, especially into DSLR's they work a lot differently compared to smaller point and shoot options, but of course you get much better results.quikdash6

Ok thanks.

So the rebel T3 comes with two lenses? (18-55mm and 55-250mm)

And I dislike point and shoot. I'm well past that stage and I can't get the shot that I really want with a point and shoot.

Ok I guess I didn't understand macro, but I want to be able to take close-ups at high quality, and 18-55mm is perfect for that, just not distance.

It doesn't necessarily come with two lenses. It depends where you purchase it from and what kind of bundle they have.

This is a true macro photograph

This is probably what you would get from the kit lens after the photo was cropped

Ok that makes sense, I don't need macro just close-ups.

Avatar image for quikdash6
quikdash6

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 quikdash6
Member since 2004 • 480 Posts

[QUOTE="phhstom1"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]So the rebel T3 comes with two lenses? (18-55mm and 55-250mm)

And I dislike point and shoot. I'm well past that stage and I can't get the shot that I really want with a point and shoot.

Ok I guess I didn't understand macro, but I want to be able to take close-ups at high quality, and 18-55mm is perfect for that, just not distance.

GOGOGOGURT

Depends on where you buy it from. Some places will just sell you the body with no lenses, others will put in the most basic (18-55) some will do twin lens kits (18-55 and 55-250) and others will do a discount on another lens if you buy it at the same time (or at least that's how we do it here in Australia, i assume it's the same worldwide.) Yeh a lot of people think macro photography is just close up, but pure macro requires that minimum of 1x magnification. If you're just after close up then the 18-55 (or even 55-250mm) will serve you okay. Macro really is difficult to get your head around and it requires a lot of reading and new techniques to account for issues like incredibly shallow depth of field and stuff, but it is fantastic! As far as shooting at distance i'm not quite sure what you mean. Are you talking about doing landscapes or something where the subject is the quite far awya and you need to be able to 'zoom' in on them?

Yes, like wildlife photograhy, being able to get a good shot without getting so close to scare them off. Would a 55-250mm do for that?

So if I bought it off Amazon, do you think a 2 lense kit would be an option? If you don't know, then what store would you reccomend to buy the camera from?

I can see how the Depth of field would be difficult with macro, but it seems pretty cool.

It is (I'm looking right now), but the zoom/telephoto lenses aren't really ideal. For those it really helps to have the Image Stabilization and the bundles I'm seeing don't have IS and would probably be out of your price range if they did. The 18-55 kit lens does have IS though.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

[QUOTE="phhstom1"] Depends on where you buy it from. Some places will just sell you the body with no lenses, others will put in the most basic (18-55) some will do twin lens kits (18-55 and 55-250) and others will do a discount on another lens if you buy it at the same time (or at least that's how we do it here in Australia, i assume it's the same worldwide.) Yeh a lot of people think macro photography is just close up, but pure macro requires that minimum of 1x magnification. If you're just after close up then the 18-55 (or even 55-250mm) will serve you okay. Macro really is difficult to get your head around and it requires a lot of reading and new techniques to account for issues like incredibly shallow depth of field and stuff, but it is fantastic! As far as shooting at distance i'm not quite sure what you mean. Are you talking about doing landscapes or something where the subject is the quite far awya and you need to be able to 'zoom' in on them?quikdash6

Yes, like wildlife photograhy, being able to get a good shot without getting so close to scare them off. Would a 55-250mm do for that?

So if I bought it off Amazon, do you think a 2 lense kit would be an option? If you don't know, then what store would you reccomend to buy the camera from?

I can see how the Depth of field would be difficult with macro, but it seems pretty cool.

It is (I'm looking right now), but the zoom/telephoto lenses aren't really ideal. For those it really helps to have the Image Stabilization and the bundles I'm seeing don't have IS and would probably be out of your price range if they did. The 18-55 kit lens does have IS though.

Okay that makes sense. I guess it would be nice to have IS for that, but most of the time I find myself using a very fast Shutter Speed for wildlife.

Avatar image for Bloodseeker23
Bloodseeker23

8338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#24 Bloodseeker23
Member since 2008 • 8338 Posts
Don't buy an SLR if you're not going to use it a lot.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="phhstom1"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]So the rebel T3 comes with two lenses? (18-55mm and 55-250mm)

And I dislike point and shoot. I'm well past that stage and I can't get the shot that I really want with a point and shoot.

Ok I guess I didn't understand macro, but I want to be able to take close-ups at high quality, and 18-55mm is perfect for that, just not distance.

GOGOGOGURT

Depends on where you buy it from. Some places will just sell you the body with no lenses, others will put in the most basic (18-55) some will do twin lens kits (18-55 and 55-250) and others will do a discount on another lens if you buy it at the same time (or at least that's how we do it here in Australia, i assume it's the same worldwide.) Yeh a lot of people think macro photography is just close up, but pure macro requires that minimum of 1x magnification. If you're just after close up then the 18-55 (or even 55-250mm) will serve you okay. Macro really is difficult to get your head around and it requires a lot of reading and new techniques to account for issues like incredibly shallow depth of field and stuff, but it is fantastic! As far as shooting at distance i'm not quite sure what you mean. Are you talking about doing landscapes or something where the subject is the quite far awya and you need to be able to 'zoom' in on them?

Yes, like wildlife photograhy, being able to get a good shot without getting so close to scare them off. Would a 55-250mm do for that?

So if I bought it off Amazon, do you think a 2 lense kit would be an option? If you don't know, then what store would you reccomend to buy the camera from?

I can see how the Depth of field would be difficult with macro, but it seems pretty cool.

Thanks for the excellent advice! you know your stuff!

I feel more comfortable with a rebel, so that seems the way to go.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
Go look in your city's newspaper, find who is having a garage or yard sale, and get their early on the first day. Because you might just find someone who doesn't know what they have in cameras.
Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts
Get a Sony RX100 and call it a day
Avatar image for quikdash6
quikdash6

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 quikdash6
Member since 2004 • 480 Posts
Get a Sony RX100 and call it a dayGioVela2010
Yeah, an overpriced point and shoot is a better buy than the T3
Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts
[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]Get a Sony RX100 and call it a dayquikdash6
Yeah, an overpriced point and shoot is a better buy than the T3

Overpriced cOmpared to what?
Avatar image for quikdash6
quikdash6

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 quikdash6
Member since 2004 • 480 Posts
[QUOTE="quikdash6"][QUOTE="GioVela2010"]Get a Sony RX100 and call it a dayGioVela2010
Yeah, an overpriced point and shoot is a better buy than the T3

Overpriced cOmpared to what?

Compared to what you get from a full sized DSLR of the same price. 1. No viewfinder 2. Smaller sensor 3. Lens isn't interchangeable 4. No ability to have external flash Yes, it is good for what it is and compared to other cameras of its kind, but not against a DSLR.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#31 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts

If you want to take the next step, go with an SLR. But, I warn you it will become an expensive hobby. As mentioned by another post, if you want to shoot real macro with an SLR you need a lens made for it. $$$$ I've found that a well made point an shoot can take a good macro shot. But really, its all about the image sensor.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

OP, if you could spend a few more bills, you can get the Rebel T3i and have get a few more features as well as a larger MP range (18 compared to 12.2). The lens that comes with both are the same and it is a wide angle to standard zoom lens.

The Canon Store is also having an instant rebate sale though Amazon has the T3i and the T3 for the same prices. Either place is fine to buy from. If you buy from the Canon store, the T3i and T3 comes with a free refurbished camera bag which would save you some money in the long run as you would not have to buy a camera bag.

If you go with the T3 though, for what you are looking to spend, you can pick up a bundle deal that includes a second telephoto zoom lens.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180084 Posts
Canon if you're strapped for cash...Nikon if you want a good camera.
Avatar image for quikdash6
quikdash6

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 quikdash6
Member since 2004 • 480 Posts

Canon if you're strapped for cash...Nikon if you want a good camera.LJS9502_basic
I own a Nikon and I say that's a load of ****

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts
[QUOTE="quikdash6"][QUOTE="GioVela2010"][QUOTE="quikdash6"] Yeah, an overpriced point and shoot is a better buy than the T3

Overpriced cOmpared to what?

Compared to what you get from a full sized DSLR of the same price. 1. No viewfinder 2. Smaller sensor 3. Lens isn't interchangeable 4. No ability to have external flash Yes, it is good for what it is and compared to other cameras of its kind, but not against a DSLR.

None of that was listed as priorities tho. Heck he even listed a G12 as an option