This topic is locked from further discussion.
Here is a little political update from yours truly.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
Here is a little political update from yours truly.
non_insane
You're an idiot. This is sad, you're wrong on almostEVERY account.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
non_insane
True. Or so youd think. Even a 'complete troop withdrawal' secretely means they will leave troops stationed there, although not as official peacekeepers. They will be there to protect the US interest with oil. And the US wont ever have its fill of Iraqi oil, they will continue extorting... i mean, 'importing' it for a long time to come.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
non_insane
First off, the US wont let Iran have sole control of Iraqi oil. Or any control actually. The US and Iraq have a trade with eachother, and the US is impossing teriffs on Iran. So no, no oil for Iran. And besides theres actually a chance Iran is going to give up its nuclear weapons programs like North korea is.
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
non_insane
Brits arent neutral. theyre part of the "war on terror** (**as long as terrorist countries have oil)".
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
non_insane
mostly correct. however canada isnt useless entirely. they are peacekeeping in afghanistan and stopping the flow of al qaeda forces into iraq.
Please come back and try again when you get a clue.
[QUOTE="non_insane"]Here is a little political update from yours truly.
DidItForTehLulz
You're an idiot. This is sad, you're wrong on almostEVERY account.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
non_insane
True. Or so youd think. Even a 'complete troop withdrawal' secretely means they will leave troops stationed there, although not as official peacekeepers. They will be there to protect the US interest with oil. And the US wont ever have its fill of Iraqi oil, they will continue extorting... i mean, 'importing' it for a long time to come.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
non_insane
First off, the US wont let Iran have sole control of Iraqi oil. Or any control actually. The US and Iraq have a trade with eachother, and the US is impossing teriffs on Iran. So no, no oil for Iran. And besides theres actually a chance Iran is going to give up its nuclear weapons programs like North korea is.
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
non_insane
Brits arent neutral. theyre part of the "war on terror** (**as long as terrorist countries have oil)".
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
non_insane
mostly correct. however canada isnt useless entirely. they are peacekeeping in afghanistan and stopping the flow of al qaeda forces into iraq.
Please come back and try again when you get a clue.
this will forever be the most intelligent post in this thread however you could have let the kid breath and not totally kill his efforts to sound remotely intelligent but still good job :)
[QUOTE="non_insane"]Here is a little political update from yours truly.
DidItForTehLulz
You're an idiot. This is sad, you're wrong on almostEVERY account.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
non_insane
True. Or so youd think. Even a 'complete troop withdrawal' secretely means they will leave troops stationed there, although not as official peacekeepers. They will be there to protect the US interest with oil. And the US wont ever have its fill of Iraqi oil, they will continue extorting... i mean, 'importing' it for a long time to come.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
non_insane
First off, the US wont let Iran have sole control of Iraqi oil. Or any control actually. The US and Iraq have a trade with eachother, and the US is impossing teriffs on Iran. So no, no oil for Iran. And besides theres actually a chance Iran is going to give up its nuclear weapons programs like North korea is.
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
non_insane
Brits arent neutral. theyre part of the "war on terror** (**as long as terrorist countries have oil)".
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
non_insane
mostly correct. however canada isnt useless entirely. they are peacekeeping in afghanistan and stopping the flow of al qaeda forces into iraq.
Please come back and try again when you get a clue.
Fuk you lulz.
[QUOTE="DidItForTehLulz"][QUOTE="non_insane"]Here is a little political update from yours truly.
non_insane
You're an idiot. This is sad, you're wrong on almostEVERY account.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
non_insane
True. Or so youd think. Even a 'complete troop withdrawal' secretely means they will leave troops stationed there, although not as official peacekeepers. They will be there to protect the US interest with oil. And the US wont ever have its fill of Iraqi oil, they will continue extorting... i mean, 'importing' it for a long time to come.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
non_insane
First off, the US wont let Iran have sole control of Iraqi oil. Or any control actually. The US and Iraq have a trade with eachother, and the US is impossing teriffs on Iran. So no, no oil for Iran. And besides theres actually a chance Iran is going to give up its nuclear weapons programs like North korea is.
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
non_insane
Brits arent neutral. theyre part of the "war on terror** (**as long as terrorist countries have oil)".
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
non_insane
mostly correct. however canada isnt useless entirely. they are peacekeeping in afghanistan and stopping the flow of al qaeda forces into iraq.
Please come back and try again when you get a clue.
Fuk you lulz.
:roll: yea ur cool
[QUOTE="non_insane"][QUOTE="DidItForTehLulz"][QUOTE="non_insane"]Here is a little political update from yours truly.
ALTER_duo
You're an idiot. This is sad, you're wrong on almostEVERY account.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
non_insane
True. Or so youd think. Even a 'complete troop withdrawal' secretely means they will leave troops stationed there, although not as official peacekeepers. They will be there to protect the US interest with oil. And the US wont ever have its fill of Iraqi oil, they will continue extorting... i mean, 'importing' it for a long time to come.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
non_insane
First off, the US wont let Iran have sole control of Iraqi oil. Or any control actually. The US and Iraq have a trade with eachother, and the US is impossing teriffs on Iran. So no, no oil for Iran. And besides theres actually a chance Iran is going to give up its nuclear weapons programs like North korea is.
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
non_insane
Brits arent neutral. theyre part of the "war on terror** (**as long as terrorist countries have oil)".
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
non_insane
mostly correct. however canada isnt useless entirely. they are peacekeeping in afghanistan and stopping the flow of al qaeda forces into iraq.
Please come back and try again when you get a clue.
Fuk you lulz.
:roll: yea ur cool
Fuk you too.
[QUOTE="ALTER_duo"][QUOTE="DidItForTehLulz"][QUOTE="non_insane"]Here is a little political update from yours truly.
non_insane
You're an idiot. This is sad, you're wrong on almostEVERY account.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
non_insane
True. Or so youd think. Even a 'complete troop withdrawal' secretely means they will leave troops stationed there, although not as official peacekeepers. They will be there to protect the US interest with oil. And the US wont ever have its fill of Iraqi oil, they will continue extorting... i mean, 'importing' it for a long time to come.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
non_insane
First off, the US wont let Iran have sole control of Iraqi oil. Or any control actually. The US and Iraq have a trade with eachother, and the US is impossing teriffs on Iran. So no, no oil for Iran. And besides theres actually a chance Iran is going to give up its nuclear weapons programs like North korea is.
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
non_insane
Brits arent neutral. theyre part of the "war on terror** (**as long as terrorist countries have oil)".
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
non_insane
mostly correct. however canada isnt useless entirely. they are peacekeeping in afghanistan and stopping the flow of al qaeda forces into iraq.
Please come back and try again when you get a clue.
this will forever be the most intelligent post in this thread however you could have let the kid breath and not totally kill his efforts to sound remotely intelligent but still good job :)
Are you a fuking idiot? All he did was bring up tarrifs on Iran which is completetly false. Do you even know what a tarrif is? Your an idiot. When i said Iran will get Iraq oil I meant it. Theres no proof the US will leave secret troops. Also when i said Canada was useless, I also meant peace keeping in afganistan was useless. All its doing is killing innocent Canadians. Your an idiot for not picking up on any of this Alter_dou. You think your so intelligent, your just a moron coinciding with lulz to make yourself seem more intelligent. Bugger off.
Sorry but its time to rip your prepubescence egotistical self a new orifice. Great so, you managed to make fun of me for screwing up a single word. You should have been able to figure out i meant trade sanctions, not tariffs, but youre an idiot so i guess thats a bit much for you aye? Then again that other guy never even picked up on it, which shows his level of intelligence. Sadly, hes miles ahead of you. You made up pretty much everything you said. Gj.
Theres no proof the us will leave troops? How about that the US has left military bases in every country they have occupied since WWII, retard That should be proof enough on its own. As for Canada being useless, the mission in Afghanistan is saving hundreds of US lives. There are many rebel warlords in afghanistan who would leak troops into Iraq without the Canadian border patrol in Afghani territory. Only 40~ Canadians have died, and they have saved countless US lives. d say thats important. You friggen imbecile.
Like i said, try again when you grow a single brain cell. As for alter_duo he sure doesnt seem intelligent either... but i must commend him for telling whats right and wrong. You on the other hand are a tard.
I am starting to get suspicious about the differnce between these two users. >__>CrimzonTide
...um what? The fact that one human could be so much more intelligent that another? lol
[QUOTE="non_insane"][QUOTE="ALTER_duo"][QUOTE="DidItForTehLulz"][QUOTE="non_insane"]Here is a little political update from yours truly.
DidItForTehLulz
You're an idiot. This is sad, you're wrong on almostEVERY account.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
non_insane
True. Or so youd think. Even a 'complete troop withdrawal' secretely means they will leave troops stationed there, although not as official peacekeepers. They will be there to protect the US interest with oil. And the US wont ever have its fill of Iraqi oil, they will continue extorting... i mean, 'importing' it for a long time to come.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
non_insane
First off, the US wont let Iran have sole control of Iraqi oil. Or any control actually. The US and Iraq have a trade with eachother, and the US is impossing teriffs on Iran. So no, no oil for Iran. And besides theres actually a chance Iran is going to give up its nuclear weapons programs like North korea is.
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
non_insane
Brits arent neutral. theyre part of the "war on terror** (**as long as terrorist countries have oil)".
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
non_insane
mostly correct. however canada isnt useless entirely. they are peacekeeping in afghanistan and stopping the flow of al qaeda forces into iraq.
Please come back and try again when you get a clue.
this will forever be the most intelligent post in this thread however you could have let the kid breath and not totally kill his efforts to sound remotely intelligent but still good job :)
Are you a fuking idiot? All he did was bring up tarrifs on Iran which is completetly false. Do you even know what a tarrif is? Your an idiot. When i said Iran will get Iraq oil I meant it. Theres no proof the US will leave secret troops. Also when i said Canada was useless, I also meant peace keeping in afganistan was useless. All its doing is killing innocent Canadians. Your an idiot for not picking up on any of this Alter_dou. You think your so intelligent, your just a moron coinciding with lulz to make yourself seem more intelligent. Bugger off.
Sorry but its time to rip your prepubescence egotistical self a new orifice. Great so, you managed to make fun of me for screwing up a single word. You should have been able to figure out i meant trade sanctions, not tariffs, but youre an idiot so i guess thats a bit much for you aye? Then again that other guy never even picked up on it, which shows his level of intelligence. Sadly, hes miles ahead of you. You made up pretty much everything you said. Gj.
Theres no proof the us will leave troops? How about that the US has left military bases in every country they have occupied since WWII, retard That should be proof enough on its own. As for Canada being useless, the mission in Afghanistan is saving hundreds of US lives. There are many rebel warlords in afghanistan who would leak troops into Iraq without the Canadian border patrol in Afghani territory. Only 40~ Canadians have died, and they have saved countless US lives. d say thats important. You friggen imbecile.
Like i said, try again when you grow a single brain cell. As for alter_duo he sure doesnt seem intelligent either... but i must commend him for telling whats right and wrong. You on the other hand are a tard.
The US border patrol makes the Canadian one obsolete.If Canadians werent there, the US would just put troops at the same garrisons the Canadians have currently. I mean the Canadians are effective in reducing the amount of Us lives lost, but at a Canadian cost. Also lulz seems to be very biased towards the United States, making it almost seem as if he believe Canadian lives are worthless. Alter dou is a complete cretin, one of the stupider members of gamespots idiot population. Commend him from deciding right from wrong? This is an opinionated discussion, there is no right and wrong? Maybe your the worthless resource consumer here, not I.
[QUOTE="ALTER_duo"][QUOTE="non_insane"][QUOTE="DidItForTehLulz"][QUOTE="non_insane"]Here is a little political update from yours truly.
non_insane
You're an idiot. This is sad, you're wrong on almostEVERY account.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
non_insane
True. Or so youd think. Even a 'complete troop withdrawal' secretely means they will leave troops stationed there, although not as official peacekeepers. They will be there to protect the US interest with oil. And the US wont ever have its fill of Iraqi oil, they will continue extorting... i mean, 'importing' it for a long time to come.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
non_insane
First off, the US wont let Iran have sole control of Iraqi oil. Or any control actually. The US and Iraq have a trade with eachother, and the US is impossing teriffs on Iran. So no, no oil for Iran. And besides theres actually a chance Iran is going to give up its nuclear weapons programs like North korea is.
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
non_insane
Brits arent neutral. theyre part of the "war on terror** (**as long as terrorist countries have oil)".
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
non_insane
mostly correct. however canada isnt useless entirely. they are peacekeeping in afghanistan and stopping the flow of al qaeda forces into iraq.
Please come back and try again when you get a clue.
Fuk you lulz.
:roll: yea ur cool
Fuk you too.
[QUOTE="DidItForTehLulz"][QUOTE="non_insane"][QUOTE="ALTER_duo"][QUOTE="DidItForTehLulz"][QUOTE="non_insane"]Here is a little political update from yours truly.
non_insane
You're an idiot. This is sad, you're wrong on almostEVERY account.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
non_insane
True. Or so youd think. Even a 'complete troop withdrawal' secretely means they will leave troops stationed there, although not as official peacekeepers. They will be there to protect the US interest with oil. And the US wont ever have its fill of Iraqi oil, they will continue extorting... i mean, 'importing' it for a long time to come.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
non_insane
First off, the US wont let Iran have sole control of Iraqi oil. Or any control actually. The US and Iraq have a trade with eachother, and the US is impossing teriffs on Iran. So no, no oil for Iran. And besides theres actually a chance Iran is going to give up its nuclear weapons programs like North korea is.
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
non_insane
Brits arent neutral. theyre part of the "war on terror** (**as long as terrorist countries have oil)".
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
non_insane
mostly correct. however canada isnt useless entirely. they are peacekeeping in afghanistan and stopping the flow of al qaeda forces into iraq.
Please come back and try again when you get a clue.
this will forever be the most intelligent post in this thread however you could have let the kid breath and not totally kill his efforts to sound remotely intelligent but still good job :)
Are you a fuking idiot? All he did was bring up tarrifs on Iran which is completetly false. Do you even know what a tarrif is? Your an idiot. When i said Iran will get Iraq oil I meant it. Theres no proof the US will leave secret troops. Also when i said Canada was useless, I also meant peace keeping in afganistan was useless. All its doing is killing innocent Canadians. Your an idiot for not picking up on any of this Alter_dou. You think your so intelligent, your just a moron coinciding with lulz to make yourself seem more intelligent. Bugger off.
Sorry but its time to rip your prepubescence egotistical self a new orifice. Great so, you managed to make fun of me for screwing up a single word. You should have been able to figure out i meant trade sanctions, not tariffs, but youre an idiot so i guess thats a bit much for you aye? Then again that other guy never even picked up on it, which shows his level of intelligence. Sadly, hes miles ahead of you. You made up pretty much everything you said. Gj.
Theres no proof the us will leave troops? How about that the US has left military bases in every country they have occupied since WWII, retard That should be proof enough on its own. As for Canada being useless, the mission in Afghanistan is saving hundreds of US lives. There are many rebel warlords in afghanistan who would leak troops into Iraq without the Canadian border patrol in Afghani territory. Only 40~ Canadians have died, and they have saved countless US lives. d say thats important. You friggen imbecile.
Like i said, try again when you grow a single brain cell. As for alter_duo he sure doesnt seem intelligent either... but i must commend him for telling whats right and wrong. You on the other hand are a tard.
The US border patrol makes the Canadian one obsolete.If Canadians werent there, the US would just put troops at the same garrisons the Canadians have currently. I mean the Canadians are effective in reducing the amount of Us lives lost, but at a Canadian cost. Also lulz seems to be very biased towards the United States, making it almost seem as if he believe Canadian lives are worthless. Alter dou is a complete cretin, one of the stupider members of gamespots idiot population. Commend him from deciding right from wrong? This is an opinionated discussion, there is no right and wrong? Maybe your the worthless resource consumer here, not I.
You just dont know when to quit.
The US border patrol doesnt in any way make the Canadian one obsolete. The US patrols are spread out and undermanned. Without the Canadian counterparts theyd be even less effective than they are right now... And since there are more (and more dangerous) militias in Iraq, allowing Afghanis to get into Iraq would cause even more trouble than there is currently. Comparatively, Afghanistan is relatively stable.
The Canadian cost in lives has been verylow. Even though there are more US troops stationed in the middle east than canadian ones, the per capita loss amount is still lower for Canadians. Since they both accheive the same goals in the 'war on terror', it makes sense to have canadians stationed too. I am not biased towards the US, I am merely stating logic and facts, while you are pulling sh*tty arguements out of your arse. Also this may be an poinionated discussion, but it includes something called 'facts'. Now, you might not know what a fact is, but it doesnt change depending on your view. Facts prove that I am logically right.Put that in your pipeand smoke it, crack boy.
[QUOTE="non_insane"][QUOTE="DidItForTehLulz"][QUOTE="non_insane"][QUOTE="ALTER_duo"][QUOTE="DidItForTehLulz"][QUOTE="non_insane"]Here is a little political update from yours truly.
DidItForTehLulz
You're an idiot. This is sad, you're wrong on almostEVERY account.
The United States, being pressured from almost EVERY country, is soon to leave Iraq in a year or two. After getting there fill of oil of course.
non_insane
True. Or so youd think. Even a 'complete troop withdrawal' secretely means they will leave troops stationed there, although not as official peacekeepers. They will be there to protect the US interest with oil. And the US wont ever have its fill of Iraqi oil, they will continue extorting... i mean, 'importing' it for a long time to come.
Iran will intervene after the US leaves, and begin to deplete the remaining amount of Iraqs oil. This will be of course, to pay for there nuclear weapons
non_insane
First off, the US wont let Iran have sole control of Iraqi oil. Or any control actually. The US and Iraq have a trade with eachother, and the US is impossing teriffs on Iran. So no, no oil for Iran. And besides theres actually a chance Iran is going to give up its nuclear weapons programs like North korea is.
Britian will remain "neutral", with there alligencies still tied to the US but secretly.
non_insane
Brits arent neutral. theyre part of the "war on terror** (**as long as terrorist countries have oil)".
Canada will remain useless.
China will continue to expand.
non_insane
mostly correct. however canada isnt useless entirely. they are peacekeeping in afghanistan and stopping the flow of al qaeda forces into iraq.
Please come back and try again when you get a clue.
this will forever be the most intelligent post in this thread however you could have let the kid breath and not totally kill his efforts to sound remotely intelligent but still good job :)
Are you a fuking idiot? All he did was bring up tarrifs on Iran which is completetly false. Do you even know what a tarrif is? Your an idiot. When i said Iran will get Iraq oil I meant it. Theres no proof the US will leave secret troops. Also when i said Canada was useless, I also meant peace keeping in afganistan was useless. All its doing is killing innocent Canadians. Your an idiot for not picking up on any of this Alter_dou. You think your so intelligent, your just a moron coinciding with lulz to make yourself seem more intelligent. Bugger off.
Sorry but its time to rip your prepubescence egotistical self a new orifice. Great so, you managed to make fun of me for screwing up a single word. You should have been able to figure out i meant trade sanctions, not tariffs, but youre an idiot so i guess thats a bit much for you aye? Then again that other guy never even picked up on it, which shows his level of intelligence. Sadly, hes miles ahead of you. You made up pretty much everything you said. Gj.
Theres no proof the us will leave troops? How about that the US has left military bases in every country they have occupied since WWII, retard That should be proof enough on its own. As for Canada being useless, the mission in Afghanistan is saving hundreds of US lives. There are many rebel warlords in afghanistan who would leak troops into Iraq without the Canadian border patrol in Afghani territory. Only 40~ Canadians have died, and they have saved countless US lives. d say thats important. You friggen imbecile.
Like i said, try again when you grow a single brain cell. As for alter_duo he sure doesnt seem intelligent either... but i must commend him for telling whats right and wrong. You on the other hand are a tard.
The US border patrol makes the Canadian one obsolete.If Canadians werent there, the US would just put troops at the same garrisons the Canadians have currently. I mean the Canadians are effective in reducing the amount of Us lives lost, but at a Canadian cost. Also lulz seems to be very biased towards the United States, making it almost seem as if he believe Canadian lives are worthless. Alter dou is a complete cretin, one of the stupider members of gamespots idiot population. Commend him from deciding right from wrong? This is an opinionated discussion, there is no right and wrong? Maybe your the worthless resource consumer here, not I.
You just dont know when to quit.
The US border patrol doesnt in any way make the Canadian one obsolete. The US patrols are spread out and undermanned. Without the Canadian counterparts theyd be even less effective than they are right now... And since there are more (and more dangerous) militias in Iraq, allowing Afghanis to get into Iraq would cause even more trouble than there is currently. Comparatively, Afghanistan is relatively stable.
The Canadian cost in lives has been verylow. Even though there are more US troops stationed in the middle east than canadian ones, the per capita loss amount is still lower for Canadians. Since they both accheive the same goals in the 'war on terror', it makes sense to have canadians stationed too. I am not biased towards the US, I am merely stating logic and facts, while you are pulling sh*tty arguements out of your arse. Also this may be an poinionated discussion, but it includes something called 'facts'. Now, you might not know what a fact is, but it doesnt change depending on your view. Facts prove that I am logically right.Put that in your pipeand smoke it, crack boy.
Ya know what? Theres one thing you underestimated.
Ya know what? Theres one thing you underestimated.
non_insane
your stupidity? lmao
[QUOTE="non_insane"]
Ya know what? Theres one thing you underestimated.
DidItForTehLulz
your stupidity? lmao
my ability to compensate.
lmao
loller skates
ftw
lol
roflmfao
ok that was actually a quick summary
lmao
loller skates
ftw
lol
roflmfao
ok that was actually a quick summary
Elite_Rendog92
You have the intelligence of a muskrat. Fuk you.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment