POLL Best Era of Music

I'm more into the Glam Rock thing,so thats why i like the 80's,and i like synth sounds taht were popular in the 80's

90's - and if you think otherwise you are musically challenged

ps. if you think 80's your crazy, the 80's was the worst decade of music EVER

R-Dot-Yung

The Beatles, Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, Hendrix, The Doors, its the 60's so you must be musically challenged but the 80's were the worst decade in musical history.

90's

As far as popular music goes, they were all good (60's-present).

I can't choose a favorite, though.

What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?at0mic13

Faith no more !!!!!

What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?at0mic13

*Sigh* no comment ..

What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?at0mic13

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?PaddyPlasterer

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?slorg_king

Rubber Soul, I win.

[QUOTE="slorg_king"][QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?at0mic13

Rubber Soul, I win.

I win even morez.

That is a really tough question. Specific genres had their better decades.

60s, 80s, and 90s were good though. Hell, the 70s too.

90s

Today's is also really good if you know where to look

[QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?at0mic13

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

[QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?PaddyPlasterer

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

modern metal for me. i went with today's.

[QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?at0mic13

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

To each his own. Comparing different genres and saying one is more talented than the other makes no sense. Twice as loved? I bet there's thousands of people who loved the 90's Seattle grunge wave.Basically, you're always gonna find people who like the kind of music you like, so comparing different genres is stupid.

[QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?at0mic13

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

[QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?PaddyPlasterer

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

Also, i was never one to call Rage Grunge...more Alternative...

[QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?kylekatarn10

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

Also, i was never one to call Rage Grunge...more Alternative...

[QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?kylekatarn10

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

To each his own. Comparing different genres and saying one is more talented than the other makes no sense. Twice as loved? I bet there's thousands of people who loved the 90's Seattle grunge wave.Basically, you're always gonna find people who like the kind of music you like, so comparing different genres is stupid.

No, people didnt love Seattle grudge like The Bealtes were loved, Beatlemania.

[QUOTE="kylekatarn10"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?at0mic13

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

To each his own. Comparing different genres and saying one is more talented than the other makes no sense. Twice as loved? I bet there's thousands of people who loved the 90's Seattle grunge wave.Basically, you're always gonna find people who like the kind of music you like, so comparing different genres is stupid.

No, people didnt love Seattle grudge like The Bealtes were loved, Beatlemania.

[QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?PaddyPlasterer

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

Hendrix, Clapton, and Harrison alone are 100 times better than Cantrell, and your an idiot if you think otherwise, The Beatles were and still are much much much more loved than Nirvana, and Dylan was a much better songwriter than Cobain.

[QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="kylekatarn10"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?PaddyPlasterer

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

To each his own. Comparing different genres and saying one is more talented than the other makes no sense. Twice as loved? I bet there's thousands of people who loved the 90's Seattle grunge wave.Basically, you're always gonna find people who like the kind of music you like, so comparing different genres is stupid.

No, people didnt love Seattle grudge like The Bealtes were loved, Beatlemania.

I lived through it and it wasn't even on the same scale as beatlemania.

[QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="kylekatarn10"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?at0mic13

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

To each his own. Comparing different genres and saying one is more talented than the other makes no sense. Twice as loved? I bet there's thousands of people who loved the 90's Seattle grunge wave.Basically, you're always gonna find people who like the kind of music you like, so comparing different genres is stupid.

No, people didnt love Seattle grudge like The Bealtes were loved, Beatlemania.

I lived through it and it wasn't even on the same scale as beatlemania.

[QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="kylekatarn10"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"][QUOTE="at0mic13"][QUOTE="PaddyPlasterer"]

[QUOTE="at0mic13"]What is with everyone saying the 90's, what was so good about that decade in musical terms ?PaddyPlasterer

*Sigh* no comment ..

Give me one good reason why the 90's were better than the 60's.

Even if you only think of The Beatles, The Stones, The Who, and Dylan, they were twice as big as all those bands you listed, twice as talented, and twice as loved.

To each his own. Comparing different genres and saying one is more talented than the other makes no sense. Twice as loved? I bet there's thousands of people who loved the 90's Seattle grunge wave.Basically, you're always gonna find people who like the kind of music you like, so comparing different genres is stupid.

No, people didnt love Seattle grudge like The Bealtes were loved, Beatlemania.

I lived through it and it wasn't even on the same scale as beatlemania.

Yes it was popular but not earthshattering like The Bealtes.