*POLL* Do you think the age to drive should be raised?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Capn_Circus
Capn_Circus

231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Capn_Circus
Member since 2003 • 231 Posts

This is a discussion and a poll about the teen driving crisis. It has been proven that many teen drivers are extremely wreckless. Teens are obtaining drivers licencses too easily, and they are text messaging, messing around, not paying attention to the road.... and for the male teens they are not only doing that but trying to race and drive extremely carelessly, do crazy stunts to impress their friends, etc.

I am not saying all teens are irresponsible behind the wheel, but many certainly are, and it really is becomming a crisis. This is the number one cause for teen death in America. Just a few days ago, 5 young girls were killed in a head on collision because the driver decided to talk on the phone, and text at the same time. Her silly decision causted her life, and four other lives.

Teens (in general... not all) just aren't very mature to begin with. Each year they are taking thousands of lives (not just their own) because they are just in general too immature, and do not fully understand how important it is to be safe behind the wheel.

In my personal opinion, they should still be able to get a driverse license at age 16, but there will be really strict regulations until age 18.

1) The drivers test must be harder, and you MUST drive with an instructer for more than 30 minutes before being able to obtain a license.

2) You may not drive with a friend in the car until after 6 months of driving. Then you may not drive with more than 1 friend in the car until you are 18 years old.

3) If you receive more than one speeding ticket per year, your license will immediately be revoked until you are 18 years old, and if you receive a ticket for wreckless driving at least once, your license will be restricted until 18.

4) Something must be done about this. There must be strict driving rules in place to drastically bring down the death toll list.

Opinions?

Avatar image for DejaVu72
DejaVu72

980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DejaVu72
Member since 2007 • 980 Posts
16 is good to me.
Avatar image for bobbyturkalino
BobbyTurkalino

31463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: -4

#3 BobbyTurkalino
Member since 2003 • 31463 Posts
Well I dont know if it should be raised, but the test should be much more challenging and less leniant.
Avatar image for sthadji
sthadji

4682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 sthadji
Member since 2004 • 4682 Posts
It's 18 here, but I really think the age to which one is entitled to a learner's license should be lowered to 17.
Avatar image for Teuvan
Teuvan

10151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 Teuvan
Member since 2003 • 10151 Posts

Hell. Yes.

At least to 18.

Avatar image for Squidward117
Squidward117

4374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 Squidward117
Member since 2005 • 4374 Posts
On the contrary, I firmly believe it should be lowered. The age should be 10.
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts
If there was a vote to raise it to 18, I would vote yes. I would also vote yes to anything that makes anyone over 60ish to retake their test every 5 years.
Avatar image for GettingTired
GettingTired

5994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 GettingTired
Member since 2006 • 5994 Posts
It's fine the way it is, unfortunately the thing is not enough drunk drivers get caught. The penalties are pretty harsh already.
Avatar image for jbdb1345
jbdb1345

810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#9 jbdb1345
Member since 2005 • 810 Posts

If there was a vote to raise it to 18, I would vote yes. I would also vote yes to anything that makes anyone over 60ish to retake their test every 5 years.LukeAF24

yeah that would be a good idea

Avatar image for CommanderShiro
CommanderShiro

21746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 CommanderShiro
Member since 2005 • 21746 Posts
I think some elderly drivers need retesting as they get older. They cause accidents too ya know.
Avatar image for jbdb1345
jbdb1345

810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#11 jbdb1345
Member since 2005 • 810 Posts

On the contrary, I firmly believe it should be lowered. The age should be 10.Squidward117

why are you 10?

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#12 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts
I believe the some of the problem lies in the fact that parents are relying on the DMV and drivers ed to teach their kids how to drive versus being in that passenger seat all the time. My parents tought me how to drive, and I thank that from that because when I started driving by myself, I as a good driver. Also, part of the problem lies in the fact that some of these parents are just bad drivers anyway. A lof of people on the road today, not just kids, inherited bad driving habits from their parents. I honestly don't believe raising the driving age would do anything. In fact, I think it would make it worse.
Avatar image for Squidward117
Squidward117

4374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 Squidward117
Member since 2005 • 4374 Posts

[QUOTE="Squidward117"]On the contrary, I firmly believe it should be lowered. The age should be 10.jbdb1345

why are you 10?

No... I believe kids are responsible and mature enough to begin driving at the age of 10.

Avatar image for ThaStig
ThaStig

707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 ThaStig
Member since 2006 • 707 Posts
Well in California I think its fine the way it is...but the thing about only 1 person in the car until you're 18 is a good idea I guess.
Avatar image for ConManWithGun
ConManWithGun

6272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ConManWithGun
Member since 2005 • 6272 Posts
I'm 16, I got my drivers liscense on a 5 minute road test, very easy to get it but I choose to be responsible, since I don't want to die, but no they should not have those restrictions for people under 16, their not going to learn that way
Avatar image for Aznsilvrboy
Aznsilvrboy

11495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Aznsilvrboy
Member since 2002 • 11495 Posts

How about just adopt Ontario's (Canada) graduated licensing sytem...? From Wikipedia:

  • Learners permit (G1): Available at age 16, with the passing of a multiple choice road theory test, a driving permit is issued which allows the learning driver to drive on roads accompanied by someone with full valid driver's licence whose BAC is less than .05 and has been fully licenced for four years. The driver also cannot drive roads with a posted speed limit over 80km/h (50 MPH) or between 12:00 AM - 5:00 AM and must maintain their own BAC at zero.
  • Probationary licence (G2): Available after having held a learners permit for 12 or eight months if the driver has completed a certain number of driving lessons with recognized driving school. Probationary licence is acquired after successfully completing a road test. At this point the driver must still maintain a BAC of zero. As of 2005 drivers with a G2 licences are restricted in the number of passengers under 19 that they can carry during night-time driving.
  • Full licence (G): After 1 year of possessing the G2 licence a driver can take an additional road test that often includes driving on a four lane divided highway. With successful completion they will obtain a full licence which carries no restrictions and are not required to take any further tests until 80 providing they renew their licence regularly. Drivers 80 years of age and over must complete a vision and knowledge test and participate in a 90-minute group education session to renew their licence.

Ontario has been using a graduated licensing system since 1994. A driver can take as little as 20 months to get a full licence, however a driver must have a full licence (G) within five years of obtaining a learners permit (G1).

The exact same process, except with other restrictions, is used for obtaining a motorcycle (M) licence.

In Ontario, there was a recently proposed legislation to deny driver's licences to high school dropouts until they turned 18. It was meant as an incentive for students to graduate.

Traffic Violations convictions usually come with demerit against your licence. The points may affect your insurance or if you collect enough of them you may face a licence suspension.

Avatar image for Guitar_Man_101
Guitar_Man_101

114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Guitar_Man_101
Member since 2005 • 114 Posts
I really don't want it to be raised because I'm 15 and I am really looking for to getting behind the wheel of a car next year.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
21 should be the first year in which a person is of legal age to drive alone. Teenagers spend far too little time learning how to drive. It takes years of experience behind the wheel of a car and proper guidance to learn properly. They should be allowed to learn at 15 or 16 but not allowed to drive alone until they either turn a certain age or can prove they have spent a significant amount time practicing and learning the proper rules of the road. It really shouldn't be judged by a number though, unless that number is a score of an extremely harsh written/road test.
Avatar image for skooks
skooks

1411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 skooks
Member since 2006 • 1411 Posts

I think harsher penalties should be introduced for a start, I mean in the UK drunk drivers can sometimes get away with a two year driving ban and a 6 month sentence. I've read about that happening even in the case of them actually hitting and injuring someone with their car, not just driving under the influence and being caught.

Sometimes me and some friends browse Mydeathspace.com, out of morbid curiosity I suppose, and it's amazing how many teens on there died in car accidents.

Tests should be harder, the driving age should be raised, and harsher penalties should be implemented. Considering how many people die in car accidents each year, something has to be done about the amount of morons on the road, no matter how old they are.

Avatar image for Capn_Circus
Capn_Circus

231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 Capn_Circus
Member since 2003 • 231 Posts
For those of you who voted in the Poll to not do anything.... what is your plan to make these teens less wreckless?
Avatar image for ralf1
ralf1

278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 ralf1
Member since 2005 • 278 Posts

On the contrary, I firmly believe it should be lowered. The age should be 10.Squidward117

I like how this guy thinks.

Avatar image for sthadji
sthadji

4682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 sthadji
Member since 2004 • 4682 Posts
[QUOTE="jbdb1345"]

[QUOTE="Squidward117"]On the contrary, I firmly believe it should be lowered. The age should be 10.Squidward117

why are you 10?

No... I believe kids are responsible and mature enough to begin driving at the age of 10.

Yeah. Maybe companies can make mini cars, so you can have a mini BMW or a mini Mercedes for these kids to drive around in mini streets to hone their driving skills. Starting from an early age will really make them better drivers in the future.

Avatar image for Heat_Guy_D
Heat_Guy_D

5534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Heat_Guy_D
Member since 2005 • 5534 Posts
I definitely think there should be harsher punishments, but not just for under 18 driver's. I don't know how it is in America but laws concerning the road over here in the UK are just too easy going.
Avatar image for Squidward117
Squidward117

4374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#24 Squidward117
Member since 2005 • 4374 Posts
[QUOTE="Squidward117"][QUOTE="jbdb1345"]

[QUOTE="Squidward117"]On the contrary, I firmly believe it should be lowered. The age should be 10.sthadji

why are you 10?

No... I believe kids are responsible and mature enough to begin driving at the age of 10.

Yeah. Maybe companies can make mini cars, so you can have a mini BMW or a mini Mercedes for these kids to drive around in mini streets to hone their driving skills. Starting from an early age will really make them better drivers in the future.

Stop smoking.

Avatar image for cmhawk
cmhawk

16494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 cmhawk
Member since 2003 • 16494 Posts
1) The drivers test must be harder, and you MUST drive with an instructer for more than 30 minutes before being able to obtain a license. Circus888
LOL!! i was shocked when i read that. 30 mins is nothing, how can u learn 2 drive in so little time. here in the uk. most ppl drive manual cars and i hear in america most ppl drive automatics, so yeah maybe that affects how long it would take 2 learn. but regardless of that u need much more than 30 mins 2 learn things like reading the road etc. like anticipating wut other drivers might decide 2 do or b able 2 spot potential hazards etc. where i live. u have 2 b 17 before u can get ur provisional licence and start learning 2 drive. with that licence u cant drive unless a passenger is over 21 and had a full licence for 3 years. and ur not allowed on the motorway at all. so basicly u have lessons with an instructor, which is a recommended minimum of 40 hours they say. i had a 1 hour lesson every week untill i was ready 4 my test. but b4 u can do the practical test you have 2 pass a theory test which is questions on things like rules and road signs and markings etc. the actuall practical test is about 45 mins long. and so 4 most ppl they wud have become 18 by the time they get 2 taking their driving test 2 get their ful licence anyways. imo its important that u have a lot of driving experience under supervision b4 being given a full licence so that ppl have enuff skill and understanding 2 make them realise how and why 2 drive safely, which means much more than 30 mins lol...
Avatar image for Headbanger88
Headbanger88

5023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#26 Headbanger88
Member since 2004 • 5023 Posts
Really what we need to do is get 17 year old girls off the road. More often then not, when I'm in a close call it's a 17 year old girl driving in a big Ford Explorer while talking on a cell phone. The difference between men and women drivers as I see it is this: Men are more focused on driving, and sometimes get really into it. This may tempt men to drive faster and dangerously. Women tend to be more occupied while driving and multitask(cell phones, makeup, children, etc). This also is dangerous. But really, the real issue is 17 year old girls.
Avatar image for sthadji
sthadji

4682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#27 sthadji
Member since 2004 • 4682 Posts
[QUOTE="sthadji"][QUOTE="Squidward117"][QUOTE="jbdb1345"]

[QUOTE="Squidward117"]On the contrary, I firmly believe it should be lowered. The age should be 10.Squidward117

why are you 10?

No... I believe kids are responsible and mature enough to begin driving at the age of 10.

Yeah. Maybe companies can make mini cars, so you can have a mini BMW or a mini Mercedes for these kids to drive around in mini streets to hone their driving skills. Starting from an early age will really make them better drivers in the future.

Stop smoking.

You're the one who started it really.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Really what we need to do is get 17 year old girls off the road. More often then not, when I'm in a close call it's a 17 year old girl driving in a big Ford Explorer while talking on a cell phone. The difference between men and women drivers as I see it is this: Men are more focused on driving, and sometimes get really into it. This may tempt men to drive faster and dangerously. Women tend to be more occupied while driving and multitask(cell phones, makeup, children, etc). This also is dangerous. But really, the real issue is 17 year old girls.Headbanger88


That is a terrible generalization. The fact of the matter is, it is usually the cell-phones and other activities people are doing while driving. You should concentrate on driving 100% of the time when you are on the road... nothing else. If you can't do that, get off the road. I believe most collisions are caused by people who are distracted on the road.
Avatar image for Squidward117
Squidward117

4374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#29 Squidward117
Member since 2005 • 4374 Posts
[QUOTE="Squidward117"][QUOTE="sthadji"][QUOTE="Squidward117"][QUOTE="jbdb1345"]

[QUOTE="Squidward117"]On the contrary, I firmly believe it should be lowered. The age should be 10.sthadji

why are you 10?

No... I believe kids are responsible and mature enough to begin driving at the age of 10.

Yeah. Maybe companies can make mini cars, so you can have a mini BMW or a mini Mercedes for these kids to drive around in mini streets to hone their driving skills. Starting from an early age will really make them better drivers in the future.

Stop smoking.

You're the one who started it really.

Yeah, but I never said anything about miniature BMWs... Come to think of it, miniature cars wouldn't pollute as much as full size cars... We might have something.

Avatar image for sthadji
sthadji

4682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#30 sthadji
Member since 2004 • 4682 Posts
[QUOTE="sthadji"][QUOTE="Squidward117"][QUOTE="sthadji"][QUOTE="Squidward117"][QUOTE="jbdb1345"]

[QUOTE="Squidward117"]On the contrary, I firmly believe it should be lowered. The age should be 10.Squidward117

why are you 10?

No... I believe kids are responsible and mature enough to begin driving at the age of 10.

Yeah. Maybe companies can make mini cars, so you can have a mini BMW or a mini Mercedes for these kids to drive around in mini streets to hone their driving skills. Starting from an early age will really make them better drivers in the future.

Stop smoking.

You're the one who started it really.

Yeah, but I never said anything about miniature BMWs... Come to think of it, miniature cars wouldn't pollute as much as full size cars... We might have something.

Hmm...I never thought of it like that. But there would be the problem of also fitting adults into those miniature cars. Sounds like a job for..Chris Bangle. :P Oh wait...he got fired.

Avatar image for xtn702
xtn702

4203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 xtn702
Member since 2007 • 4203 Posts
nevada sucks they already changed the law to 18 yars old here :evil:
Avatar image for Vyse_The_Daring
Vyse_The_Daring

5318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Vyse_The_Daring
Member since 2003 • 5318 Posts

I've never come close to being hit by a teenager, it's always people older than me, so no I don't think so. I also think it's ridiculous that anyone would consider changing the age you can drive before banning cell phones while driving.

Also to the person who posted Ontario's legislation, I live in Ontario and thought most places were like that, do people in certain states not have to wait before being able to drive?

Avatar image for Zero-Pirate
Zero-Pirate

2156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Zero-Pirate
Member since 2003 • 2156 Posts

How about just adopt Ontario's (Canada) graduated licensing sytem...? From Wikipedia:

  • Learners permit (G1): Available at age 16, with the passing of a multiple choice road theory test, a driving permit is issued which allows the learning driver to drive on roads accompanied by someone with full valid driver's licence whose BAC is less than .05 and has been fully licenced for four years. The driver also cannot drive roads with a posted speed limit over 80km/h (50 MPH) or between 12:00 AM - 5:00 AM and must maintain their own BAC at zero.
  • Probationary licence (G2): Available after having held a learners permit for 12 or eight months if the driver has completed a certain number of driving lessons with recognized driving school. Probationary licence is acquired after successfully completing a road test. At this point the driver must still maintain a BAC of zero. As of 2005 drivers with a G2 licences are restricted in the number of passengers under 19 that they can carry during night-time driving.
  • Full licence (G): After 1 year of possessing the G2 licence a driver can take an additional road test that often includes driving on a four lane divided highway. With successful completion they will obtain a full licence which carries no restrictions and are not required to take any further tests until 80 providing they renew their licence regularly. Drivers 80 years of age and over must complete a vision and knowledge test and participate in a 90-minute group education session to renew their licence.

Ontario has been using a graduated licensing system since 1994. A driver can take as little as 20 months to get a full licence, however a driver must have a full licence (G) within five years of obtaining a learners permit (G1).

The exact same process, except with other restrictions, is used for obtaining a motorcycle (M) licence.

In Ontario, there was a recently proposed legislation to deny driver's licences to high school dropouts until they turned 18. It was meant as an incentive for students to graduate.

Traffic Violations convictions usually come with demerit against your licence. The points may affect your insurance or if you collect enough of them you may face a licence suspension.

Aznsilvrboy

I definitely agree that a graduated licencing program is the way to go. Saskatchewan has also introduced something similar to this, and I think it's a very good idea. It still allows for people to get experience behind the wheel while greatly reducing the risks associated with inexperienced drivers.

If the age limit was raised, we would have inexperience 18 year olds instead of inexperienced 16 year olds. There is not much of a difference there.

And to whoever said people shouldn't be able to drive without supervision until the age of 21: that is absurd. You are expected to be starting a career, or going to university, starting your own family, but yet you can't drive without supervision. For that matter, the drinking age at 21 in the US is just as absurd. You are responsible enough to vote for your country's leader when you are 18, yet you aren't responsible enough to have a drink? Makes no sense at all.

Avatar image for SWTTVGfreak
SWTTVGfreak

411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#34 SWTTVGfreak
Member since 2005 • 411 Posts

I think teens should be able to drive with other teenagers in the car. But only during certian hours. Like say 6:15-9:00 and 2:00-4:00. Enough time to drive to school and back home. That allows wiggleroom for students with classes that start before the rest of the classes do(They're called 0 period here. Not sure if its the same elsewere). Also enought to allow for the traffic jam that happens after school gets out.(My HS has 3,000+ kids its a mess after school). If you really think about it, this is encouraging carpooling. So itis envoirment friendly.

Oh and FYI since July 1st it is illegal to drive a car while holding a cellphone to your ear in California. Those hands free things are still legal.

Avatar image for Capn_Circus
Capn_Circus

231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Capn_Circus
Member since 2003 • 231 Posts
Cmhawk, it would help if you learned basic English before coming to these forums. My message was not about 30 minutes practice... it was about being required to be in the car with an instructer... TESTING for 30 minutes before.... OBTAINING a license. Which means no more quick 5 minute tests like there are now. They should be more lengthy.
Avatar image for Headbanger88
Headbanger88

5023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 Headbanger88
Member since 2004 • 5023 Posts

Oh and FYI since July 1st it is illegal to drive a car while holding a cellphone to your ear in California. Those hands free things are still legal.

SWTTVGfreak

Which I was glad to see happen. I've always tried to pull over if the phone call is important, otherwise I'll ignore it. I don't know how hard the police are going to enforce it, guess we'll see in a couple months of having the law.

Avatar image for johndoh4
johndoh4

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#37 johndoh4
Member since 2003 • 1743 Posts
It should be 18, but they wont change it.