Does the BP oil spill affect your gas purchasing?
I wasn't buying gas from them to begin with, but if I was, I wouldn't be now (unless I lived in some rural area or something and it was the only thing around).
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Does the BP oil spill affect your gas purchasing?
I wasn't buying gas from them to begin with, but if I was, I wouldn't be now (unless I lived in some rural area or something and it was the only thing around).
I don't, not becuase of the spill but becuase they are always usually the most expensive no matter where I go.
i would never buy a drop of gas from them. 11 people died due to there cheap carelessnes they did the biggest oil spill in history . i hope the government takes every penny they make to help save jobs and the envourment
This is by far NOT the biggest oil spill in history. It's the biggest in American history.i would never buy a drop of gas from them. 11 people died due to there cheap carelessnes they did the biggest oil spill in history . i hope the government takes every penny they make to help save jobs and the envourment
dontshackzmii
Then you will never buy another drop if gas ever again...i would never buy a drop of gas from them. 11 people died due to there cheap carelessnes they did the biggest oil spill in history . i hope the government takes every penny they make to help save jobs and the envourment
dontshackzmii
[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]This is by far NOT the biggest oil spill in history. It's the biggest in American history.i would never buy a drop of gas from them. 11 people died due to there cheap carelessnes they did the biggest oil spill in history . i hope the government takes every penny they make to help save jobs and the envourment
Theokhoth
i never said in world history.
As a Brit, i am just curious. A standard full tank of PETROL (gas is not a liquid, it is a, you guessed it, GAS!) is about £40. Now i don't know the exchange rate. About $70 give or take.
As far as i know, Americans get it a lot cheaper. Wouldn't paying just a bit more be something to consider? Then maybe you wouldn't use so much... Just a thought, what you think?
That's a horrid idea. Gas costs more where you live because you folks get paid a lot more money. Everything costs more where you live. And gas consumption isn't what this threads about. It's about will you sitll use BP or not.As a Brit, i am just curious. A standard full tank of PETROL (gas is not a liquid, it is a, you guessed it, GAS!) is about £40. Now i don't know the exchange rate. About $70 give or take.
As far as i know, Americans get it a lot cheaper. Wouldn't paying just a bit more be something to consider? Then maybe you wouldn't use so much... Just a thought, what you think?
IAMTHEJOKER88
I pay about $36 for a full tank of gas here. 13 gallons at $2.75/gallon. Thats about £24.50.As a Brit, i am just curious. A standard full tank of PETROL (gas is not a liquid, it is a, you guessed it, GAS!) is about £40. Now i don't know the exchange rate. About $70 give or take.
As far as i know, Americans get it a lot cheaper. Wouldn't paying just a bit more be something to consider? Then maybe you wouldn't use so much... Just a thought, what you think?
IAMTHEJOKER88
The boycott is stupid. Regardless of what caused the spill, we definitely don't need less competition in the oil market.guynamedbillyAnd it's not like they did this on purpose. They didn't choose to lose billions of dollars in product every couple of days. Boycotting them serves no purpose if you even have one by you.
I didn't go to BP regularly before, but I would go if it was convienent, now I'll go out of my way to avoid going to a BP. I guess buying from other gas companies isn't that much better which makes me wish all the more that there was a viable alternative, but if BP gets through this and goes back to posting enourmous profits then other companies won't see the incentive to put failsafes into place and I hope at the very least something that comes out of all this is that offshore drilling is made safer by these precautions being implemented.
And it's not like they did this on purpose. They didn't choose to lose billions of dollars in product every couple of days. Boycotting them serves no purpose if you even have one by you.[QUOTE="guynamedbilly"]The boycott is stupid. Regardless of what caused the spill, we definitely don't need less competition in the oil market.Pirate700
No, but they chose not to implement the proper failsafes, they chose not to have enough qualified people in place to be monitoring for this, and they're choosing right now to downplay the impact of this and cover up what is actually going on in the Gulf right now. If they get away with doing these things that sends the message that this is acceptable behavior and opens the door for other companies to follow.
And it's not like they did this on purpose. They didn't choose to lose billions of dollars in product every couple of days. Boycotting them serves no purpose if you even have one by you.[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
[QUOTE="guynamedbilly"]The boycott is stupid. Regardless of what caused the spill, we definitely don't need less competition in the oil market.theone86
No, but they chose not to implement the proper failsafes, they chose not to have enough qualified people in place to be monitoring for this, and they're choosing right now to downplay the impact of this and cover up what is actually going on in the Gulf right now. If they get away with doing these things that sends the message that this is acceptable behavior and opens the door for other companies to follow.
I agree they need to be punished but boycotting a company over an accident just seems odd to me.And it's not like they did this on purpose. They didn't choose to lose billions of dollars in product every couple of days. Boycotting them serves no purpose if you even have one by you.[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
[QUOTE="guynamedbilly"]The boycott is stupid. Regardless of what caused the spill, we definitely don't need less competition in the oil market.theone86
No, but they chose not to implement the proper failsafes, they chose not to have enough qualified people in place to be monitoring for this, and they're choosing right now to downplay the impact of this and cover up what is actually going on in the Gulf right now. If they get away with doing these things that sends the message that this is acceptable behavior and opens the door for other companies to follow.
If everyone boycotts them and drive them away from the US, what incentive would they have to fix this damage? If everyone boycotts them and they shut down, how would they be able to afford fixing the damage? Sure, they need to be punished and sued and whatever else can legally be done to get them to fix what's wrong. I don't see how a boycott can help in that effort at all.Wow, everything about that post was just so ignorantly obnoxious...[QUOTE="Dark__Link"]
[QUOTE="IAMTHEJOKER88"]
As a Brit, i am just curious. A standard full tank of PETROL (gas is not a liquid, it is a, you guessed it, GAS!) is about £40. Now i don't know the exchange rate. About $70 give or take.
As far as i know, Americans get it a lot cheaper. Wouldn't paying just a bit more be something to consider? Then maybe you wouldn't use so much... Just a thought, what you think?
IAMTHEJOKER88
As for the topic... if there were any BP stations around, I wouldn't hesitate to get gas from them if I needed it.
Hypocrite. For stating i was ignorant i clearly wrote, 'Just a thought' and 'just curious'.
Enlighten me, why is that post so obnoxiously ignorant?
And to whoever said we all earn more. That is ignorant in itself. You clearly have never been to Britain. We are not all rich folk here... i live in a council flat. Pretty meagre wealth. Just about pay for food and enough for the occasional treat. We can't afford what you might call cable. My standing is rife in this country.
Yup, I agree with pretty much all of what you've said. And as you say, we're not as rich as people think.
It's pretty funny how the US is hounding down BP, but remains quiet about Bhopal, which was far far FAR worse. Obama should realise that BP is a multinational corporation owned 39% by Americans (and has more US employees than British) and the rig where the pipe burst was in the American branch of the business anyway. And him calling BP 'British Petroleum' (which it hasn't been called in years, since 1998 I think?) to aim the blame at the British is him simply trying to avoid criticism.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment