This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm against total isolationism. Getting involved in other countries affairs can easily backfire, but so too can not getting involved at all. We need a better policy than simply "what is in our current best interest for the time being".
Bad example of U.S. intervention: Guatemala
Would-have-been-good example of U.S. intervention: Rwanda.
Well i wouldn't mind them standing back a bit. Mainly because i am really not impressed with how they deal with their own people. But i don't want an entire discussion devoted to that. EMOEVOLUTION, You think the USA are close to being too isolationist? I'm just asking, nothing intended.KungfuKittenNo, I don't think that. I think we could go that way though because of poor decision making by the Government. The USA can do a lot of good around the World. I'm not talking about military action or telling people how to do things.
I get the feeling the world isn't grateful for the billions of dollars the US spends every year trying to help. The solution: spend those billions of dollars on the US.FragStainsI agree good sir. Let's not force money on other nations.
Example or proof?[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"]
No, It's not. Isolationism is a very dangerous thing.
Unassigned
World War II, Genocides in Darfur and Rwanda.
[QUOTE="FragStains"]I get the feeling the world isn't grateful for the billions of dollars the US spends every year trying to help. The solution: spend those billions of dollars on the US.LJS9502_basicI agree good sir. Let's not force money on other nations. I don't mind if you force money on to me :P
I think this is a very positive trend. I hope it continues. We can't afford more of these "nation-building" wars.
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]No it isn't. There is a lot of good that the U.S. can and should do in the world. mrbojangles25
yea but the recent trend among other nations is Americaphobia...even if we have the best intentions, they wont want us getting involved.
Its sad, and I agree we can do a lot of good (we do, actually...stationing hospital ships off of tidal-wave struck countries, sharing our constant wheat surplus, etc) but we cant cram our help down their throats.
Well, I don't think other people hate America to the degree in which they would refuse our aid if they were in dire need of it. I'm a little wary to use the example of Iraq, but when we initially invaded, there was a very brief period where we were in fact - to use what are now Dick Cheney's infamous words - "greeted as liberators" by the Iraqi people (of course that did quickly change do to incredible mismanagement of the war).I think it is reasonable to assume that if the U.S. were to reach out its hand to an oppressed people in need, that its hand would be grasped, not shoved away because of hatred for the U.S. (assuming that the effort is genuine and properly managed). And if they don't accept our aid, there are plenty of other people that could use the aid, both domestically and abroad.
We're by far the most generous nation in the world already, I say we start focusing on healing ourselves for once.
JustusCF
:lol:
Ok whatever you say man...
But yes, the U.S. should start fixing internal problems before trying to intervene in foreign affairs.
Example or proof?[QUOTE="Unassigned"]
[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"]
No, It's not. Isolationism is a very dangerous thing.
_BlueDuck_
World War II, Genocides in Darfur and Rwanda.
Those are not examples of "Isolationism" but thanks for sharing.[QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"][QUOTE="Unassigned"] Example or proof?
Unassigned
World War II, Genocides in Darfur and Rwanda.
Those are not examples of "Isolationism" but thanks for sharing.The latterare examples of non-interventionalism, which is a key component to isolationism.
Those are not examples of "Isolationism" but thanks for sharing.[QUOTE="Unassigned"][QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"]
World War II, Genocides in Darfur and Rwanda.
_BlueDuck_
The latterare examples of non-interventionalism, which is a key component to isolationism.
The former is a consequence of isolationism.
I agree that this is a very bad trend. Not only is in infeasible--our economy depends on trade in foreign countries--it's also ignorant.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment