If no one knows you existed, do you actually exist?
im gonna say no, if no one knows you exist then your non existent, how can someone exist if no one can think of them or ever thought of them
This topic is locked from further discussion.
No one knows I beat off five minutes ago. But I TOTALLY beat off five mins ago.If no one knows you existed, do you actually exist?
im gonna say no, if no one knows you exist then your non existent, how can someone exist if no one can think of them or ever thought of them
cee1gee
You only exist if you think you exist.Also, Luke is your father.If no one knows you existed, do you actually exist?
im gonna say no, if no one knows you exist then your non existent, how can someone exist if no one can think of them or ever thought of them
cee1gee
Of course. Simply being validated by something or someone else doesn't mean you exist more than one that hasn't.If no one knows you existed, do you actually exist?
im gonna say no, if no one knows you exist then your non existent, how can someone exist if no one can think of them or ever thought of them
cee1gee
Interesting thought: if a person is color blind, and cannot see orange, then does orange exist for him? It exists for us who can see it, but we are incapable of describing orange to a person who cannot see it.
If no one knows you existed, do you actually exist?
im gonna say no, if no one knows you exist then your non existent, how can someone exist if no one can think of them or ever thought of them
No one knows I beat off five minutes ago. But I TOTALLY beat off five mins ago. same thing as the whole tree falling in the woods question reallyDoes that planet that gets discovered for the first time tomorrow exist before tomorrow? Yes. Being unaware of something doesn't make it non-existent. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.snowman6251there are also unknown unkowns. things that we don't know that we don't know.
Do I know I exist? If so, then I exist. Descartes nailed this one some time ago.If no one knows you existed, do you actually exist?
im gonna say no, if no one knows you exist then your non existent, how can someone exist if no one can think of them or ever thought of them
cee1gee
[QUOTE="snowman6251"]Does that planet that gets discovered for the first time tomorrow exist before tomorrow? Yes. Being unaware of something doesn't make it non-existent. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.Serraph105there are also unknown unkowns. things that we don't know that we don't know. And once we figure them out that just means we're aware of their existence, not that they only just started to exist right then and there, especially if we can carbon date them or something to prove they were around longer than we were aware of them.
Not exactly the same, someone who is colour blind will just see orange as a different colour. They will have been taught that that colour is "orange" and so it will always be "orange" to them. A more interesting notion would be to describe a brand new colour. Like if you discovered red while having only known blue and green. :PInteresting thought: if a person is color blind, and cannot see orange, then does orange exist for him? It exists for us who can see it, but we are incapable of describing orange to a person who cannot see it.
heysharpshooter
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]Hang on... If you only exist when somebody else verifies it, and that person only exists when somebody else verifies it, who exists in the first place to get the ball rolling?cee1geeGod does....we just solved the religious puzzle That's one solution. Or maybe the whole conundrum is senseless. I exist because I'm aware of it. I don't need external verification.
[QUOTE="cee1gee"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]Hang on... If you only exist when somebody else verifies it, and that person only exists when somebody else verifies it, who exists in the first place to get the ball rolling?jimmyjammer69God does....we just solved the religious puzzle That's one solution. Or maybe the whole conundrum is senseless. I exist because I'm aware of it. I don't need external verification. what if we were not aware we existed?
[QUOTE="smc91352"]exactly, if no one can imagine it, than i just see no possibility in its existence So new species of insects and galaxies and stars and such don't exist until scientists discover them? How were they able to discover them if they didn't exist?If I can imagine it, it exists.
If I haven't heard of it, it doen't exist.
Now leave me and myManBearPigin peace.
cee1gee
exactly, if no one can imagine it, than i just see no possibility in its existence So new species of insects and galaxies and stars and such don't exist until scientists discover them? How were they able to discover them if they didn't exist? so let me get this straight...your saying if nothing knows you exist,you still exist? well why do the atheists say God does not exist? wouldnt it be the same thing[QUOTE="cee1gee"][QUOTE="smc91352"]
If I can imagine it, it exists.
If I haven't heard of it, it doen't exist.
Now leave me and myManBearPigin peace.
guynamedbilly
[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="snowman6251"]Does that planet that gets discovered for the first time tomorrow exist before tomorrow? Yes. Being unaware of something doesn't make it non-existent. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.snowman6251there are also unknown unkowns. things that we don't know that we don't know. And once we figure them out that just means we're aware of their existence, not that they only just started to exist right then and there, especially if we can carbon date them or something to prove they were around longer than we were aware of them. yeah you kinda missed that I was quoting The Boondocks but whatever :P
[QUOTE="guynamedbilly"]So new species of insects and galaxies and stars and such don't exist until scientists discover them? How were they able to discover them if they didn't exist? so let me get this straight...your saying if nothing knows you exist,you still exist? well why do the atheists say God does not exist? wouldnt it be the same thing I'm an atheist. I think God doesn't exist because there is no evidence whatsoever (and actually the way I look at it there's evidence of the contrary, being the sheer number of different religions and gods and the origins of religion and how wrong the bible and other holy books are at basic science, amongst other things). Something like a newly discovered planet has evidence. They looked through a telescope, boom planet discovered, proof presented. If someone looked through a telescope and saw God chilling on a cloud I would A) be shocked and B) be proven wrong and believe in God.[QUOTE="cee1gee"] exactly, if no one can imagine it, than i just see no possibility in its existencecee1gee
[QUOTE="snowman6251"][QUOTE="Serraph105"] there are also unknown unkowns. things that we don't know that we don't know.Serraph105And once we figure them out that just means we're aware of their existence, not that they only just started to exist right then and there, especially if we can carbon date them or something to prove they were around longer than we were aware of them. yeah you kinda missed that I was quoting The Boondocks but whatever :P yeah. Totally went over my head.
[QUOTE="cee1gee"][QUOTE="guynamedbilly"] So new species of insects and galaxies and stars and such don't exist until scientists discover them? How were they able to discover them if they didn't exist?so let me get this straight...your saying if nothing knows you exist,you still exist? well why do the atheists say God does not exist? wouldnt it be the same thing I'm an atheist. I think God doesn't exist because there is no evidence whatsoever (and actually the way I look at it there's evidence of the contrary, being the sheer number of different religions and gods and the origins of religion and how wrong the bible and other holy books are at basic science, amongst other things). Something like a newly discovered planet has evidence. They looked through a telescope, boom planet discovered, proof presented. If someone looked through a telescope and saw God chilling on a cloud I would A) be shocked and B) be proven wrong and believe in God. So basically he doesnt exist because you never seen him, but the people who claim they talked to him, or he answered their prayer...you claim they are crazy, and wont accept Gods existence because you havent seen it for yourself...which basically means that nothing exists unless youve seen it first handsnowman6251
[QUOTE="guynamedbilly"]So new species of insects and galaxies and stars and such don't exist until scientists discover them? How were they able to discover them if they didn't exist? so let me get this straight...your saying if nothing knows you exist,you still exist? well why do the atheists say God does not exist? wouldnt it be the same thing The scientists that discover new planets have no reason to believe they will discover a planet in that one exact place they look, but if they never looked in that exact place and never discovered that planet, the planet would still exist. Can you do the same with God? Can you show us where God is? Until you can, most logically scientific people will not believe he exists. That of course doesn't mean that he doesn't exist, it just means that they have no reason at this time to believe that he does.[QUOTE="cee1gee"] exactly, if no one can imagine it, than i just see no possibility in its existencecee1gee
I'm an atheist. I think God doesn't exist because there is no evidence whatsoever (and actually the way I look at it there's evidence of the contrary, being the sheer number of different religions and gods and the origins of religion and how wrong the bible and other holy books are at basic science, amongst other things). Something like a newly discovered planet has evidence. They looked through a telescope, boom planet discovered, proof presented. If someone looked through a telescope and saw God chilling on a cloud I would A) be shocked and B) be proven wrong and believe in God. So basically he doesnt exist because you never seen him, but the people who claim they talked to him, or he answered their prayer...you claim they are crazy, and wont accept Gods existence because you havent seen it for yourself...which basically means that nothing exists unless youve seen it first hand Um sort of. Take the new planet example again. They can look through the telescope, photograph it, and show it to other people. There is proof of their finding. Concrete evidence. We don't just have to take their word for it because they have solid proof. Anyone can claim they spoke to god. I could claim that last night God told me I'd find $10 today and then I did. Its a miracle. There's no proof of that however aside from my word which may or may not be reliable. And like I said, if someone was able to show me concrete, indisputable proof, that God exists, then I would eat my own words. I'd have been proven wrong. He would have existed the whole time I denied him and I simply would have been wrong. But no one has that proof and I think they are all just a bunch of crazies (or liars) and until someone can prove otherwise, I'm sticking to that.[QUOTE="snowman6251"][QUOTE="cee1gee"] so let me get this straight...your saying if nothing knows you exist,you still exist? well why do the atheists say God does not exist? wouldnt it be the same thingcee1gee
I'm an atheist. I think God doesn't exist because there is no evidence whatsoever (and actually the way I look at it there's evidence of the contrary, being the sheer number of different religions and gods and the origins of religion and how wrong the bible and other holy books are at basic science, amongst other things). Something like a newly discovered planet has evidence. They looked through a telescope, boom planet discovered, proof presented. If someone looked through a telescope and saw God chilling on a cloud I would A) be shocked and B) be proven wrong and believe in God. So basically he doesnt exist because you never seen him, but the people who claim they talked to him, or he answered their prayer...you claim they are crazy, and wont accept Gods existence because you havent seen it for yourself...which basically means that nothing exists unless youve seen it first hand[QUOTE="snowman6251"][QUOTE="cee1gee"] so let me get this straight...your saying if nothing knows you exist,you still exist? well why do the atheists say God does not exist? wouldnt it be the same thingcee1gee
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]Do I know I exist? If so, then I exist. Descartes nailed this one some time ago.Pretty simple concept.If no one knows you existed, do you actually exist?
im gonna say no, if no one knows you exist then your non existent, how can someone exist if no one can think of them or ever thought of them
xaos
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]So basically he doesnt exist because you never seen him, but the people who claim they talked to him, or he answered their prayer...you claim they are crazy, and wont accept Gods existence because you havent seen it for yourself...which basically means that nothing exists unless youve seen it first hand Um sort of. Take the new planet example again. They can look through the telescope, photograph it, and show it to other people. There is proof of their finding. Concrete evidence. We don't just have to take their word for it because they have solid proof. Anyone can claim they spoke to god. I could claim that last night God told me I'd find $10 today and then I did. Its a miracle. There's no proof of that however aside from my word which may or may not be reliable. And like I said, if someone was able to show me concrete, indisputable proof, that God exists, then I would eat my own words. I'd have been proven wrong. He would have existed the whole time I denied him and I simply would have been wrong. But no one has that proof and I think they are all just a bunch of crazies (or liars) and until someone can prove otherwise, I'm sticking to that.[QUOTE="snowman6251"] I'm an atheist. I think God doesn't exist because there is no evidence whatsoever (and actually the way I look at it there's evidence of the contrary, being the sheer number of different religions and gods and the origins of religion and how wrong the bible and other holy books are at basic science, amongst other things). Something like a newly discovered planet has evidence. They looked through a telescope, boom planet discovered, proof presented. If someone looked through a telescope and saw God chilling on a cloud I would A) be shocked and B) be proven wrong and believe in God. snowman6251
you sir, are a rare breed on this forum...a poster with intillegence, i cant agree more with your statements
what i am saying is basically, if someone believes in God, than he obviously exists to them, does something that doesnt exist to someone, exist to some other person? ofcourse it does, but its still existence, its there, God is there, we labeled him, he exists.can we plz not get into religion again..... I mean really its gettin annoying
CommonFable
[QUOTE="CommonFable"]what i am saying is basically, if someone believes in God, than he obviously exists to them, does something that doesnt exist to someone, exist to some other person? ofcourse it does, but its still existence, its there, God is there, we labeled him, he exists. We labeled Santa Claus and according to you he exists as a real being to Children but not to adults. But your logic is flawed. Since we gave it a label Santa Claus does exist but not as a literal being. Santa Claus exists as a fictional character who comes and brings gifts to children on Christmas, but not as a real entity. I view God the same way. He exists in the sense that he is a man made fictional being whom we have labeled God. He doesn't exist however as an all powerful deity who created the universe in a week.can we plz not get into religion again..... I mean really its gettin annoying
cee1gee
[QUOTE="cee1gee"][QUOTE="CommonFable"]what i am saying is basically, if someone believes in God, than he obviously exists to them, does something that doesnt exist to someone, exist to some other person? ofcourse it does, but its still existence, its there, God is there, we labeled him, he exists. We labeled Santa Claus and according to you he exists as a real being to Children but not to adults. But your logic is flawed. Since we gave it a label Santa Claus does exist but not as a literal being. Santa Claus exists as a fictional character who comes and brings gifts to children on Christmas, but not as a real entity. I view God the same way. He exists in the sense that he is a man made fictional being whom we have labeled God. He doesn't exist however as an all powerful deity who created the universe in a week. how is my logic flawed? wasnt santa clause based on a real person saint nicholas who went to a town to give all the poor kids toys,clothescan we plz not get into religion again..... I mean really its gettin annoying
snowman6251
Reality is not perception. Everything that exists, exists, whether one person is aware of it or not. Honestly, defining existance based on your own perceptions or the fact that somebody else has to perceive you for you to be real.. is absurd, and an extremly self centered idea. What we think isn't that important to give reality or no reality to something.If no one knows you existed, do you actually exist?
im gonna say no, if no one knows you exist then your non existent, how can someone exist if no one can think of them or ever thought of them
cee1gee
If I learned anything in physics class, undoubtedly.If a tree falls down and no one is around to hear it does it still make a sound?
FreezeBlast95
This is a very interesting question. I heard about a physics question that physicists asked themselves at one point relating to quantum theory. That question is: If you can't see the moon (it's a new moon or on the other side of the Earth), does it exist? The answer they said was no, it does not exist at least according to quantum theory. Why quantum theory? It is impossible to know the exact location of any one particle. Physicists use lab equipment to find, lets say a Proton. They will never know exactly where the Proton is, but they will get a percentage of how close they are to the Proton. The funny thing is, they never get to 100% as the Proton is more like a haze rather than a particle. So (this is gonna sound weird), we can never know the "exact" (quantum level) position of anything, including the moon. So, that being said, is existance a mere illusion or just one big cruel joke?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment