"If they're gonna support us, support us all the way."

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2203f11597

Thoughts?

They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...KobukSohn

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...SymphonicWaves

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...KobukSohn

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...xaos

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

Then you don't support raising money to properly equip our troops in battle?

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...KobukSohn

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...KobukSohn

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...KobukSohn

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

Then you don't support raising money to properly equip our troops in battle?

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...comp_atkins

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...comp_atkins

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

Answer me this:

Is it better for America to lose some soldiers there in Iraq with full support from the boys back home, yet eventually win the conflict and stabilize the situation

Or

Would it be better to pull out of Iraq and leave behind a broken Iraq and a further destabilized Middle East with even more, better organized terrorist organizations that will strike back against the United States?

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"][QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...xaos

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

Then you don't support raising money to properly equip our troops in battle?

What, don't have an answer?

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...KobukSohn

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

Answer me this:

Is it better for America to lose some soldiers there in Iraq with full support from the boys back home, yet eventually win the conflict and stabilize the situation

Or

Would it be better to pull out of Iraq and leave behind a broken Iraq and a further destabilized Middle East with even more, better organized terrorist organizations that will strike back against the United States?

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...KobukSohn

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

Answer me this:

Is it better for America to lose some soldiers there in Iraq with full support from the boys back home, yet eventually win the conflict and stabilize the situation

Or

Would it be better to pull out of Iraq and leave behind a broken Iraq and a further destabilized Middle East with even more, better organized terrorist organizations that will strike back against the United States?

I don't support the troops because I don't support the war.sped_ed

There we go, a man who actually has the stones to go out and say it.

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"][QUOTE="xaos"]No, not at all; I can't even fathom how you conflate the two. An expression of support for the troops to me would be getting them out of harm's way and out of an area where they have an ill-defined mission for which they are poorly suited.KobukSohn

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...xXBuffJeffXx

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

Answer me this:

Is it better for America to lose some soldiers there in Iraq with full support from the boys back home, yet eventually win the conflict and stabilize the situation

Or

Would it be better to pull out of Iraq and leave behind a broken Iraq and a further destabilized Middle East with even more, better organized terrorist organizations that will strike back against the United States?

We can at least stabilize the situation by following the guidelines of the Baker-Hamilton Commission, yet for some reason our leaders refuse to follow them.

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"][QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"][QUOTE="xaos"]No, not at all; I can't even fathom how you conflate the two. An expression of support for the troops to me would be getting them out of harm's way and out of an area where they have an ill-defined mission for which they are poorly suited.xaos

You still haven't properly answered my question, dancing around it instead,

You still haven't properly answered my question, dancing around it instead,KobukSohn

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...KobukSohn

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

Answer me this:

Is it better for America to lose some soldiers there in Iraq with full support from the boys back home, yet eventually win the conflict and stabilize the situation

Or

Would it be better to pull out of Iraq and leave behind a broken Iraq and a further destabilized Middle East with even more, better organized terrorist organizations that will strike back against the United States?

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...comp_atkins

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

Answer me this:

Is it better for America to lose some soldiers there in Iraq with full support from the boys back home, yet eventually win the conflict and stabilize the situation

Or

Would it be better to pull out of Iraq and leave behind a broken Iraq and a further destabilized Middle East with even more, better organized terrorist organizations that will strike back against the United States?

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="SymphonicWaves"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]They irony of "We're against what you're getting killed for, but we support you anyway"...comp_atkins

If you don't support the cause their fighting for, what's the point in supporting the soldiers themselves?

If you're opposed to the cause, wouldn't you logically be opposed to those fighting for that cause?

Answer me this:

Is it better for America to lose some soldiers there in Iraq with full support from the boys back home, yet eventually win the conflict and stabilize the situation

Or

Would it be better to pull out of Iraq and leave behind a broken Iraq and a further destabilized Middle East with even more, better organized terrorist organizations that will strike back against the United States?

If you want to see my stance on how to solve things, just read the Baker-Hamilton Report.

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"]You still haven't properly answered my question, dancing around it instead,xaos

You can't support equipping our troops with weapons which will aid them in carrying out their mission, and not support the cause.

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]You still haven't properly answered my question, dancing around it instead,KobukSohn

You can't support equipping our troops with weapons which will aid them in carrying out their mission, and not support the cause.

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]You still haven't properly answered my question, dancing around it instead,xaos

You can't support equipping our troops with weapons which will aid them in carrying out their mission, and not support the cause.

I'm just spreading the message of the boys who are actually serving in Iraq.

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]You still haven't properly answered my question, dancing around it instead,KobukSohn

You can't support equipping our troops with weapons which will aid them in carrying out their mission, and not support the cause.

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]You still haven't properly answered my question, dancing around it instead,KobukSohn

You can't support equipping our troops with weapons which will aid them in carrying out their mission, and not support the cause.

I'm just spreading the message of the boys who are actually serving in Iraq.

[QUOTE="KobukSohn"][QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="KobukSohn"]You still haven't properly answered my question, dancing around it instead,xaos

You can't support equipping our troops with weapons which will aid them in carrying out their mission, and not support the cause.

I'm just spreading the message of the boys who are actually serving in Iraq.

I will, to my cousin.