Link
Wow. I mean, the glove didn't fit and the jury did acquit. :o
[spoiler] Confirmed what we already knew [/spoiler]
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Link
Wow. I mean, the glove didn't fit and the jury did acquit. :o
[spoiler] Confirmed what we already knew [/spoiler]
[QUOTE="DavidianMH"]Is anyone really surprised?AllicrombieI thought it was that dude on the grassy knoll. It was actually Colonel Mustard in the Study with the candlestick.
Someone trying to make up a story. So ridiculous. Until I actually hear it from a credible source, I'm sticking with my "he's innocent" belief. Bring me more evidence than that.
How nice of you to repost the link from the first reply :POprah's representative has denied the report.
m0zart
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]Check the link again... Check your own link again, this time read it. So close.The National Enquirer...really?
Ace6301
[QUOTE="Allicrombie"][QUOTE="DavidianMH"]Is anyone really surprised?Hallenbeck77I thought it was that dude on the grassy knoll. It was actually Colonel Mustard in the Study with the candlestick.
And here I thought it was Miss Scarlett with the pipewrench in the library. ;)
How nice of your to repost the link from the first reply :P[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"][QUOTE="m0zart"]
Oprah's representative has denied the report.
m0zart
You're welcome.
Considering that the link debunking the story was ignored by several people and their posts went on about the fake confession it will probably need to be reposted at least every five posts or so.
I don't think anyone is that stupid, to confess to murdering folks after getting away with it.
But, you never know...might be
I don't think anyone is that stupid, to confess to murdering folks after getting away with it.
But, you never know...might be
mrbojangles25
If OJ actually committed the murders and later confessed to it after being acquitted double jeopardy would prevent him from being criminally charged for it again. Technically, the day after his acquittal he could walk down the streets saying in detail how it took place and the worst he would probably face would be perjury charges if he lied on the stand (and if I'm not mistaken he didn't even take the stand during the trial, but I was only 13 at the time when the trial took place so I don't remember).
Confessing would do little more than remove doubt from people who still say he's innocent since the vast majority of people today that I know of think he did it. What I do remember from back then was since I grew up in the southern half of Atlanta most people thought he was innocent and was being framed by Mark Fuhrman and the LAPD. Later, when I moved to another area more diverse people would say they thought he got away with murder.
He didn't serve time though so he can't be held under double jeopardy, can he?Ace6301Double jeopardy is when someone is either convicted or acquitted of the charges against them, they can't be charged with those same things again. The case must be "dismissed" in order for the charges to be open for re-filing.
and in related news your not a mod anymore? when did this happen? why wasnt i notified?I still don't think he did it. Officer Nordberg wouldn't even hurt a fly.
-Sun_Tzu-
[QUOTE="Ace6301"]He didn't serve time though so he can't be held under double jeopardy, can he?foxhound_foxDouble jeopardy is when someone is either convicted or acquitted of the charges against them, they can't be charged with those same things again. The case must be "dismissed" in order for the charges to be open for re-filing. Oh, I thought the accused had to be found guilty. The logic being you can't be found guilty for the crime of killing someone twice. If they get off and are acquitted and they then confess the crime it would make more sense to allow for them to be tried again. I'll just assume you're correct though.
[QUOTE="MgamerBD"]He didn't do it...BranKetraWhy make a book explaining how he had done it, if it really happened? I haven't read the book, though. Honestly...I don't know and I don't care. Only thing I know is that he wasn't proven guilty. So...basically he didn't do it..
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Ace6301"]He didn't serve time though so he can't be held under double jeopardy, can he?Ace6301Double jeopardy is when someone is either convicted or acquitted of the charges against them, they can't be charged with those same things again. The case must be "dismissed" in order for the charges to be open for re-filing. Oh, I thought the accused had to be found guilty. The logic being you can't be found guilty for the crime of killing someone twice. If they get off and are acquitted and they then confess the crime it would make more sense to allow for them to be tried again. I'll just assume you're correct though.
Double Jeopardy mostly exists to prevent someone from constantly being retried for a crime till they run into an unfriendly jury and get convicted for something they did not do.
And as part of the quick and speedy trial thing (ain't quick and speedy if you have to do it 5 times)
[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="MgamerBD"]He didn't do it...MgamerBDWhy make a book explaining how he had done it, if it really happened? I haven't read the book, though. Honestly...I don't know and I don't care. Only thing I know is that he wasn't proven guilty. So...basically he didn't do it.. Are you serious? The court system isn't perfect.
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Ace6301"]He didn't serve time though so he can't be held under double jeopardy, can he?Ace6301Double jeopardy is when someone is either convicted or acquitted of the charges against them, they can't be charged with those same things again. The case must be "dismissed" in order for the charges to be open for re-filing. Oh, I thought the accused had to be found guilty. The logic being you can't be found guilty for the crime of killing someone twice. If they get off and are acquitted and they then confess the crime it would make more sense to allow for them to be tried again. I'll just assume you're correct though.
No. The 'double jeopardy' rule exists to keep someone from being maliciously prosecuted for the same crime over and over until the prosecution finally gets the desired result.
Frankly, if OJ did it and got away is of little matter now, since he's now serving 30 years for an unrelated crime.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment