Another thread got me interested in this.
Does anyone have any good links about the possible effects of prayer and if it works or not? I'm looking for some solid information, if it's even possible to research such a thing.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I prayed for another job and I just got one today:Dgamefan67Wow, to think last time I was job hunting, I wasted time distributing a resume and going to interviews :(
[QUOTE="gamefan67"]I prayed for another job and I just got one today:DxaosWow, to think last time I was job hunting, I wasted time distributing a resume and going to interviews :( Man you got to have an interview with the lord first before you can get the job:P
Simply put, prayer whether effective or not (meaning whether or not the entity you pray to is real or not and therefore your prayer being something that is real), can work much like placebo drugs work.
They can create certain "delusions" (not in the traditional sense, hence the quotes) that are beneficial psychologically.
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="rawsavon"]There has been research that showed the positive effects of prayer...I forget where, I am sorry...saw it when I was in school and had more access to that stuff -believers will say that it is because God answers prayers -non believers will say that it comes from positive thinking, self fulfilling prophecy, etc. I do not want to debate the why...just saying that it is out there, and the results I saw had an overall positive correlation between prayer and the desired outcomerawsavonThat's why the study I linked to above used a double blind method on intercessory prayer, and it found no linkage between being prayed for and health outcomes. This has been many years for me (why I can't produce it or remember who did it) -my first undergrad degree (in psychology) -my feeling is that there will be just as many studies proving as disproving...as with most things in psychology
Wouldn't you suggest that this is what we call the 'File Drawer' problem in the publishing of psychological studies? It's certainly relevant in this instance, alongside any other studies within the broader realm of paranormal psychology.
This has been many years for me (why I can't produce it or remember who did it) -my first undergrad degree (in psychology) -my feeling is that there will be just as many studies proving as disproving...as with most things in psychology[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="xaos"] That's why the study I linked to above used a double blind method on intercessory prayer, and it found no linkage between being prayed for and health outcomes.poptart
Wouldn't you suggest that this is what we call the 'File Drawer' problem in the publishing of psychological studies? It's certainly relevant in this instance, alongside any other studies within the broader realm of paranormal psychology.
Possibly...probably
One of the many problems with this "science"
You will almost always find an equal amount of studies supporting each side in psychology (anything that was not proven 50 years ago, anyways)
-also one of the many reasons I did not pursue a PhD
It works.
I have often prayed for things that couldn't have happened otherwise, with at times it being the same way for which I was praying for. Things like that CAN'T be a coincidence. It's all faith, which I have. :)
It works.
I have often prayed for things that couldn't have happened otherwise, with at times it being the same way for which I was praying for. Things like that CAN'T be a coincidence. It's all faith, which I have. :)
I have faith as well, but the TC wants actual studies that prove/disprove...not just testimony[QUOTE="Zeromus1337"]I have faith as well, but the TC wants actual studies that prove/disprove...not just testimonyIt works.
I have often prayed for things that couldn't have happened otherwise, with at times it being the same way for which I was praying for. Things like that CAN'T be a coincidence. It's all faith, which I have. :)
rawsavon
Ah, true. Well, it's all faith. I don't think studies can actually disprove and/or prove prayer, since it's all faith, which is a necessary component. My mistake.
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="Zeromus1337"]
It works.
I have often prayed for things that couldn't have happened otherwise, with at times it being the same way for which I was praying for. Things like that CAN'T be a coincidence. It's all faith, which I have. :)
I have faith as well, but the TC wants actual studies that prove/disprove...not just testimonyAh, true. Well, it's all faith. I don't think studies can actually disprove and/or prove prayer, since it's all faith, which is a necessary component. My mistake.
No mistake. -not too many other Christians on here...and even fewer polite ones...good to see another- And there are studies on each side of the issue...numbers and studies are easy to skew depending on your POV and the results you are seeking -one of the many problems with psychology...a "human science" -so the TC can just choose one that supports whatever he is trying to proveThere was one conducted by the American Heart Journal in 2006; a double blind experiment with about 1200 with cardiac bypass patients.
About half were told they'd be receiving the prayers of an unknown congregation, the other half were not told. The study concluded the prayer had no impact, in fact the group told they were receiving prayers did slightly worse.
Of course, this proves basically nothing.
There was one conducted by the American Heart Journal in 2006; a double blind experiment with about 1200 with cardiac bypass patients.
About half were told they'd be receiving the prayers of an unknown congregation, the other half were not told. The study concluded the prayer had no impact, in fact the group told they were receiving prayers did slightly worse.
Of course, this proves basically nothing.
Danm_999
That is not a very good one IMO
-no way of knowing if the sick people believed in prayer
-if I told a bunch of atheists that people were praying for them it would have no effect (probably make them mad)
-also, no one was actually praying
Study needs to involve
1. actual prayer
2. people that believe in the power of prayer
3. people that do not
4. prayer by the individual
5. prayer by many (congregation)
6. control for each
...etc.
needs to be a massive study to conclude anything meaningful
[QUOTE="Danm_999"]
There was one conducted by the American Heart Journal in 2006; a double blind experiment with about 1200 with cardiac bypass patients.
About half were told they'd be receiving the prayers of an unknown congregation, the other half were not told. The study concluded the prayer had no impact, in fact the group told they were receiving prayers did slightly worse.
Of course, this proves basically nothing.
rawsavon
That is not a very good one IMO
-no way of knowing if the sick people believed in prayer
-if I told a bunch of atheists that people were praying for them it would have no effect (probably make them mad)
-also, no one was actually praying
Study needs to involve
1. actual prayer
2. people that believe in the power of prayer
3. people that do not
4. prayer by the individual
5. prayer by many (congregation)
6. control for each
...etc.
needs to be a massive study to conclude anything meaningful
The study sought to examine the empirical impacts prayer had on patients. In that regard, its design was fine.
Spending any more money on this is a waste of time honestly, because you can't mix science and religion like this. Even if every single study 100% conclusively proved prayer had no impact on health, or success, or whatever the intention of the prayer is, the cause of this cannot be ascertained. God may not exist, therefore there will never be any positive result. God may exist, but may not want prayer quantified.
These prayers tests are honestly a waste of time, and only serve to waste money and inflame debate.
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
[QUOTE="Danm_999"]
There was one conducted by the American Heart Journal in 2006; a double blind experiment with about 1200 with cardiac bypass patients.
About half were told they'd be receiving the prayers of an unknown congregation, the other half were not told. The study concluded the prayer had no impact, in fact the group told they were receiving prayers did slightly worse.
Of course, this proves basically nothing.
Danm_999
That is not a very good one IMO
-no way of knowing if the sick people believed in prayer
-if I told a bunch of atheists that people were praying for them it would have no effect (probably make them mad)
-also, no one was actually praying
Study needs to involve
1. actual prayer
2. people that believe in the power of prayer
3. people that do not
4. prayer by the individual
5. prayer by many (congregation)
6. control for each
...etc.
needs to be a massive study to conclude anything meaningful
The study sought to examine the empirical impacts prayer had on patients. In that regard, its design was fine.
Spending any more money on this is a waste of time honestly, because you can't mix science and religion like this. Even if every single study 100% conclusively proved prayer had no impact on health, or success, or whatever the intention of the prayer is, the cause of this cannot be ascertained. God may not exist, therefore there will never be any positive result. God may exist, but may not want prayer quantified.
These prayers tests are honestly a waste of time, and only serve to waste money and inflame debate.
1. you are right...nothing will prove/disprove God...the whole point is that it is a faith thing
2. Tax $$$ should not be used
3. But I have no problem with private universities/institutes using their money however they want
4. debate is not a bad thing IMO...but it too often dissolves into worse things
5. I still don't see how that study worked though
-there was no actual prayer...they were just told that people were praying
5. I still don't see how that study worked thoughIntercessory prayer was provided for two weeks for those patients. The people praying were strangers across the country; they didn't want the patients or their families deploying variable amounts of prayer, they wanted a set amount for each patient.
-there was no actual prayer...they were just told that people were prayingrawsavon
1. you are right...nothing will prove/disprove God...the whole point is that it is a faith thing rawsavonEven if we could measure God, a prayer test isn't the way to do it. God may or may not exist, but prayer is simply another variable. God may exist and simply not answer prayers.
Intercessory prayer was provided for two weeks for those patients. The people praying were strangers across the country; they didn't want the patients or their families deploying variable amounts of prayer, they wanted a set amount for each patient.[QUOTE="rawsavon"]5. I still don't see how that study worked though
-there was no actual prayer...they were just told that people were prayingDanm_999
ok...I misunderstood
I thought they just told them that people would be praying for them
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]1. you are right...nothing will prove/disprove God...the whole point is that it is a faith thing Danm_999Even if we could measure God, a prayer test isn't the way to do it. God may or may not exist, but prayer is simply another variable. God may exist and simply not answer prayers. Very true...no way of knowing if god exists, if it is the christian god, etc. -But if the Christian God exists and if the Bible is from him...then he answers prayer But I get what you are saying
Intercessory prayer was provided for two weeks for those patients. The people praying were strangers across the country; they didn't want the patients or their families deploying variable amounts of prayer, they wanted a set amount for each patient.[QUOTE="Danm_999"]
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]5. I still don't see how that study worked though
-there was no actual prayer...they were just told that people were prayingrawsavon
ok...I misunderstood
I thought they just told them that people would be praying for them
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment