SAT vs ACT what do you think is the better test.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

Which one do you feel is a better measure of knowledge and which is easier. I have only taken the SAT so far.

Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#2 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

Neither..Both are pretty worthless tests for the most part.

I've taken both.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts
ACT i guess. Although I hated the science section.
Avatar image for Suzy_Q_Kazoo
Suzy_Q_Kazoo

9899

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Suzy_Q_Kazoo
Member since 2010 • 9899 Posts

I did slightly better on the ACT, so I guess that.

Avatar image for rcignoni
rcignoni

8863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 rcignoni
Member since 2004 • 8863 Posts
ACT because I did better on it. :P
Avatar image for TheGreatDog
TheGreatDog

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TheGreatDog
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Sat Judges how you think. If yu had crappy teachers you'll BOMB the act
Avatar image for CommanderShiro
CommanderShiro

21746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 CommanderShiro
Member since 2005 • 21746 Posts

I found the ACT easier when I did it.

Avatar image for T_REX305
T_REX305

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 T_REX305
Member since 2010 • 11304 Posts

dunno :|

Avatar image for artichoke
artichoke

2271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 artichoke
Member since 2006 • 2271 Posts
Only took the ACT, not really sure why.
Avatar image for blackngold29
blackngold29

14137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 blackngold29
Member since 2004 • 14137 Posts

Neither..Both are pretty worthless tests for the most part.

I've taken both.

taj7575
I've only taken the SAT, but I agree that the whole standardized testing is stupid.
Avatar image for artichoke
artichoke

2271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 artichoke
Member since 2006 • 2271 Posts
[QUOTE="taj7575"]

Neither..Both are pretty worthless tests for the most part.

I've taken both.

blackngold29
I've only taken the SAT, but I agree that the whole standardized testing is stupid.

I guess it is in a way but since I tend to go good on standardized testing I'm okay with it.
Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

Neither I think both test are very flawed and I am glad more and more colleges are not making SAT/ACT scores a factor in their choices

Avatar image for CongressManStan
CongressManStan

918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 CongressManStan
Member since 2010 • 918 Posts
I definitely think ACT, the only section that really requires detailed prior knowledge is the math section. The science section for example can be completed 100% without any prior knowledge of the subjects.
Avatar image for rockguy92
rockguy92

21559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 rockguy92
Member since 2007 • 21559 Posts
Only taken the ACT.
Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#15 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
The Bar Exam. Its a lot harder than those two fakie tests.
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

The ACT was supposed to be the modern replacement for the SAT and its flaws, so...

ACT.

Avatar image for deactivated-6016f2513d412
deactivated-6016f2513d412

20414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-6016f2513d412
Member since 2007 • 20414 Posts
I took both. I hated the ACT. That science section is so awful. It's just...kind of poorly done. I definitely preferred the SAT. I'm not sure which one I found "easier" though. I got a 32 on the ACT and a 2100 on the SAT. Not bad scores...though not great either.
Avatar image for blackacidevil96
blackacidevil96

3855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 blackacidevil96
Member since 2006 • 3855 Posts

both tests are immediatly irrelevant to your life as soon as you get accepted into a college.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts
[QUOTE="t3hrubikscube"]I took both. I hated the ACT. That science section is so awful. It's just...kind of poorly done. I definitely preferred the SAT. I'm not sure which one I found "easier" though. I got a 32 on the ACT and a 2100 on the SAT. Not bad scores...though not great either.

I change my opinion to this. :P
Avatar image for deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510
deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510

17401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510
Member since 2007 • 17401 Posts
Dunno, all I've taken was the ACT. The only reason to take the SAT in Michigan is if you're going out of state for college.
Avatar image for frostybanana
frostybanana

5523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#21 frostybanana
Member since 2010 • 5523 Posts
The ACT is the "easier" test. Though I will say that neither of them are a good measure of "knowledge."
Avatar image for the_ChEeSe_mAn2
the_ChEeSe_mAn2

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Member since 2003 • 8463 Posts
[QUOTE="t3hrubikscube"]I took both. I hated the ACT. That science section is so awful. It's just...kind of poorly done. I definitely preferred the SAT. I'm not sure which one I found "easier" though. I got a 32 on the ACT and a 2100 on the SAT. Not bad scores...though not great either.

Considering how a top mark for ACT is 36 and 2400 for the SAT, I'd say you have done extremely well considering the average ACT score is 20 and SAT score is 1500.
Avatar image for silverwind23
silverwind23

660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 silverwind23
Member since 2009 • 660 Posts
neither since, im not from the states
Avatar image for ttobba07
ttobba07

2396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 ttobba07
Member since 2005 • 2396 Posts

I preferred ACT as it tested my actually knowledge about hard facts and numbers in science, vocab, and math. Then it tested my reading comprehension. I didn't like the SAT because it didn't feel like a real knowledge test to me. It didn't challenge me to think except for the math part. It is also why midwest schools stopped using the SAT because ACT scores generally translate to better college aptitude.

Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts
both are stupid tests, but they both are beaten in the worthless department by the GRE
Avatar image for PerfectCircles
PerfectCircles

2359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 PerfectCircles
Member since 2009 • 2359 Posts
I liked the ACT more because I did better on it.
Avatar image for Lastemperor28
Lastemperor28

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Lastemperor28
Member since 2010 • 63 Posts
[QUOTE="t3hrubikscube"]I took both. I hated the ACT. That science section is so awful. It's just...kind of poorly done. I definitely preferred the SAT. I'm not sure which one I found "easier" though. I got a 32 on the ACT and a 2100 on the SAT. Not bad scores...though not great either.the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Considering how a top mark for ACT is 36 and 2400 for the SAT, I'd say you have done extremely well considering the average ACT score is 20 and SAT score is 1500.

It's more about what you're aiming for. Most academic scholarships require around at least something above a 30 on the ACT or 2100 on the SAT and many higher-tier public and privates look in the range of at least something above a 32 ACT or 2200 SAT. Of course, the average person can aim for something lower and be just fine.
Avatar image for xXDrPainXx
xXDrPainXx

4001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 xXDrPainXx
Member since 2008 • 4001 Posts
Only took the SAT and fell asleep through the whole math part. I think both tests really are a waste of time and most colleges unless they are really uppity private Ivy League schools don't even consider them anymore. I know IU really doesn't and neither does University of Michigan.
Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#29 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts
We don't have those in Canada. At least not mandatory.
Avatar image for the_ChEeSe_mAn2
the_ChEeSe_mAn2

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Member since 2003 • 8463 Posts
[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"][QUOTE="t3hrubikscube"]I took both. I hated the ACT. That science section is so awful. It's just...kind of poorly done. I definitely preferred the SAT. I'm not sure which one I found "easier" though. I got a 32 on the ACT and a 2100 on the SAT. Not bad scores...though not great either.Lastemperor28
Considering how a top mark for ACT is 36 and 2400 for the SAT, I'd say you have done extremely well considering the average ACT score is 20 and SAT score is 1500.

It's more about what you're aiming for. Most academic scholarships require around at least something above a 30 on the ACT or 2100 on the SAT and many higher-tier public and privates look in the range of at least something above a 32 ACT or 2200 SAT. Of course, the average person can aim for something lower and be just fine.

Well in my post I was referring to how t3hrubiksscube thought that she didn't do well on her tests, when academically, she practically aced them. That said I did awful on my ACT but good enough on my SATs to get into the university I wanted.
Avatar image for cgi15
cgi15

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 cgi15
Member since 2008 • 492 Posts

Well, here is my personal experience with both tests.

ACT - took two times. 33, then 34. Overall the fact that you can guess without losing points makes the whole thing a lot easier than the SAT. Plus, the science section makes the whole thing a joke, because the science section should be called the "Can you interpret this graph or table correctly?" section, because that is all it is.

SAT - took once. 2110. Much harder. Math especially. This math section had more actual critical thinking/problem solving than theACT which seemed to be much more basic. The addition of a penalty for guessing also requires you to be more confident in your answers.

Although there are some people who score higher on the SAT, the majority of the people i have known definitely do higher on the ACT, although this is skewed because i only have a select group of people i know that have taken both tests.

Avatar image for -Tish-
-Tish-

3624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#32 -Tish-
Member since 2007 • 3624 Posts
They're both ridiculously overrated.
Avatar image for Agent-Zero
Agent-Zero

6198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Agent-Zero
Member since 2009 • 6198 Posts
ACT i guess. Although I hated the science section.mrmusicman247
Dude the science section was so easy! There was barely even any science it was just like reading comprehension w/ science theme.
Avatar image for deactivated-6016f2513d412
deactivated-6016f2513d412

20414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-6016f2513d412
Member since 2007 • 20414 Posts
[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"][QUOTE="t3hrubikscube"]I took both. I hated the ACT. That science section is so awful. It's just...kind of poorly done. I definitely preferred the SAT. I'm not sure which one I found "easier" though. I got a 32 on the ACT and a 2100 on the SAT. Not bad scores...though not great either.

Considering how a top mark for ACT is 36 and 2400 for the SAT, I'd say you have done extremely well considering the average ACT score is 20 and SAT score is 1500.

Well thanks! Not that it matters now (I'm in my second year of college), but I remember being very disappointed to the point of not even applying to a few schools because I felt so discouraged. I of course regret that now because it would've been better to at least try, but oh well. That's another subject entirely. :)
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#35 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

Neither..Both are pretty worthless tests for the most part.

I've taken both.

taj7575
depends on the what worth is seen in them. if they are used by admissions officials then it's worthwhile since scores correlate to college performance very well. and they want ppl that will do well.
Avatar image for ArchonBasic
ArchonBasic

6420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 ArchonBasic
Member since 2002 • 6420 Posts

[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"][QUOTE="t3hrubikscube"]I took both. I hated the ACT. That science section is so awful. It's just...kind of poorly done. I definitely preferred the SAT. I'm not sure which one I found "easier" though. I got a 32 on the ACT and a 2100 on the SAT. Not bad scores...though not great either.t3hrubikscube
Considering how a top mark for ACT is 36 and 2400 for the SAT, I'd say you have done extremely well considering the average ACT score is 20 and SAT score is 1500.

Well thanks! Not that it matters now (I'm in my second year of college), but I remember being very disappointed to the point of not even applying to a few schools because I felt so discouraged. I of course regret that now because it would've been better to at least try, but oh well. That's another subject entirely. :)

A 32 is in the 99th percentile. Granted, the financial aid goes up steeply with each additional point, but a 32 will still get you into most schools.

Avatar image for Dark_Knight6
Dark_Knight6

16619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Dark_Knight6
Member since 2006 • 16619 Posts

I didn't find either test to be particularly good in assessing the knowledge of the taker. That said, I absolutely hated the ACT and would recommend the SAT over it.

Avatar image for SamusFreak
SamusFreak

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 SamusFreak
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts

[QUOTE="t3hrubikscube"][QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"] Considering how a top mark for ACT is 36 and 2400 for the SAT, I'd say you have done extremely well considering the average ACT score is 20 and SAT score is 1500.Archon_basic

Well thanks! Not that it matters now (I'm in my second year of college), but I remember being very disappointed to the point of not even applying to a few schools because I felt so discouraged. I of course regret that now because it would've been better to at least try, but oh well. That's another subject entirely. :)

A 32 is in the 99th percentile. Granted, the financial aid goes up steeply with each additional point, but a 32 will still get you into most schools.

A 32 is very good, out here in the midwest, it well get you a regional scholarship into pretty much all the universities.

Avatar image for A_Mobile_Doll
A_Mobile_Doll

919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 A_Mobile_Doll
Member since 2009 • 919 Posts

I took both of them about 4 years ago.

I really don't think either of them is any better, but I think I did better on the ACT.

Avatar image for Guybrush_3
Guybrush_3

8308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Guybrush_3
Member since 2008 • 8308 Posts

I liked the SAT better the one time I took it. I hated the ACT, it was not interesting at all. By the time I would get to the science section I was always burnt out so I never made higher than a 27 (compared to over 30 in everything else 36 in math, 35 in reading, 31 in english)

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

Hmm a lot of varying opinions.

Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#43 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts
The ACT SOUNDS much harder than the SAT.
Avatar image for dragonfly110
dragonfly110

27955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#44 dragonfly110
Member since 2008 • 27955 Posts

well the only one of them Im going to be taking is the ACT so that (I plan on staying in the midwest for college, either goin downtown chicago or to Columbus community)

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#45 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45436 Posts
I only took the SAT, don't really know anything about the ACT.