I'd say it's generally accepted that Jesus was a real historical figure.
What's up for debate is whether or not he was the son of a divine being, and even if he was he was created as a man, meaning he's not going to have "divine" DNA, if there could even be such a thing.
Heck, Muslims even think he was a phrophet, but just like athiests they don't believe he was the son of god.
So now we have athiests and Muslims vs ... Judio-Christians?
Log in to comment