September 11 Anniversary: Recalling Responses of World Leaders

  • 62 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Stesilaus
Stesilaus

4999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Stesilaus
Member since 2007 • 4999 Posts

As we commemorate the 12th anniversary of the September 11 2001 attacks, let us recall some of the statements made by world leaders in the wake of the attacks:

Pope John Paul II: "How can episodes of such savage cruelty happen? The heart of man is an abyss out of which sometimes emerge plots of unspeakable ferocity capable of overturning in an instant the tranquil and productive life of a people."

UK Prime Minister Tony Blair: "Britain must, and I am sure will, stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States of America and peaceful nations across the world in deploying every possible resource to bring to justice the people responsible, and make sure terrorism never prevails."

French President Jacques Chirac: "We express our friendship and solidarity in this tragedy."

Iranian President Mohammad Khatami: "My deep sympathy goes out to the American nation, particularly those who have suffered from the attacks and also the families of the victims"

Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee: "We stand ready to cooperate with you in the investigations into this crime and strengthen our partnership ... to ensure that terrorism never succeeds again."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: "It's very good."

Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#2 Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts
Why do we need to recall what leaders of other countries said 12 years ago? Seriously.. it was a tragic even that has caused more than one war which are still being fought over a decade later. It's sad so many people lost their lives but I could care less what leaders of other countries said over a decade ago.
Avatar image for Wilfred_Owen
Wilfred_Owen

20964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#3 Wilfred_Owen
Member since 2005 • 20964 Posts
I said something once. Riveting stuff. I open my mouth an panties come off.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Why do I get the feeling the Netanyahu quote is taken out of context...
Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#5 Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts
Why do I get the feeling the Netanyahu quote is taken out of context...chessmaster1989
Yup, seems like it.
Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts
Why do I get the feeling the Netanyahu quote is taken out of context...chessmaster1989
Haven't you seen that picture of him laughing hysterically while lightning bolts strike innocent angel babies in the background of the falling of the Twin Towers as he said that comment? Totally legit.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#7 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

Why do I get the feeling the Netanyahu quote is taken out of context...chessmaster1989
yeah. Unfortunately the tc doesn't mention where he gets these quotes from.

Avatar image for Stesilaus
Stesilaus

4999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Stesilaus
Member since 2007 • 4999 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Why do I get the feeling the Netanyahu quote is taken out of context...whipassmt

yeah. Unfortunately the tc doesn't mention where he gets these quotes from.

It's from the ninth paragraph of this New York Times article.

Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ''It's very good.''

New York Times

Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#9 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

I don't see the big deal. Would you rather he lied?

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"] yeah. Unfortunately the tc doesn't mention where he gets these quotes from.

Stesilaus

It's from the ninth paragraph of this New York Times article.

Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ''It's very good.''

New York Times

So yes, you both took the quote out of context and, once you provided the context, you selectively edited: Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ''It's very good.'' Then he edited himself: ''Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.'' He predicted that the attack would ''strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.''
Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

20624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#11 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 20624 Posts

For more context, Israeli leader Netanyahu's full response the day after 9/11:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/12/us/day-terror-israelis-spilled-blood-seen-bond-that-draws-2-nations-closer.html

Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ''It's very good.'' Then he edited himself: ''Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.'' He predicted that the attack would ''strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.''

In the same article, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's response:

Yasir Arafat, leader of the Palestinian Authority, looked shaken as he appeared before reporters in Gaza to deplore ''this terrible act.''

''We are completely shocked,'' Mr. Arafat said. ''Completely shocked.''

Avatar image for Stesilaus
Stesilaus

4999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Stesilaus
Member since 2007 • 4999 Posts

So yes, you both took the quote out of context and, once you provided the context, you selectively edited: Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ''It's very good.'' Then he edited himself: ''Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.'' He predicted that the attack would ''strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.''

chessmaster1989

I just quoted the relevant parts.

:|

Avatar image for Wolfetan
Wolfetan

7522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Wolfetan
Member since 2010 • 7522 Posts

"It's very good" :lol::lol:

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#14 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

It's from the ninth paragraph of this New York Times article.

[QUOTE="New York Times"]

Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ''It's very good.''

Stesilaus

Yep. You took that totally out of context. Probably for thread hits.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="Stesilaus"] It's from the ninth paragraph of this New York Times article.

[QUOTE="New York Times"]

Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ''It's very good.''

GreySeal9

Yep. You took that totally out of context. Probably for thread hits.

I mean, it is Stesilaus.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

So yes, you both took the quote out of context and, once you provided the context, you selectively edited: Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ''It's very good.'' Then he edited himself: ''Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.'' He predicted that the attack would ''strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.''

Stesilaus

I just quoted the relevant parts.

:|

:| You made it look like he was responding to the planes hitting the twin towers with "It's very good." He was talking about how it would eventually strengthen relations between the two countries, he's not looking at the events taking place on 9/11 and cheering going "It's very good."
Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
9/11 was an inside job.
Avatar image for VaguelyTagged
VaguelyTagged

10702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 VaguelyTagged
Member since 2009 • 10702 Posts

even if Israel had something to do with the incident, why would they expose themselves like that?

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

even if Israel had something to do with the incident, why would they expose themselves like that?

VaguelyTagged
/facepalm
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#20 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

lol, Stesilaus and his nonsense again.

 

and Netanyahu wasn't a leader at the time , he was a defeated shadow of a politician yet to actually do anything goes to show what people know.

nevermind that comment was taken out of context , but then , Stesilaus is interested in propaganda, not truth , thats not a strong point of his.

Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts

i thought this was serious until i saw the last quote :lol:

but in all seriousness 9/11 was a planned event and not by those who live half way across the planet.

anyone who denys this has a bucket over their entire head.

Avatar image for Toph_Girl250
Toph_Girl250

48978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Toph_Girl250
Member since 2008 • 48978 Posts
12 years later and 9/11 stuff is still going on... I'd rather just forget about this and have it blow over, but nope, this date likely is gonna keep getting talked about (and governments/airports will continue to be paranoid) until an apocalypse actually happens, and who knows when that will be.
Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts
12 years later and 9/11 stuff is still going on... I'd rather just forget about this and have it blow over, but nope, this date likely is gonna keep getting talked about (and governments/airports will continue to be paranoid) until an apocalypse actually happens, and who knows when that will be.Toph_Girl250
around 3000 peopled died on 9/11 and as a result of that millions died in the middle east as a response from America and are still suffering to this day no speck of justice took place, so yes 9/11 should be mentioned.
Avatar image for Toph_Girl250
Toph_Girl250

48978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Toph_Girl250
Member since 2008 • 48978 Posts
So basically America overreacted and started a pointless war.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#26 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="Toph_Girl250"]12 years later and 9/11 stuff is still going on... I'd rather just forget about this and have it blow over, but nope, this date likely is gonna keep getting talked about (and governments/airports will continue to be paranoid) until an apocalypse actually happens, and who knows when that will be.GrayF0X786
around 3000 peopled died on 9/11 and as a result of that millions died in the middle east as a response from America and are still suffering to this day no speck of justice took place, so yes 9/11 should be mentioned.

actually millions died mostly as a result of Muslims killing other Muslims, whether its Sunni/Shia, ethnic, or tribal . there is alot of truth in the idea that the US caused more harm than good (and indeed alot of people were killed in various ways), but you can't blame them for the deaths which were caused by other Muslims.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"][QUOTE="Toph_Girl250"]12 years later and 9/11 stuff is still going on... I'd rather just forget about this and have it blow over, but nope, this date likely is gonna keep getting talked about (and governments/airports will continue to be paranoid) until an apocalypse actually happens, and who knows when that will be.Darkman2007
around 3000 peopled died on 9/11 and as a result of that millions died in the middle east as a response from America and are still suffering to this day no speck of justice took place, so yes 9/11 should be mentioned.

actually millions died mostly as a result of Muslims killing other Muslims, whether its Sunni/Shia, ethnic, or tribal . there is alot of truth in the idea that the US caused more harm than good (and indeed alot of people were killed in various ways), but you can't blame them for the deaths which were caused by other Muslims.

You can blame Americans for killing thousands of innocent civilians. Sadly, they were not on American soil, and not in some prestigious building, so no-one cares.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#28 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"] around 3000 peopled died on 9/11 and as a result of that millions died in the middle east as a response from America and are still suffering to this day no speck of justice took place, so yes 9/11 should be mentioned.Nibroc420
  actually millions died mostly as a result of Muslims killing other Muslims, whether its Sunni/Shia, ethnic, or tribal . there is alot of truth in the idea that the US caused more harm than good (and indeed alot of people were killed in various ways), but you can't blame them for the deaths which were caused by other Muslims.

You can blame Americans for killing thousands of innocent civilians. Sadly, they were not on American soil, and not in some prestigious building, so no-one cares.

 

thousands yes, millions? no , most of those millions were killed by other Muslims over issues that in some cases have been around before the US was ever a state.

the only reason these problems didn't surface was because those countries were ruled by dictators who kept everybody's head down ,while usually making their own tribe or sect the dominant one, something which can be said in Afghanistan , Iraq, Syria and Libya

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"]  actually millions died mostly as a result of Muslims killing other Muslims, whether its Sunni/Shia, ethnic, or tribal . there is alot of truth in the idea that the US caused more harm than good (and indeed alot of people were killed in various ways), but you can't blame them for the deaths which were caused by other Muslims.Darkman2007

You can blame Americans for killing thousands of innocent civilians. Sadly, they were not on American soil, and not in some prestigious building, so no-one cares.

 

thousands yes, millions? no , most of those millions were killed by other Muslims over issues that in some cases have been around before the US was ever a state.

the only reason these problems didn't surface was because those countries were ruled by dictators who kept everybody's head down ,while usually making their own tribe or sect the dominant one, something which can be said in Afghanistan , Iraq, Syria and Libya

>Angry Muslims come and kill a few thousand people. >US goes to their country, kills thousands of innocents, completely destroys any stability, and forces US based beliefs/policies upon the surviving populous. Hmm who's worse? :roll:
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#30 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] You can blame Americans for killing thousands of innocent civilians. Sadly, they were not on American soil, and not in some prestigious building, so no-one cares.Nibroc420

 

thousands yes, millions? no , most of those millions were killed by other Muslims over issues that in some cases have been around before the US was ever a state.

the only reason these problems didn't surface was because those countries were ruled by dictators who kept everybody's head down ,while usually making their own tribe or sect the dominant one, something which can be said in Afghanistan , Iraq, Syria and Libya

>Angry Muslims come and kill a few thousand people. >US goes to their country, kills thousands of innocents, completely destroys any stability, and forces US based beliefs/policies upon the surviving populous. Hmm who's worse? :roll:

thats besides the point I was making, I wasn't saying who is worse or better, merely that one should blame the US for things it did, not for the things it didn't do
Avatar image for VaguelyTagged
VaguelyTagged

10702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 VaguelyTagged
Member since 2009 • 10702 Posts
[QUOTE="VaguelyTagged"]

even if Israel had something to do with the incident, why would they expose themselves like that?

Nibroc420
/facepalm

why? lol , i knew that the quote was taken out of the context and everything. i just mean let's assume for a moment that it wasn't.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

 

thousands yes, millions? no , most of those millions were killed by other Muslims over issues that in some cases have been around before the US was ever a state.

the only reason these problems didn't surface was because those countries were ruled by dictators who kept everybody's head down ,while usually making their own tribe or sect the dominant one, something which can be said in Afghanistan , Iraq, Syria and Libya

Darkman2007
>Angry Muslims come and kill a few thousand people. >US goes to their country, kills thousands of innocents, completely destroys any stability, and forces US based beliefs/policies upon the surviving populous. Hmm who's worse? :roll:

thats besides the point I was making, I wasn't saying who is worse or better, merely that one should blame the US for things it did, not for the things it didn't do

I'm simply pointing out the double standard. In American Media, 1 life =/= 1 life. An AMERICAN who dies, is mourned. If 100 AMERICANS die, the country is heart broken. Yet when an American Chopper-gunner kills children and innocent news crews, or when we hear about the US military doing "Double taps" to kill innocent people rushing to aid victims, people shrug their shoulders "Wrong place, wrong time" If one were to openly react the same way to 9/11, as Americans react to the death of non-Americans, They'd be chastised.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#33 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"] >Angry Muslims come and kill a few thousand people. >US goes to their country, kills thousands of innocents, completely destroys any stability, and forces US based beliefs/policies upon the surviving populous. Hmm who's worse? :roll:

thats besides the point I was making, I wasn't saying who is worse or better, merely that one should blame the US for things it did, not for the things it didn't do

I'm simply pointing out the double standard. In American Media, 1 life =/= 1 life. An AMERICAN who dies, is mourned. If 100 AMERICANS die, the country is heart broken. Yet when an American Chopper-gunner kills children and innocent news crews, or when we hear about the US military doing "Double taps" to kill innocent people rushing to aid victims, people shrug their shoulders "Wrong place, wrong time" If one were to openly react the same way to 9/11, as Americans react to the death of non-Americans, They'd be chastised.

different point to one I was making.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#36 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"] actually millions died mostly as a result of Muslims killing other Muslims, whether its Sunni/Shia, ethnic, or tribal .

than US and NATO forces go there to celebrate Picnic than??

never said that, looks like you didn't bother reading what I actually wrote
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

12 years later and 9/11 stuff is still going on... I'd rather just forget about this and have it blow over, but nope, this date likely is gonna keep getting talked about (and governments/airports will continue to be paranoid) until an apocalypse actually happens, and who knows when that will be.Toph_Girl250

Why shouldn't the worst attack on our soil be remembered?

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

For future 9/11 anniversaries can we please pre-emptively suspend SNIPER and Grayfox? It would be most appreciated by every single person on this forum, I think.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

when there will be anniversaries of palestinians, Iraqis, afghans etc who lost their lives?? or for those who kill in drone attacks???SNIPER4321

Go to an Iraqi, Palestinian, or Afghani website and ask them.

Why are you here if all you intend to be is an insufferable douche?

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

because unlike you claim to show want equal freedom and justice but only care about few ppls loss at 9/11 and support Nato bombing in all over the world and. i speak for justice. SNIPER4321

You can't even speak english. How do you intend to speak for justice when that little distinction escapes you?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180104 Posts

ITT Stesilaus lies to promote his bigotry, Gaza wears a tin foil hat, SNIPER and Grayfox troll and people feed Nibrc again.....thread blows.

Avatar image for th3warr1or
th3warr1or

20637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#45 th3warr1or
Member since 2007 • 20637 Posts
0/10.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#46 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="SNIPER4321"] than US and NATO forces go there to celebrate Picnic than??

never said that, looks like you didn't bother reading what I actually wrote

Before 9/11 muslims were not killing or fighting with muslims but when 9/11 happend and muslims start killing muslims make perfect sense

that statement is really hilarious, study your own history, Muslims have been fighting each other for the last 1300 years.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#48 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"] that statement is really hilarious, study your own history, Muslims have been fighting each other for the last 1300 years.

so are christians and jews. during WW1, WW2, both sides have Christians. they kill each others.

but nobody is denying that, you on the other hand, are trying to paint a picture where everybody in the Islamic world were sitting around a campfire in peace before 9/11 , and you know that's nonsense Muslims have been fighting for one reason or another, be it religious , tribal , ethnic, or whatever it might be, the Iraq-Iran being a good example of a recent historical war like this. and no , don't try to deny that on the basis of Iran being Shia
Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

ITT Stesilaus lies to promote his bigotry, Gaza wears a tin foil hat, SNIPER and Grayfox troll and people feed Nibrc again.....thread blows.

SNIPER4321

either gaza wear tin foil hat or not. but everything cant be coincide. can it be??

 

AwZmAwTCAAA74uF.jpg:large

 

 and also why is comming soon written in picture??

Seriouly, so Cartoon Network is connected with 9/11? Is there anyone NOT behind 9/11? :roll:

The picture is clearly referring to a movie called The Towering Inferno, the reason it reads comming soon, they were in front of a movie theaters.