Should h0mosexual adoption be allowed?

Hi I need some arguments about this subject especially arguments against it

There are no logical arguments against it. Single people have proven they can be parents... why not two people of the same gender? If they can make it through the rigorous adoption process... they deserve to adopt a child. Heterosexual people who would never be good parents can just make them whenever they want. Seems kind of unfair.

I can't think of a single reason why not, parents are still parents..regardless if they're the same sex and the child will grow up accepting that as the normality.

There is no way you can deny that they should be allowed to adopt, there are millions of orphans that would do anything for loving parents.

A single parent would be worse for a child's development, than two parents of the same sex

why should they not be allowed to adopt?MattUD1

[QUOTE="MattUD1"]why should they not be allowed to adopt?MushroomWig

Why not? I'd adopt a homosexual.

bottom line is

A same sex couple is always going to be better for the child than no parents. Sure he or she might get bullied a little or develop some complex about not having a maternal/paternal relationship in their life but this is still infinitely better than a lonely child.

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]why should they not be allowed to adopt?Darth-Caedus

no....i feel bad for the kid who has to go through it...

"hey guys my parents are homos, whats up?

Revolution316

You must around 12 years old.

Why not? I'd adopt a homosexual.

poptart

Yes. homosexuals should have the right to adopt.

they are people just the same and should be treated as such.

if gays are truly wanting to adopt then that means they know the risks and are capable of adoption, usually. now i know there are probly some cases where they are not capable but the ones that are, whether it be, two males or two females, should be able to adopt.

sorry if that was confusing or whatever:P i know what i want to say but i cant quite put it into words:P

bottom line is

A same sex couple is always going to be better for the child than no parents. Sure he or she might get bullied a little or develop some complex about not having a maternal/paternal relationship in their life but this is still infinitely better than a lonely child.

Partcik

...and /thread.

I'm kind of in the middle on this. I believe the best situation is for a child to have a mother and a father, but there's a lot of crappy mothers and fathers out there and we don't take kids away from them.

[QUOTE="Partcik"]

bottom line is

A same sex couple is always going to be better for the child than no parents. Sure he or she might get bullied a little or develop some complex about not having a maternal/paternal relationship in their life but this is still infinitely better than a lonely child.

Revolution316

[QUOTE="Partcik"]

bottom line is

A same sex couple is always going to be better for the child than no parents. Sure he or she might get bullied a little or develop some complex about not having a maternal/paternal relationship in their life but this is still infinitely better than a lonely child.

Revolution316

you cant catch the gays

no....i feel bad for the kid who has to go through it...

"hey guys my parents are homos, whats up?

Revolution316

"Hey guys my parents are obese, whats up?"

Clearly fat people should not be able to have children, either, the poor might get teased about it by other kids! (Who happen to be jackasses that will tease people about something else anyway...)

Also, because being teased is sooooo much worse then living a miserable life with no parents at all...:roll:

Also, if homosexuality was less taboo, those children wouldn't be teased about it. They key is more tolerance, not giving in to intolerance because it is easier.

[QUOTE="Partcik"]

bottom line is

A same sex couple is always going to be better for the child than no parents. Sure he or she might get bullied a little or develop some complex about not having a maternal/paternal relationship in their life but this is still infinitely better than a lonely child.

Revolution316

are you serious? homosexuals are not a different species, they are people just the same and should not be referred to as "one of them".

and where is your proof to that statement?

I don't see why not. Those kids would do better ina same sex couple home than in a foster home.

[QUOTE="poptart"]

Why not? I'd adopt a homosexual.

xaos

Aww… Would you like a wowwipop?

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="poptart"]

Why not? I'd adopt a homosexual.

poptart

Aww… Would you like a wowwipop?

a child without parents learns to survive, becomes a man.

Revolution316

a child with homo parents ends up being one of them. we already got enoughRevolution316

How would you know if you were adopting a homosexual?rawsavon

I don't see any reason why they should be allowed to adopt.bededog

[QUOTE="Revolution316"]

[QUOTE="Partcik"]

bottom line is

A same sex couple is always going to be better for the child than no parents. Sure he or she might get bullied a little or develop some complex about not having a maternal/paternal relationship in their life but this is still infinitely better than a lonely child.

konvikt_17

are you serious? homosexuals are not a different species, they are people just the same and should not be referred to as "one of them".

and where is your proof to that statement?

The first 40 seconds of this Here explains the issue with gay people

As long as it's not mandatory :xxaos

[QUOTE="poptart"]

[QUOTE="xaos"] *puppy dog eyes*rawsavon

Aww… Would you like a wowwipop?

We'll call it a draw

[QUOTE="bededog"]I don't see any reason why they should be allowed to adopt.Darth-Caedus

As long as it's not mandatory :xxaos

Huh? I thought you liked being called Daddy?

I don't actually remember ever seeing anyone on OT be very adamantly against any type of gay rights, so I think you're on the wrong site for that.XilePrincess

no....i feel bad for the kid who has to go through it...

"hey guys my parents are homos, whats up?Revolution316

That problem shouldn't exist, but it's not a reason why a homosexual couple shouldn't adopt.

Subject matter of this type, while allowed needs to have a very strong beginning, and that falls to the responsibility of the topic creator. Plus based on the opening post, I don't see the topic creator doing much in this thread.

Feel free to create a new thread but start right off the bat with discussion starting with your very own opinions. Making a topic asking everyone else what they have as an opinion but failing to do so yourself? Sorry won't fly. Thanks.

This was a verbal warning, no moderation happened here.