should the 2on amendment be re-writing?

  • 71 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for delol
delol

8793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#1 delol
Member since 2005 • 8793 Posts

i mean these kind of things happens to often in the USA and the easy way you can get a gun seems to be the main factor for massacres as it happens today at Virginia.

And please don´t blame video games cause we do not have nothing to do whit this kind of violence :we are button smashers not head shooters

Avatar image for newbpwnage
newbpwnage

2409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 newbpwnage
Member since 2007 • 2409 Posts
nope. FTW
Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts

I'll make this quick:

Banning guns doesn't stop illegal arms trafficking.

Banning guns doesn't stop homicidal people from being homicidal. 

Avatar image for blooddemon666
blooddemon666

22587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 blooddemon666
Member since 2003 • 22587 Posts

I'll make this quick:

Banning guns doesn't stop illegal arms trafficking.

Banning guns doesn't stop homicidal people from being homicidal.

Redmoonxl2
QFT. the rules shouldn't be re written, they should be enforced. But where we will get the money to enforce gun laws is a conundrum
Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts
No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.
Avatar image for Erasorn
Erasorn

14502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Erasorn
Member since 2004 • 14502 Posts
I like my bear arms.. :(
Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts

No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.-Karayan-
Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen.  There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right.  They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Avatar image for tehdiabetic
tehdiabetic

460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 tehdiabetic
Member since 2007 • 460 Posts

i mean these kind of things happens to often in the USA and the easy way you can get a gun seems to be the main factor for massacres as it happens today at Virginia.

And please don´t blame video games cause we do not have nothing to do whit this kind of violence :we are button smashers not head shooters

delol

I do think the 2nd Amendment is out of date. I don't think the founding father thought that guns would evolve into the way they have.

Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.MattUD1

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
[QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.-Karayan-

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

Explain. 

Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts
[QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.-Karayan-

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

:roll: 

Avatar image for delol
delol

8793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#12 delol
Member since 2005 • 8793 Posts
[QUOTE="delol"]

i mean these kind of things happens to often in the USA and the easy way you can get a gun seems to be the main factor for massacres as it happens today at Virginia.

And please don´t blame video games cause we do not have nothing to do whit this kind of violence :we are button smashers not head shooters

tehdiabetic

I do think the 2nd Amendment is out of date. I don't think the founding father thought that guns would evolve into the way they have.

right the 2ond amendment was write in an other historical era so it is time to change it
Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts
[QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.MattUD1

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

Explain.

I'm sure guns will be banned from private property in due time. 

Avatar image for bastards12345
bastards12345

7194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 bastards12345
Member since 2005 • 7194 Posts
[QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.-Karayan-

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

That was pretty harsh. 

Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts
[QUOTE="MattUD1"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.-Karayan-

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

Explain.

I'm sure guns will be banned from private property in due time.

Tell me, how does banning guns stop a homicidal person from getting guns by illegal means to kill people? Also, how does banning guns stop that same homicidal person from thinking up several other ways to kill people, like a home made bomb, home made gases or using melee weapons such as knives? 

Avatar image for DeerhunterIA
DeerhunterIA

684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 DeerhunterIA
Member since 2006 • 684 Posts

No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.-Karayan-

What makes you think that?  I'm pretty sure that those in militias are citizens.  In fact, I'm positive that they are. 

Avatar image for blooddemon666
blooddemon666

22587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 blooddemon666
Member since 2003 • 22587 Posts
[QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.bastards12345

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

That was pretty harsh.

yeah, we are the most powerful country on earth, and yet we aren't the least bit civilized?
Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts
[QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.Redmoonxl2

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

Explain.

I'm sure guns will be banned from private property in due time.

Tell me, how does banning guns stop a homicidal person from getting guns by illegal means to kill people? Also, how does banning guns stop that same homicidal person from thinking up several other ways to kill people, like a home made bomb, home made gases or using melee weapons such as knives?

The statistics don't lie.

Gun control would have drastic effects. 

That was pretty harsh.

bastards12345

Point?

Avatar image for DeerhunterIA
DeerhunterIA

684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 DeerhunterIA
Member since 2006 • 684 Posts
[QUOTE="MattUD1"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.-Karayan-

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

Explain.

I'm sure guns will be banned from private property in due time. 

A lot of U.S. citizens will have to be killed before that ever happens.

Avatar image for thatpunk
thatpunk

482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 thatpunk
Member since 2004 • 482 Posts
wtf?!! thats a dumb question. if this guy wouldn't have used a gun, he would have found something.
Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.DeerhunterIA

What makes you think that? I'm pretty sure that those in militias are citizens. In fact, I'm positive that they are.

You have to put it in perspective with today's world. 

[QUOTE="bastards12345"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.blooddemon666

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

That was pretty harsh.

yeah, we are the most powerful country on earth, and yet we aren't the least bit civilized?

So were the gauls when they went rampaging, killing and raping through Roman lands. 

Avatar image for delol
delol

8793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#22 delol
Member since 2005 • 8793 Posts
[QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.Redmoonxl2

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

Explain.

I'm sure guns will be banned from private property in due time.

Tell me, how does banning guns stop a homicidal person from getting guns by illegal means to kill people? Also, how does banning guns stop that same homicidal person from thinking up several other ways to kill people, like a home made bomb, home made gases or using melee weapons such as knives? 

here in Europe the use of fire guns is extremely limited and so far we haven´t heard of cases like this :and if it isn´t the easy way that you can get a gun in the USA what it is then the causes of this massacres ,i mean they are becoming trivial at the United States
Avatar image for Erasorn
Erasorn

14502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Erasorn
Member since 2004 • 14502 Posts

Tell me, how does banning guns stop a homicidal person from getting guns by illegal means to kill people? Also, how does banning guns stop that same homicidal person from thinking up several other ways to kill people, like a home made bomb, home made gases or using melee weapons such as knives? 

Redmoonxl2

Ah, so if I'm about to kill, I should just use guns purchased legally, right? I like your style.

Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts
[QUOTE="Redmoonxl2"]

Tell me, how does banning guns stop a homicidal person from getting guns by illegal means to kill people? Also, how does banning guns stop that same homicidal person from thinking up several other ways to kill people, like a home made bomb, home made gases or using melee weapons such as knives?

delol

here in Europe the use of fire guns is extremely limited and so far we haven´t heard of cases like this :and if it isn´t the easy way that you can get a gun in the USA what it is then the causes of this massacres ,i mean they are becoming trivial at the United States

You're not answering my question. If anything, you're just giving me talking points.

By the way, there were plenty of examples of shootings in Europe.

Gutenburg shootings rings a bell?

 

Avatar image for DeerhunterIA
DeerhunterIA

684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 DeerhunterIA
Member since 2006 • 684 Posts
[QUOTE="Redmoonxl2"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.-Karayan-

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

Explain.

I'm sure guns will be banned from private property in due time.

Tell me, how does banning guns stop a homicidal person from getting guns by illegal means to kill people? Also, how does banning guns stop that same homicidal person from thinking up several other ways to kill people, like a home made bomb, home made gases or using melee weapons such as knives?

The statistics don't lie.

Gun control would have drastic effects. 

That was pretty harsh.

bastards12345

Point?

The statistics don't lie - gun control is very ineffective in keeping guns out of criminals hands. 

Avatar image for DeerhunterIA
DeerhunterIA

684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 DeerhunterIA
Member since 2006 • 684 Posts
[QUOTE="DeerhunterIA"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.-Karayan-

What makes you think that? I'm pretty sure that those in militias are citizens. In fact, I'm positive that they are.

You have to put it in perspective with today's world. 

[QUOTE="bastards12345"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.blooddemon666

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

That was pretty harsh.

yeah, we are the most powerful country on earth, and yet we aren't the least bit civilized?

So were the gauls when they went rampaging, killing and raping through Roman lands. 

I am looking at it in todays world.  I see no reason why I can't protect myself, my family and my fellow citizens.  I also see no reason why I can't collect guns or own them for hunting. 

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#27 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
Its 250 years too late for this.
Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
Over in England it'd be actually be shocking to hear that someone's parent owns a gun, that might sound weird to Americans but heck, there isn't huge massacres every week in England so maybe actually not having guns helps.
Avatar image for videokidandrew
videokidandrew

4000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 videokidandrew
Member since 2005 • 4000 Posts
[QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.Redmoonxl2

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

:roll:

 I agree with the :roll:

Its our right as Americans to own firearms 

Avatar image for DeerhunterIA
DeerhunterIA

684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 DeerhunterIA
Member since 2006 • 684 Posts

Over in England it'd be actually be shocking to hear that someone's parent owns a gun, that might sound weird to Americans but heck, there isn't huge massacres every week in England so maybe actually not having guns helps.Brainkiller05

There are not massacres in the US each week either.  But, just like England (which bans guns), there are shootings.  Hmm.

Avatar image for delol
delol

8793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#31 delol
Member since 2005 • 8793 Posts
[QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="DeerhunterIA"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.DeerhunterIA

What makes you think that? I'm pretty sure that those in militias are citizens. In fact, I'm positive that they are.

You have to put it in perspective with today's world. 

[QUOTE="bastards12345"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="MattUD1"]

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.blooddemon666

Well it did when there wasn't a national army and just a bunch of Militia's.

It'll never happen. There are too many people that feel that having a gun is their right. They will strike down whatever legislation comes up in regards to guns being banned.

Progress is slow, but I'm sure the US will catch up with the civilized world sooner or later.

That was pretty harsh.

yeah, we are the most powerful country on earth, and yet we aren't the least bit civilized?

So were the gauls when they went rampaging, killing and raping through Roman lands. 

I am looking at it in todays world.  I see no reason why I can't protect myself, my family and my fellow citizens.  I also see no reason why I can't collect guns or own them for hunting. 

i see one reason you do not trust the police or the state :well i do and that is the reason i ask the immediate suspension of the 2nd amedment
Avatar image for bastards12345
bastards12345

7194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 bastards12345
Member since 2005 • 7194 Posts
[QUOTE="bastards12345"]

That was pretty harsh.

-Karayan-

Point?

It's an old law, yes, you made that point--but saying that 'the US should catch up with the civilized world' is a pretty irrational statement, though from your st yle I'm quite sure that you didn't mean it literally.

Avatar image for CRUNK3050
CRUNK3050

2449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 CRUNK3050
Member since 2006 • 2449 Posts
Um no. What was the first thing Stalin, Hitler or Fidel Castro did? Outlaw guns. The two main things that keep us free imo is the right to own property and the right to own a weapon. Also statistics show that in places where a citizen can own a gun the result is lowered crime. And not only can citizens protect themselves from criminals but the main reason the founding fathers made the 2nd amendment is for protection from the government.
Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts

Over in England it'd be actually be shocking to hear that someone's parent owns a gun, that might sound weird to Americans but heck, there isn't huge massacres every week in England so maybe actually not having guns helps.Brainkiller05

Good god your perception of America is completely twisted and ignorant. You make it sound like every house in America has a gun and we're indifferent to it.

Also, newsflash: We don't have massacres every week here. This was a freak occurrence, not the norm. 

Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
No it should stay the way it is
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"]Over in England it'd be actually be shocking to hear that someone's parent owns a gun, that might sound weird to Americans but heck, there isn't huge massacres every week in England so maybe actually not having guns helps.Redmoonxl2

Good god your perception of America is completely twisted and ignorant. You make it sound like every house in America has a gun and we're indifferent to it.

Also, newsflash: We don't have massacres every week here. This was a freak occurrence, not the norm. 

Explain...why do the US have the most gun-murders in the west? no it's not becuase it's bigger than any European country, because if you add all thoes countries statistics up...they still doesnt come close.....and we're 200 million more than you......explain please

Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts

The statistics don't lie - gun control is very ineffective in keeping guns out of criminals hands.

DeerhunterIA

But accidents happen a lot, and it does prevent a lot of deaths. 

I am looking at it in todays world. I see no reason why I can't protect myself, my family and my fellow citizens. I also see no reason why I can't collect guns or own them for hunting.

DeerhunterIA

You have a bigger chance of shooting a family member than a burglar/ assaultee.

Besides, pepperspray works fine. 

Avatar image for cmdrmonkey
cmdrmonkey

994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#40 cmdrmonkey
Member since 2004 • 994 Posts

The second amendment is the reason the US is still a democracy. A government should have a healthy fear of its citizens. It only takes one bullet to kill a tyrant. Look at the rise of fascist nations throughout history. One of the first rights they revoke is the right to bear arms. Moreover, the US would not exist at all without personally owned firearms. How do you think the colonists formed a successful rebellion against the British? There are plenty of perfectly legitimate reasons to own firearms, such as personal protection, hunting or target shooting. Getting rid of the guns doesn't get rid of violent crime. Criminals will just use other weapons or obtain firearms through illegal means, and regular law abiding citizens will no longer have a way to protect themselves.  We can't let fear govern our decision making with such fundamental rights.

And in this particular case, it wasn't the guns' fault, it was the fault of the psychopath who went on a rampage.

Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts

The second amendment is the reason the US is still a democracy. A government should have a healthy fear of its citizens. It only takes one bullet to kill a tyrant. Look at the rise of fascist nations throughout history. One of the first rights they revoke is the right to bear arms. Moreover, the US would not exist at all without personally owned firearms. How do you think the colonists formed a successful rebellion against the British? There are plenty of perfectly legitimate reasons to own firearms, such as personal protection, hunting or target shooting. Getting rid of the guns doesn't get rid of violent crime. Criminals will just use other weapons or obtain firearms through illegal means, and regular law abiding citizens will no longer have a way to protect themselves. We can't let fear govern our decision making with such fundamental rights.

And in this particular case, it wasn't the guns' fault, it was the fault of the psychopath who went on a rampage.

cmdrmonkey

You do realize that other countries get along just fine with gun restrictions? 

Avatar image for deactivated-58e533ed44b01
deactivated-58e533ed44b01

1747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-58e533ed44b01
Member since 2003 • 1747 Posts
this shooting incident should not be generalized, i fail to see how on psycho with a gun represents everyone with a gun. A gun is just a tool, the person with it is the responsible one.
Avatar image for cmdrmonkey
cmdrmonkey

994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#43 cmdrmonkey
Member since 2004 • 994 Posts

That's why I was reading horror stories out of Britain a few years back, in Manchester I believe, about violent gangs going around breaking into homes and terrorizing people people who had no way to defend themselves.

And how many of those countries have been democracies for 200+ years?

Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts

That's why I was reading horror stories out of Britain a few years back, in Manchester I believe, about gangs going around terrorizing people...robbing, raping, killing, unchecked because people had no way to defend themselves.

And how many of those countries have been democracies for 200+ years?

cmdrmonkey
The US is one of the youngest countries. :|
Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
Probably, in it's current context it creates crime issues.......
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
Well, if the US government wants the best for its citizens they should ban the guns......but I think too many americans fail to realize that....and keep whine about "rights" and crap like that.....The founding fathers didnt know that assault rifles and automatic pistols would be avalible to the people 200 years later...
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
No, the amendment doesn't even apply to citizens.-Karayan-
QFT. America just needs to look in the mirror and help its own citizens.
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

That's why I was reading horror stories out of Britain a few years back, in Manchester I believe, about violent gangs going around breaking into homes and terrorizing people people who had no way to defend themselves.

And how many of those countries have been democracies for 200+ years?

cmdrmonkey

almost all of them....

Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts
[QUOTE="Redmoonxl2"]

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"]Over in England it'd be actually be shocking to hear that someone's parent owns a gun, that might sound weird to Americans but heck, there isn't huge massacres every week in England so maybe actually not having guns helps.jointed

Good god your perception of America is completely twisted and ignorant. You make it sound like every house in America has a gun and we're indifferent to it.

Also, newsflash: We don't have massacres every week here. This was a freak occurrence, not the norm.

Explain...why do the US have the most gun-murders in the west? no it's not becuase it's bigger than any European country, because if you add all thoes countries statistics up...they still doesnt come close.....and we're 200 million more than you......explain please

Easy, drug and gang violence, which illegal guns tend to be involved in anyways.

Virginia Tech is not a normal, everyday American event. Painting it as such is ignorant.

Avatar image for cmdrmonkey
cmdrmonkey

994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#50 cmdrmonkey
Member since 2004 • 994 Posts
[QUOTE="cmdrmonkey"]

The second amendment is the reason the US is still a democracy. A government should have a healthy fear of its citizens. It only takes one bullet to kill a tyrant. Look at the rise of fascist nations throughout history. One of the first rights they revoke is the right to bear arms. Moreover, the US would not exist at all without personally owned firearms. How do you think the colonists formed a successful rebellion against the British? There are plenty of perfectly legitimate reasons to own firearms, such as personal protection, hunting or target shooting. Getting rid of the guns doesn't get rid of violent crime. Criminals will just use other weapons or obtain firearms through illegal means, and regular law abiding citizens will no longer have a way to protect themselves. We can't let fear govern our decision making with such fundamental rights.

And in this particular case, it wasn't the guns' fault, it was the fault of the psychopath who went on a rampage.

-Karayan-

You do realize that other countries get along just fine with gun restrictions? 

 This is America. Why don't we just ban freedom of speech while we're at it because people say offensive things? If you oppose the second amendment, you don't understand this country at all. The second amendment is designed specifically to give citizens the ability to defend themselves should the government become tyranical. IF anything, the founding fathers would probably be happy that we have access to powerful weapons.