Involved, as in military action.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
no, it'd be nice to see the rest of the world take an interest to be honest, considering theyre as legitimate a target as the US is (the Wester nations, at least)
Yeah, I always notice this. God knows I would never wish a terrorist attack on another nation no matter what, but that's what it might take for Europe(not counting the UK) to take this threat seriously. Like a 9/11 type attack on France or something, I mean, people need dramatic examples to shake them out of apathy.(And yes, I like BB).no, it'd be nice to see the rest of the world take an interest to be honest, considering theyre as legitimate a target as the US is (the Wester nations, at least)
mrbojangles25
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]Yeah, I always notice this. God knows I would never wish a terrorist attack on another nation no matter what, but that's what it might take for Europe(not counting the UK) to take this threat seriously. Like a 9/11 type attack on France or something, I mean, people need dramatic examples to shake them out of apathy.(And yes, I like BB).no, it'd be nice to see the rest of the world take an interest to be honest, considering theyre as legitimate a target as the US is (the Wester nations, at least)
Master_Live
yea, then again it could have the opposite effect.
Remember the bombings in Spain, at the train station in Madrid iirc? They pretty much pulled all support from any operation or dealings they had concerning counterterrorism.
Idunno, part of me wonders if the terrorists are more reasonable than we think. I wonder that if we simply leave them alone, they will leave us alone. I'd like to think most people just want peace and stuff.
Then again, they have been the one's to attack first, attack civilians, etc. so they essentially deserve whatever comes their way.
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]
Then again, they have been the one's to attack first, attack civilians, etc. so they essentially deserve whatever comes their way.
Baranga
Do they ever attack without a reason?
That's a stupid question to pose. I could kill somebody for saying my shirt is ugly. It's a gross overreaction and completely irrational, but I would still technically have a reason.Egypt did that once during The Cold War, and it was disastrous. It actually predated America's Vietnam, so you might as well call it "America's Yemen" :P. Although I will admit these are different times and different situations, getting involved while stretched like this in terms of military resources is a bad idea, especially since the situation hasn't really gotten out of control yet. Basically, it doesn't warrant direct intervention, although military and economic assistance I will accept.
Remember when US started accusing countries like this (after 9/11)
It was Libyans/Syrians/Iranians
Who gives right to USA to act like this (accusing without proof)
pecanin
Maybe becuases of the HiJackers Nationalities?
http://www.sptimes.com/2002/09/01/911/plotters.shtml
[QUOTE="pecanin"]
Remember when US started accusing countries like this (after 9/11)
It was Libyans/Syrians/Iranians
Who gives right to USA to act like this (accusing without proof)
Snipes_2
Maybe becuases of the HiJackers Nationalities?
http://www.sptimes.com/2002/09/01/911/plotters.shtml
Nope
Accusations after 9/11 started flying long before any flight manifest was made available
i'm just saying that we shouldn't jump to conclusions ,very easy in today's world.
I say you are terrorist and by the time that you prove your innocence i am laughing and you are crying
i support what US and UK Governments are doing (training ppl that will fight terrorist's in Yemen)
but if i understood what TC i saying about military action that is different story
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment