Should it?
I think it should, it should be one of those functions that the government does. I'd trust the government with my health over a corporation anyday.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I think it would be better then what you have now, because you are stuck in the middle, halfway between both. That position won't be able to last forever, you will have to decide to either go back to what you had before (reverse what obama did) or progress even more towards universal
What are you talking about?I think it would be better then what you have now, because you are stuck in the middle, halfway between both. That position won't be able to last forever, you will have to decide to either go back to what you had before (reverse what obama did) or progress even more towards universal
gamedude2020
I don't support universal healthcare. I like the concept but the reality is that it can be expensive and there aren't alot of oppurtunities for doctors. Our insurance healthcare plan has its faults but not everyone gets denied healthcare coverage. There is a sense of personal responsibility in getting a healthcare plan.
No. More government programs = more government control. I'm sorry, I'm not for big government.
Also do away with Social Security. Privatized retirement >>>> social security.
Well do away with SS for my generation, there are at least 2-3 generations that still need it. Phase it out.
Bring back the days of more powerful state governments and local governments. Our country needs to be as politically diverse as it is culturally diverse for all to thrive.
[QUOTE="LiftedHeadshot"]That depends, are you a socialist?SgtKevali
No, I don't think government should run everything, but they should be in charge of something like this. It makes more sense.
I would trust profit motive (greed) over government interests (civilian care) anyday.So you would rather trust your life to a corporation than the government? And we're not going back to the time of strong local government. As technology increases government will become even more centralized.No. More government programs = more government control. I'm sorry, I'm not for big government.
Also do away with Social Security. Privatized retirement >>>> social security.
Well do away with SS for my generation, there are at least 2-3 generations that still need it. Phase it out.
Bring back the days of more powerful state governments and local governments. Our country needs to be as politically diverse as it is culturally diverse for all to thrive.
Wasdie
It contradicts Capitalism, and what is the only economic model that promotes progress? Captialism.LiftedHeadshotcapitalism is also a system that is destined to fail. its based on unlimited growth and nothing in this world has unlimited growth. there is a ceiling to everything. however that is all irrelevant to this debate. i am not against the federal govt providing options to the common man, hell local state govts been doing it for years.
So you would rather trust your life to a corporation than the government? And we're not going back to the time of strong local government. As technology increases government will become even more centralized. Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
No. More government programs = more government control. I'm sorry, I'm not for big government.
Also do away with Social Security. Privatized retirement >>>> social security.
Well do away with SS for my generation, there are at least 2-3 generations that still need it. Phase it out.
Bring back the days of more powerful state governments and local governments. Our country needs to be as politically diverse as it is culturally diverse for all to thrive.
SgtKevali
Should it?
I think it should, it should be one of those functions that the government does. I'd trust the government with my health over a corporation anyday.
SgtKevali
Of course, because the government has managed social security and Medicare with flying colors.
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"][QUOTE="LiftedHeadshot"]That depends, are you a socialist?LiftedHeadshot
No, I don't think government should run everything, but they should be in charge of something like this. It makes more sense.
I would trust profit motive (greed) over government interests (civilian care) anyday.That profit motive doesn't include your wellbeing
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]So you would rather trust your life to a corporation than the government? And we're not going back to the time of strong local government. As technology increases government will become even more centralized. Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
No. More government programs = more government control. I'm sorry, I'm not for big government.
Also do away with Social Security. Privatized retirement >>>> social security.
Well do away with SS for my generation, there are at least 2-3 generations that still need it. Phase it out.
Bring back the days of more powerful state governments and local governments. Our country needs to be as politically diverse as it is culturally diverse for all to thrive.
LJS9502_basic
Nuh-uh! Everything is free with no strings, don't you know?
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]
Should it?
I think it should, it should be one of those functions that the government does. I'd trust the government with my health over a corporation anyday.
QuistisTrepe_
Of course, because the government has managed social security and Medicare with flying colors.
It's done it better than any private company would.
Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.LJS9502_basicIs this common in countries with universal healthcare? I'm covered by the NHS yet I can exercise whenever I feel like and eat what I want to eat. They don't exactly control my health.
[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]
Should it?
I think it should, it should be one of those functions that the government does. I'd trust the government with my health over a corporation anyday.
SgtKevali
Of course, because the government has managed social security and Medicare with flying colors.
It's done it better than any private company would.
Really? Do tell me more then. Last I checked, a private corporation goes bankrupt and dies off when it's poorly managed. I could be wrong about that after all.
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]So you would rather trust your life to a corporation than the government? And we're not going back to the time of strong local government. As technology increases government will become even more centralized. Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.I think that's kind of a tinfoil hat way of looking at it.[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
No. More government programs = more government control. I'm sorry, I'm not for big government.
Also do away with Social Security. Privatized retirement >>>> social security.
Well do away with SS for my generation, there are at least 2-3 generations that still need it. Phase it out.
Bring back the days of more powerful state governments and local governments. Our country needs to be as politically diverse as it is culturally diverse for all to thrive.
LJS9502_basic
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]So you would rather trust your life to a corporation than the government? And we're not going back to the time of strong local government. As technology increases government will become even more centralized. Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
No. More government programs = more government control. I'm sorry, I'm not for big government.
Also do away with Social Security. Privatized retirement >>>> social security.
Well do away with SS for my generation, there are at least 2-3 generations that still need it. Phase it out.
Bring back the days of more powerful state governments and local governments. Our country needs to be as politically diverse as it is culturally diverse for all to thrive.
LJS9502_basic
That's an absurd analogy. Anyway, the health care companies control our health right now. Look at how they deny people coverage, decide what operations you can and can't get.
Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="SgtKevali"] So you would rather trust your life to a corporation than the government? And we're not going back to the time of strong local government. As technology increases government will become even more centralized.
SgtKevali
That's an absurd analogy. Anyway, the health care companies control our health right now. Look at how they deny people coverage, decide what operations you can and can't get.
Is it? In the US cigarettes, alcohol, and fast food are taxed because they aren't good for you. Now tanning beds have a government tax in place because they aren't good for you. Pop is getting taxed in some areas because it's not good for you....right the government would NEVER do that.:|So the government deciding operations is better? Many people in socialized medicine countries have to wait years for some operations.
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.LJS9502_basic
That's an absurd analogy. Anyway, the health care companies control our health right now. Look at how they deny people coverage, decide what operations you can and can't get.
Is it? In the US cigarettes, alcohol, and fast food are taxed because they aren't good for you. Now tanning beds have a government tax in place because they aren't good for you. Pop is getting taxed in some areas because it's not good for you....right the government would NEVER do that.:| IIRC they do not in the UK or Canada.[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]
[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]
Of course, because the government has managed social security and Medicare with flying colors.
QuistisTrepe_
It's done it better than any private company would.
Really? Do tell me more then. Last I checked, a private corporation goes bankrupt and dies off when it's poorly managed. I could be wrong about that after all.
Last time i cheked, corps these days get bailed out and still manage to fail, in other words, Gov + Corps just plain fail :PAnway, seeing all the countires that have better health care than us makes one wonder.
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.LJS9502_basic
That's an absurd analogy. Anyway, the health care companies control our health right now. Look at how they deny people coverage, decide what operations you can and can't get.
Is it? In the US cigarettes, alcohol, and fast food are taxed because they aren't good for you. Now tanning beds have a government tax in place because they aren't good for you. Pop is getting taxed in some areas because it's not good for you....right the government would NEVER do that.:|So the government deciding operations is better? Many people in socialized medicine countries have to wait years for some operations.
Not true in all countries with universal healthcare by a longshot.
[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]
It's done it better than any private company would.
Yongying
Really? Do tell me more then. Last I checked, a private corporation goes bankrupt and dies off when it's poorly managed. I could be wrong about that after all.
Last time i cheked, corps these days get bailed out and still manage to fail, in other words, Gov + Corps just plain fail :PAnway, seeing all the countires that have better health care than us makes one wonder.
Better in payment....not care.Is it? In the US cigarettes, alcohol, and fast food are taxed because they aren't good for you. Now tanning beds have a government tax in place because they aren't good for you. Pop is getting taxed in some areas because it's not good for you....right the government would NEVER do that.:|[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]
That's an absurd analogy. Anyway, the health care companies control our health right now. Look at how they deny people coverage, decide what operations you can and can't get.
SgtKevali
So the government deciding operations is better? Many people in socialized medicine countries have to wait years for some operations.
Not true in all countries with universal healthcare by a longshot.
Uh...operations DO have to be approved with socialized medicine. And if it's not deemed necessary....you wait.[QUOTE="LiftedHeadshot"]It contradicts Capitalism, and what is the only economic model that promotes progress? Captialism.coochie_kutacapitalism is also a system that is destined to fail. its based on unlimited growth and nothing in this world has unlimited growth. there is a ceiling to everything. however that is all irrelevant to this debate. i am not against the federal govt providing options to the common man, hell local state govts been doing it for years. Growth not only in economy, but in science and technology. if you were an engineer, would you strive to invent technological breakthroughs because you knew you would become ultra-wealthy, or because your government would give you a pat on the back? Capitalism is the only economic model that promotes progress so far. Greed is a powerful tool.
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]So you would rather trust your life to a corporation than the government? And we're not going back to the time of strong local government. As technology increases government will become even more centralized. Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.I wonder if you was saying the same when Bush was in power but about other issues, i dunno where you stand politically but i hope your not a republiclown.[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
No. More government programs = more government control. I'm sorry, I'm not for big government.
Also do away with Social Security. Privatized retirement >>>> social security.
Well do away with SS for my generation, there are at least 2-3 generations that still need it. Phase it out.
Bring back the days of more powerful state governments and local governments. Our country needs to be as politically diverse as it is culturally diverse for all to thrive.
LJS9502_basic
[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]
It's done it better than any private company would.
Yongying
Really? Do tell me more then. Last I checked, a private corporation goes bankrupt and dies off when it's poorly managed. I could be wrong about that after all.
Last time i cheked, corps these days get bailed out and still manage to fail, in other words, Gov + Corps just plain fail :PAnway, seeing all the countires that have better health care than us makes one wonder.
Zing! As long as the government deems you "too big to fail.";)
Yes.
We are the only industrialized country left in the world that doesn't have it. It's about time we catch up with the rest of the world.
Letting corporations control everything is a bad thing.
A little socialism mixed with some capitalism won't hurt.
Rikusaki
So, what is it we're catching up to?
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]So you would rather trust your life to a corporation than the government? And we're not going back to the time of strong local government. As technology increases government will become even more centralized. Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
No. More government programs = more government control. I'm sorry, I'm not for big government.
Also do away with Social Security. Privatized retirement >>>> social security.
Well do away with SS for my generation, there are at least 2-3 generations that still need it. Phase it out.
Bring back the days of more powerful state governments and local governments. Our country needs to be as politically diverse as it is culturally diverse for all to thrive.
LJS9502_basic
Oh don't be silly. We have universal healthcare in the UK and the only "control" of our healthcare comes in the form of stuff like advertisements that tell us that if you eat healthily and exercise more then you'll be at less risk of heart attacks. Is that really a bad thing? Really?
Yes, it will probably mean you'll have to pay slightly higher taxes, but at least you won't get a nasty bill when you need medical care.
And all those Americans who rant on about "it's Communism!! Communism!! COOOOMMMMUUUUNIIIIISSSMMMMM" really make me lol.
Universal Healthcare is awesome in my opinion.
It contradicts Capitalism, and what is the only economic model that promotes progress? Captialism.LiftedHeadshot
Progress....right. I'm not a socialist or communist, but capitalism is just as wicked and evil as the other two. Go learn about the Guilded Age and you will see the true evils of capitalism. Personally I think people should have the choice of health care, if they want privitized which would be provide quicker service and be a bit more expensive so be it, or if they are good with the health care the government can provide that is cheaper so be it. However if I was forced to chose between no government run health care and government run healthcare, I would chose government run health care.
[QUOTE="coochie_kuta"][QUOTE="LiftedHeadshot"]It contradicts Capitalism, and what is the only economic model that promotes progress? Captialism.LiftedHeadshotcapitalism is also a system that is destined to fail. its based on unlimited growth and nothing in this world has unlimited growth. there is a ceiling to everything. however that is all irrelevant to this debate. i am not against the federal govt providing options to the common man, hell local state govts been doing it for years. Growth not only in economy, but in science and technology. if you were an engineer, would you strive to invent technological breakthroughs because you knew you would become ultra-wealthy, or because your government would give you a pat on the back? Capitalism is the only economic model that promotes progress so far. Greed is a powerful tool.
What does distribution of health insurance have to do with scientific or technological progress?
[QUOTE="Yongying"]Last time i cheked, corps these days get bailed out and still manage to fail, in other words, Gov + Corps just plain fail :P[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]
Really? Do tell me more then. Last I checked, a private corporation goes bankrupt and dies off when it's poorly managed. I could be wrong about that after all.
LJS9502_basic
Anway, seeing all the countires that have better health care than us makes one wonder.
Better in payment....not care.Better health care system.[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]
Yes.
We are the only industrialized country left in the world that doesn't have it. It's about time we catch up with the rest of the world.
Letting corporations control everything is a bad thing.
A little socialism mixed with some capitalism won't hurt.
QuistisTrepe_
So, what is it we're catching up to?
Europe. You know, arguably where the best health care in the world is.[QUOTE="LiftedHeadshot"]It contradicts Capitalism, and what is the only economic model that promotes progress? Captialism.DarkGamer007
Progress....right. I'm not a socialist or communist, but capitalism is just as wicked and evil as the other two. Go learn about the Guilded Age and you will see the true evils of capitalism.
A lot of that had to do with monopolies that were created by legislation.
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]So you would rather trust your life to a corporation than the government? And we're not going back to the time of strong local government. As technology increases government will become even more centralized. Do you want the government telling you what you can eat, how much you need to exercise, what you can't do? Because if government provides the health care they have the right to control your health.[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
No. More government programs = more government control. I'm sorry, I'm not for big government.
Also do away with Social Security. Privatized retirement >>>> social security.
Well do away with SS for my generation, there are at least 2-3 generations that still need it. Phase it out.
Bring back the days of more powerful state governments and local governments. Our country needs to be as politically diverse as it is culturally diverse for all to thrive.
LJS9502_basic
I don't see this happening in any of the other western countries, many of whom have higher average standards of living.
[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]
Yes.
We are the only industrialized country left in the world that doesn't have it. It's about time we catch up with the rest of the world.
Letting corporations control everything is a bad thing.
A little socialism mixed with some capitalism won't hurt.
QuistisTrepe_
So, what is it we're catching up to?
Do you like being ranked among other THIRD WORLD countries when it comes to our healthcare system? That's just plain embarrassing.[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"]
Yes.
We are the only industrialized country left in the world that doesn't have it. It's about time we catch up with the rest of the world.
Letting corporations control everything is a bad thing.
A little socialism mixed with some capitalism won't hurt.
bluezy
So, what is it we're catching up to?
Europe. You know, arguably where the best health care in the world is.Awesome, I was looking for a place with a long wait for mediocre service.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment